Miles just published part 1 of a 4-part piece on “Ancient Spooks” up at his site. I am starting a new post devoted to discussion of this series of papers, as it seems they will be important and spark lots of discussion. I’d rather have the discussion here rather than on the main ‘Defending Miles Mathis’ thread. I might do this as new important papers or topics come up.
Here is the link to part 1.
Here is the link to part 2.
Here is the link to part 3.
Here is the link to part 4.
the solar system is (already) a gigantic spaceship.
the earth travels (already) in the galactic or intergalactic space and “it” knows perfectly where we are going!
No need to spend money … the trip is for free!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cosmic!
LikeLike
do you think it happens like in the video ?
LikeLike
The graphic is obviously sped up. A friend of mine who used be into astrology and all that nonsense admitted that the constellations in Ptolomey’s time have changed/moved over the centuries, which would signify, albeit slowly, the sun’s traveling in space alongwith the planets.
LikeLike
That’s a great video and a good reminder that we live in a dynamic Universe where every thing is changing its position each nanosecond. The reality is far more complicated than shown in the video, as we are also orbiting the centre of our galaxy and our orbit will be influenced the other massive bodies we pass on our journey. Finally our galaxy is also orbiting around the centre of mass of the Universe, so trying to get a handle on our actual position in space at any moment in time is only ever a close approximation.
We still have much to learn.
LikeLike
this one is from the system solar in the galaxy,
with all approximations needed to make it visual 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shouldn’t the galactic ‘stellar wind’ be slowing the sun down, considering it’s a headwind? When our own solar wind suddenly increases due to a solar flare for instance, when it hits the atmosphere, the atmosphere is compressed and bounces back.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both videos depict the planets as dragging behind the sun. What would cause the drag? Would the cp sea do that?
Could that pattern of motion explain apparent gravitational attraction?
The videographer, DJ Sadhu, attributes the ideas to Keshava Bhat:
http://www.feandft.com/curriculum-vitae-of-dr-pallathadka-keshava-bhat/
Astronomer Phil Plait, who (according to the link he provides) “has appeared as a talking head on approximately a bazillion Discovery Channel shows,” argues against Bhat’s ideas here:
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/no-our-solar-system-not-vortex
Here’s an excerpt from Plait’s argument:
“The claim that the Sun is at the tip of the solar system with the planets trailing behind is also demonstrably wrong. The Sun does not really lead the solar system through the galaxy like the tip of a bullet as Bhat apparently claims (and as Sadhu’s videos show). The planets go around the Sun, and the whole shebang moves around the galaxy as a unit, tipped by that 60° angle. That means sometimes the planets are ahead of the Sun, and sometimes behind it along that galactic orbit.
“It’s a bit like walking down a path while spinning around your head a string with a ball attached at the end (and the circle it makes tipped by 60°). Sometimes the ball is ahead of you and sometimes behind you. It always moves with you down the path no matter how fast you go, and relative to you is always moving at the same speed. If you trace your own motion you make a line, and the ball makes a tilted helix. This is what Bhat and Sadhu are trying to describe, but get wrong.”
Hmm, OK, but that analogy makes the angle 0°. Spinning a ball on a string, while LEANING WAY FORWARD, wouldn’t that be a hybrid? With the ball ahead sometimes, but mostly behind?
Behind, unless we replace the string with a stiff wire, then the ball does not follow behind, but stays even, regardless of the angle. Which should it be? Which more closely models the behavior of the force binding the solar system, do we know?
LikeLike
The video is both correct and misleading at the same time.
The planets aren’t in the galaxy’s gravity “well”, they are in the sun’s. They follow the sun’s motion, and are indeed sometimes ahead of it relative to the sun’s motion around the galactic core. But the planets are “glued” to the sun, not to the galaxy.
In the same way, the moon is “glued” to the Earth, not to the sun. It’s in balance with the sun mostly but it’s not in the sun’s gravity well, it’s in the Earths’.
The moon has its own gravity well, also. Once one enters the moon’s gravity well, the Earths’ gravity is trumped and overwhelmed. The pull of the Earth has been nullified by the pull of the closer body, the moon.
Mapping motion trails is a tricky thing – they can tell you whatever you want them to, but they don’t necessarily tell us what’s actually happening.
GarrettDerner’s quote from Plait: “The claim that the Sun is at the tip of the solar system with the planets trailing behind is also demonstrably wrong. The Sun does not really lead the solar system through the galaxy like the tip of a bullet as Bhat apparently claims (and as Sadhu’s videos show). The planets go around the Sun, and the whole shebang moves around the galaxy as a unit, tipped by that 60° angle. That means sometimes the planets are ahead of the Sun, and sometimes behind it along that galactic orbit.”
…is correct as far as I know. The Vortex people just never really studied Relativity, I guess.
LikeLike
Where does Relativity come in?
LikeLike
GarrettDerner said, “Where does Relativity come in?”
Because it matter where you’re viewing something FROM. If you’re watching from the sun for example, the planets appear to move a certain way. The photons you receive FROM the planets telling you where it was will be different than the photons you receive from another vantage point.
Yes, the planets are spiralling through space along with the galaxy, but is that helpful as a model of how the planets spin around the sun? No, not at all. They are in the sun’s gravity well, not the galaxy’s. Or some balance between the two which effectively is STILL just the sun’s gravity.
So we have so study objects from their own perspective and also screen them against the background of OUR perspective. The galaxy doesn’t care. The Universe, definitely not. To measure planets and their orbits you have to study the body that THEY are orbiting, not the bodies that their orbiter is orbiting. Sure that plays a part but it’s so tiny we can ignore it for initial measurements and maths. It’s fodder, it can be filtered out.
If you wanna know how the moon moves you don’t study Alpha Centauri or Sirius. You study the moon, the Earth, and the sun. In that order. When we find perturbations, we look to the nearest influences – which are Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Not Ganymede or Titan initially. Not Pluto or Mercury necessarily. You study the near objects first and determine if they have an influence.
LikeLike
In many pdfs the links to the peerage have disappeared.f.e. Alamo, ok, Custer.
Didn’t have time to look at others yet.
LikeLike
I think it is an ongoing project with its own dedicated spooks. There was one administrator — the “Disconnectrix” — whose job seemed to be one of misdirection and muddying the waters. Perhaps now they’re simply hiding the connections completely. It must be hard for their egos to deal with.
LikeLike
No, the links inside the PDFs have disappeared. Not on the website. The PDF only has a blue underline without a link.
LikeLike
Could it have something to do with restricting hyperlinking/hotlinks/bandwidth etc?
That whole ‘hot-linking not allowed’ thing?
LikeLike
This is a strange phenomenon experienced on this end as well. Many of the links on Miles’ earlier papers (PDFs) are basically gone—as in 404 errors. Others seem to come and go at will, depending on the device being used. On my tablet, it’s rare that the links work, yet on a laptop they do. Rarely browse on a phone. Have tried different browsers with same results. Also, some sites are balking when the VPN is turned on and of course ad blockers and no-tracking is always an issue.
Not sure what the issue is since it’s inconsistent.
LikeLike
Well, at least he’s saying rockets do work in a vacuum (I think). That’s an improvement on Shack. But, he seems to pontificate his own laws of nature, like that Boethius character from Cluesforum. And, like Boethius, he also doesn’t answer questions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The above is in reference to the gravity, gas, rocket, “Gaia,” space travel posts above.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What question? I asked a question in the appropriate thread on Space Travel.
I disagree with Simon Shack on many points and have been the only one (so far, which is quite sad) who reviewed his TYCHOS book in detail. And he was not responding well to the founded criticism.
Him calling me an “ESA shill” for pointing out the scientific inconsistencies in his book and model was quite ironic, as he himself allegedly has hosted ESA employees.
I have nothing to do with him whatsoever, other than liking his now pretty much dated September Clues work.
I have different areas of research. But let’s talk about space in the space thread. Curious to know what space travel you do and what you don’t believe in.
LikeLike
How can space travel be impossible if the Earth, Moon and other planets are traveling through space?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Space travel is mainly about entering and changing orbits. Naturally this is no problem, as there are evidently celestial objects in orbits and the changing of orbits occurs as well. Can this be done artficially? Surely, if you have enough fuel for the needed changes in velocity. But what if you don’t have enough fuel? Now, the reality of space travel as it is presented by space agencies and msm hinges largely on two questions: Are gravity assists real? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_assist) and are heat shields capable of resisting reentry heat at the reported velocities? Both are necessary to make mission critical velocity changes without any fuel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.americanelements.com/meltingpoint.html
So I doubt any metal or metal alloy is capable.
Carbon on the other hand is more than capable of withstanding re-entry temp’s.
Aerogel is perfect but much too fragile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Space travel is mainly about entering and changing orbits.”
So they claim indeed. But orbits are, according to the model they use, the result of gravitational forces. You cannot “enter” or “change” orbits. You can only be caught in one. Which you always will be; hence why space travel is impossible (both for us and for extraterrestrials).
People here really think that some space thingy can escape the same force [the only force existing all around in ‘space’] that keep the Moon, Earth, Sun, planets, asteroids, etc. together in an eternal beautifully predictable bachata?
Fuel?
The grapefruit satellite allegedly worked for ages.
The same ridiculous stories appear about “satellites” as about the rest of their space thingies.
“We designed this mission and thought it would work for 3 months, but [magically] things keep working [in the most hostile environment possible] for 5 times the planned mission span…”
Next car I buy I do at NASA. A normal car would run fine for like 10-15 years, but NASA’s Teslas in space (the Sandy Hoax of the Space Travel scam) run for 50-75 years…
.
.
.
.
WITH-OUT A-NY MAIN-TE-NANCE!
LikeLike
“You cannot “enter” or “change” orbits. You can only be caught in one.”
I…..erm…..I…..errrrrm…..I don’t know how to reply to that without getting banned from the internet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Russell, I see a list of melting points? I didn’t claim the metals (mostly the worst possible metal to choose in a radiated environment; Al) or alloys are melting at 300 C?
But the list is good; one of the lowest melting point is -188 degrees for propane. So everything including or ‘heavier’ than propane is not a gas at “just” those temperatures/
And then we are not even at -270…
As you see, Hydrogen melts at -259, so it is a fluid at the temperatures of space (according to their own claims). It is a not a gas (vapor phase) and thus they could never use the lightest element as rocket fuel.
On the rocket aluminum can in space; we have no materials that can withstand both extremes at the same time and all the time.
So how could they ever pull that off?
LikeLike
Not got the time right now but I’ll get back to you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well of course Mt. St. Helen’s was fake, that one photographer escaped with his Ford Pinto. What more proof do you want? Certainly better luck than this thread seems to have.
LikeLike
Certainly better luck than this thread seems to have.
LikeLike
The thought occured to me today, how heavy is the moon? Therefore the gravitational forces of the earth must be exceedingly strong to keep it in earth’s orbit. I’m no scientist or space expert, but a rocket to leave the earth must surely require a helluva load of thrust and be able to withstand considerable pressure.
Look at the size of the fuel cells on this baby:
LikeLike
How did the docking mechanism work on the return after it was attached to the lunar module? I guess NASA will have to get back to us on that one. Hat tip to Dave!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looking to be entertained by the LA Times about the Manson Project for 29 minutes?
Fake fauxtos and a whole lot more. Enjoy.
LikeLike
Book recommendation about The Normans, who seemed to follow in the footsteps of the Phoencians :
“Tancred de Hauteville, an obscure Norman knight living in northern France had little he could offer his twelve sons and most left to seek their fortunes in the south. …By the time the youngest Hauteville brother died, his relatives sat enthroned in Palermo, Tripoli, Malta, and Antioch, and the family possessed the strongest and wealthiest kingdom in Europe.”
LikeLike
He sounds like just another fictional historic character based on the usual rags to riches stories. These mythical knights, kings et al were created by those, most often religious, institutions wanting to provide some written proof to justify their usurping of a piece of property, land or other wealth. Unfortunately our scant repository of history and religious books is mainly pure fiction and cannot be trusted.
LikeLike
That is true. I learned last night that the primary sources are records form monasteries that were founded by one of Tancred’s grandson’s so many years after the fact and of course the monks were beholden to the family for their existence. I’m taking it in with a very large grain of salt in the tradition of mythology.
LikeLike
RE: Bob Dylan’s ghost written music as described in Miles’ paper on Dylan
I was watching “No Direction Home: Bob Dylan,” the Martin Scorcese documentary. There is a scene in which Joan Baez reminisces about her relationship with him back in the 1960s. She tells an anecdote of being with him when her recording of the Dylan song “Love Is Just a Four-Letter Word” came on the radio and they listened to it. Bob commented that it was a really good song and acted as if he’d never heard it before. Joan said she laughed and said, “You wrote it, you dope.”
LikeLike
Yeah, sounds like a hint. I think probably you get clues about who wrote which Dylan song, by looking at who Bob was hanging out with at the time. “Love is Just a Four-Letter Word” would be by Joan, along with maybe all the Dylan songs she used to perform in her mock Dylan voice.
LikeLike
Like a complete unknown!
LikeLike
Time to draw a long bow and send an arrow at one of the big questions: where did these Jews come from anyway? If you’re not down for some super high octane speculation, better to just skip this. I can’t really give a TL;DR either, because I suspect it’ll sound like lunacy until you see the evidence as I came across it in the effort to answer simple questions. And what I found were strange, disparate pieces that must somehow fit together to form history. Apologies for the length.
What is the origin of the word “jew”? Gerry discusses this in AS5, but in my view it goes even deeper and comes from the Hebrew Yud. In the wiki “Yodh:Origins”, they tell us that this letter originated from a pictograph of a hand, which traces to Proto-Semitic and perhaps to the Egyptian hieroglyph of an arm or hand. Does this signify anything?
And what’s up with these “hamsa” amulets Gerry went over in AS5? Clearly they were quite significant as they were and are “popular throughout the Middle East and North Africa”, as wiki tells us. But let’s look further: “Early use of the hamsa has been traced to ancient Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) as well as ancient Carthage [Phoenicia].” Well, that makes their use very old indeed, and makes me think that their modern significance may be quite different from the original. So what is that significance? We’ve seen this “hand” thing twice now, both times in deep antiquity.
Do we still reflect this “hand” idea in English today? Sure, very commonly: “All hands on deck”, or “handyman”, or even “the long arm of the law”. But note the underlying usage: sailors are reporting to take orders, not give them; the handyman does small jobs around the house, he doesn’t own it; the policeman enforces the law, he isn’t the legislator. And if you’re a Game of Thrones fan, the Hand of the King carries out the king’s will but is not the king, correct? Let’s press on.
Does the word “Hebrew” mean the same thing as “Jew”? Oddly, there seems to be no firm answer in the mainstream. So what does the etymology say? Again, there’s no firm answer at all and it’s even foggier than the first question. I did come across this: one theory holds that it traces back to the word “ivri”. How interesting! You see, I had read elsewhere that a person of the Sumerian city of Nibru would hand been called “nibri”, eventually shortened to just “ibri”. Coincidence?
I suppose you know the Jews have their own calendar, but did you ever notice they have a super high year number? In 2019 it’s now the year 5779 according to them. In short, that means their “Year Zero” was 3760BC. Maimonides calculated that was the date of the “creation of the world”. Now the plot really thickens because there’s an ancient Sumerian calendar known as the “Nippur calendar” and what’s strange is that no academic seems to even want to mention that it must have its own “Year Zero”. You can find non-mainstream sources place it at 3773BC or even simply the same as the Hebrew calendar. Oh really? Also, the city of Nippur was originally known as Nibru. Didn’t we just see that?
Since we’ve been looking at so many Jewish surnames in our studies, have you ever noticed the patterns in them? They fall into a small number of groups and wiki even has a “Category:Jewish surnames” page. You’ll notice that two of the six are “Kohenitic” and “Levite”, and we have seen so very many of those among the cryptos, haven’t we? (See Gerry’s AS5 for a discussion of “Levi”.) And so many other Jewish surnames seem quite literally mundane, with many translating to simple occupations. It seems that even among the Chosen there are Chosen. We might think that today’s surnames are more or less random, but given that categories are still apparent among Jews, might there have been something like a more meaningful assignment when they originated?
And what’s up with Jewish laws against intermarriage? It runs from Ezra Chapter 9 through to the Israeli Interior Ministry, in addition to being deeply culturally embedded. It’s all quite bigoted, especially by today’s SJW standards, but of course no one calls them on it. Our social betters keep insisting all the rest of us are bigots (to which I do not subscribe) but this is way beyond that. Supposed ultra-racist and eternal punching bag David Duke only uses the word “miscegenation” when criticizing Jewish attitudes against it, which is about as far as you can get from advocating laws against it. So what was the genesis of this prohibition?
Finally, who was the first Jew? Some few would be able to name Abraham, and most of those would guess he was some random goat-herder plucked out of obscurity on a mission from God. I’ll have to cut a very long story short here, but it appears Abe and his father Terah were plugged in at the highest levels of the Sumerian priesthood, and that’s why he got the assignment. So… what, a Stone Age witch doctor? Who cares?
Take a look at a plan view of the ancient city of Ur. (Abraham was born there, making him a Sumerian. It’s also the location of the US military base Camp Adder. Another coincidence.) The temple complex takes up, to my eye, about 15% of the entire city. The buildings therein were much larger and more sophisticated than the simple one and two-story dwellings surrounding them. Also, take a look at the Ziggurat of Ur, restored by Saddam, which is quite impressive even in 2019. For perspective, the temple complex scaled up to modern Rome would be 100 Vaticans (yes, I penciled it out), and there was a temple complex in each city. Abraham Terah were heavy hitters. Why is this all overlooked by historians and theologians?
So how does this all fit together? Buckle up.
About 6000 years ago in Sumer, human civilization was opened up for business ex nihilo. Some of the Neolithic humans were “chosen” and brought together to serve TPTB, building and moving into cities for the purpose. These were the original “jews”. They were trained and given assignments, and were not to intermix with the “wild-type” humans. Certain of them were given managerial (“kohen”) and administrative (“levi”) functions. All within the city had a task and a place in the hierarchy, and all outside the city might as well have been cattle (“goyim”). Although elaborated, occulted, and diffused, do you not think this system still exists today?
Bonus coincidence #1: I just heard about a recent book called “The Fall” by Steve Taylor. While his thesis is nothing like mine, he recognized that 4000BC saw the introduction into human society of: war, patriarchy, massive inequality, class system, gods/organized religion, and violent invasion.
Bonus coincidence #2: In 1650, Bishop James Ussher, working from the Old Testament, calculated the date of Creation as 4004BC. For the record, I’m not a Young Earth Creationist but it’s still pretty weird, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“About 6000 years ago in Sumer, human civilization was opened up for business ex nihilo. Some of the Neolithic humans were “chosen” and brought together to serve TPTB, building and moving into cities for the purpose. These were the original “jews”. ”
That’s something I thought also, since Gerry came up with Jew being another name for ‘leader’.
You’re also basically describing one of the underlying plots of Battlestar Galactica, the new miniseries. The underlying plot is said to be based on Mormon religion, but we now know Mormonism goes deeper (crypto-Jewish) than that. One of the subplots is about the Cylons and humans intermingling and then seeding the Earth. The Cylons almost wiped out the humans in an apocalyptic, deluge like catastrophe (nuclear Armageddon). They’re are a monotheistic race based on a very numerologist set of clones, and chase the 12 colonies (based on the zodiac) all the way to Earth. When they get here they inter-breed with protohumans who were already here, and 150,00 years later here we are.
The spook-a-nomics behind the show is interesting, including show-creator Ron Moore and that a couple of the actresses were later caught up in some silly sex-cult scam. Some top Family names in the cast roster and not just Moore, including a Forbes, Rhodes, and Campbell.
LikeLike
Welcome back Miles….yep, you heard that right folks!
LikeLike
One more *tiny piece of evidence supporting a wide-spread Phoeny merchant empire and one of the sources of its power…
https://backend-484.uni-heidelberg.de/sites/default/files/styles/img_free_aspect_1024/public/2019-09/zinn_map_c_c_daniel_berger.jpg?itok=Vzx7tfLS
LikeLike
Ze link to ze article..
https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/en/newsroom/enigma-bronze-age-tin
LikeLike
As for not-so-ancient spookery, I just found this little gem:
Until I saw the documentary “The Revolutionary” at the Philadelphia Independent Film Festival, I mistakenly thought that China during the revolutionary period was one country that had not felt the Jewish embrace. In fact, 85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs, who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home to assist the Chinese.
Laura Goldman(!!): A Jew in Mao’s China
Does anyone know which daughter of which founder they’re referring to? Somehow I don’t feel like buying the DVD just for that, because they probably won’t tell you anyway. This may even be an advertisement especially aimed at truthers.
And just for the record: I think they felt that “embrace” long before Communism.
LikeLike
Bruce Lee was a Ho Tung Bosman per the narrative of course. Here’s one of his more famous cousins…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Ho
LikeLike
Bruce Lee was the son of a Ho?
LikeLike
Yes he was. A ho full of grace. His father was a famous actor of course…
https://www.wingchunnews.ca/geraldo-rivera-interviews-with-bruce-lees-mother-in-her-only-tv-appearance/
LikeLike
There was a Godfrey Ho who was a notorious film-maker: he made god-awful martial arts movies that are so bad they are very funny to watch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Ho
LikeLike
If actress Sandra Oh married filmmaker Godfrey Ho her name would be Sandra Oh-Ho.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I like the look on peoples’ faces when I tell them Bruce Lee was (is) a Jew. It’s almost as fun as telling folks that bob marley was (is) a Jew.
LikeLike
Bruce used a stunt double on “Enter the Dragon” in the scenes where his character does acrobatic flips such as in the film’s opening scene where he does a flip over his buddies’ heads. Also in his fight with O’Hara where he does a back-flip and kicks him in the crotch.
I believe he did have legit skills though that were exceptional.
LikeLike
Ho Chi Minh comes to mind. Chinese traditionally put their surname first.
Zhang Jue, leader of the Yellow Turban rebellion, has an interesting name, also spelled Zhang Jiao (Zhang is one of the seven Jewish surnames conferred by Ming):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_Jue
LikeLike
Talking of Ho Chi Minh:
‘North Vietnam’s Politburo chairman, Ho Chi Minh, suggested to David Ben-Gurion in 1946 that he proclaim a Jewish Government in Exile, and establish such a government’s headquarters in North Vietnam.’
https://www.jta.org/1966/11/08/archive/ben-gurion-reveals-suggestion-of-north-vietnams-communist-leader
LikeLike
Yeah the Internet wouldn’t tell me either after about 15mins of searching. She would have to be either Ella Goldman, Rebecca Dreyfuss, Rosa Sachs, or Louisa Sachs if I’m reading their tree correctly. I would not be surprised if we came across their names if we read up on the seemingly hundreds of rebellions going on in China during the 19th century. I probably already did but didn’t notice.
LikeLike
As for the historical operations in China of the Phoenicians (or any of their numerous proxies), I have the sneaking suspicion that one of them was the Taiping Rebellion of 1850-64. I suspect only a handful in the English-speaking world have ever even heard the name, but Wiki describes it thusly: “It ranks as one of the bloodiest wars in human history, the bloodiest civil war, and the largest conflict of the 19th century. Estimates of the war dead range from 20–70 million to as high as 100 million, with millions more displaced.” I’ve never once heard it mentioned by the mainstream.
But why would I think the Jews might have been behind it? “Led by Hong Xiuquan, the self-proclaimed brother of Jesus Christ, the goals of the Taipings were religious, nationalist, and political in nature; they sought the conversion of the Chinese people to the Taiping’s syncretic version of Christianity, the overthrow of the ruling Manchus, and a wholesale transformation and reformation of the state.” Sounds kinda like he was Trump Christ, and I think we all know how the Phoenicians feel about Trump and Christ.
Might it be yet another war that was managed and largely faked? Possibly, as that certainly seems to be the rule for wars. But then we have to answer the question of why they would fake it then flush it down the memory hole. Haven’t we also learned that our attention should be drawn most acutely to that which is most pointedly ignored?
LikeLike
@Matt
““Led by Hong Xiuquan, the self-proclaimed brother of Jesus Christ, the goals of the Taipings were religious, nationalist, and political in nature;”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/church-of-sweden-announced-greta-thunberg-successor-of-jesus
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay now THAT is hilarious!
LikeLike
Why do we need them to tell us? It’s totally self-evident. Similar hairdos and so many other things. As I heard it, the elite Jews all loved that guy and were anxious to do exactly what he said, so obviously we should do whatever Greta(TM) tell us to. Anybody ever hear what happened with that Jesus character? He sorta fell off the map.
LikeLike
@Gerry: Yes the more reading I do on ancient history, the more it seems like the colonization/globalism project started from the very beginning.
Disclaimer: The Buddhists in the room.. I don’t mean to insult you. Also, I was never good with boundaries.
Anyways, I’ve been trying to ‘fill the gap’ so to speak and been doing some light readings on Greco-Bactrian, the Indo-Greeks, and early Buddhist/Mauryan history.
I’m sure some people out there have already figured this out, especially since it’s fairly easy to figure it out on the Wiki pages… but Buddhism was an Ancient spook project.
First clue: Buddha’s bodyguard was Vajrapani, or Hercules.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajrapani#In_India
Also the reason I say this is that early Buddhist history is fuzzy (of course), and doesn’t seem to get active until after the “Greek” invasions in India.
Nah, Alexander the Great,The Project, didn’t stop at the Hyphasis. They really try to oversell the idea in causal mainstream history that Alexander’s army mutinied and all the Greeks went home save for a few colonizers. Mainstream also says Buddhism was a true Indian invention..
Yeah I’m not so sure about that anymore.
Ashoka the Great was also a spook project, except on the other side. However he barely exists in the archeological record.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka
“According to Roman historian Appian, Chandragupta had made a “marital alliance” with Seleucus; there is thus a slight possibility that Ashoka had a Seleucid Greek grandmother.[17][18] An Indian Puranic source, the Pratisarga Parva of the Bhavishya Purana, also described the marriage of Chandragupta with a Greek (“Yavana”) princess, daughter of Seleucus.[19][20] Although there are no evidence showing if the Seleucid princess, as one of the many consorts of the Mauryan harem, had any children, let alone giving birth to Bindusara.[21]”
I’m not sure if I read it here or on another Wiki page, but Ashoka would be at least a quarter Yona, or “Greek” (or 100% spook). It was his grandfather (I believe), Chandragupta Maurya, who had a handler behind his throne named Chanakya, also known as Kautilya. He would write a political treatise called the Arthashastra, that honestly after reading a few chapters, makes The Prince read like a book for wee children. It’s crazy psychotic, and the whole point of it is to set up and maintain totalitarian spy regime.
A lot more on this later (especially the connection to Christianity). But I saw this at the bottom of Ashoka’s page, and I think here’s what a map looks like to the hidden rulers:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Phil, thanks for sharing that, and sorry for my delayed answer. I only stumbled over Greco-Buddhism recently, and haven’t yet read much about it. My entry was when I was searching for occurrences of Semitic vocabulary, and came across the Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription in Greek & Aramaic, also allegedly by Ashoka.
You’re right: The fact that Buddhism needs is also proclaimed in Greek & Aramaic puts a question mark to the “true Indian invention”. The empires of several merchant overlords may have overlapped in the region, and perhaps they wished for a merger into some silk-road joint-venture. The Susa weddings were another such puzzle piece earlier on.
“The usage of Aramaic reflect the fact that Aramaic (the so-called Official Aramaic) had been the official language of the Achaemenid Empire which had ruled in those parts until the conquests of Alexander the Great.”
LikeLike
As for possible punnery in the name of Buddha’s “protector” वज्रपाणि Vajira-Pani:
वज्र vajra means “thunderbolt” & “diamond”, but also hard & mighty
पणितृ pani means “hand”, but also trader & seller
So the guy lurking behind the image of Buddha could simply be a mighty trader. Or a diamond merchant.
And in the Greek design also a “hidden leader”, with the Hercules imagery. Must’ve been difficult for the ancient spooks to keep up with all the multi-lingual punnery.
LikeLike
And eerily, in the Semitic languages the root בדה √bdh means to invent, fabricate, concoct.
But I wouldn’t go so far as to call Buddhism itself a “project”. It was & is a tool just as much or as little as any other religion. All religions were founded on true & useful ideas, but were institutionalized by the spook overlords to be means to commercial ends.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought about that statement for awhile after writing it. I have a bit of difficult time writing about religion, since I don’t want to give anyone a serious bout of cognitive dissonance or lose the positive aspects of their faith. But it’s hard to know where to draw the line, since every time I look into the beginnings of the major religions I keep finding the same type of shady people behind it or around it, and the same type of tricks being pulled. So ‘Bdh’ means to invent or fabricate!? Ooo wee..
But you’re right. These spooks are ‘untapped’. They have to hijack and corrupt the real thing and twist it to suit their own evil purposes. Reading about the Buddhism, my guess is that whatever was real back then came out of the Sramana movement, and they hijacked this. The Brahmins definitely represented old Indian aristocratic, moneylending & priestly spook class (think rabbis), and the Sramanas were their new enemy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Arama%E1%B9%87a
“The śramaṇa refers to a variety of renunciate ascetic traditions from the middle of the 1st millennium BCE.[11] The śramaṇas were individual, experiential and free-form traditions.[11] The term “śramaṇas” is used sometimes to contrast them with “Brahmins” in terms of their religious models.[11] Part of the śramaṇa tradition retained their distinct identity from Hinduism by rejecting the epistemic authority of the Vedas, while a part of the śramaṇa tradition became part of Hinduism as one stage in the Ashrama dharma, that is as renunciate sannyasins.[11][27]”
Reminds me of early conflict between early Christianity v. Judaism right around the same time Buddhism was getting hot and its conflict with Hinduism. The parallels are striking. My knowledge on the Vedas and Hinduism is close to zero though.
LikeLike
While reading about Buddha’s son, Rāhula, I was reminded he and Gautama were from the Shakya</> royal family. The amount of times they’ve re-spelled or shuffled up this name throughout history is immense. Reading up on Scythian history will connect to you just about every other single nomadic empire in history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
“Some scholars, including Michael Witzel[44] and Christopher I. Beckwith[45] argue that the Shakya were Scythians from Central Asia or Iran, and that the name Śākya has the same origin as “Scythian”, called Sakas in India. Scythians were part of the Achaemenid army in the Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley from the 6th century BCE.[46] Indo-Scythians were also known to have appeared later in South Asia in the Middle Kingdom period, around the 2nd century BCE to the 4th century CE.[47]”
Plenty of other wiki pages and elsewhere that confirms the same, despite the amount of obfuscation on these pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka
“The Scythians (/ˈsɪθiən, ˈsɪð-/; from Greek Σκύθης, Σκύθοι), also known as Scyth, Saka, Sakae, Iskuzai, or Askuzai, were a nomadic people who dominated the Pontic steppe from about the 7th century BC up until the 3rd century BC…
The Scythians are generally believed to have been of Iranian origin.[5] They spoke a language of the Scythian branch of the Iranian languages,[6] and practiced a variant of ancient Iranian religion.[7] Among the earliest peoples to master mounted warfare,[8] the Scythians replaced the Cimmerians as the dominant power on the Pontic Steppe in the 8th century BC.[9] During this time they and related peoples came to dominate the entire Eurasian Steppe from the Carpathian Mountains in the west to Ordos Plateau in the east,[10][11] creating what has been called the first Central Asian nomadic empire.[9][12] Based in what is modern-day Ukraine and southern Russia, the Scythians called themselves Scoloti and were led by a nomadic warrior aristocracy known as the Royal Scythians”
Remember Cimmerians = Gomerites = Gomer = son of Japheth from the Table of Nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gomer
“In 1498 Annio da Viterbo published fragments known as Pseudo-Berossus, now considered a forgery, claiming that Babylonian records had shown that Comerus Gallus, i.e. Gomer son of Japheth, had first settled in Comera (now Italy) in the 10th year of Nimrod following the dispersion of peoples. In addition, Tuiscon, whom Pseudo-Berossus calls the fourth son of Noah, and says ruled first in Germany/Scythia, was identified by later historians (e.g. Johannes Aventinus) as none other than Ashkenaz, Gomer’s son. ”
Biblical Ashkenaz is usually derived from Assyrian Aškūza (cuneiform Aškuzai/Iškuzai)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians#Descent_claims
“A number of groups have claimed possible descent from the Scythians, including the Ossetians.[19] Some legends of the Poles,[71] the Picts, the Gaels, the Hungarians (in particular, the Jassics), among others, also include mention of Scythian origins. Some writers claim that Scythians figured in the formation of the empire of the Medes and likewise of Caucasian Albania.”
“The Scythians also feature in some national origin-legends of the Celts. In the second paragraph of the 1320 Declaration of Arbroath, the élite of Scotland claim Scythia as a former homeland of the Scots. According to the 11th-century Lebor Gabála Érenn (The Book of the Taking of Ireland), the 14th-century Auraicept na n-Éces and other Irish folklore, the Irish originated in Scythia and were descendants of Fénius Farsaid, a Scythian prince who created the Ogham alphabet.
The Carolingian kings of the Franks traced Merovingian ancestry to the Germanic tribe of the Sicambri. Gregory of Tours documents in his History of the Franks that when Clovis was baptised, he was referred to as a Sicamber with the words “Mitis depone colla, Sicamber, adora quod incendisti, incendi quod adorasti.” The Chronicle of Fredegar in turn reveals that the Franks believed the Sicambri to be a tribe of Scythian or Cimmerian descent, who had changed their name to Franks in honour of their chieftain Franco in 11 BC. ”
Finally, see the bee/fly symbols on Scythian jewelry.
Look at the object on the right, center below the human figure:
And here, also center:
There is a book I came across awhile ago, written in the 19th or early 20th century, which was a conspiracy/revisionist book claiming the Scots were actually Scythians, and that the Ashkenazi Jews and the current Sachs clan are descended from them. It read like mis-direction at the time, but now I’m curious to read it. I couldn’t find it the other day searching for it, but if anyone has a link I would appreciate it.
Sooner or later I will find the connection to the Hata clan in Japan and it seems I’m inching closer every month. Plus we need to look at other spooky Japanese names like Akizuki, Osaka, and Obama.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hata_clan
LikeLike
‘Hata – this name was changed to Koremune in 880.’ A slur on Komnene?
LikeLiked by 1 person
At the bottom of the page there is a link to a Hata no Kawakatsu, sometimes called Hada no Kōkatsu. (Khosrow, Khusro, Khosrau?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hata_no_Kawakatsu
Here’s what wki says about the theory on the bottom of the Hata page. I might have posted this before:
There is no evidence available, including modern DNA analysis, to support this hypothesis. A recently published study of the genetic origins of Japanese people does not support a genealogical link as put forward by Saeki.[5] Researcher and author Jon Entine emphasizes that DNA evidence excludes the possibility of significant links between Japanese and Jews.[6] “
Remember it was the Nestorians who stole sericulture from the Far East and brought it back to the Byzantine Empire.
This Jon Entine = high ranker spook. Miles might have covered him before. Graduated from Trinity College in Hartford in 1974. Directed McGovern’s 1972 presidential primary campaign, won 19 emmys, producer for NBC, ABC, and founder of the Genetic Literacy Project, supporter of GMOs, fascist think tank bot and it just goes on and on. Sure we can trust him! /sarc
LikeLike
Guys, please be careful with the Twelve Tribes. I personally believe they’re utter hogwash. I already showed you that most of the 12 names are obvious puns about finance & power.
But that’s not all. Most of spook numerology is also puns.
Ten means wealth. It’s even related, through tithing.
ˁšr עשר = fortune, riches, wealth
ˁšr עשר = ten
Two means disguise. It’s also related, through doubling & imitation.
šnh שנה = alter, change, double, duplicate, disguise, pervert
šny שני = two
And tribe really means scepter. It’s the same entry even.
šbṭ שבט = rod, staff, club, scepter, tribe
So the ten-and-two tribes are really the scepter of hidden wealth. Why do you think the European Union is symbolized by 12 stars?
I haven’t looked too closely on the Genealogies of Nations, but I don’t think they should be taken literally either. The spooks are not about ethnicity & religion, they’re about power & finance.
LikeLike
I’m with ya, but let’s be more specific here. All the work we’ve done here and on Miles site, strongly suggests that having Jewish/Phoenician blood in your veins is a significant part of the power structure.
But I don’t think the Table of Nations isutter hogwash. To me, the 12 tribes stuff reads like a gameplan for re-taking over the world after the Great Catastrophe(s). For example, I found the Cimmerians or “Gomerites” geographical location seems to line up nicely with Yamnaya culture. See this map gif here:
Also why doesn’t Yamna culture occupy Crimea? If it did, might it suggest maritime origin for this culture?
Interesting how these migrations are ending up exactly where we are finding centers of spooky power., all around the world
Iran, check. Anatolia, check. Macedonia, check. Armenia, check. Tarim basin (Scythia, Silk Road), check. Lower Scandinavia, check. That far eastern culture right where Mongolia is located (the name is too blurly on this map.. Alanosavo culture?), and where the Han Chinese fought off centuries of “nomadic” empires, check.
But yes, I’m not studying this history as an ethnic history first. IMHO, they are hidden tribes based on wealth, and maintain this by keeping all power in the ‘family’, and by, for thousands of years, holding an intelligence/knowledge advantage over the rest of the world.
LikeLike
Afanasievo culture, thats what I meant. Not exactly where Mongolia is, but close enough. The history of the Silk Road empires in this whole region is very interesting (and spooky).
LikeLike
Gerry, very interesting! So what’s the hidden ancient spook meaning of 18? And 33? And 47?
LikeLiked by 1 person
the simplest
1 ==> A
8 ==> H
1818 ==> ah ah 🙂
but there must be a smartest meaning, of course
LikeLike
Answer below, space is getting narrow here. 😉
LikeLike
That’s the answer I’m looking for too, Josh. Why these numbers?
LikeLike
Since you brushed up against it a couple of times above, I thought I’d bring the Aryans into the conversation. The mainstream admits that’s where Iran gets its name, but they do not do so for Ireland. I think we can see the connection just from the information you mentioned above: Ireland <- Scythians <- Iran <- Aryans. Note that the Aran Islands lie at the mouth of Galway Bay.
So who were these Aryans? Good question. and good luck trying to sort fact from fiction on its wiki page. (Although I did notice that according to Blavatsky: “The Semites were a subdivision of the Aryan root race.” Haha!) All that we good slaves know is that as soon as someone speaks the very word we are to turn our heads and spit on the ground.
A ginormous cloud of noxious smoke went up over the Aryans in the early 1940’s, courtesy of the fake Nazis, who also very effectively blackwashed the swastika. Do you imagine this was happenstance? Me neither.
LikeLike
Yes I believe they shit-canned the Aryan theory (and Phoenician history) because it was leading to everything we are finding out here.
Furthermore, per the page on the Shakya dynasty, they were vassals of the larger Kingdom of Kosala.
Kosala was the ancient kingdom founded by the semi-mythical Ikshvaku or Solar dynasty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_dynasty
The primogenitor of this dynasty is alleged to be the sun god Suyra, or Vivasvan and his son Vaivasvata Manu, who was the king of Dravida, and just like Noah, was warned of the Great Flood and built an ark.
“In Vishnu Purana, Vaivasvata, also known as Sraddhadeva or Satyavrata, was the king of Dravida before the great flood.[3] He was warned of the flood by the Matsya (fish) avatar of Vishnu, and built a boat that carried the Vedas, Manu’s family and the seven sages to safety, helped by Matsya. The myth is repeated with variations in other texts, including the Mahabharata and a few other Puranas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu_(Hinduism)”
So Buddha’s genealogy takes us right back to the origins of Hinduism and the Vedas. Ooof.
LikeLike
Also to note, 24 Jain ‘tirthankaras’ or spiritual teachers, are descended from this dynasty. Just a reminder of Jainism main symbols:
It seems part of the project of Nazism was not just to blackwash the truth about the Jews, Phoenicians, but to blackwash and obfuscate all of human history.
LikeLike
If it aids the debate;
The ARyans – ARmenians of ARarat
https://aratta.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/the-aryans-armenians-of-ararat/
Ancient Armanoids
https://www.facebook.com/pg/ancientarmenoids/photos/
Armenoid race
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenoid_race
LikeLike
The book ‘Deadlier Than The H Bomb’ (1956) by Leonard Young.
https://archive.org/stream/deadlier-than-the-h-bomb-leonard-young/deadlier-than-the-h-bomb-leonard-young_djvu.txt
Excerpt from chapter 2, p.12;
The teaching in the synagogue incited the Jews to a thorough exploitation of
their Gentile neighbours and the doctrine was eventually embodied in a book,
called the Shulchan Aruk. A few quotations will suffice to show its character:
‘When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches another Jew may go to the same
Gentile, lend him money and, in his turn, deceive him so that the Gentile shall
be ruined. For the property of a Gentile (according to our law) belongs to no
one, and the first Jew that passes has the full right to seize it.’
‘When a Jew makes a deal with a Gentile and another Jew comes up and
deceives the Gentile no matter in what manner, whether he give him false
measure or overcharge him, then both Jews must share between them the profits
thus sent by Jehovah.”
‘Although it is not a direct obligation for a Jew to kill a Gentile with whom
he lives in peace yet, in no case is he allowed to save a Gentile’s life.’
‘It is always a meritorious deed to get hold of a Gentile’s possessions.’
‘Marriages taking place among Gentiles have no binding strength,
i.e., their cohabitation is just as the coupling of horses therefore their children
do not stand as humanly related to their parents.’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sunshine, I was not raised religious and learned some but not a lot about Judaism. My feeling is that the families are not very religious either, so I don’t think we’re likely to learn much by trying to figure out what kind of religious laws are followed by religious Jews.
Having said that, some of the statements you repeated did not ring true to me, despite my limited knowledge. So I looked up the issue of stealing from gentiles and not saving the life of a gentile. I found that neither of them seem to be true.
http://halachayomit.co.il/en/default.aspx?HalachaID=3359
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh
I live in a country where every day seven million jews wake up every morning trying to figure out how to screw each other over.
I don’t know by what code or beliefs the ruling families live, but I’m pretty damned sure it isn’t halacha (Jewish law).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey Josh! Thanks for the message. I’m glad you added these links to help the bigger picture. Admittedly, I haven’t read Shulchan Aruch as the author states to establish my opinion on this particular question but I will try and find an English translation. Any suggestions?
LikeLike
Type in shulchan aruch English translation into any search engine and I believe you find it.
LikeLike
In recognition of Yom Kippur, now just a few days past, I would like to share with you the declaration of the Kol Nidre, recited before the evening services for the Day of Atonement by every congregation in every synagogue:
“All vows we are likely to make, all oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.”
Does anyone think the ruling families would go along with that one?
LikeLiked by 2 people
That may be the most Jewish thing I’ve ever read.
LikeLike
Just another reason not to take their word for anything, eh? Josh, I would be interested to hear your take on this. I just looked this up, but the mainstream Jewish explanation makes no sense. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/kol-nidrei-the-power-of-words/
LikeLike
Full text:
“אוֹר זָרוּעַ לַצַּדִּיק
Ohr zaroo-ah latzadeek
Light is sown for the righteous
וּלְיִשְׁרֵי לֵב שִׂמְחָה
u-l’yishrei lave simchah
and for the upright in heart—joy
The following declaration is made by the cantor and repeated three times:
עַל דַּֽעַת הַמָּקוֹם
ahl da’at hamakom
With the consent of the Almighty,
וְעַל דַּֽעַת הַקָּהָל
vee-al da’at hakahal
and consent of this congregation,
בִּישִׁיבָה שֶׁל מַֽעְלָה
beesheevah shel ma’alah
in a convocation of the heavenly court,
וּבִישִׁיבָה שֶׁל מַֽטָּה
u-beesheevah shel matah
and a convocation of the lower court,
אָֽנוּ מַתִּירִין
ah-noo mahteereen
we hereby grant permission
לְהִתְפַּלֵּל עִם הָעֲבַרְיָנִים
l-hitpalel bayn ha-abaryaneem
to pray with transgressors
כָּל נִדְרֵי
kol nidrei
All vows,
וֶאֱסָרֵי
veh-essaray
and things we have made forbidden on ourselves,
וּשְׁבוּעֵי
u-sh’vooh-ay
and oaths,
וַחֲרָמֵי
vacharamay
and items we have consecrated to the Temple,
וְקוֹנָמֵי
vih-konamay
and vows issued with the expression “konum,”
וְכִנּוּיֵי
vih-cheenooyay
and vows which are abbreviated,
וְקִנוּסֵי
vih-keenoosay
and vows issued with the expression “kanos,”
דִּנְדַֽרְנָא
dindahrnah
that we have vowed,
וּדְאִשְׁתַּבַּֽעְנָא
u-d’eeshtahbahnah
and sworn,
וּדְאַחֲרִימְנָא
u-d’achareemnah
and dedicated,
וּדְאָסַֽרְנָא עַל נַפְשָׁתָֽנָא
u-d’ahsahrnah ahl nahfshatahnah
and made forbidden upon ourselves;
מִיּוֹם כִּפּוּרִים זֶה
meeyom keepooreem zeh
from this Yom Kippur
עַד יוֹם כִּפּוּרִים
ahd yom keepoorim
until next Yom Kippur—
הַבָּא עָלֵֽינוּ לְטוֹבָה
hahbah ahlaynoo l’tovah
may it come to us at a good time—
בְּכֻלְּהוֹן אִחֲרַֽטְנָא בְהוֹן
bihchoolhone eecharahtnah b’hone
We regret having made them
כֻּלְּהוֹן יְהוֹן שָׁרָן
coolhone y-hone shahrahn
may they all be permitted
שְׁבִיקִין, שְׁבִיתִין
sh’veekeen, sh’veeteen
forgiven, eradicated
בְּטֵלִין וּמְבֻטָּלִין
bihtayleen u-m’vootahleen
and nullified,
לָא שְׁרִירִין
lah sh’reereen
and may they not be valid
וְלָא קַיָּמִין
v’lah kayameen
or exist any longer.
נִדְרָֽנָא לָא נִדְרֵי
needranah lah nidrei
Our vows shall no longer be vows,
וֶאֱסָרָֽנָא
veh-ehsahrahnah
and our prohibitions
לָא אֱסָרֵי.
lah ehsarei
shall no longer be prohibited,
וּשְׁבוּעָתָֽנָא לָא שְׁבוּעוֹת
oosh’vooahtanah lah sh’voo’ote
and our oaths are no longer oaths.
The cantor and congregation say three times:
וְנִסְלַח לְכָל עֲדַת
v’nislach l’chol adaht
Forgive the entire congregation
בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל
b’nay yisrael
of the children of Yisrael
וְלַגֵּר הַגָּר בְּתוֹכָם
v’lahgare hagahr b’tochahm
and the stranger amongst them
כִּי לְכָל הָעָם בִּשְׁגָגָה:
kee l’kole ha’ahm bishgahgah
for the entire people sin unintentionally.
סְלַח נָא לַעֲוֹן הָעָם הַזֶּה
s’lach nah la’avone ha’am hazeh
Please pardon the sins of this nation
כְּגֹֽדֶל
kih goh-dell
in accordance with the greatness
חַסְדֶּֽךָ
chas’dechah
of Your lovingkindness;
וְכַאֲשֶׁר נָשָֽׂאתָה לָעָם הַזֶּה
vih ka’ashare nahsahtah la’am hazeh
and as You forgave this people
מִמִּצְרַֽיִם וְעַד הֵֽנָּה:
mee-mitzrayim v’ad haynah
from when it left Egypt until now.
וְשָׁם נֶאֱמַר
v’shahm ne’emahr
And there it is said:
Congregation says three times:
וַיֹּֽאמֶר יְהֹוָה
vah-yoe-mare adonai
And Adonai said
סָלַֽחְתִּי כִּדְבָרֶֽךָ
sah-lach-tee kid’vorecha
“I have pardoned [them] as you have asked””
LikeLike
@MathisderMaler
I didn’t reply to Matt simply because I don’t really know what to make of the Kol Nidre. I don’t think the ruling Jews believe in God or faith or have any religious belief — at least none that I would recognize as Jewish. So I don’t see why they’d need to recite this loophole every year.
The first I heard of the Kol Nidre was a couple of years ago reading on conspiracy websites and hearing that that the Jews have a special prayer they say on Yom Kippur that makes all vows and promises for the coming year null and void. “Really?” I thought. “They do? How come I never heard about that?”
As I’ve said I was not brought up in a very religious household. My parents were reform (though my mom had been brought up orthodox), and we only went to the synagogue on Rosh Hashanah and/or Yom Kippur. The number of people attending those services swelled so much at those times that our synagogue actually rented out a church for those services. For a number of years I did go to ‘Sunday school’ which was some kind of religious education but since we were reform it didn’t amount to much. Hebrew school the same — nobody was interested so it was just learning a few vocabulary words, the Hebrew alphabet, and then kinda sorta how to read words as long as they had vowel markings. It was enough to get ready for a Bar Mitzvah, which I did have. I read the Torah portion without understanding the words I was reading. I mean, I had read the English translation of it, of course, but could not have really told you which words meant what. It was rote memorization. After that I pretty never went back. A year later I became agnostic.
Was the Kol Nidre a special part of our Yom Kippur service? It might have been. We never went to the evening service anyway, so I wouldn’t know. That may be why I never read it or learned about it. But even if I had recited it, it’s not clear that it would have had any meaning for me. By that I mean, the way prayers were written in the prayer books was you’d have Hebrew (or in this case Aramaic) on one side, a transliteration on the other (so you could read along even if you didn’t know the Hebrew, which most people there didn’t), and then lower on the page a translation. If you didn’t bother to read the translation, you wouldn’t even know what you’re saying.
My understanding of Yom Kippur was that is is a day of atonement. The days between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are for recalling and contemplating your transgressions, presumably breaking Judaic law but for us it was just doing wrong in general. Also to ask people you’ve sinned against for forgiveness. Yom Kippur is a day to ask God to forgive you. A bit like Catholic confession, since you presumably get to start from scratch at that point. That is the extent of my understanding of the whole thing.
I agree that the text of the Kol Nidre is extremely suspect. In my experience no Jewish person I’ve ever met had an understanding that you could then break promises with impunity just because you had recited the Kol Nidre during Yom Kippur services. That doesn’t mean they would never lie, mind you. But most of the Jews I knew grewing up were honorable and well-intentioned. I would not say the same about my experience living in Israel. I will ask my brother-in-law about the kol nidre. He became Orthodox religious a few years ago–I will report back if he has a different opinion.
I also agree that the meaning attributed to Kol Nidre on the ‘My Jewish Learning’ site makes no sense. Same for some other sites I looked at. Here is a site that talks about the historical genesis of the Kol Nidre. I won’t go into too much detail, but one takeaway is that the Kol Nidre was not part of Judaism from the beginning and that it was for a long time controversial. Another is that the law came about because people were all the time swearing oaths to God but then not following through on them (like New Year’s resolutions). But since breaking a sworn oath to God was taken very seriously, they had a problem where people were doing it a lot (kind of like breaking New Year’s resolutions). So they came up with a loophole. Another site I found said that the prayer is often printed with a footnote explaining that it doesn’t mean what it seems to mean. Either it is only oaths you make to yourself with God as your witness (I swear I’m going to stop smoking, God), but not to other people. Or, it doesn’t apply if you make a promise not intending to keep it.
I don’t want to sound like an apologist. I just think its significance is exaggerated, if only because, as I said, I don’t think the Jews running the world are bound by belief in God, so I don’t see why they’d need the Kol Nidre, and for believers I think the literal significance of the words is not the significance it has to them. But maybe back when the Kol Nidre was written things were different. I don’t know.
Here are some links I found that seem a bit more illuminating than My Jewish Learning:
https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-significance-of-kol-nidre-a-footnote
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-curious-case-of-kol-nidre/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol_Nidre#Form_of_the_chant
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oddly, Rosh Hashanah also means “hidden leader”, in addition to the meaning “start of the year”. Rosh means “head”, which also means “start” & “boss” in most languages. Shanah for “year” is derived from a “repeating” cycle, and that from “doubling”, and that also means “imitation” & “disguise”.
rˀš ראש = head, first, top, leader, master, captain, chief
šnh שנה = year
šnh שנה = second, repeat
šnh שנה = alter, change, double, duplicate, disguise, pervert
My guess is the laws are still somehow about the year, and they just like words that pun with “hidden leader”?
LikeLike
Yom Kippur could also mean “vow of secrecy” or something. It’s the KPR root from Samson’s riddle, the 1st solution being “words of atonement”. My impression is that they have commoners live the literal meaning of these laws & practices, while the spooks live the encoded meaning.
In any case, thanks for sharing your experiences, Josh.
LikeLike
The section under Historical controversies, titled ‘Use by anti-semites’ is interesting, as it ties us right back to Miles paper on the Crusades.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol_Nidre#Historical_controversies
“Historically, this accusation was leveled so often and so persistently that many non-Jewish legislators considered it necessary to have a special form of oath administered to Jews (“Oath More Judaico”), and many judges refused to allow them to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this prayer. As early as 1240 in the Disputation of Paris, Yechiel of Paris was obliged to defend Kol Nidrei against these charges.[3] The Russian government, in 1857, decreed that the prayerbooks must include, as an introduction to Kol Nidrei, a Hebrew explanation to the readers of the limited nature of the vows that could be released by this ceremony.[68]”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputation_of_Paris
If you read in between the lines on this page and related ones, its more fuel to the fire that Louis IX’s court was a Jewish one.
“Donin’s translation of statements taken from the Talmud into French changed the Christian perception about Jews. Christians had viewed the Jews as the followers of the Old Testament who honored the law of Moses and the prophets, but the alleged “blasphemies” included among the Talmudic texts indicated that Jewish understandings of the Old Testament differed from the Christian understanding.[17] Louis IX stated that only skilled clerics could conduct a disputation with Jews, but that laymen should plunge a sword into those who speak ill of the Christ.[18][19]”
Apparently you needed to be a ‘skilled cleric’, or have special access, to debate with the rabbis? The Paris ‘Disputation’ wasn’t the only one during the Medieval ages either.
Nicholas Donin’s page reads like this was some sort of spook operation. Like who exactly is this Donin from a Paris ghetto, who also gets special access to the Pope?
I’m reminded of the ‘blood libel’ accusations made throughout the centuries. Perhaps they were like the “Pizzagates” of their time aka misdirection. IMHO, this pitting of common Jews vs. Christians (and Muslims) in endless (and profitable) conflict for the spoops goes back to the time of the Bar-Kokhba revolt, perhaps earlier.
“The Bar Kokhba revolt greatly influenced the course of Jewish history and the philosophy of the Jewish religion. Despite easing the persecution of Jews following Hadrian’s death in 138 CE, the Romans barred Jews from Jerusalem, except for attendance in Tisha B’Av. Jewish messianism was abstracted and spiritualized, and rabbinical political thought became deeply cautious and conservative. The Talmud, for instance, refers to Bar Kokhba as “Ben-Kusiba”, a derogatory term used to indicate that he was a false Messiah. It was also among the key events to differentiate Christianity as a religion distinct from Judaism.[23] Although Jewish Christians regarded Jesus as the Messiah and did not support Bar Kokhba,[24] they were barred from Jerusalem along with the other Jews.[25]”
I might need to say the Judaism and Christianity of that time was different than it is today, and so were the people involved, but still fodder for some future research.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does that work for credit card bills too?
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Josh: I had figured out Aces & Eights (I think), but since you asked about the twelve, I’ve looked into the others again.
One puns with Jew & leader, though only in a Y-prefixed grammatical form meaning “singular” & “united”. That’s why the crisis actors are giving us the single finger all the time.
yḥyd יחיד = only, only one, solitary
yhwdy יהודי = Jew
hdwy הדוי = leader
Eight puns with hidden, though the pun works only with Aramaic spelling & pronunciation.
tmny תמני = eight
ṭmn טמן = hide, conceal, hidden
So the Aces & Eights would just be our “hidden leaders”, once again. Yawn.
But I’m not so sure about the other numbers.
Four puns with mixed multitudes, which may mean us commoners.
ˀrbˁ ארבע = four
ˁrbyˁy ערביעי = fourth
ˁrb ערב = mingled people, mixed multitude
ˁrb ערב = mix, blend, intermingle, intermarry
Seven may pun with coloring & dyeing. Out of context, not a great pun, but it could mean “simulating”, a term which was otherwise not explicitly used in ancient times, when you just “did” things.
šbˁ שבע = seven
ṣbˁ צבע = to color, dye, launder, baptize
So, just judging from Miles’ finding that many top spooks are “born” at dates with 47, it could mean that they are “painted as commoners”. It’s not a very great pun, but we’ve seen even worse with the spooks. Both “four” and “seven” have many othe homonyms and near-homonyms.
Thirty-three is the toughest nut. It may pun with fake terror or just fake theater. However, this works only in Aramaic, plus most dictionaries don’t even have those entries. It’s possible that the plural of 30 is needed to get the M for MTL מתל, which is the modern word for “theater”, and that’s why it must be 33 and not 3. Not sure here, suggestions appreciated.
tlt תלת = three
tltl תלתל = to deride
tlt תלת = to frighten
mtl מתל = compare to, be made like, represent symbolically
mtwlwt מתולות = theater, show, play, performance (modern language)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looks convincing to me, especially the 33. I’m thinking of that company of Thespians that staged a show in Germany to frighten us all into another World War.
LikeLike
So yes, maybe there is a pattern in that the spook number reveals the essence of the “caper”: 33 to stage to frighten; 47 you’ve made the grade; 1 and 8 being the standard spooky seal.
LikeLike
in common egyptian,
33 is
talata o’ talatin
may be a pun with alta, alto
or
atla(s)
or
atlanti
or Atlanta…
look at the wiki page of Atlanta, capital of Georgia
the flag and the seal are instructive.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta
also, the nicknames of atlanta :
Since then, the city has known numerous nicknames. As of the 2010s, The ATL, and The A are the most prevalent.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicknames_of_Atlanta
LikeLike
Here are a list of some occurences of the number 47 in the Star Trek series alone (found this list on the web):
Star Trek: Voyager
Caretaker
The USS Voyager’s registry number is NCC 74656. (Also note that the last 3 digits; 656 times the speed of light is Warp 7) (Inverted 47)
The energy pulse increases by .47 seconds in frequency.
[Episode 1, Season 1]
Parallax
The Doctor notes that he is programmed with the experiences of 47 individual medical officers.
The Doctor asks Captain Janeway to switch to monitor input 47.
[Episode 2, Season 1, Teleplay by Brannon Braga]
Phage
The Doctor says that Neelix will survive another 47 minutes with a blood-gas infuser.
Kim notes that they are 547 metres away from the source of the dampening field within the asteroid.
[Episode 4, Season 1, Teleplay by Brannon Braga et al]
Emanations
The Voyager crew discovers the 247th element.
[Episode 8, Season 1, Written by Brannon Braga]
Cathexis
Paris’ memory was interrupted for 1 minute, 47 seconds.
[Episode 12, Season 1, Story by Brannon Braga and Joe Menosky, Teleplay by Braga]
Learning Curve
B’Elana notes that there are only 47 gel packs remaining in storage.
[Episode 15, Season 1]
Projections
The Doctor discovers that the holographic program for Captain Janeway is stored in memory block 47-alpha.
[Episode 18, Season 2, Written by Brannon Braga]
Elogium
At one stage Shields are at 47 percent.
[Episode 19, Season 2]
Non Sequitur
Kim’s office is on level 6, subsection 47 of the main complex.
Kim’s apartment is number 4-G (G is the 7th letter of the alphabet).
The USS Yellowstone, a prototype for a new, advanced runabout, has the registry number NX-74751. (Inverted 47)
[Episode 20, Season 2, Written by Brannon Braga]
Twisted
Kim starts counting mega-pascals of pressure; the camera cuts to the holodeck, and when it returns Kim resumes counting from 47 mega-pascals.
There are several 47s on the computer display which shows Voyager being distorted. (Look for LCARS 40274, 8-747, 4786)
[Episode 21, Season 2]
Cold Fire
Tanis initiates a subspace carrier wave, then says that it will take 47 hours for the female caretaker to respond.
[Episode 25, Season 2, Teleplay by Brannon Braga]
Maneuvers
There are 7 Kazon ships .4 light-years away from Voyager. (Inverted 47)
[Episode 26, Season 2]
Resistance
Kim says to plot a course 219 mark 47 to find the electrical storm over which Voyager can hover to avoid detection.
[Episode 27, Season 2]
Prototype
B’Elanna re-activates Automated Personnel Unit 3947.
[Episode 28, Season 2]
Threshold
Paris’ twin hearts are shown on a computer display labelled Biomedical Scan 47.
[Episode 30, Season 2]
Meld
The centre of the top DNA strand shown on the computer is labelled with a 47.
[Episode 31, Season 2]
Dreadnought
B’Elanna’s last access to Dreadnought was on Stardate 47582.
The readout from Dreadnought’s data banks contains a single 47 amongst a stream of long numbers.
[Episode 32, Season 2]
Death Wish
The Sickbay monitor above Q2 displays the number 47.
[Episode 33, Season 2]
Lifesigns
The Doctor notes that he has performed 347 medical examinations since his activation.
The Doctor instructs Kes to set the Delta band of the holoemitter to 7MHz. (Delta is the 4th letter of the Greek alphabet)
[Episode 34, Season 2]
Investigations
Neelix and Hogan each use the code Omega 4 7.
[Episode 35, Season 2]
Deadlock
B’Elanna says that she remodulated the carrier 5 times on all 47 frequencies.
Voyager was boarded by 347 Vidiians and “More were coming”.
Paris says that there is a large plasma drift at bearing 4 0 mark 7.
[Episode 36, Season 2, Written by Brannon Braga]
Innocence
B’Elanna shows Planetary Scan 047 to Captain Janeway.
[Episode 37, Season 2]
Resolutions
Paris warns that shields are down to 47 percent.
[Episode 40, Season 2]
Basics Part II
A cross-section display of Voyager is labelled Vessel Schematic 4747.
A button on the panel used by Suder to sabotage Voyagers backup phasers is labelled 247.
[Episode 42, Season 3]
Flashback
The hull breach is on Deck 12, section 47.
[Episode 43, Season 3]
The Chute
The bombing that Paris and Kim are convicted of carrying out resulted in 47 off-duty patrollers being killed.
[Episode 44, Season 3]
The Swarm
Kim reports that the swarm is 40,000Km away; later Paris reports that it is 7,000Km away.
[Episode 45, Season 3]
False Profits
That Stardate at one point is 50074.3.
One of the Ferengi notes that there are 47 separate commentaries on the Rules of Acquisition.
One of the Ferengi, while counting profits, reads the number 147 then stops at 148.
[Episode 46, Season 3, Teleplay by Joe Menosky]
Future’s End Part I
One of the EM signals that Voyager picks up is “..Airlines, Flight 47…”.
It is noted that Southern California sank as a result of the Hermosa Quake of 2047.
The police officer chasing Captain Braxton says “This is 247…”.
The schematic of the orbiting gamma emmissions include the number 274. (Inverted 47)
Rain’s computer crashes displaying the message “Fatal System Error: Error #0047”.
The diagram of the time ship on Starling’s computer includes 4747 in a list of numbers.
[Episode 49, Season 3]
Future’s End Part II
Starling’s assistant is waiting for Starling’s signal that he is ready to be beamed off Voyager; the computer says: “SatComm 47 activating”.
Starling plans to enter the rift at penetration point 96 mark 047.
[Episode 50, Season 3]
The Q and the Grey
The shockwave from the supanova approaches Voyager from a heading of 217 mark 47.
[Episode 52, Season 3]
Macrocosm
After the Doctor beams down, he notifies the bridge that he will be proceeding on vector 147.
The antigen bomb is knocked out of Janeway’s hand 40 seconds from detination; she manages to get it back when there are 7 seconds till detonation.
[Episode 53, Season 3]
Fair Trade
Biometric Gel should be stored in a Starfleet standard issue L647-X7 container.
[Episode 54, Season 3]
Alter Ego
Chakotay warns that shields are down to 47%.
The stardate at one stage in this episode is 50471.3.
[Episode 55, Season 3]
Unity
Chakotay is instructed, via a mind-link to the former Borg, to beam into section 47-Omega of the Borg ship.
[Episode 58, Season 3]
Rise
Neelix stabalises the tethers velocity at 47Kph.
[Episode 60, Season 3]
Before & After
Kim tells Kes that the current Star Date is 56947.
Kes discovers that the chronaton temporal variance has a frequency of 1.47; This figure is also displayed on Kes’ tricorder.
[Episode 62, Season 3, Produced by Joe Menosky, Supervising Producer Brannon Braga]
Real Life
Tuvok says that the anomoly is at a heading of 047 mark 19.
[Episode 63, Season 3, Produced by Joe Menosky, Supervising Producer Brannon Braga]
Distant Origin
The saurian race, the “Voth”, have 47 genetic markers in common with life forms from the planet Earth, including humans.
[Episode 64, Season 3, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Worst Case Scenario
Chakotay notes that there had so far been 47 accesses to the holoprogram.
Tuvok uses security clearance ‘Tuvok 4774’ to access the holoprogram.
[Episode 66, Season 3]
Scorpion Part 1
The Borg have named their new enemy Species 8472.
The monitor the Doctor uses to display the Borg nanoprobes is labelled ‘Image Enhancement 047′.
[Episode 67, Season 3, Produced by Joe Menosky, Written by Brannon Braga and Menosky]
The Gift
The communication node that Seven of Nine sees is labeled ’59S47B Starfleet Communications Node’.
The Doctor notes that Kes underwent 17.4 seconds of cellular flux. (Inverted 47)
Annika Hansen (now Seven of Nine) was born on stardate 25479.
[Episode 69, Season 4]
Day of Honour
Hull integrity of the Tom and B’Elana’s shuttle is at 53%; therefore 47% of the hull integrity has been lost.
[Episode 70, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Nemesis
Chakotay joins the 4th regiment of a resistance movement, who are searching for the 7th regiment.
[Episode 71, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Scientific Method
The Doctor uses a type 4 phase variance on Seven of Nine.
Tom Paris views Vessel Schematic 4747.
Seven of Nine reports hull breaches on decks 4, 7, 8 and 12.
[Episode 74, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
The Year of Hell [Part 1]
One of the days shown is Day 47 (captioned on screen).
Seven notes that the chronaton temporal variance has a frequency of 1.47.
[Episode 75, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Concerning Flight
It is noted that the computer on Voyager is capable of accessing 47 million channels simultaneaously.
Kim discovers that the location of the holoemitter is 4.7 kilometres outside the city.
[Episode 78, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Waking Moments
The stardate at the conclusion of the epsiode is 51471.3.
B’Elana wakes up Tom at 0740 hours. (Inverted 47)
[Episode 80, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Message in a Bottle
Captain Janeway sends the Voyager’s current coordinates to the Prometheus; they are 18 mark 204 mark 47.
When the Romulan commander uses the Prometheus’ multiple vector attack mode, he orders attack pattern Beta 4 7.
[Episode 81, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Hunters
Harry notes that the relay station is on a heading of 274 mark 3. (Inverted 47)
Seven of Nine reports that the Borg knew of a ‘similar’ species to the Hunters, designated Species 5174. (Inverted 47)
[Episode 82, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Prey
The Doctor recommends that Seven of Nine read page seventeen of ‘Bridge Bantor for (4) Beginners’.
[Episode 83, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
The Killing Game Part I
Seven of Nine tells Janeway that the night’s takings were 1247 Francs, 81 Reichmarks.
Two numbers on Janeway’s message decoding grid are 4 and 7.
Janeway access a panel in sickbay that is labeled Auxiliary Systems 0470. Kim accesses this same panel later.
Seven requests that the annular confinement beam be narrowed to .47 terahertz.
[Episode 93, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
One
Seven of Nine orders Nutritional Supplement 14 Beta 7 from the replicator.
Seven and the Doctor examine “Vessel Schematic 4747” in order to explain the malfunctions.
Seven later adjusts the ships heading by .347 degrees starboard.
[Episode 94, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Hope & Fear
At the end of their game of Velocity, Janeway notes her score is 6, and Seven’s 4.
The Voyager crew note that the launch date for the USS Dauntless was Stardate 51472.
The Starfleet admiral says that the Dauntless’ developers had run 47 successful trial runs of the slipstream drive.
Seven examines a display which contains the label “Energy Path Simulation 2473”.
[Episode 95, Season 4, Produced by Joe Menosky]
Night
The HoloDoc shows Janeway and Chakotay a computer display of the void-alien’s status. Under the text ‘Patient Biomedical Status’ is the Cellar Degredation rate which is 13.47. Below this is the Theta Radiation Level, this number changes rapidily but starts at 267.47, and returns to this number several times.
Tom announces that the time to intercept the Vortex is 47 seconds.
[Episode 95, Season 5, Produced by Joe Menosky, Screenplay Joe Mensky et al]
Drone
‘One’ announces that he has assimilated 47 billion teraquads of information on a vast array of subjects.
[Episode 96, Season 5, Produced by Joe Menosky]
LikeLike
Does 137 rhyme with anything amharic? α is the lucky number of theoretical physicists of course…
“Pauli famously quipped, “When I die my first question to the Devil will be: What is the meaning of the fine structure constant?” Unfortunately Pauli died without accomplishing his goal in the Red Cross Hospital of Zurich in Room 137—and he was aware of that synchronistic irony before he died.
The great psychotherapist Carl Jung helped Pauli in his quest to find a mathematical basis for the fine structure constant by interpreting more than 400 of Pauli’s dreams, published in Jung’s Psychology and Alchemy. Jung believed that Pauli unconsciously comprehended “some grand cosmic order.” Arthur Miller wrote a book about their collaboration entitled, 137: Jung, Pauli, and the Pursuit of a Scientific Obsession.
The brilliant Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman had this to say about the fine structure constant:
“It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it. Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to π or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms [known as e]? Nobody knows. It’s one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the ‘hand of God’ wrote that number, and ‘we don’t know how He pushed his pencil.’ We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don’t know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!” -Richard Feynman QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1985)”
http://www.secretsinplainsight.com/why-137/
LikeLike
alpha =7,297 352 566 4(17) 10^-3
FiNe Structure Constant.
LikeLike
@smj
Miles figured out the fine structure constant: what it is and why it has the value that it does. But I know you don’t believe in physics. I guess the cosmos is constructed out of pieces of string and drinking straws stuck together with chewed bubble gum.
http://milesmathis.com/fine2.pdf
http://milesmathis.com/fine.html
http://milesmathis.com/fine3.pdf
http://milesmathis.com/fine4.pdf
LikeLike
You don’t find it strange that theoretical physicists seem to worship 137?
Seems to me that miles was saying α is a fake number. I concur of course. But that’s where we diverge seeing as I don’t believe in spacetime and therefore onestone’s mass-energy equivalence. I do take physics seriously; that’s why, for example, I don’t believe in slow motion hovering rockets or nukes.
However, I leave cosmology for the ordo ab chaos types and the folks that are into cosmetics like eddie topham so I’m not gonna claim to have any idea how the so-called cosmos was constructed…
https://www.etymonline.com/word/cosmos
I do believe in string, straws, and bubble gum though.
LikeLike
He wasn’t saying it’s a fake number. Just that there’s nothing mysterious about it. The number is real and has a significance that mainstream physicists either missed or misdirected about missing. His work also doesn’t employ or support the concept of spacetime, if you are referring to the post-Einstein merger of space and time into a single “fabric.” He does, though, explain why E=mc^2. It’s kind of neat. If, you know, you’re into mind blowing insights into how the physical world works. But the only thing you seem interested in blowing is smoke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cool. I never knew 137 was anything else in nature. My wife and I play scrabble most every night. About a month or two ago, we tied. We both got 731. A million to one shot. (We average 350 & 425) I laughed out loud at the ‘coincidence’. My reason: 1. God is ONE (Spirit). 3. He appointed a man-King, his first born Son, named Yah’s Salvation, and anointed Him with His Holy Spirit ‘without measure’. THREE presences of Yah. And finally 7, well, what can I say? It’s all about His 7th day. And beyond. Or that’s what His words summarized seem to say anyway. And there is just about SEVEN everything, as in the holes in our head. 😉
LikeLike
Ramsay said: ” And there is just about SEVEN everything, as in the holes in our head.”
Wait until you get to your eyes, nose, fingers, and toes.
LikeLike
Reading the french wiki about Sissi, Empress Elisabeth of Austria, because of Miles footnote about Emperor Franz Joseph, i found this :
“His body rests alongside the bodies of the 137 other members of the Habsburg-Lorraine dynasty, in the crypt of the Capuchins in Vienna.”
LikeLike
Hmm, that doesn’t have anything to do with posing as a commoner. But there’s another possibility for the forty-seven, and that would be the “masked leader”, another time. But the homonymity is even worse here, as we have to strip the Aleph & Ayin completely.
ˀrbˁ ארבע = four
rb רב = chief, teacher, nobleman, chieftain, master
šbˁ שבע = seven
ṣbˁ צבע = to color, dye, launder, baptize
LikeLike
in france
47 is the number of the «département du Lot », and
74 is the number of … Haute-Savoie.
(haute = alto or alta)
funny to find the Savoie here, after all we learn about the the Savoy family…
we have also 73, the number of département de la Savoie.
if we put Savoie and Haute Savoie together, we have 73 74…
plus = 147
minus = 1
and as 3+4=7 it makes 777
jackpot !
LikeLike
Hah! I think I got a better idea for the thirty-three, and it’s a major spook theme I haven’t been able to find in the punnery until now: fake death! Both “thirty” and “threes” would be pronounced שלושים šlwšym in Hebrew. And that is written exactly like the phrase שלו-שים šlw-šym, which means “set up corpse”.
šlwšym שלושים = thirty
šlw שלו = corpse
šym שים = put, placed, set up, assigned, disguised, expected, look, make, painted, performed, show, substitute
Here the homography is perfect, but the words are a bit unspecific. Something that’s “put up” is not always a deception, and שלו šlw simply means “quiet” and is probably an abbreviation for גופה-שלו gwph-šlw meaning “quiet body”. Still, since the letters match so well, so I think it’s the better lead.
Does someone know if the 33 occurs most often with fake deaths in Miles’ research? Or does it occur with all things spooky?
LikeLike
Might refer to an ultimate death or a planned demise even a figurative one, e.g. the planned fall of Germany?
LikeLike
You posted this at 8:33 PM, Gerry! I’m onto you! 🙂
LikeLike
It doesn’t always occur with a fake death. I see lots of articles online with headings like ’33 best this or that’, ’33 things to do…’ etc..
LikeLike
What if those articles are pushing things that “they” know are bad for you, ultimately leading to some sort of “demise”? 😉
LikeLike
A good deal of them are. Demise is certainly a relevant term, but does it equate to “fake death”? Not literally, but perhaps symbolically. I don’t know how far you can stretch things in punnery. If we translated “corpse painted” it could be a way of saying here is a dead/lifeless/valueless thing we’ve dressed up to seem attractive. It could also fit the “fake theatre” description originally posted by Gerry. I don’t know, just thinking out loud.
LikeLike
Miles has outed Carole Lombard’s suicide at 33, ditto for David Koresh, then there’s Eva Braun, Eva Peron, Timothy McVeigh, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy…
+33 is the international dialing code for France.
The number of deities in the Vedic Religion is 33.
One of the symbols of Ku Klux Klan. (K is the 11th letter of the alphabet; 3 times 11 is 33, KKK).
(Wiki sourced)
LikeLike
did you try to call the
+33 47 18 18 11 9
?
LikeLike
They were out.
LikeLike
Ok! one more for the road…….King David ruled for 40 years, 7 in Hebron, 33 in Jerusalem. Kings 1-2 or somewhere. Just thought I should throw that one out there.
LikeLike
The seal of the university of Chicago is interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Chicago
A phoenix rising from the flames!
‘The University of Chicago has produced many prominent alumni, faculty members and researchers. As of October 2019, 100 Nobel laureates have been affiliated with the university as professors, students, faculty, or staff, making it a university with one of the highest concentrations of Nobel laureates in the world.[23] Similarly, 34 faculty members and 18 alumni have been awarded the MacArthur “Genius Grant”.[24] In addition, as of 2018, UChicago’s alumni and faculty include 54 Rhodes Scholars,[25] 26 Marshall Scholars,[26] 9 Fields Medalists,[27] 4 Turing Award Winners, 25 Pulitzer Prize winners,[28] 20 National Humanities Medalists,[29] 16 billionaire graduates and a plethora of members of the United States Congress and heads of state of countries all over the world.’
LikeLike
like the seal of Atlanta :
with a nice 47
Atlanta and its suburbs are home to multinationals such as United Parcel Service, Coca-Cola, CNN and Delta Air Lines. Atlanta is the headquarters of the prestigious federal agency Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
what were we speaking about concerning Health ???
LikeLike
also, is it a coincidence to find Keisha Lance Bottoms as 60th and current Mayor of Atlanta, Georgia ?
Bottom is the real (or fake) name of the phoenix family, remember…
our friend joak-in the jok-R
LikeLike
Talking of Bottom, River Bottom has a paper on the Bulgarian revolution at Miles’ —
http://mileswmathis.com/bulg.pdf
LikeLike
Good paper.
Well they — the Phoeny Families — are a tad late in introducing their Phoeny one world currency. So maybe that’s her job? Unless the whole Phoenix Currency was another piece of misdirection.
https://altcoopsys.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ArticleEconomist1988GetReadyforthePhoenix_001.pdf
LikeLike
@bulg.pdf
The picture of Dimitar Stoyanov, better known by his alias Radoy Ralin, has a wee look of Spike Milligan, Anglo-Irish comedian born in India.
Spike’s father was Leo Alphonso Milligan born in Sligo, brother to Herbert Charles Milligan, their grandparents were Michael Milligan and Ellinor Kennedy. Alphonso often used by Iberian royalty, not very Irish.
LikeLike
I’m a little late (about 32 years) in formally recognizing a joke from the Phoenicians regarding their greatly desired and forthcoming One World Currency. The joke is on the January 1988 cover of The Economist. A Reddit post contains a good image of the cover along with some further links:
Did you see the joke? It’s that it’s a phoenix rising from the burning fiat currency that you now think is so important, right? Nope, look closer.
See that medallion on its chest, and the symbol on the medallion? It’s the Greek letter “phi”. Now think back to junior high math class. The letter phi was used to denote the set which has no members. That is, the “null” set or “empty” set. Good one, huh? What’s 10 times null worth? Right in our faces again.
Bonus: Rather than the Greek letter “phi”, the null set is properly designated by the letter Ø from the Norwegian alphabet. That’s according to Andre Weil who first promulgated such notation. See, TPTB and their hireling graphic artists don’t know everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not being in any particular hurry to sit and watch 52 episodes of a drama about how a rich family lived through the first decades of the 20th century, I avoided Downton Abbey like I avoid watching adverts. So after 7 series I started watching after sampling a trailer. There’s far too much nasty back-stabbing, adulterous stuff to keep me riveted but most of the acting is very good. Too much like Emmerdale Farm and Coronation Street for my liking. They are full of lying, backstabbing gits too. At least Downton has more than it’s fair share of tear jerking moments and is well written and acted in that respect.
Any road up!
We are now up to Series 6 on Amazon Prime and I keep noticing lots of Jewish references. After reading Miles and guest writers papers about such matters over the past year or two, I must say that the writers are certainly not holding anything back.
Throughout series 5 there are lots of references to Russian Jews and rich Jews marrying into British aristocracy. The parents of Lady Cora wife of Lord Grantham are said to be Jewish and there are several other references to family members having Jewish origins. So it’s been full of unexpected bonuses, catching all these references and linking them to Miles & Co’s papers. I mean, the writers could have easily hidden these connections…in fact…it’s almost as if they are gloating about the British aristocracy’s heritage being infiltrated by rich Jews.
I suppose the whole series could have been written with the sole purpose of propagandising the holocaust for a young, modern audience. But the whole exercise will serve one purpose for me, and that is, one way or another, confirming what I already know. They have been accurate and truthful so far. So lets wait and see how far they are willing to stick their necks out…..maybe the series will stop short of that sensitive area….who knows….no spoilers!
I don’t usually watch anything like Downton, but I certainly recommend it, especially for anyone who likes a period drama. I love watching Maggie Smith and Hugh Bonneville so I guess it was only a matter of time until I gave it a go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually really enjoyed that show. It was very humorous in parts as well, with a British humor that is rather difficult to pull off in my opinion. It’s not like Monty Python or Red Dwarf obviously, but just some really highbrow laughs. And cries. And it’s very well-written and acted across the board.
Some artistry still exists in this world. It’s not hard to find, if you keep your eyes peeled! 🙂
LikeLike
Lady Cora is Jewish? I missed that one. Well then, the series does have some spooky hidden depths. I enjoyed the series and the movie…and all that posh English totty 😉
LikeLike
I watched Downton but it always seems a PC version of Upstairs Downstairs, a classic in comparison.
There was a documentary on the BBC some time since about real servants from that era and I remember one posh numpty say the only thing she recalled vividly about those times was that the servants were smelly and dirty. The ‘experts’ for the period said servants were oft beaten by their masters, even in the 1920s, and the servants werent allowed to look at their employers and had to face the wall if they were walking down the same corridor!
LikeLike
It’s certainly been written with a modern audience in mind Lewis.
I think the characters and cast choices were better nailed down than in Upstairs Downstairs.
I lost interest quickly with that drama because it always seemed like you were watching ‘opening night’, the acting lacking credulity somehow.
Casting a Scot to play a Scot is always a good place to start but then asking that Scot to characterise a voice for the part often leads to failure. Gordon Jackson being a prime example. David Robb was a perfect choice for the Downton Doctor in my opinion. His part was utterly believable. It’s often better to stick with your own voice and concentrate on characteristics and body language and delivering your lines succinctly, than it is to fail miserably trying to remember how to create a fake voice series after series. Did you notice how Mary’s diction altered as time went on? No particular reason was apparent, but that characteristic vocal drone/drawl was lost and she developed an almost monarch-like plum-in-the-mouth voice more characteristic of Claire Foy in The Crown. Mary’s original voice was wonderful. If you listen carefully, both Cora and Edith picked up on that subtle drone and I believe unconsciously incorporated it into their own characters. If it was deliberate then it was very clever, and they deserve praise for delivering such accuracy.
Yes, I admit it, I watched The Crown. Claire Foy was superb, nay delicious, but there was something lacking in the support. Big names don’t necessarily make it work, but very careful cast selection can turn a good drama into a great drama. For an example Javier Bardem as Salazar in Dead Men Tell No Tails.
A truly spine tingling performance.
NADA:
“and all that posh English totty”
I wonder how often the chauffeur got a sample….in reality?
LikeLike
I beg to differ. There’s nothing there that strikes me as fine acting in Downton, just extensions of themselves. I’ve seen most of them in other programmes, and like The Duke playing the Roman Soldier at Calgary, they’re laughably limited at times, except maybe Maggie Smith, though of course Isis the dog who shone for me, he’s no ham like Hugh Bonnetvoice.
A greatgrandmother of mine was a cook for a Laird with a big estate, and my grandfather always said she was like Mrs Bridges, and always used to say never trust a skinny cook.
LikeLike
I just remembered this is the spooky thread, so getting back on topic (sorry Josh).
I wonder how many of the staff were spies Lewis, it being so easy for staff to spy on the family members? Lots of them were shown using loitering tactics to overhear conversations and witness dubious acts, which the staff then used, mainly, against each other to gain a position of power over their colleagues. But occasionally they would show a member of staff trying to blackmail a family member. The maid ‘Bevan, who tried to blackmail Mary after she witnessed her goings-on with Lord Gillingham. I would have thought someone snaring a high ranking family member in that way would disappear one foggy night!
I feel a bit of a study coming on. I’m wondering what the differences were between the English, Irish and Scottish aristocracy, you know, the finer details like staff pecking-orders and such like? Family member attitude toward staff etc.
LikeLike
In real life, the servants would have been too busy to do all that snooping unless they were actual agents. They worked very long hours in those times and only had half a day off a week. The upper classes had a disdain for the lower orders similar to Wellington’s attitude toward his own troops, Downton is blatant whitewashing of the elite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that it’s whitewashing of the elite, but some of the actors are really good – the servants, I should say. They aren’t acting elite at all, they are just acting like downtrodden, raped, mishandled people. I don’t find that to be an easy one to pull off – to express pain like the one lady does, so well and deeply. I don’t find the expression of pain easy to do, myself. It’s pretty hard to fabricate without some personal insight into the topic, you know?
I mean the Family in the show, they don’t really even have to act at all. I’m with you there, but those weren’t the actors I was thinking of that stood out. Though I do love the old dowager’s humor.
“Well if you’re going to act an American about it, I shall go DOWNSTAIRS!”
LikeLike
@Russell Taylor: I came across this page last week:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Rebellion_of_1641
This is one of the best pages I found out-lining the ‘hierarchy ‘you are talking about, at least when it comes to the British Isles. You get a feel for about 1000 years of Spook vs. Spook conflict here and related pages.
“The roots of the 1641 rebellion lay in the failure of the English State in Ireland to assimilate the native Irish elite in the wake of the Elizabethan conquest and plantation of the country. The pre-Elizabethan Irish population is usually divided into the “Old (or Gaelic) Irish”, and the Old English, or descendants of medieval Norman settlers. [so not native Irish either] These groups were historically antagonistic, with English settled areas such as the Pale around Dublin, south Wexford, and other walled towns being fortified against the rural Gaelic clans.[1]
By the seventeenth century, the cultural divide between these groups, especially at elite social levels, was declining. Many Old English lords not only spoke the Irish language, but extensively patronised Irish poetry and music, and have been described as Hiberniores Hibernis ipsis (“More Irish than the Irish themselves”). Intermarriage was also common. Moreover, in the wake of the Elizabethan conquest, the native population became defined by their shared religion, Roman Catholicism, in distinction to the new Church of England and Church of Scotland of settlers, and the officially Protestant (Church of Ireland) English administration in Ireland. During the decades between the end of the Elizabethan wars of re-conquest in 1603 and the outbreak of rebellion in 1641, the political position of the wealthier landed Irish Catholics was increasingly threatened by the English government of Ireland.[2] “
LikeLike
The Maunder Minimum started roughly 1640 after a cooling trend over the previous 20 years. So it looks to me like good timing, causing massive unrest followed by political, religious and land ownership changes, just in time for the next dark period of starvation and disease induced death (population control to conserve food for the aristocracy?). Temperatures were falling rapidly and crops were failing by around 1630 then there was a further dump in temperature right around 1640.
The Irish Rebellion was right at the very start of the Maunder Minimum which continued for roughly 70 years.
“The summer of 1641 was the third coldest recorded over the past six centuries in Europe and the winter of 1641–1642 was the coldest ever recorded in Scandinavia.”
“The Maunder Minimum did not cause all the catastrophes alone during the 17th century, but it most certainly exacerbated many of them. Outbreaks of disease, especially smallpox and plague, erupted as was the case during the previous episode that saw the Black Plague wipe out 50% of the population. Plagues correlate to periods when harvests are poor or have failed. When an uprising by Irish Catholics on October 23, 1641, drove the Protestant minority from their homes, no one had foreseen a severe cold snap with heavy frost and snow in a place that rarely has snow. Thousands of Protestants died of exposure, turning a political protest into a massacre that cried out for vengeance. Oliver Cromwell would later use that episode to justify his brutal campaign to restore Protestant supremacy in Ireland. This was the period of the British Civil War with the Puritans beheading Catholic King Charles I.”
source:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/maunder-minimum-petri-dish-of-political-change/
LikeLike
Downton, where all the lights are bright
Downton, waiting for you tonight
Downton, you’re going to be all right now…
The comedy ‘You Rang M’Lord’ is more realistic than Downton, tho’ not as funny.
LikeLike
Nice find, Matt! Just blatant as all heck, too.
LikeLike
three times i tried to post a comment concerning the phoenix currency of 1888 and three times it failed : one time, it disappeared when i did “post comment”, one time it was awaiting moderation, but was never edited and last time deleted.
why ?
what is wrong with that post ?
LikeLike
Josh is “on the road” at the moment. I think. Don’t quote me on that. I was never here…
LikeLike
Hi Mantalo,
Your post was twice sent to moderation. Not sure what happened the third time — maybe it went to spam, which I haven’t checked in ages. I do not know why it went to moderation twice. To be blunt, I can tell you that I did not publish it because it seemed like nonsensical babble to me. I couldn’t make heads or tails of it. I have noticed that you have a tendency towards very free association when it comes to words. Sometimes this might lead you to interesting places, but sometimes it really just comes across as nonsense. Such was the case with that comment. There was another one a few weeks ago that also went to moderation that I didn’t agree to post for the same reason. Honestly, there are probably other posts of yours I would not have approved had they first gone to moderation for the same reason. Just because some part of one word vaguely sounds like or reminds you of another word does not mean there’s any connection between them or any meaning to them.
LikeLike
Thank you Josh for your reply.
I know that I am just an anonymous guest on your forum, and that I don’t have to criticize your choices but I thought that here, at least, I could express myself freely.
You say I make combinations of words that lead to nonsense and that my comments are “nonsensical babbling” … it’s very critical of you and not very nice. I imagined more tolerance, since we serve the same cause.
I may have misunderstood the purpose of your forum, but to follow it from the beginning, I felt that people were free to post their thoughts and that no one judged as long as we remained polite .
And I sincerely believed to do like other contributors: look for links, correspondences, follow the track, etc. with my own way of understanding…
Obviously I’m wrong in some links analysis, I do not have the infused science, sometimes I’m right, sometimes I’m wrong.
But given the mass of nonsenses that was posted on the different topics by the different contributors, I thought that I could also post my “point of view”.
So, I did not know that the contributions had to be serious, obligatorily effective, and to include only rational reasonings.
However, if I want to make a link between the global currency announced in 1988 by The Economist and the worldwide tool called i-phone X (whose name is a perfect anagram of phoenix), where is the problem ? and where have I wrong?
Explain to me, where is my error in this combination of words?
Why am I wrong when I translate a word from English to French and then from French to English? Are we not allowed to do this ?
What are the rules of intelligent reasoning that you oppose to my insane babbling?
Thank you for your constructive and necessary explanations.
I would be sad if you don’t allow me to write here 😦
as i’m not a troll.
LikeLike
Hi Mantalo,
You haven’t been disinvited from posting here. At minimum, just please try to make sure your comments makes sense. I think that’s a pretty low bar. Of course, I’m sure that your comment made sense to you, so I guess I should say try to make sure that your comment will make sense to others. Here I will reprint your comment in its entirety so everyone else will know what we’re talking about. It was in response to Matt’s comment about the old Economist article predicting a single world currency in 2018:
we didn’t get a world currency called Phoenix in 2018, because it was a joke
currency = devise
devise = motto
motto = blague
blague = joke
but in 2017, one year ahead of schedule, we got the i-phone X 🙂
another way to control people
another way pun-cturing them”
LikeLike
Of course, you are right, i go straight on to my way of thinking. I should explain with more details.
I mean that we made a mistake by believing the « Une » of the Economist and that we should understand it differently.
1) The famous Economist belongs to Rothschilds (100%). 1rst clue.
2) In 1988, it announced the arrival of a single world currency called Phoenix. I’m french, i need to translate « currency » to be sure of what it means. The google translator give me currency = « devise » and also gives me another sens : motto https://translate.google.com/?hl=fr#view=home&op=translate&sl=en&tl=fr&text=currency
3) I don’t know what is a « motto », so i translated « devise » from french to english. https://translate.google.com/?hl=fr#view=home&op=translate&sl=fr&tl=en&text=devise
4) Then, i learned that the french « devise » has 2 senses in english : currency and motto and that « motto » has also 2 senses : currency and joke that is « blague » in french.
5) At this moment, i feel that we were misunderstanding the message by taking it to the 1st degree. That it must have, as usual, a hidden sens… but which one ?
6) Some days later, i was speaking about I-phone with one friend who knows perfectly the schedule of the releases of I-Phone. He told me that there was no I-phone 9, the I-phone X being released in 2017… and i realized that Apple jump from 8 to 10 in the numbering of I-phones.
7) As i made the Mathis School, i say : »oh, ace and eight » and i notice that it was not 10, it was the latin number « X »… and that this strange new I-phone arrived one year before the alleged world currency.
8) Then, i questionned : why X and not 10 ? my iphone isn’t an i-phone IV, it’s an i-phone 4.
9) Then i made 1 + 1… i-phone X is anagram of phoenix, a perfect anagram… 🙂
10) It was the proof that the announced « currency » was not about money, but about the world control by the smart phones.
11) But as the smart phones and the subscriptions cost one arm, i realized that our dear leaders made double blow : we are volonteers to spend our money to buy a tool that allowed to control us, our mind, our time, our lives. No need to a single world currency that will call to revolt, as would single world religion, single world government., etc.
12) No, at the place, we buy smart phones, I-phone X, ( and here, i use the phonetic, as i like to do : hi phoenix, high phoenix).
It was what i wanted to share with you.
Do you really think it is nonsensical babbling ?
Tell me where i got wrong ? i will accept if i made a mistake.
LikeLike
Thanks for the explanation, Mantalo. I think the iPhone X as a kind of Phoenix is a neat insight. As I said I think your exercises in free association sometimes lead to good insights. And that would be one. I don’t know that it has anything to do with the Economist prediction. I would have expected them to get the timing right, but who knows? Maybe there’s something to it. Certainly the mainstream explanation for why they skipped the iPhone 9 didn’t make a lick of sense.
Digital payment systems are becoming extremely popular. They serve(d) as the backbone of China’s Orwellian social credit system. They are not dependent on the iphone, obviously, nor are they universal. But they’re off to an incredible start and are catching on like wildfire.
The part that sounded like nonsense was the apparent mistranslation of various words. Of course you didn’t really say they were translations, so it was a bunch of unintelligible equalities between things that don’t seem to be remotely related. Thanks for taking the time to break it down. It seems to me that google translate led you astray on this one, though, as Benjamin pointed out.
I apologize if I offended you. I wish this could be a totally free and open forum for expressing whatever we want. But unfortunately the reality of the situation is such that we must be constantly on guard for people coming here trying to gum up the works, in one way or another. To give a few examples, it could be by leading us down fruitless rabbit holes, distracting us with endless debates that never go anywhere, or simply posting nonsense to make us all look bad and blackwash intelligent commentary. So while I could see some value in what you wrote about the iphone, the rest of it…well, not so much.
LikeLike
I think Mantalo is onto something, even if it is as lame as another phoeny pun or as insidious as a smart-device being the real one-world medium of exchange. Smart thinking.
The jump from 8 to 10 and the Phone-X renaming, seem too much for coincidence given what we now know.
LikeLike
I agree — Phone-X seems too much of a coincidence given what we now know.
LikeLike
From the Wiki on Motorola DynaTAC – the first commercially available cell phone series (1983 – 1994):
“The first cellular phone was the culmination of efforts begun at Bell Labs, which first proposed the idea of a cellular system in 1947, and continued to petition the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for channels through the 1950s and 1960s, and research conducted at Motorola.”
So, here’s our timeline:
1947 – first proposal for a cellular system
1983 – first commercially available cell phone
1988 – The Economist announces a future world currency 30 years from now
2017 – iPhone X released (November 3)
30 years from The Economist’s publication date, January 9, 1988, is January 9, 2018. The iPhone X released 67 days prior to January 9, 2018.
My question is, at what point in the timeline did they know they had a device that would become a global “currency?”
LikeLike
it depends on how many years of technological advance they keep far from the knowledge of ordinary mortals.
what do we know about hidden research centers that would be at the cutting edge of technology?
probably nothing.
they could have 100 years of innovation to drop us, drop by drop, and we might just as well ignore it.
it is necessary that the billions of dollars pumped by rivers in the global transit serve for something, no ?
LikeLike
also we have to remember that in 1949, orwell announced big brother (is watching you) for 1984.
he was writing this (not so) dystopia during 1947 and 1948, I guess.
it matches perfectly with the 1947 and 1983 that you bring in the timeline
and if 1983/84 was the birth of big brother, he is now adulte… 35 or 36 years.
too young to be presbyopic 😦
LikeLike
It’s an anagram for Phoenix. I don’t know if that’s a coincidence or not, but it sure is interesting either way.
LikeLike
I think Mantalo is spot on that i phone x = phoenix, and that it was done on purpose. But the rest is bad translation. Motto in English is no synonym of Currency, so it is rather odd that is where the translator took you.
Currency is money.
Motto is a saying, phrase, adage, proverb, etc…
As the iphone is not used as money, I think we can safely say it is not the new/future world currency. Everyone is still using notes and coins, last time I checked.
LikeLike
Windows also jumped from 8 to 10 if I remember well
LikeLike
“Windows also jumped from 8 to 10 if I remember well”
Wasn’t that 8.1 – aces & eights Roelf?
Benjamin:
“As the iphone is not used as money, I think we can safely say it is not the new/future world currency.”
It made me think of the future of internet banking, and something I read about an app on your phone connecting with a server in the supermarket, so your phone can automatically connect with your online bank account to pay for your goods, without the need for cash, wallet, purse, credit cards, gems, feathers, cattle or other means to pay.
Considering almost everyone connected to the matrix has a cell-phone, this could be a means to an end…..an end to general cash anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watched an episode of Inspector Morse last night and in one scene he (Morse) endeavoured to stop the cctv video he was watching at: 11:22:30, 22 June 1995.
LikeLike
After reading through the historical research of Miles and others, has the question ever occurred to you why there is such a close association between the Phoenicians and textiles? They have become almost synonymous and a near certain marker. Okay, the banking angle we get, but is the textile angle mere happenstance? E. Michael Jones was interviewed on Red Ice Radio (“The Religion of Greta Thunberg” 10/23/1029, see link below). He was commenting on the lack of development in East Africa, and backed into the answer (timecode 45:50):
“Clothing, cloth is the basis for every economy that ever developed in the world. It was the basis for Florence moving into a money economy. It was the basis for Germany in the 16th Century, England in the 18th Century, America in the 19th Century, and China and Japan in the 20th Century. You can’t get development without producing basic things like cloth. Cloth is the main engine driving development here. So what happened here? The politicians in East Africa woke up to the fact, they banned the importation of used clothing. Good, that’s a good idea, that a good use of tariffs. That exactly what the United States and Germany did in the 19th Century to keep out cheap English cotton. What happened then? The Jewish rag pickers in New Jersey complained to the Treasury Department, and Mr. Mnuchin, he then threatened them with sanctions, economic sanctions, and all of the East African countries except Rwanda backed down.”
Bonus: If you’re wondering why Rwanda was the exception, that country has been wholly owned by Intel and their pet dictator/monster Paul Kagame since the 1994 genocide of the Tutsi by the Hutu. Except—surprise!—it was the Tutsi genociding the Hutu and also the moderate Tutsi who might have objected to such a thing. About the only piece of evidence you’ll need to show this is that Kagame, in power since the genocide (and probably forever after the 2015 referendum where 98% of the electorate voted to exempt him from term limits) is himself a Tutsi.
Double bonus: Paul Rusesabagina, the hero of the movie “Hotel Rwanda” as portrayed by Don Cheadle and set during the time of the genocide, has since fled the country and has described it as a “big open prison” and that, “There is no free man in that country.” Lest you think he’s simply a tribalist, Rusesabagina’s father is Hutu and his mother and wife are Tutsi. I suspect his fall from grace rather has something to do with his failure to refrain from going around saying inconvenient truths aloud.
https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-religion-of-greta-thunberg
LikeLike
New Miles paper up about the fake assassination of Olof Palme –
http://mileswmathis.com/palme.pdf
LikeLike
That’s true…..I mean fake….I mean….erm!
LikeLike
as his third surname is Joachim, i thought that his children were called rain, river and summer palme
🙂
but no
LikeLike
Wasn’t there a Mrs Palme and her five daughters?
LikeLike
it was a Mrs PalmeR…
🙂
LikeLike
I don’t know about you, but he totally got me with that title. Hook, line and sinker. “Finally!” I thought
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yah, he got me too.
LikeLike
Good one, Miles. My initial thought before clicking on it was “is this for real?”
LikeLike
I thought I caught a glimpse of Roman Polanski in one of those Kings…
https://postimg.cc/gallery/qz09e9gi/
LikeLike
Lol. I’ve identified twin hair-dos again 😉
LikeLike
Max born was Olivia NEWTON john’s grandfather of course.
LikeLike
The name Sporberg reminded me of Spongebob Squarepants, which was created by Stephen Hillenburg. His bio makes little sense for a normal person, but makes total sense for a spook baby.
Couldn’t find any links to Sporberg on his genealogy posted on geni.com (they usually don’t make it that easy I think), but on his material side it goes all the way back to the Vests.
https://www.geni.com/people/Moses-Vest/6000000010610653384
LikeLike
Oops should have been Sporborg, but really at this point I can bet I’m still right with their constant tendency to shuffle up their names.
But Moses Vest birthed a John Valentine. I’m assuming Valentine and maybe West is what we’re looking for, which Valentine shows up in his Palme paper (see pg. 6), and Vest is some sort of placer like Blank. Can’t find any info on his ‘Veste’ family of Switzerland from quick internet searches.
I had no intention of writing this today.. I just watched way too many Spongbob episodes over the weekend and just now stumbled into this. The world is very small at the top..
LikeLike
Moses Vest Geni account is managed by Ken Bates, any relation to Bo Diddley, the Spencers, Dunhams, Frys, etc?
LikeLike
Likely.
Again I always post too soon and missed the juicey nugget.
West = Warr/Ware.
Where was Hillenburg born? Lawton, OK. Who was it named after? Major General Henry Ware Lawton. So Hillenburg is 100% spook baby. Very spooky town too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawton,_Oklahoma#Notable_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ware_Lawton
The Wares of course are top ranking banksters.
LikeLike
Star of the The Mozart Brothers, Loa Falkman, was born interestingly on 24.7.47.
The name Palme made me think on ‘Palme d’Or’, and looking thru the winners, there’s only two (yep, not even 8, 11, or 22) movies I would watch again, namely The Third Man and MASH.
‘Who do you love?’ came on my mp3 player in the car today as I drove to work, by the Woolies from Nuggets, its opening line is: ‘I walk 47 miles of barbed wire’. Written by Bo Diddley aka Ellas Otha Bates. Otha? A fudge on Offa, the Saxon king who had a dyke, but that’s another story.
LikeLike
“A fudge on Offa, the Saxon king who had a dyke, but that’s another story.”
A great walk!
LikeLike
A cake walk? I think not! 😉
LikeLike
Vex has an interesting new article at his site:
https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2019/10/31/minix-the-most-widely-used-operating-system-in-the-world/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed, it was a nice post and definitely informative. I disagree with a couple technical things but that’s honestly likely just my bias towards AMD, which should be purely for financial reasons but it is what it is. He’s not wrong, but in the case of AMD only a few of their CPUs have the little ARM coprocessor and it’s not nearly the same thing as Intel’s obvious spooky shit. It may SEEM similar, and spooky, but it’s not AS spooky.
But the truth is these 7-nanometer chips are so fucking tiny there’s no real way to know what is or isn’t on them, without a serious microscope. So my AMD “fanboy” status isn’t really helpful here and proves nothing. Vex is correct. These devices are made with backdoors aplenty, especially modern cell phones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d be glad to learn new things and consequently update my post. Can you post these tech issues and further reply at my blog, please?
You say only a few AMD CPUs have ARM processor in-built. Specifically, it’s Cortex-A5 we’re talking about here and according to AMD news section I won’t link to here, they’ve been in cohorts and onboard with Cortex-A5 ever since 2014, announcing such move as early as in 2012. So only AMD CPUs older than 2014 exist possibly without any onboard co-processor. They call this CPU as “upgrade”, naming it APU – Advanced Processing Unit, which has its “Trustzone” powered by Cortex-A5 -> in simple words, AMD has both CPU and second CPU packed as APU. You can find these in mobiles, XBox and PS4 for instance, as well as on business servers and home PCs with brand name Radeon (raid on?). Not as spooky? Well, consider this: AMD’s equivalent to Intel’s ME is so-called Trustzone, developed by Trustonic Inc. It runs powered by ARM Cortex-A5 and is attached to AMD’s CPU. While there are some details known about mechanism of Intel’s ME, there’re absolutely no details known about Trustzone. That’s right, nothing. Based only on this, I think there’s an obvious winner here in terms of spookiness and it isn’t Intel, my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for that Vexman. My IT/gaming son thinks the sun shines out of AMD’s collective butts. I told him they are no more trustworthy than Intel but he thinks every conspiracy theory is promoted by insane people soooo…..
My own AMD processor is around 7 or 8 years old now so should be safe….’ish!
LikeLike
Thinking about Miles’ many connections to Halloween, it is known as The Spookiest Time of Year!
LikeLike
That’s the thing, Vex: only AMD CPUs (Central Processing Unit) with the built-in AMD Radeon GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) classify as APUs (Advanced Processor Units) at all. Regular, standalone-CPUs (such as all the Bulldozer/Piledriver and newer Zen cores are) don’t have GPUs and are not APUs. They aren’t Systems-on-a-Chip, they are just the main chip. You HAVE to add in a separate graphics card to even see them start up at all.
So for example, I have one single A8 4-core APU in my old TV-PC. For layfolk, that’s a 4-core CPU coupled with a built-in Radeon GPU chip for the graphics, which in this case has been disabled and replaced by an Nvidia GTX-750TI anyway. It’s been defunct and down for quite awhile, and I built it too look like a Home Theater receiver. It was only intended to play movies/shows and light games on this old plasma TV which is beautiful. See the little tiny silver guy at the bottom of my TV stand, next to the battery backup?
So the ARM interconnect chip was effectively disabled the whole time I used that computer, anyway.
On the left (big gunmetal gray box) we have an 8-core (42) Bulldozer FX-8120 and on the right (smaller, gamer-looking black box) another 8-core (42) Piledriver FX-8350 – which is the one I’m using here at home primarily, though both are always on for network rendering. These are both older models but they run great. These are NOT APUs. They do NOT have any embedded ARM sub/coprocessor. These are FX cores and not the much newer, more powerful and efficient Zen cores from the last three years – which puts us at before 2016. The ‘Dozer is from like 2014 if I recall.
And while a sub/coprocessor might SEEM fishy and spooky, we have no reason at all to believe these ARM chips have access to anything flowing through the actual CPU/memory at all, since those ARM chips were built as interconnects between the CPU/GPU combo that makes up the “APU”. They aren’t the same monster as the Intel-ME situation – not necessarily.
So while we are wise to distrust things, you really only have two choices and AMD is by far the better, cheaper, more powerful, and more efficient choice. Macs don’t have this option – they are Intel-only and every Mac was always compromised, ever. AMD chips are better, cleaner, and more powerful once again (though it’s not always been the case) with their new Zen architecture. ARM isn’t even a player at this level. They never have been and likely never will. ARM isn’t a chip manufacturer anyway, they only license DESIGNS to others to build, such as Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, and Huawei. It’s not the same thing.
A single core of ARM’s best chip is still roughly 1/64th as powerful as a single Zen core, Intel core, or about 1/16th of a Radeon/Nvidia core for graphics. They’re intended for low-power mobile use and are very weak in comparison. So I don’t really find AMD using a cheap ARM-chip controller in some of their chips to really be much of a threat at all. The main CPU could just do that anyway using like 1/512th its capacity and never even registering in Taskman. AMD likely jammed a few of those ARM controller chips into their cheapest line (the APUs are literally their cheapest chips) just to save some manufacturing costs on those.
And all THAT was before the Infinity Fabric interconnects that the Zen cores are using now, which are vastly superior to their older, copper interconnects. Germanium is a very potent material and has not only great conductivity but switches very rapidly too. It’s an amazing atom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
According to the Libreboot FAQ, co-processor is built into anything Family 16h and newer (released mid-2013). Theoretically, that means Jaguar, Puma, Zen and beyond according to the Wikipedia’s “List of AMD microprocessors” page, but the Wikipedia “Puma” (microarchitecture) page claims that “Support for ARM TrustZone via integrated Cortex-A5 processor” in the “Improvements over Jaguar” list, so I’m not sure whether it was in the earliest Family 16h chips. Which also means that Zen family IS compromised with the ARM chip.
I don’t know and couldn’t find sources about what models of older family’s CPU’s have Cortex-A5 onboard. Bulldozer was launched in 2012 if I remember correctly, so it may actually lack Cortex-A5.
I don’t trust any information released about this issue by AMD or Intel.
LikeLike
R T (Russell Tropinski) and I went over this quite heavily in emails and bashed the numbers about. All it really means is that Intel is for sure Intelligence, and AMD is likely also intelligence but less monitored, possibly. I’m not saying either are secure. But if you’re gonna get spied on, might wanna spend less on a better chip and at least save some money. It’s a fucked up thing to even consider – on the one hand, Intel is straight TELLING you they’re CIA but on the other hand, AMD at least gives you some financial break for choosing them. Probably both CIA, just the usual controlled misdirection to make us (me, here) feel better about getting pillaged and looted.
LikeLike
It should be an open secret by now that any computer or chip is loaded with backdoors. Most of modern spying seems to be more about efficiency and storage, as there still has to be an agent and human being on the other end making a decision about it. We always lived in a world with our communications compromised somewhere down the line. Reading about how the ancients could unseal letters and re-seal without noticeable tampering, uh, sealed the deal for me. The Lockingpicking Lawyers videos on YT are also an entertaining example of how most locks today have built-in, easily by-passable flaws.
What frightens me more is the ‘normalization’ of this new tech world. Face it, cell phones aren’t going away anytime soon. The way I see people depend on them now (especially kids) is astonishing. I certainly depended on mine during my weekend in Denver. I even boarded the plane using a digital ticket on my phone screen.
See here for another example. “Cashierless” Amazon Go store. After you check in with your phone, you can just walk in and out with your stuff.
The ceilings are loaded with sensors of all types. Face-scanners I’m sure too. See 2:14. Everything in the name of convenience, eh?
“You are your ID” said the TSA posters at the airport.
But we/our kids will need to learn how to adapt to this new 24-7 tracking future-world. It’s like they want a tiered society where “approved” citizens get easier access to all the tech goodies, and the plebs are left in the dust. Standing at the airport security theater line forever while TSA ‘Pre-checks” got through the line faster sure made me feel that way.
I for one welcome a techno-barbarian future where folks can fabricate their own chips in their basements.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read a story about someone in China who jaywalked and immediately got a fine deducted from the electronics payment app on his phone. The facial recognition cameras identified him.
LikeLike
Jared I’ve never emailed you in my life, that I can remember. I don’t even know your address — are you really having conversations with someone who claims to be me? Maybe it’s the other Russell here and you recalled incorrectly? That’s spooking me.
LikeLike
Sorry R_T, I was confused. It was Alan Ackley that I had those conversations with. I don’t know how I mixed it up.
LikeLike
Alright, I did a bit more research to verify things in this subthread.
First, R_T it was actually Alan Ackles I figured out that we’d had an email discussion about this topic quite some time ago, back in October of 2018. We went into great detail on the topic, which is how I was confident addressing Vexman’s analysis here at all.
Second, @Vexman I definitely AM biased, but not a paid shill or whatever. I just actually believe the AMD chips to be superior at this point, based on how they perform VS the cost for that performance. BUT! And this is a big one, I don’t really belive AMD is any better or less spooky than Intel. I’m positive they’re both owned by the same Tyrant family assholes we’ve been uncovering (or, for me, watching along as you guys uncover) the whole time.
So my premise here would be:
A) ARM isn’t a chip manufacturer – they only license cheap, efficient designs to OTHER players such as Apple, Cortex, Samsung, etc.
B) The ARM co-processor in-question is nowhere to be found on AMD’s big-dog chips, from Bulldozer on forward to now, the Ryzen 3 architecture. Here’s a very detailed explanation:
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/microarchitectures/zen
Now we can take THAT with a grain of salt, but the point is these Zen-3 chips are already smaller at 7nm than the ARM chip that was in use on certain ones as the co-processor/backdoor in question. So it can’t exactly hide – it was way bigger. Especially on the 4-core Ryzen chips – it would have been BIGGER than any of those 4 cores. There’s really nowhere TO hide it.
Even when we go up the line to their (amazingly powerful) 32-core chips, we really don’t have any room ON the die for the ARM co-processor. It’s over twice as large as the Zen cores here at 7nm.
C) That ARM co-processor in question is so laughably inferior to these shiny new Zen3 cores that it would be absolutely superflous. ARM chips are, by design, low-budget, low-power-consumption, weak-ass chips meant for cell phones and whatnot – and even ONE Zen core is more powerful than any single or multi-core ARM Cortex CPU core. Quick math puts one Zen core at about 6 ARM Cortex cores of the same era, in general – if not 8 ARM cores.
So my premise would be the ARM cores would be superflous, they can’t fit on the chip anyway, and if anyone wanted/needed a backdoor it would already BE there in the form of an actual, regular Zen core. This doesn’t give AMD a pass – all I’m saying is ARM is not really a factor here and it would cost MORE to make the chips to even use their shitty, shoddy chip designs here. And yet the AMD chips undercut Intel chips at every level. So they can’t really cost more to make and still do so at a profit, which gives us another reason ARM isn’t involved here. That angle is simply unnecessary in my opinion.
If the spoops want to spy, they don’t even need shit happening at the CPU level – they just go through Windows or iOS or Android or whatever anyway – since all these Operating Systems are owned by them in the first place.
I completely agree that all our hardware is potentially and easily compromised. Absolutely, Vex. I just wanted to clarify the technical side of it because I’m a nerd.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We might disagree on Zen family chips. According to everything written at the link you provided, https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/microarchitectures/zen#Security , Cortex-A5 is incorporated “into their server-class Zen processors (e.g., EPYC)”.
Here’s a slide from another link, showing the position of co-processor within the Zen SoC:
From another source (https://tinyurl.com/yaezh5vc), written in June 2017:
“For years AMD’s processors for business PCs supported additional security technologies (collectively known as AMD Secure Processor and Platform Security Processor before that) enabled by the ARM TrustZone platform with the ARM Cortex-A5 core.”
Technically, you don’t need a GPU in addition to a CPU to have SoC. All you need is a small micro-controller instead 🙂 In any case, this micro-controller / co-processor doesn’t have to be any kind of computing monster to perform the tasks it was installed for. It needs to i.e. access some memory slot or HDD data and send it to the mothership. Or just open up a TCP/IP port so somebody can do remotely whatever needs to be done. The essence here is not about the efficiency or computing power of such ARM chip, it’s about the stealth access to anything inside your PC without you noticing it. Even after you have “protected” yourself with tons of firewalls, proxies, encryption, and whatnot.
Anyway, all above is just a technical detail about the hardware. Like you mentioned earlier, they don’t need this kind of exploit to access data on most devices. Modern OSs are already full of exploits and backdoors so any of your data is already exposed to possible abuse. The only safe solutions are not connecting outwards or even better – not storing / saving digitally anything important at all.
A short personal experience with Windows 7: During 2007/8 I used to play a video game that required connecting to some servers to join it. I didn’t care about disconnecting after I finished. Some time passed by before I noticed strange activity going on so I took my laptop to my friend who’s a computer geek. We were shocked with what we found in my system: there was a French version of Win7 installed within my Win 7 system, and this newly installed OS took absolute control over my device and documents. I couldn’t move, copy, delete and / or change permissions on any file at all – they digitally disowned me from anything on my laptop. The solution was ugly: I lost quite some content which was not backed-up since the last backup – pictures, business files, projects, etc. It also made me refrain from accessing / joining any online game server ever again. So I take it as a positive experience since it helped me escape from spending countless hours on a video game back then and now. Maybe it was a part of my waking up too. Using all that technology inside a laptop just for fun is really a big waste of resources, besides being dangerous in terms of opening system’s ports to unknown entities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I sit corrected about the A5 on the Epyc chips, and we can assume I was incorrect on the others since it turns outthe A5 is much smaller than I thought, physically. It’s BUILT on a much larger architecture (24nm-40nm for the older ones) but it’s still smaller than the 7nm Zen chips, because it has nowhere near the transistors. It’s not meant for that, as you said. It’s an MMU “Memory Management Unit” design that is very similar to the ones Intel uses. So, effectively does the same shit.
The single core:
And a quad-core variant:
Contrast this with the diemap you posted and we can see a huge size difference. The A5 is just a tiny cluster surrounded by AMD’s ridiculous Zen setup.
I did say I was biased towards AMD, but I have no problem admitting I was wrong. Thanks for plugging away on this one Vex and keeping me in line! 🙂
LikeLike
I feel you on the bias issue. Been there, done that 🙂 I’ll put some bits of this into an update. Information on AMD’s co-processor is even more obscure than Intel’s, so any additional piece of puzzle is welcome.
Did you know previously about the MINIX OS? I didn’t and was completely surprised learning about it. But it makes sense in the military / intel angle: the internet is their invention so controlling it was figured long ago. When they chose to release it to the public, free data exchange was offered as a bait and another miracle, while the intention was to know what is exchanged. At the same time, chip building was theirs too. Add to this list operating systems as they were owned by the same stooges since inception. As high-tech progressed, so did the control mechanisms. We have learned elsewhere that they always control the narrative. Also, they always seem to be one (or few) step(s) ahead. Following that logic, it’s very likely to be the same about the internet – it was never about secure anything, that’s only an illusion we chose to believe as true.
If you’re into IT tech, read this pdf, it’s about the way every router ever produced is programmed to “report” to the D.o.D IP via a hidden network. It basically means, D.o.D. has ability to “listen” to anything that comes and/or goes from your home network and access it remotely if needed. It only proves control mechanisms are multi leveled across all devices and platforms in the communication link.
LikeLike
I forgot the link: https://we.tl/t-MzCbYplStM
LikeLike
@Vexman: After reading that document and doing some research, this reads like some sort of limited hangout. Not saying any of this isn’t true though, but this reads like some Spy v. Spy shenanigans.
On pg. 35, the authors recommend TCPCRYPT, and claim the NSA has been trying to shut this down as they claim it provides ‘true native end-to-end encryption’. Or “almost” according to their website. Things start to get spoopy once you check out their About Us section.
http://www.tcpcrypt.org/aboutus.php
All these cats are part of or affiliated with the Stanford research group, Stanford Secure Computer Systems.
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/
Their Star of David is crooked.
Anyways, checking out their bios, they all worked for Apple, Intel, Google, SpaceX, etc. Their funding page gives it away:
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/funding.html
“Some research is made possibly by gifts from Google.” What does that even mean? Also isn’t Google owned by Alphabet Inc, an NSA/CIA front? Seriously, why is this Full Disclosure document, which is warning us about NSA backdoors, also recommending we check out TCPCRYPT as a solution, which was also funded by the NSA?! Not to mention the funding by DARPA and the NSF also listed here. What is this mickey mouse shit?
I read a maxim a long time ago, that said, “Never trust anything that you didn’t code yourself.” Agreed.
LikeLike
@Philip
Nothing should be taken at face value, that’s for sure.
Here’s just a short analysis of what your reply means to me. On one hand, I could read that file in the same way you did – skimming though it and then trying to find anticipated red flags. Nothing wrong with that, just to be clear. What may be wrong with such approach, is ignoring the essence of their writing regarding any wifi router out there. Are you willing to ignore the hidden setup of your router no matter what red flag you find? Well, nothing wrong with your choice in this case, but mine was different.
On the other hand, if you didn’t check their claims first, you’re missing the point of their paper, no matter how many red flags you believe you’ve found. The truth in their paper worth following is that your router’s a piece of spying equipment until de-programmed. So I assume you didn’t check your router as per their suggestions. If you did, you’d find it’s true and that fact alone would outshadow all possible red flags.
There are grains of truth in every limited hangout, it only depends whether you find such truths worth following or not. The biggest red flag about this whole document is not some encryption tool linked to in the text. This whole issue about routers being pre-programmed to spy was first mentioned by Snowden. That should make you as suspicious as you can get. But then again, what if it’s true? Don’t you find it important enough to get to the truth about it? Are you willing to ignore your router spying on you just because the wrong kind of guy pointed to it? I don’t get such logic, but I can live with it.
Knowing about MINIX makes all this look like a joke, really. No matter what you may do to hide your tracks, your device has a hardware backdoor into the system you’re using on your device. So no encryption is going to help you hide some piece of information as your encryption key is owned from the start.
“Never trust anything that you didn’t code yourself” . So very true. Start applying this rule first to your router’s firmware 🙂
LikeLike
“Are you willing to ignore your router spying on you just because the wrong kind of guy pointed to it?”
That’s the mechanism behind blackwashing isn’t it? The double bluff?
My son seems to think that there are no back-doors and it’s all conspiracy nonsense.
LikeLike
That’s some heavy allegation right there.
I’d like to talk about facts only. Since you’re relying on your son’s claims, please provide details of his verification: what router was used in his test, what firmware did it operate on, type of connection, how did he access EPROM,, some screenshots of routing tables before and after connection cable was plugged in, etc. Or even better, a video of complete procedure which made him conclude there’s no side routing going on.
Only then can we talk about facts. Until then it’s only a word of mouth. With all respect, what you offered here isn’t enough to back up your allegations of blackwashing, don’t you think?
I linked to that document as a side evidence that each piece of hardware has it’s own exploits. Which implies multiple levels of control over data flow. Don’t you find that reasonable, considering factual evidence of extra processor controlling your PC/device and its own OS called MINIX?
LikeLike
“Since you’re relying on your son’s claims, please provide details of his verification.”
I don’t rely on anything my son says Vex’. He’s been a successful gamer for about 12 years and builds his own gaming computers. Got an IT diploma but seems to think he knows all there is to know computer-wise.
I am with you totally on the back door spy angle.
I asked him if he could add anything to the conversation but almost got insulted.
Also the blackwashing was aimed at the “wrong guy” you mentioned, not you.
I just see that someone taking blackwashing and turning it on it’s head, who happens to seem untrustworthy to start with, reminds me of a double-bluff. Do you see?
LikeLike
Yes, I get your point now 🙂
Share this lik with your son https://routersecurity.org/bugs.php , I’m 100% sure he can learn something new there…
LikeLike
Thanks Vex’. Link sent. But I have a funny feeling that it might be about as useful as a Welsh phrase book is to a Gerbil. One can but try….
LikeLike
Boyo, have you never heard of Welsh Gerbils, see?
I learned Welsh through repeated viewings of Zulu. And yes, I now assume that battle was a load of crock.
LikeLike
“Boyo, have you never heard of Welsh Gerbils, see?”
I read where Gerbils can’t produce enough phlegm to pronounce the place names properly, so get well and truly lost when on holiday there.
LikeLike
PS 11 Victoria Crosses awarded. Wink. Wink. Wink. Nudge. Nudge. Nudge. Nudge. Eh? Eh? Gaddammit, I loved that movie as a phoeny-traumatized kid. Heck, it is still good as a piece of fiction about a piece of fiction, I suppose. And the soundtrack is superlative.
PPS I used to pronounced “suPERlative” as “super-lative”. Boy was that drummed out of me when a Cambridge-educated lass laughed her socks-off to my face, and countered with “It’s supPERlative!” in her lovely posh accent. Yes, I brought the subject back to posh English totty again 😀
LikeLike
My post wasn’t about denying that paper’s findings. In fact I said I didn’t deny any of it was true. Actually it was only confirming my existing biases, since I believe they do have backdoors stuck in most/all electronic devices. I even shared this with some friends.
However I will disagree and say the ‘who’ is the bigger red flag here. Controlled opposition is one of the biggest issues humanity is facing. We can’t get anything real done with these inbred Families and their lackeys constantly fucking everything up and denying real, necessary reform. I prefer focusing on this and some other issues.
What I read are anonymous authors spending 60 pages warning us about NSA backdoors and other things, while simultaneously suggesting a solution that was also created by a high ranking, spook feeder university group and funded by all kinds of Intelligence fronts.(Insert WTF meme here). In other words, our chains are being yanked yet again here. Either ‘The Adversaries’ are really stupid to trust these Stanford mandarins, or this is yet another controlled op (or some other third thing I can’t think of at the moment). I wouldn’t be surprised if the Standford group wrote this document themselves. Also people need to take a good, hard honest look at Linux and all its affiliations. Like hell they would leave any of that alone. They would be terrible spies if they didn’t stick their tentacles in it, right?
On the backdoor issue, I feel the same way I do when I see people trying to out-finance the financiers. All the power to the IT guys out there trying to resist this and all global surveillance tyranny though. I fully support that. However, IMHO It’s a battle of attrition I don’t think we can win. I see a lot of technocrats in the IT world who fully support a global surveillance world. It would also be super hard convincing me any radio/wifi device doesn’t have a backdoor, or be able to create a setup where they can’t intercept your comms somewhere down the line. Or be able to sustain that spook-free setup long-term. Also they may be employing some sort of Stasi trick, where they want to convince everyone they are being spied on all the time.
Going entirely off grid isn’t the answer for a lot of families, even if it may come down to that at some point in the future. I’m not sure what the real answer to this is though, other than to live honest lives and realize that the only people that need to hide are true criminals and spooks. And if people generally were just braver, than those truly needing to hide from tyranny maybe wouldn’t have to do so.
LikeLike
“And if people generally were just braver, than those truly needing to hide from tyranny maybe wouldn’t have to do so.”
It’s not so much the tyrants we have to avoid but the friends, family and colleagues who are still shackled to the matrix. When the miners were on strike in the UK 1984-85, neighbours fought each other in the streets and families broke apart permanently. It reminded me of the Northern Ireland troubles. People have been killed queue jumping in winter sales in retail outlets, just over pure greed. So I think that when we are divided, as we so often are, we need to fear each other more than TPTB.
They sell the guns but we pull the triggers!
LikeLike
Jared check out this video by Coreteks on RISC-V and tell me what you think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think these open RISC standards are pretty cool, but this is the 5th iteration and the first four did nothing to topple x86. In fact, there’s really no more x86. x64 has replaced it, since x86 was stuck at 32-bits, which meant you could only have up to 4GB of RAM. My phone has 6GB, for example. And they are all RISC processors technically. I don’t see it as anything groundbreaking and it certainly won’t speed up the chips. It’s just the instruction set, not anything to do with the silicon-germanium.
LikeLike
Otto Von Bismark, apparently. I wonder who he really waited on, in all the senses of that word 😉 Of course in this case, God should be Gods should be the Families.
LikeLike
Maybe the name Bismarck was shortened to Marx?
LikeLike
Semitic m-rḥš means “by subtle motivation”, derived from the root רחש rḥš for moving, creeping, swarming, stirring, agitating. It would fit Marx’s role as a faux agitator, and could fuzzy-translate into Latin X. But that’s just a guess.
mrḥšn מרחשן = motivator
mrḥšnw מרחשנו = subtle suggestion, motivation
LikeLike
New paper up @ Miles’ —
http://mileswmathis.com/stern2.pdf
LikeLike
Take your eye off the screen for 30 minutes and boing! Up pops another paper. This is great!
LikeLike
@stern2pdf
One name I noticed – John Hillen? Hiller? Hillenberg?
Are we being led a [Spongebob Square]dance?
LikeLike
Great papers just keep rolling out. This one reminded me of the absurd “true story” portrayed in the recent she Spike Lee movie, “the Blackkklansman” about a black cop who infiltrated a local kkk chapter back in the 70’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This one is best read with the Benny Hill theme playing in the background.
They had to borrow this one from the Comedy Central writing team. Looks like the cops in the first pic can barely contain their laughter. That picture of Stern wow. What’s next, a black & blind white supremacist (that Dave Chappelle sketch)?
LikeLike
I heard a rumor that some hard drives were being built pre-compromised. There was a bit of stink around 2 years ago that some modems and routers had built in back doors. At that time Huawei equipment was forbidden to be installed in USA government related networks.
We KNOW that the major operating systems were all compromised since this was proven by the vault 7 release of hacking tools. All older versions of operating systems were exposed to hacking tools being sold on the dark net, such that users of Windows XP, 7, 8 & 8.1 were advised to upgrade to W10. Likewise tools in the vault 7 set were provided (sold, via bitcoin transfers) to drive users to adapt to the latest versions of IOS and Android. I believe the vault 7 releases were used, not only to compromise Assange, but also to drive users to newer operating systems.
Looking into open sourced Linux operating systems, I confronted the fact that many drivers had to be provided by the manufacturers and were not open sourced. Besides that, it would not seem to hard for an intelligence agency to infiltrate the staff working on the larger open sourced Linux distributions, or Mozilla, for what it’s worth…
Farther into speculating; I read a rumor that 3G capability had been placed inside some CPU chips in order to provide an exploit for air gapped systems that were kept away from the internet. I’d imagine the antenna must use the PC board traces in a manner similar to how an old Walkman used the headphone cord for an antenna. Some major exploits like this may remain unused, just in case of some future emergency.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I apologize for confusing our email conversations with Russell Tropinski (R_T here, now), Alan, regarding the backdoors in our main CPU tech. They were helpful and good conversations and if you found anything of value in them by all means feel free to share. It had just been quite some time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can tell me whether or not you agree but I feel like most of the widely promulgated security vulnerabilities and major hacks and data leaks are either in whole or in part theater. Their purpose being stimulating and supporting a multi-billion dollar cyber-security industry. Any way they can further bilk the treasury, and if that means faking a few high-profile security vulnerabilities and major-company leaks, you can be sure they’re doing it. And because these companies are all owned by the same people, they can be convinced to take the hit to their stock price for the greater good, and if the leader of the company doesn’t agree to play along, you can be sure there are other family members who will.
LikeLike
I have assumed that the theatrics of computer security vulnerabilities was being done in order to farm hackers. They grow them, then pick the ones they like the looks of. They can even force them to work for cheap in order to avoid prosecution.
Meanwhile the Vault 7 release forcing users onto Windows 10 is not just about money, but may also be about streamlining their hacking and monitoring platforms. It is not that it is safer, it may be instead that it is a newer and more elegant type of unsafe.
LikeLike
Talking of hacking and security vulnerabilities Alan have you seen this? My mum cancelled and wondered why she was still being billed. A long phone call to customer support resolved the matter.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50571832
LikeLike
Yes, distraction is the most efficient tactics. Mainstreamed vulnerabilities are a theater, made to push security concerns to the users while milking them for protection and forcing them to sign up to SW “security updates”. One of many profitable rackets, no doubt. As 99% of people discuss theirs, loosing time and money while at it, PTB made each and every component in the network compromised on the most basic hardware level. Just to remind you – speaking technically, our computers (and all other electronic devices with an installed microchip aka CPU) are operated by the set of instructions that are given as controls / operators for underlying hardware. How can lay people establish or analyze CPU’s output, its instructions given to the hardware? Answer: we can’t. It requires special equipment we don’t have access to, so we can only notice symptoms if lucky / educated / experienced enough, in terms of unusual network traffic, CPU activity, electricity consumption, noise, heat, etc… Also, keep in mind two important facts: internet is an army invention while computers / CPUs were first developed for and used by the army intelligence. In a perverted way this makes their plan viciously perfect: they control every single digital bit going over the network while we’re paying for being monitored. All this combined suggests we’ve put infinite trust in wrong kind of people, again. It also suggests i.e. that FB driven revolutions (think Egypt’s latest) are a pun made by those in the know. To recap, if you want to keep anything de facto safe or private, don’t keep it in a digital form and don’t discuss it online and/or in front/presence of any kind of electronic device.
As I mention this, I should also mention that I think the latter just described is what led them to globally push the internet and hook us to mobile devices – their biggest fear are people getting organized as we’re waking up to all the mockery going on. Being organized implies we’re exchanging information as we prepare for some action and that makes it their worst nightmare – not knowing what we’re possibly doing to remove them as our rulers. You see, it reminds them of their own millennia-long conspiring against the majority.
LikeLike
Maybe they were trying to tell us something?
LikeLike
I agree with your suggestion that these vulnerabilities were likely leaked on purpose — anything they can do to pressure companies to spend more money on new hardware, new software, to spend money on security based on threats that are mostly imagined. I’m sure these vulnerabilities exist, but I’m also sure that the people that are of most danger to your data and privacy are not the ones who could gain access to these vulnerabilities, but the ones who originally designed them. However regarding Assange you can be sure that he was merely playing his role since the beginning. He never had to be pressured, and never needed to be compromised. He was compromised from the start.
LikeLike
These Scovells are likely straight up Phoenicians, and possible descendants of the also crypto-Jewish/Phoenician Severan dynasty. Miles is likely right Dave is being forced to publicly bow to a higher, and very old rank.
I came across all this after looking up the name Sabrina, which according to legend is taken from the Roman name for the Severn river, located in the UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabrina_(given_name)
In Sabrina Fair, a Broadway play written by Samuel Taylor, Sabrina Fairchild is the daughter of a chauffeur to the wealthy Larrabee family. Noted.
So looking up the name Scovell in Wiki gives us a short list, presumably all spooks:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scovell
Especially a Mr. George Scovell, a codebreaker during the Napoleonic Wars, who does the hand in the vest thingy seen here:
I’ve been reading on and off again the Historia Augusta for awhile, and earlier this week I was on the chapter for Caracalla. This work is more or less a huge collection of ancient Roman red flags if we’re being serious here, first complied by a Renaissance crypto-Jew Isaac Casaubon, with most of it now considered fraudulent, depending on who you read. Deliberate mystification is how the Wiki describes it, and that’s probably accurate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Casaubon
“In their book Isaac Casaubon, the Jews, and a Forgotten Chapter in Renaissance Scholarship, Anthony Grafton and Joanna Weinberg show that Casaubon was a Hebrew scholar too, taking serious interest in Jewish studies.
The Jewish bibliographer Isaac ben Jacob, in his Bibliography Otsar Hasefarim (1880), mentions notations on Michlol, the Hebrew book by David Kimhi on Hebrew grammar, which he attributes to one “Rabbi Isaac Casaubon”.”
OK so they admit it here, but only at the bottom of the page, and they still pretend he was a Huguenot in the main sections.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emesan_dynasty
Anyways, one of the members of the “Emesene” royal dynasty (Severan) was the advocatus fisci (attorney general) of Rome Aemilius Papinianus. Here its admitted he was a follower, along with Severus, of Quintus Cervidius Scaevola. The amount of misdirection on this ancient “Syrian, or Arab” dynasty is immense, and the origin history of the Mucia/Scaevolas is scant. But they also enthroned an Armenian king Sohaemus, if that’s any more clue. Wiki also says he is from the Orontid dynasty of Commagene., and also descended from the Achaemenids.
Hmmm.. Scaevola.. Scovell.. I have no direct linkages but that similarity is striking. Especially if we look up the name Scaevola in Roman history, and we find all kinds of high ranking consuls, praetors, and at least two Pontifex (basically the pagan pope). Scaevola was also the name of a 1958 nuclear test as part of Operation Hardtack I.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mucius_Scaevola
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintus_Mucius_Scaevola_Pontifex
Most spoopily, we get this ridiculous 6th Century BC Roman propaganda story in the name of Gaius Mucius Scaevola. Scaevola apparently is Latin for ‘left handed’. He was also apparently the first Mucii. The name Mucius is prominent here also, since all Scaevola’s carried it. Not sure what the modern connection for that name could be though (yet). Also the Pontifex Scaevola, Quintus, had a daughter named Mucia Tertia, who married Pompey the Great, and later descendants intermarried with the Sulla/Cornelius family.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaius_Mucius_Scaevola
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mucia_(gens)
The popular culture section here is interesting, as it includes a bit about Friedrich Nietzsche trying a similar stunt as a twelve year old boy. We’re also given the link to the Old Norse, Old High German god Týr (Trier) at the bottom of the page. His story also includes a similar bit about him having to sacrifice his arm to the wolf Fenrir.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fantastic rock-lifting here — look at the little blighters squirming under the light. Very interesting indeed.
LikeLike
The Arabs called the Levant, or part of it, Bilad al-Sham. or “land on the left-hand”. I think we’ve seen this left hand symbolism pop up before in previous papers, like the left version of the Red Hand of Ulster.
Of course that begs the question.. what is the meaning of Scovell? Can’t get any clear answers with internet searches, however ancestry.com says it is a French habitational name from Escoville in Calvados, Normandy. None of the variants of this name give any clues either, except perhaps Saville.
The English wiki page for Escoville is scant, but the French page is more informative. Further down the page, we get the coat of arms of the lord of Escoville, or the coat of arms of Charlotte de Mannoury, widow of Louis Valois. The Bourbon dynasty was a cadet branch of the Valois.
Looks like the Rose Croix together with crescent shaped (Phoenician) boats, along with the Lambda symbol. Lambda is derived from the Phoenician Lamed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamedh
LikeLike
Scovell – Schofield? As in Philip Schofield the annoying numpty in the We Buy Any Car for peanuts) advert and Blue Peter presenter.
LikeLike
The Scofield Bible, introducing Catholic ideas into protestant Christianity.
LikeLike
Italian Scovell & Latin Scaevola may be transcriptions of a Semitic name or term.
My best guess would be that it’s the Bibical name שאול šˀwl Saul, since U & V were written with the same letter in Latin & Hebrew.
It’s derived from the root שאל šˀl, which means “asking”, but also “granting” & “lending”, so it may even be another synonym for “banker”. In the Bible story, Saul was “granted” or “lent” the kingdom until David took over.
LikeLike
Gerry where do you think the hard ‘k’ sound was introduced to the scovell name if it originates from Saul?
LikeLike
Should’ve said pun-transcription, sorry. It didn’t originate from Saul, it’s just a possible sound-alike. Not the best one.
LikeLike
There’s also a weird “ecclesiastical” reading /ˈʃe.vus/ for scaevus, without hard K, which is more in tune with Saul.
Not sure if this is one, but there are definitely some “encryptions” among the big Roman names. Many have no explanation, or silly ones, like Scaevola.
LikeLike
They weren’t scaevola enough to get it by the keen eyes here…fine, I’ll get me coat.
LikeLike
in hebrew, arabic and greek, scovell should be read from right to left and would give
llevocs
in this, i read levi and also lenox as v was nu in greek.
i read also lovis and louis, and of course clovis.
the c is pronounced as k, and k was kappa and chi in greek, and chi is written X in greek also. kappa disappeared.
that’s why scovell is just to read as boustrophedon, and bring us always to the same roots : oX and LN who’s sounds like hellens, the Ancient greeks
LikeLike
Mantalo, that’s not really how things work when you “translate” names back and forth from languages that are read left-to-right to ones that are read right-to-left (or vice versa). Words are written out as they sound. When you sound them out, they don’t have any direction. So when you have a name like “Cohen” which is written from right to left in Hebrew, you don’t flip it around and “translate” it as Nehok or something like that.
LikeLike
@josh
this is what i was thinking before to go back to phoenician alphabet, then to greek alphabet which is said to be derivated from phenician, and started by being written from right to left (if we believe wiki) then as boustrophedon that is line one, from one way and line two, from inverse way, etc.
i didn’t started to make « puns » with words until i read gerry, and made my own researches.
the spooks like to make puns, they use letters as they want, They were the ones who invented alphabet and were already ruling the countries when alphabets and words got transformed, with the time, till our latin one or arabic one….
so ok, you want to believe that scovell is not boustrophedon of llevocs… and has absolutely no link with levis or lennox…
up to you
it’s just a mirroring, nothing illegal.
and this is their family names,
give me the rule, the law that say that They are not allowed to do that…
what you say is that They, as rulers of the world, are not allowed to reverse the way they write their names ?
you must’ve joking 🙂
they do what they want with their names, as we saw that comnene was khomeiny, and cohen was khan and may be kennedy, and that rockefeller was livingstone or levinstone and that bauer became rothschild and so on.
i didn’t decided these rules. they did it.
and i see nowhere that it is forbidden.
and you choose to ignore that OCS or OX has no special meaning, but the ox is the animal that was used to create Aleph, or alpha… the first letter of all alphabets even hebrew and arabic.
you refuse to see the links, i wonder why ?
LikeLike
Oo wee I thought I was done, but suddenly I took a left turn and tumbled down some musty rabbit hole. The physicists in the room pay attention.
First need to explain that ridiculous 6th century Roman story involving Gaius Mucius Scaevola. So the story goes he is sent with approval of the Senate to assassinate the Etrusucan king Lars Porsena, who is besieging Rome with his army. Gaius bonks it and accidentally kills his look-alike secretary (body double?) instead, so he is brought before the king. Gaius boasts there are another 300 Roman would-be assassins that would follow him, and to demonstrate his bravery thrusts his right hand into a campfire. Lars is apparently so impressed by this badass, he decides to free him and immediately sign a peace treaty with Rome. Lars also leaves behind a store of provisions for the Romans cause he was that impressed.
Later on during peace negotiations, Porsena’s deal is that he gets a group of Roman hostages, including a young woman named Cloelia. She later flees the Etruscan camp with a bunch of virgins. Porsena whines to the Romans to give them back, and they consent. Upon her return, again Porsena thinks she’s such a badass he allows her to chose half of the remaining hostages to be freed.
If anyone can make sense of this part of the Roman-Etruscan Wars and Lars’ spooky behavior, then you deserve a 1000 shekels. The historians can’t seem to decide if this one is mythical or real, or what version is real.
Anyways on to the point, Lars had a legendary tomb built for him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomb_of_Lars_Porsena
Roman writer Marcus Varro (check out the schnauzer on him) described it as such:
“Porsena was buried below the city of Clusium in the place where he had built a square monument of dressed stones. Each side was three hundred feet in length and fifty in height, and beneath the base there was an inextricable labyrinth, into which, if any-body entered without a clue of thread, he could never discover his way out. Above this square building there stand five pyramids, one at each corner and one in the centre, seventy-five feet [c. 22 meters] broad at the base and one hundred and fifty feet [c. 44 meters] high. These pyramids so taper in shape that upon the top of all of them together there is supported a brazen globe, and upon that again a petasus from which bells are suspended by chains. These make a tinkling sound when blown about by the wind, as was done in bygone times at Dodona. Upon this globe there are four more pyramids, each a hundred feet [c. 30 meters] in height, and above them is a platform on which are five more pyramids. ”
An 18th century priest Angelo Cortenovis (no wiki page) said the tomb was a machine for conducting lightning. A writer by the name of Robert Scrutton (also no wiki page) wrote about it in his 1978 book Secrets of Lost Atland (Atlantis).
Cortenovis’s description is also interesting, which we get out of this book by Alexander von Humboldt.
https://books.google.com/books?id=5oMOAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA139&dq=Father+Angelo+Cortenovis+Porsena&num=100&ei=f00lSPGNCouCyQSzoLiPCw&client=firefox-a#v=onepage&q=Father%20Angelo%20Cortenovis%20Porsena&f=false
“The story formerly current in Germany, and reported on the testimony of Father Angelo Cortenovis, that the tomb described by Varro of the hero of Clusium Lars Porsena, ornamented with a bronze hat and bronze pendant chains, was an apparatus for collecting atmospherical electricity, or for conducting lightning (as were also, according to Michaelis, the metal points on Solomon’s temple), was related at a time when men were inclined to attribute to the ancients the remains of a supernaturally-revealed primitive knowledge of physics, which was, however, soon again obscured. The most important notice of the relations between lightning and conducting metals (which it was not difficult to discover) appears to me to be that of Ctesias (Indica, cap 4, p. 169, ed. Lion; p. 248 ed. Baehr). “He had possessed, it is said, two iron swords, presents from the king Artaxerxes Mnemon, and from Parysatis, the mother of the latter, which, when planted in the earth, averted clouds, hail and strokes of lighting. “He had himself seen the results of this operation, for the king had twice made the experiment before his eyes.” The great attention paid by the Etruscans to the meteorological processes of the atmosphere in all that differed from that ordinary course of natural phenomena, makes it certainly a cause for regret that nothing has come down to us from the books of the Fulguratores…”
It goes on to say it was possibly used for religious reasons or to advert (or call?) thunderstorms. We’re also given links to Ley lines and Telluric currents on the tomb page for Lars.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Philip, you seem to like to write. You should put something together for me. Choose your topic.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Will do. With winter arriving early Ill have time for a longer paper.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Phil, I second that, you should write. I didn’t argue about the Table of Nations to detract you, just to spare you some punny pitfalls.
LikeLike
Yeah, you’re really on top of this stuff, Philip. Always a joy. Keep at it, you definitely inspire with you depth and research level. It’s not a hierarchy obviously but I always look forward to you and Gerry’s posts here and feel like it’s a great team altogether, just wish I could contribute more on these topics but Miles’ physics has me spending more energy on that side of things and it’s just gotta be that way. Everyone has their strengths – keep going with YOURS.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Do you have any information about the possibility they used electric lights inside the pyramids because there’s no soot residue on the walls from burning lamps or torches?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not really. This was actually the first (apparently) pre-19th century story I read suggesting electric tech in these ancient tombs.
However on YT, I noticed this past summer there has been a flurry of new 4K videos from all the most popular ancient sites in the world. Most of them seem to come out of this tour-guide named Brien Foerster. Just be careful here, as he and a few other active channels on YT are palling around with Hitchcock and David Hatcher Childress. You don’t have to accept their suggestions or conclusions (I don’t), and they suggest a long lost ancient high-tech throughout these videos. But their footage is interesting nonetheless.
The Tunnels of Saqqara (also spelled Sakkara or Saccara) have these giant granite boxes. He suggests they were some sort of high tech. There’s some very deep shafts around the area, some still locked off from the public.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess the history of ancient electrical tech has been scrubbed like everything else.
LikeLike
Interesting YouTube comment :
“Maybe those boxes were used as a storage battery ?”
LikeLike
And:
“Crystal’s were inside the boxes resonating,
Measure the width/length/height=frequency.”
LikeLike
Phillip, have you read Miles’ paper on the pyramids?
LikeLike
@RT: I dont think so? I briefly recall him talking bout the pyramids in one of the papers.
LikeLike
Here you go, Philip. The entire paper is great:
A Preliminary Study of the Pyramid as an Electrical Structure. Applying the foundational E/M field to the problem of the pyramid, in a strictly mechanical analysis. 10pp.
http://milesmathis.com/pyramid.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
About the Brien Foerster videos: The most glaring contradiction is that he always says “dynastic Egyptians” have “inherited” all these granite caskets & artifacts from a “pre-dynastic culture”, and then scratched their hieroglyphs on top. As for the caskets, that part seems true.
But then he points to other granite structures, and they’re covered in perfectly carved & polished hieroglyphs, the same as in later limestone ones. That means that the mysterious “pre-dynastic culture” was… the Egyptians themselves! They survived the cataclysm, just their toolchain didn’t.
My guess is it wasn’t “lost”. They almost certainly retained documents about it, and most of the white-collar engineers would’ve survived. I’d say whatever caused the cataclysm also did something to the earth’s charge field, killing their power source. Possibly also increased gravity, seeing how easily they had flung around the granite blocks before. They still knew their tech stuff, it just didn’t work any more. They had to restart the hard way.
Fascinating, but likely not directly related to spookery.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey, I have an assignment for one of my writers. It is pretty short. Who has time to compose a short paper where most of the research has already been done? Email me, you know where.
LikeLike
Miles, I am very tempted to answer your call to write a paper. But I’m working under a deadline right now and am already spread too thin as it is. I hope someone takes you up on the offer.
LikeLike
I noticed the Cohen discussion on the current thread. I want to warn again against taking any spook name or symbol literally. I think the explanation of Cohen as a “priestly” name is just another disguise, as with Levi. The spooks were never-ever religious, all names have different meanings for them. Cohen simply means “ruler”, as do most spook names.
Cohen itself means “ruler”, “prince” & “officer”, already in the Bible.
khn כהן = chief ruler, priest, prince, principal officer
khn כהן = standing, stationed officer, esp. priest
As a secondary pun, Cohen is also homonymous with “enrichment”.
khn כהן = enrich, enriched, employ riches, flourish
Other “Cohenic” names also mean “ruler”. Take Wiki’s Cohen name list: It claims Katz is a variant of Cohen, as it’s a an acronym of “righteous priest”. But guess what? Katzen also means “leader”, once again.
qṣyn קצין = magistrate, leader, prominent man, influential man
Since the spooks read “Jew” as “leader” & “majesty”, don’t you think this is the more likely explanation for the many Katz names?
The “priestly surnames” trap assures mainstreamers that the rich “Jews” are descendants of devout people, and makes truth-seekers think that “ze Jeeews” achieved domination by cooking up some eeevil religion. But they’ve really always been irreligious overlords.
And the narrow Cohen pigeonhole prevents the detection of more elaborate punnery.
Take Komnene for example. I don’t doubt that the Komnenes descended from the overlords who seeded the Jewish religion with their nasty puns. But I strongly doubt they’d see themselves as “priests”. Rather, Semitic kmn means “hidden” & “deceptive”. I think that fits the bill better, and we don’t have to explain away the M.
kmn כמן = to hide oneself, be hidden, do something secretly, to ambush, to plot, to hide, conceal
kmn כמן = hide, cover, lurking
kmyntnw כמינתנו = deceptiveness
Khomeini is another example. It may be roughly homonymous with Komnene, but the primary pun is another one:
ayat-ollah آیتالله = ayatollah (sign of God)
khamana’i خمانائی = similitude
So Ayatollah Khomeini puns with being merely “similar” to a sign of God. Do you really think those people were ever “priests”? 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent commentary (as ever).
throws turban into the dust Otherwise known as a chuck-berry.
LikeLike
Wiki: re: Katz ‘…If the reading is correct, this abbreviation occurs on a tombstone, dated 1536, in the cemetery of Prague. It is found also on a tombstone of the year 1618 in Frankfurt, in the books of the Soncino family of Prague of the seventeenth century,[3] and in one of the prefaces to Shabbethai ben Meïr ha-Kohen’s notes on the Choshen Mishpat (Amsterdam, 1663).’
Which led me here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soncino_family_(printers)
Then here, interesting for the use of differing names fro the same man:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gersonides
‘Levi ben Gershon (1288-1344), better known by his Graecized name as Gersonides, or by his Latinized name Magister Leo Hebraeus, or in Hebrew by the abbreviation of first letters as RaLBaG, was a medieval French Jewish philosopher, Talmudist, mathematician, physician and astronomer/astrologer. He was born at Bagnols in Languedoc, France. According to Abraham Zacuto and others, he was the son of Gerson ben Solomon Catalan.’
‘Catalan Grimaldi (Catalano Grimaldi) (c. 1415–1457) was Lord of Monaco from 1454 until 1457.’
LikeLike
Gerry, interesting notes about Cohen. In Miles’ latest paper on Malcolm X, at some point tracing somebody’s genealogy he says “The Owens take us to a Cowan (Cohen).” Given that Owen is pronounced just like Cohen without the ‘C’ at the beginning, and given the prominence of Owen in these shenanigans, I wonder if Owen is just another version of Cohen where they’ve dropped the C.
I agree that the spook families were never religious. You showed that many of the stories of the old testament were filled with spook symbolism and double-entendres. I have long believed that religions were created as means to control people. I don’t think Judaism is an exception and, living where I do, I don’t see any evidence that the controllers hold Judaism in any special esteem. They use it as a control mechanism and employ it in their divide-and-conquer strategies just like every other belief system.
Judaism is known as the first “mono-theistic” religion. But it wasn’t actually the first religion to feature a single god. It was however the first religion to adopt a “our god is the only god and all other gods are false gods” attitude. It was not just monotheistic, it was what I guess you could call an exclusive monotheistic religion. I think this aspect of the religion served as an excellent means of control, since it automatically pits believers against non-believers and gives the believers a special sense of superiority.
And while we’re on that topic, here is something I came across that I found kind of interesting. I don’t really trust the sources, but I believe the observation is correct.
It is a pdf I made of a review in Ha’aretz of a book on the history of “Goyim.” Or in other words, the history of the concept in Judaism. The authors state that if you go through the Old Testament, you can see that there was not a very clear line drawn between Jews and non-Jews — at least not as clear as would be drawn later. One of the things they note is that Jews were not forbidden from marrying Egyptians. As far as I could tell from the review, this was the only marriage exception allowed at the time. Given what you’ve found about the links between ancient Egypt and the Phoenicians, I find this very telling.
The book says that the stark line between Jew and non-Jew (goy) was drawn during the rise of Christianity. This gives us some hints that Christianity was part of a divide-and-conquer strategy, whereby two “exclusive” monotheistic religions (later joined by a third) could be played off against each other.
LikeLike
As for Goyim: The word means “body” and by derivation “commonality”. I already shared a link where the word means “corporation” (lines 2, 5, 7, 8) on a Phoenician temple in Piraeus. Since it generally denotes all things “common”, the aristocrats perhaps also used it to refer to us “commoners”.
gw גו = belly, inward, community, commonality, common buildings, in common
As for Cohen / Owen: I can’t tell if that’s a garbled variant, since the N would be the only remaining “hard” vowel. What I can say is that since K is a common prefix meaning “like”, Cohen could be further broken down. It likely originated as k-hwn meaning “wise manner” for the “governor-priest”, and k-hny meaning “profitable manner” for the “enrichment” meaning.
LikeLike
Noah’s ark & Noah’s nakedness
Because we discussed whether Biblical lists of nations & tribes were utter hogwash or just hogwash, I tried an analysis of Noah, Ham, Shem & Japheth. It seems to be pure punnery to me.
Noah puns with “leader” & “eminency”, pretty much like Judah puns with “leader” & “majesty”. Nothing new here.
nḥ נח = Noah
nḥh נחה = lead, guide
nh נה = eminency, distinction
The ark seems to be a parable for “cover story”: It’s explicitly to be made of “gopher” wood. This curious material is not mentioned anywhere else.
tbh תבה = box, ark
ṭb טב = character, history, story, account
ṭbˀ טבא = rumor
ṭbybw טביבו = celebrity
gpr גפר = gopher
kpr כפר = cover
And that directly maps onto the otherwise unconnected & inexplicable “naked Noah” scene:
Noah’s vineyard also puns with “cover”.
krm כרם = vineyard
qrm קרם = skin, cover, overlay
Shem & Japheth are also puns to things that conceal the nakedness of the leader: “authority” & “deception”. For both, it is the official etymology. Shem as “authority” also explains the term “anti-Semitic”.
šm שם = Shem
šm שם = name, fame, reputation, authority
ypt יפת = Japheth
pth פתה = open, persuade, flatter, silly, delude, deceive, enticed, deceived
Ham means many things, but also “showing” & “seeing”. Ham’s son Canaan becomes a slave to Shem & Japeth after Ham “sees” Noah, the “naked leader”.
ḥm חם = Ham
ḥmy חמי = see, look, study, imagine, show, demonstrate, appear, seem
ḥmh חמה = see, protect
Ham also means “hot”, and that’s why the authors have him be father of African nations.
ḥm חם = Ham
ḥm חם = hot
Canaan, Ham’s son, has the basic meaning of “curved”, which has the derived meanings of “trade”, but also “subjugation”. Canaan becoming a servant to Shem & Japeth likely means that subjugation can be achieved through authority & deception. Ham being father of Canaan could mean that a good “show” achieves “subjugation”, or that any “appearance” of the naked truth needs to be “subdued”.
knˁn כנען = Canaan
knˁ כנע = humble, subdue, humiliate, vanquish, bend knee, bring into subjection
So, to the spooks, Noah’s story is not actually about a flood or an ark, but about leaders needing a good “cover story”, using “authority” & “deception”. There were cataclysms all right, but the spooks just used that setting to decorate their parable on the merits of cryptocracy.
Only this hidden story arc connects the 2 parts of Noah’s story perfectly. In the official narrative, they don’t fit together at all.
Since the root at the Table of Nations is a cheap pun, I’d warn against putting too much faith into it, even though it starts making a bit more sense later, when actual nations’ names occur.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gerry, this is fascinating stuff to me and you’re very good at it. Connecting the dots as well as breaking down the letters and puns!
Perhaps you could compile all the punnery you’ve posted up, here? If it’s troublesome work, I’d gladly do it for you and email it over. While I have every faith in Josh, this site might not last forever and your work here I feel deserves some posterity. Just let me know – it wouldn’t take me very long. Perhaps Miles would enjoy posting that on his site too as an addendum. 🙂
LikeLike
Don’t worry, I’m in the process of compiling all this and more, and will some day dump it somewhere in a huge pile of tiny puns. 😉
It’s just that most of it is too much bits & pieces for a new paper, and my old ones are too lengthy & convoluted to be stretched with more addendums. It’ll be all dictionary entries without any great narrative, worse even than part 5.
LikeLike
The fact is that Noah’s Ark exists. I’d love to post a pic of it along with Ron Wyatt, the guy who Yah had uncover it. He even caused an earthquake to open a crack in the dirt from one end to the other between investigative trips so he could see it better. Think what you will, but here is the proof. And the TRUE story behind the discovery. (Many others have muddied the waters.)
I can’t seem to do it so here is the link.
https://wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-the-action-years/2011-695#
LikeLike
Wood is not the best material for shipbuilding. It is not enough that a ship be built to hold together; it must also be sturdy enough that the changing stresses don’t open gaps in its hull.
Wood is simply not strong enough to prevent separation between the joints, especially in the heavy seas that the Ark would have encountered.
The longest wooden ships in modern seas are about 300 feet, and these require reinforcing with iron straps and leak so badly they must be constantly pumped. The ark was 450 feet long [ Gen. 6:15]. Could an ark that size be made seaworthy?
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html
LikeLike
Sorry Ramsay….no sale!
So how did they feed all the herbivores?
Also, how did they carry enough extra animals to feed all the carnivores? If they had a breeding programme, this would take up lots of space and extra food…there just wasn’t enough room. Back then they had no comprehension of the number of creatures that existed on the planet.
It isn’t just a case of taking two of everything. What happens when one dies? There is then no way to replicate that particular creature. Where did they store all the fresh water the creatures would need? If they also took two of every insect, they must have taken two of every flowering plant, otherwise, what did all the insects feed on?
No sunlight when it rains for 40 days and 40 nights so any plant-life would die, along with most of the insects. The whole story is like Swiss cheese, just like a wooden ship that size would be, with no automated bilge pumps.
There’s around 4,000 species of known land herbivore. So that’s 8,000 plant eating animals to start with. What did they do with all that manure? Use the methane for gas lighting? Does the bible mention this? Or did they just tip it overboard in one of the first instances of man polluting the oceans? Makes you think don’t it? They could feed all the flies with it … but the smell! They would need sealed enclosures or the flies would fly off.
It’s not just the feasibility of building a wooden ship of that size. There are dozens of impossibilities if you open your mind and analyse the whole concept.
In the same way that parts of lots of stories don’t make sense, neither does this story. If there’s to be a biblical flood sent by God as a punishment to wipe man off the face of the Earth then you must save all the other creatures, that’s the backbone of the whole story. Then again, why didn’t God just produce more creatures like he did the first time around? You can’t have the flood drown everything without there being some way to save the non-human creatures, lets face it, the creatures only gang rape and murder each other in the name of survival, which is all the Ark was doing, helping them survive; so that’s okay then.
I suppose the bible missed out the crucial bit about how they had to keep the herbivores and carnivores separated for decades until they repopulated. One accidental killing means a whole species eliminated. That goes for disease too.
Of course veterinary medicine was second to none back then.
It’ll be interesting to see that huge ark seaworthy in a big swell. Will they fill it full of ballast, the equivalent of all those animals, water and feed? Got to do the experiment right if you are going to prove anything. I wonder how much CGI will be used.
Will Elon Musk be supplying the drones to video the first voyage?
Or better still, were the ancient/biblical flood stories simply telling of ice melting on a massive scale at the end of the last major glaciation, causing huge floods worldwide?
Also note the fakery in the photo on the web-page you linked to. The guy’s face has been pasted in….why? Why the Apollo 11 quality photography?
If that ancient ship is real, wouldn’t it be perfectly feasible that it was built during times of catastrophic flooding but was a failure? Would it also be more feasible to think that it was built by men who were trying to help their families survive? Who took lots of animals with them for food? Then the story got corrupted over what is it….thousands of years?
Walks casually back to his padded cell…….
LikeLike
“…The whole story is like Swiss cheese…”
Priceless…LMAO!! Thanks Russell, saved my stubby fingers from a massive key stroke.
LikeLike
Christians have an excuse for everything….. they just say “God can do whatever he wants and it simply was a miracle”.
If that’s true, then God’s retarded and that whole scenario is totally insanity.
LikeLike
Right in the first sentence, Ron & Dave who discovered “Noah’s ark” meet up with a “Saudi Arabian prince” whom they know personally and who’s visited them in the US. Then they say Ron has several “liaisons with the Turkish government”, and meets “Turkey’s leading archaeologist”. “Things were going incredibly well.” I bet!
Add the fauxto to that, and I cannot imagine a better article to convince us that Noah’s ark didn’t exist.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I was hoping somebody would point out the ridiculous first paragraph.
Furthmore this Wyatt has his own Wiki page and was palling around with this spook:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Fasold
At first reading its possible he was sent in to implode the Creationists camp from within.
“Repudiating and then changing his views about the site, Fasold was a participant in a suit with Australian geologist and skeptic Ian Plimer against an Australian creationist group. The suit, dubbed the “Monkey Trial II,”[1] was an important case in the debate between science and religion and its role in society[citation needed].”
http://mileswmathis.com/monkey.pdf
LikeLike
Ha! One never knows where a ‘sale’ might pop up. I haven’t seen one yet though.
As far as Wyatt’s findings, time will tell I suppose. Just maybe the guy responsible is the same one responsible for the 7-day week. One of which is His day of rest. Wyatt’s ‘friends’ were mostly foes in disguise. Perhaps mine are too. The synagogue of Satan certainly is. His message is ‘Be righteous with your actions’. I suppose we can all agree that’s not a bad idea. Either way, Hallelu Yah! (A word the whole world knows, along with ‘Amen’.) Blessings to all honest folks. We all can be honestly wrong at times. I certainly was, and likely am, though not likely on this one. 😉 I’ve done the research. Time-wise about as much as I’ve read Miles work. And that’s a lot.
Peace.
LikeLike
Research on this subject is mostly by people, I suspect 98%, trying to prove the existence and the story behind it. In this respect I feel there may be just a hint of bias. I prefer logic and reasoning to people pushing a story to sell millions of dollars worth of books and video’s. These massive sales are simply pushed along on a tide of hope and faith that what you are being told is true. As it is impossible to prove that something doesn’t exist, then that avenue of research is never going to happen is it? The only research I need bother myself with is understanding the science behind the possibilities and impossibilities of the stories major points or should I say anomalies?. Logic on the other hand can prove a thing cannot possibly exist, like a car full of elephants or a bed made of sleep.
If you could post a link showing me the answers to my questions, then you might indeed have a sale Ramsay. I have a truly open mind, but with my brain firmly glued in place, so if my questions can be answered fully and rationally, they why should I doubt the story? I’m expecting some pretty amazing and irrational answers though….prove me wrong. One mention of a Crocoduck and the possibility of a sale is off!! d;^)
LikeLike
@Ramsay
Do you really want to get into a debate about bible infallibly?
LikeLike
Correct spelling : infallibility….. or what’s also called Bible Inerrancy.
Biblical inerrancy is the belief that the Bible “is without error or fault in all its teaching”; or, at least, that “Scripture in the original manuscripts does not affirm anything that is contrary to fact”.
LikeLike
Feel free to get into that debate… somewhere else, please. If you’d like I can put you two in touch over email.
LikeLike
Apologies Josh.. I’ll stay in my padded cell until I’ve learned restraint.
Damn I can’t get through the door…I just turned into a wardrobe….
LikeLike
I wasn’t trying to debate….. I was just trying to show him the futility of trying to debate that particular subject on this forum. And was asking him whether or not it was worth it.
I have found those particular debates go nowhere anyway.
People just believe what they wanna believe no matter how much proof you show them.
LikeLike
If I was Noah, I would have selected the young, to wit eggs, calves, kittens, puppies, et al. Who’s to say animal species were as numerous as today? Perhaps it’s an analogy. Who knows?
Columbus sailed the seas in a wooden ship, just like the vikings, de Gama, Captain Cook, et al, before and after him.
LikeLike
You see IHATESTARWARS I was back in my padded cell, listening to Beethoven’s nose flute quintet on my bronze ear-trumpet, and you go and wake me from my aural trance, and get me thinking about Noah and his many conundrums again.
If the story is taken literally – which religious folk seem to do with glee – then where the fork did all the water go after the flood?
“Who’s to say animal species were as numerous as today?”
Fossil record I’m afraid.
Now where did I put that ear-trumpet?
LikeLike
When I was young a peanut, walnut, Brazil nut were all nuts, then scientists said, wait a minute, that’s a legume, this is nuts…..
The saddest thing I ever saw was a Liger’s face. A result of cross breeding, like those bulldogs that can’t breathe properly because kennel club folks wanted a dog that looks like this and does that, I wonder what else they got up to…
LikeLike
Talking snakes but I don’t think they do those any more Lewis….
Noah did an excellent job of navigating all over the world, over mountains, through jungles and swamps, collecting tigers and rhino’s and gorillas and lions and alligators with his family. Because he wouldn’t have maps or a compass or GPS.
Just sayin’!
Shape-shifts into a wardrobe to escape the nurses…..again…..
LikeLike
Like this pitiful creature:
LikeLike
“Aren’t fossils easily fabricated?”
No spooky goings on with normal sized fossils dude. My daughter and I searched for fossils along the beach at West Bay near Bridport, Dorset. not only found a couple but saw the shapes in the shale where other folk had split the shale and found fossils.
Didn’t find any ultra-mega-gigantasuarus teeth though….damn! Just cephalopods from around 200 fecktillion years ago.
LikeLike
Looks like Graham Norton in a Panda costume!
You’ll have to imagine most of the costume but come on now…..
LikeLike
Graham Norton is a Walker like the Bushes, the BBC did his family tree for Who do you think you are? TV program. Norton’s Walker ancestors were originally planters from Wentworth in Yorkshire, who were sent over from England in the 17th century to take over Irish land. Some members of his family fought for the British monarchy during the Irish Rebellion of 1798 and took part in the Carnew massacre.
LikeLike
Damn!
And I thought he was just a poor boy from the gutter like all the other celebrities…..
Was Quentin Crisp a Walker too?
Wasn’t it Miles who said that you can tell if someone is from nobility, and even their rank, simply by their level of success?
LikeLike
I saw that episode of “We’re Not Who You Think We Are” and somehow I wasn’t surprised. He didn’t seem that bothered either. Anyway, I assume the show misdirected from even more direct Phoeny origins.
LikeLike
Aren’t fossils easily fabricated? There’s a whole fauxsil industry in China churning them out. They’ll be selling moon rocks soon, made in Hong Kong.
LikeLike
“Who’s to say animal species were as numerous as today?”
Who’s to say Peter Pan and Santa Claus weren’t around to help Noah?
Just sayin’.
LikeLike
I just got an email from Weispecker, indicating he still can’t comprehend me.
\Hey ‘Miles’,
You’ve outdone yourself(selves): Three major/groundbreaking research essays in 7 days!!! Holy shit!!! What’s the word total, like 10,000? More? That much work would put me in hospital. (Oh, I mean ‘in THE hospital.’)
How’s life at Tavistock? Shite? (Oh, I mean ‘Shit?’)
You guys are hilarious.\
He admits my essays are major/groundbreaking, but can’t fathom anyone could write them. If he couldn’t do it, no one could, you know. I guess that means the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which he also could not paint, was created by a committee in Tavistock. What he now needs to get busy explaining to himself is why any committee in Tavistock would be writing major/groundbreaking papers, exposing FBI projects. When has the committee in Tavistock ever written any major/groundbreaking essays on anything?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Its called envy dude!
LikeLike
Captain Zero over there’s never worked a real day in his life, of course doing something of significance would put him in the hospital. That’s not something I’d readily admit to my enemies, but I guess whatever suits you… It’s like he’s landing blows on himself before he even pressed send on that email. What a trainwreck. Imagine penning that letter and believing it made Miles look bad — the levels of delusion on these people.
LikeLike
Look at that, the fraud is even having a Hollywood movie made about his failures at life. What an inverted world we live in. It seems like your suspicions of his connections are well-founded. What other reason could there be for such talentless drivel to be brought to the big screen?
“EXCLUSIVE: Brad Anderson has been set to direct In Search of Captain Zero, a film based on Allan Weisbecker’s true-life novel of the same name that has been adapted by Michael Bacall. The project hails from Ken Kao’s Waypoint Entertainment, which recently produced Yorgos Lanthimos’ Oscar-nominated The Favourite, with Kao and Mike Weber aboard as producers and Josh Rosenbaum and Ted Field executive producing.”
LikeLike
Vice-Pecker or “nasty dick” 😉
LikeLike
the number 1/137, is actually written out in the article as 0.00729735. Lo and behold, this just so happens to be 33 when you do the sum of all numbers.
The fine structure constant, also known as alpha, is a case in point. Alpha lies at the centre of a theory Dirac
initiated and Feynman worked on: quantum electrodynamics, or QED. This is the quantum theory of the
electromagnetic force, and describes the interactions between light and matter. Alpha determines their strength. It
is itself constructed from the speed of light, the electron’s charge, pi few physical theories are complete without pi
– and a couple of other fundamental constants, carefully arranged so that it is just a pure number, independent of
human influence: 000729735 just a whisker away from 1/137
LikeLike
little bit of a problem with the images… if it doesn’t work just delete the post.
Some weird stuff I came accross. Just dumping it here.
137 = 33rd prime
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKFtGwUWkAAedqp?format=png&name=360×360
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKFtGwIW4AI8OxU?format=png&name=360×360
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKFtGwKW4AIThlK?format=png&name=360×360
Samantha seems to be the 77th death in many lists.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKFxx8iWwAEBVq_?format=png&name=360×360
Today: A French demonstration of 25,000 people claiming 49,000 women died by the hands of their husbands, carrying signs: Samantha, 34 yo 77th death. (can’t find an english article)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKFxx8gXYAEu9tP?format=png&name=medium
Too many 137 stories:
“China Has Signed 197 Belt and Road Deals with 137 Countries”-
“Norwegian Energy (OB:NOR) Share Price Increased 137% “-
“Man Utd post alarming figures as net debt rises by £137.3m ”
Earth’s rotation speed is 1,037 mph? is that correct?
Universe is 13.7 billion years old.
This dumbass 666 is an obvious one that you can find anywhere:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKBdAb3WsAUizjf?format=jpg&name=medium
Newton with a Marrano crypto handsign,
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzSs8JvX0AI7AcV?format=png&name=360×360
Cavendish doing a masonic hidden hand.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzSs845WsAA4L7X?format=png&name=360×360
Michelsen doing a hidden hand
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzStAbcW0AED0VS?format=png&name=360×360
The greatest fraud of all time doing a masonic handshake
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzSt-cJX0AA87u_?format=jpg&name=360×360
Erin Macdonald is an astrophysicist, aerospace engineer, and science fiction consultant. and tattoo freak.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKA0XEsX0AAJpya?format=png&name=360×360
Ethan R. Siegel is an American theoretical astrophysicist and science writer, who studies Big Bang theory. Also finds time to promote the vaccine scam
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2QpUVIX4AAS19p?format=png&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2QtBxPXcAIoZ1-?format=jpg&name=360×360
The yellow vests in Paris having their eyes shot out.. one eye symbolism. We can now also file this popular uprising into the hoax category.
Pirates… one eye symbolism
http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0023/6178/6426/products/pirate-eyepatch-and-earring_600x.jpg?v=1525081394
Pay attention to police cars photographed during hoaxes. License plates often add up to 33
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJLB7BLWwAE7Dvt?format=jpg&name=small
33 pounds of explosives found
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJJBb6hX0AECVum?format=png&name=360×360
The HEK293 ((2+9)*3)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJIap_kX0AI4Jc-?format=jpg&name=medium
Question regarding the chem-trails? Why don’t they spray over the ocean? Nobody would find out if they sprayed in the middle of the atlantic. Why do it over land?
It is a simulation allright, but a Phonycian media driven one
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJY2vVnXYAA92k2?format=jpg&name=small
Anyway. could go on forever.
Ending with a funny video about unreliable gravity
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e3dzpcvu5tw5yjp/Urisoli-1198123129798877184.mp4?dl=0
LikeLike
“137 = 33rd prime”
A Pythagorean Prime
LikeLike
8675309
8+6+7+5+3+09=38, 3+8=11
8+6=14 7+5=12 3+9=12
14+12+12=38, 3+8=11
I’m calling Jenny right now, for the price of a dime we can always reach out to her.
LikeLike
I remember a short video by an Australian guy who said that the number 137,000 was a fake number, used in lots of media news stories. He showed screen captures of the web-page articles with links, some of which I checked out. But can I find that video….anywhere? Nope! Been taken down, censored, silenced?
LikeLike
Also, I updated the virus definitions on my anti-virus app and it logged the update as !0:19am on Sept 9th 2019. What a coincidence?
LikeLike
made a post with too many links. went into moderation I assume
LikeLike
Good that you mentioned it. It actually went to spam, which I stopped checking quite some time ago. It got tedious to constantly clean out the spam. And if I don’t clean it daily it just piles up so high that it’s extremely tedious to go through it looking for comments that don’t pass. If somebody sees that their message hasn’t been posted 24 hours after submitting it, then let me know to check spam for it.
LikeLike
I agree about the hidden hands, but 137 isn’t just numerology in QED, it really does come up over and over in real math equations. It is a sort of scaler between the photon and electron.
LikeLike
Josh it’s been automatically moderating several of my posts — any chance you could put them through?
LikeLike
I think they went to spam. Will check in the morning.
LikeLike
R.T. BTW I did not find your missing posts in spam. Hopefully won’t happen again.
LikeLike
Cool, again. I just looked it up. A ‘scaler’ seems to provide ‘proper balance’, for light. Wow. For those with eyes to see, the works of our Painter come into clearer focus. Though His canvas could use some serious cleaning up. He’s got my vote.
LikeLike
License plate of Franz Ferdinand when he was killed in Sarajevo was Aces and eights.
The armistice was also signed on 11-11-18
LikeLike
Vex has done some interesting papers on the Franz Ferdinand ‘murder’.
https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/01/20/was-gavrilo-princip-an-agent/
https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/01/24/was-gavrilo-princip-an-agent-part-ii/
LikeLike
Keeping it in the family…
The Habsburg jaw: Facial deformity in royal dynasty linked to inbreeding
https://www.sott.net/article/425032-The-Habsburg-jaw-Facial-deformity-in-royal-dynasty-linked-to-inbreeding
I just thought it was funny given past ruminations on that jaw. No idea if the science is genuine or not.
LikeLike
Use this link if you want to avoid spooky SOTT…
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-12-facial-deformity-royal-dynasty-linked.html
LikeLike
Loud car exhausts, endless rowdy barbecues and perpetual screaming kids are part of the inbreeding down our way! Any Habsburg jaws are usually the cause of family feuds and broken bones, collected at the aforementioned barbecues..
LikeLike
Jay Leno
LikeLike
Oh, and no offence intended to anyone here with zee big jaw — I’m laughing at the spook families. I come from the island of Ireland, so if anyone has inbreeding in the bones, tis likely me 😛
LikeLike
This reminded me of the Family Rules?
The Complete Ferengi Rules Of Acquisition
Once you have their money, never give it back
You can’t cheat an honest customer, but it never hurts to try
Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to
Sex and profit are the two things that never last long enough
If you can’t break a contract, bend it
Never let family stand in the way of opportunity
Always keep you ears open
Keep count of your change
Instinct plus opportunity equals profit
A dead customer can’t buy as much as a live one
Latinum isn’t the only thing that shines
Anything worth selling is worth selling twice
Anything worth doing is worth doing for money
Anything stolen is pure profit
Acting stupid is often smart
A deal is a deal … until a better one comes along
A bargain usually isn’t
A Ferengi without profit is no Ferengi at all
Don’t lie too soon after a promotion
When the customer is sweating, turn up the heat
Never place friend ship before profit
Wise men can hear profit in the wind
Never take the last coin, but be sure to get the rest
Never ask when you can take
Fear makes a good business partner
The vast majority of the rich in this galaxy did not inherit their wealth; they stole it
The most beautiful thing about a tree is what you do with it after you cut it down
Morality is always defined by those in power
When someone says “It’s not the money,” they’re lying
Talk is cheap; synthehol costs money
Never make fun of a Ferengi’s mother
Be careful what you sell. It may do exactly what the customer expects
It never hurts to suck up to the boss
War is good for business
Peace is good for business
Too many Ferengi can’t laugh at themselves anymore
You can always buy back a lost reputation
Free advertising is cheap
Praise is cheap. Heap it generously on all customers
If you see profit on a journey, take it
Money talks, but having a lots of it gets more attention
Only negotiate when you are certain to profit
Caressing an ear is often more forceful than pointing a weapon
Never argue with a loaded phaser
Profit has limits. Loss has none
Labor camps are full of people who trusted the wrong person
Never trust a man wearing a better suit than you own
The bigger the smile, the sharper the knife
Old age and greed will always overcome youth and talent
Never bluff a Klingon
Never admit a mistake if there’s someone else to blame
Only Bugsy could have built Las Vegas
Sell first; ask questions later
PlaySkape Games – Pokemon TCG and more!
Never buy anything you can’t sell
Always sell at the highest possible profit
Pursue profit; women come later
Good customers are almost as rare as Latinum – treasure them
Friendship is seldom cheap
Fee advice is never cheap
Never use Latinum where your words will do
Never buy what can be stolen
The riskier the road, the greater the profit
Power without profit is like a ship without an engine
Don’t talk shop; talk shopping
Don’t talk ship; talk shipping
Anyone serving in a fleet who is crazy can be relieved, if they ask for it
Enough is never enough
Compassion is no substitute for a profit
You could afford your ship without your government – if it weren’t for your government
Get the money first, then let the buyers worry about collecting the merchandise
Gamble and trade have two things in common: risk and Latinum
Never let the competition know, what you’re thinking
Never trust advice from a dying Ferengi; listen but don’t trust
A Ferengi without profit is no Ferengi at all
Home is where the heart is, but the stars are made of Latinum
Every once in a while, declare peace. It confuses the hell out of your enemies
Go where no Ferengi has gone before; where there is no reputation there is profit
Don’t discriminate. The most unlikely species can create the best customers
Benefit from the Vulcan greed for knowledge
If it works, sell it. If it works well, sell it for more. If it doesn’t work, quadruple the price and sell it as an antique
There’s nothing more dangerous than an honest businessman
A smart customer is not a good customer
Revenge is profitless
She can touch your ears but never your Latinum
Death takes no bribes
A wife is a luxury, a smart accountant a necessity
Trust is the biggest liability of all
When the boss comes to dinner, it never hurts to have the wife wear something
Latinum lasts longer than lust
Mine is better than ours
He who drinks fast pays slow
Never confuse wisdom with luck
He’s a fool who makes his doctor his heir
Beware of small expenses: a small leak will kill a ship
Important, more impotant, Latinum
Faith moves mountains – of inventory
If you would keep a secret from an enemy, don’t tell it to a friend
Profit is the better part of valor
Never trust a wise man
Everything that has no owner, needs one
Never do something you can make someone do for you
Nature decays, but Latinum lasts forever
Sleep can interfere with opportunity
Money is never made. It is merely won or lost
Wise men don’t lie, they just bend the truth
There is no honor in poverty
Win or lose, there’s always Huyperian Beetle Snuff
A woman wearing clothes is like a man without profit
Dignity and an empty sack is worth the sack
Only a fool passes up a business opportunity
Treat people in your debt like family … exploit them
Never sleep with the boss’s wife unless you pay him first
Never sleep with the boss’s sister
Small print lead to large risk
Greed is eternal
There’s always a way out
If the profit seems too good to be true, it usually is
Never cheat a honest man offering a decent price
Buy, sell, or get out of the way
Even a blind man can recognize the glow of Latinum
Everything is for sale, even friendship
As the customers go, so goes the wise profiteer
A friend is only a friend until you sell him something. Then he is a customer
Friendship is temporary, profit is forever
A lie isn’t a lie until someone else knows the truth
A lie isn’t a lie, it’s just the truth seen from a different point of view
Gratitude can bring on generosity
Ferengi are not responsible for the stupidity of other races
Never trust your customers
Never trust a beneficiary
If it gets you profit, sell your own mother
The flimsier the produce, the higher the price
Never judge a customer by the size of his wallet … sometimes good things come in small packages
There’s always a catch
The only value of a collectible is what you can get somebody else to pay for it
The sharp knife cuts quickly. Act without delay!
Necessity is the mother of invention. Profit is the father
Law makes everyone equal, but justice goes to the highest bidder
Wives serve; brother inherit
The answer to quick and easy profit is: buy for less, sell for more
Competition and fair play are mutually exclusive. Fair play and financial loss go hand-in-hand
A Ferengi waits to bid until his opponents have exhausted themselves
The family of Fools is ancient
There’s nothing wrong with charity … as long as it winds up in your pocket
Always ask for the costs first
If possible sell neither the sizzle nor the steak, but the Elphasian wheat germ
New customers are like razor toothed gree worms. They can be succulent, but sometimes they bite back
Opportunity waits for no one
Females and finances don’t mix
Make your shop easy to find
Sometimes, what you get free costs entirely too much
Ask not what your profits can do for you; ask what you can do for your profits
You can’t free a fish from water
The difference between manure and Latinum is commerece
What’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is mine too
Even in the worst of times someone turns a profit
You are surrounded by opportunities; you just have to know where to look
Don’t pay until you have the goods
The customer is always right … until you have their cash
Respect is good, Latinum is better
Never kill a customer, unless you make more profit out of his death than out of his life
His money is only your’s when he can’t get it back
A thirsty customer is good for profit, a drunk one isn’t
Never spend your own money when you can spend someone elses
Never allow one’s culture’s law to get in the way of a universal goal: profit
Never give away for free what can be sold
If a deal is fairly and lawfully made, then seeking revenge especially unprofitable revenge, is illegal
Beware of relatives bearing gifts
If you’re going to have to endure, make yourself comfortable
Never gamble with an empath
Time is Latinum. The early Ferengi get the Latinum
If you can sell it, don’t hsitate to steal it
A piece of Latinum in the hand is worth two in a customer’s pocket
Share and perish
When everything fails – run
Ferengi’s don’t give promotional gifts!
Know your enemies … but do business with them always
The world is a stage – don’t forget to demand admission
Whenever you think that things can’t get worse, the FCA will be knocking on you door
Never offer a confession when a bribe will do
Even dishonesty can’t tarnish the glow of Latinum
Whenever you’re being asked if you are god, the right answer is YES
Genius without opportunity is like Latinum in the mine
There are three things you must not talk to aliens: sex, religion and taxes
If you want to ruin yourself there are three known ways: Gambling is the fastest, women are the sweetest, and banks are the most reliable way
There are two things that will catch up with you for sure: death and taxes
If your dancing partner wants to lead at all costs, let her have her own way and ask another one to dance
Never bet on a race you haven’t fixed
Borrow on a handshake; lend in writing
Drive your business or it will drive you
Let other keep their reputation. You keep their money
If the flushing isn’t strong enough, use your brain and try the brush
Klingon women don’t dance tango
It’s always good business to know about new customers before they walk in your door
Wounds heal, but debt is forever
Only give money to people you know you can steal from
Never trust your customers, especially if they are your relatives
Employees are the rungs on your ladder to success – don’t hesitate to step on them
The secret of one person is another person’s opportunity
A madman with Latinum means profit without return
The justification for profit is profit
a) A friend in need is a customer in the making
b) A friend in need means three times the profit
A Ferengi in need, will never do anything for free
When the Grand Nagus arrives to offer you a business opportunity, it’s time to leave town until he’s gone
When the customer dies, the money stops a-comin’
Fighting with Klingons is like gambling with Cardassians – it’s good to have a friend around when you lose
Never trust a hardworking employee
Give someone a fish, you feed him for one day. Teach him how to fish, and you lose a steady customer
Tell them what they want to hear
A wife, who is able to clean, saves the cleaning lady
In business deals, a disruptor can be almost as important as a calculator
If they accept your first offer, you either asked too little or offered too much
Stay neutral in conflicts so that you can sell supplies to both sides
Never begin a business transaction on an empty stomach
Instinct without opportunity is useless
Never take hospitality from someone worse off than yourself
Only pay for it if you are confronted with loaded phaser
Always know what you’re buying
A friend is not a friend if he asks for a discount
Profit is like a bed of roses – a few thorns are inevitable
Beware of any man who thinks with his lobes
Knowledge is Latinum
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Ferengi are an inside joke, a parody of “Jews” by “Jews”.
The word “Ferengi” may be a variant of “Franks”, which may just be another term for “Phoenicians”, and perhaps also “Jews” in the meaning of “creditors”.
“Phoenicians” & “Punics” is derived from the root פן pn for “turning” & “exchange”, i.e. merchants & bankers.
“Franks” seems to be derived from the similar root פרע prˁ for “returning” & “credit”. I heard some modern incantators pronounce Aramaic prˁ as “farang”, perhaps reading the Ayin as Ghayin.
The modern words “pun” & “prank” may be derived from “Punic” & “Frank”, because in both cases you “turn” something around, or “exchange” the truth for something else.
“Frank” as “prank” may also explain some aristocratic pranks.
It could help if we found some symbols which exclusively stand for the Franks, such as the phoenix for the Phoenicians. But I haven’t found any so far.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I just happen to be watching a episode of Deep Space 9 and it dawned on me that the Ferengi were very similar to the Phoenicians.
I kept hearing about the laws of acquisition so I decided to look it up and when I read them I was laughing my ass off how true they were to the way merchants have always acted in history.
There funny in a kind of black comedy way.
I was originally going to call it the laws of the Phoenician Navy.
I didn’t completely realize how long the list was….. so I’m sorry if it’s a little too long
After I posted it I realized that.
I’m personally getting a kick out of reading them!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rule Of Acquisition #26
“The vast majority of the rich in this galaxy did not inherit their wealth; they stole it.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Ferengi religion is commerce and their society is determined by profit.
The Ferengi believe that the universe is held together by the Great Material Continuum, also known as the Great River.
The Ferengi believe that each part of the universe has too much of one thing, but not enough of another, and it is through the continual flow of the Great River that wants and needs can be fulfilled, if one navigates the River with sufficient entrepreneurial skill.
I’m noticing the nautical references.
It seems they all have to become sailors?
LikeLike
I’m thinking French Francs and the Franking of mail…exempt from charges.
Just a wild stab in the dark really….
Lets go to the beggars charity box for some info?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_franc
LikeLiked by 1 person
The name Ferengi was coined based on the Persian term Ferenghi, used throughout Asia (compare older Feringhee), meaning “foreigners” or “Europeans”
Persian (/ˈpɜːrʒən, -ʃən/), also known by its endonym Farsi (فارسی, fārsi, [fɒːɾˈsiː], is a Western Iranian language belonging to the Iranian branch of the Indo-Iranian subdivision of the Indo-European languages.
Various critics have argued that the depiction of the Ferengi and their culture mirrors anti-Semitic stereotypes of Jews, namely the love of profit and the over-sized facial features – in the case of the Ferengi, the ears.
LikeLike
What about those “Vikings” that turned up in Byzantium — the Varangians?
LikeLike
The Persian term فرنگ farang or فرنگی farangi was coined after the “Frankish” word “Franks”. So the Hollywood Ferengi are officially named after the Franks. My question was what the Franks were named after.
You can easily see that the Franks were a con, because in the official genealogies, all Roman aristocratic lines die out, and all Frankish lines pop up out of nowhere and take the same spots. Most celebs on FamousKin.com are admitted to be direct descendants of Frankish emperor Charlemagne, but are not admitted to be direct descendants of earlier emperors.
LikeLike
Wouldn’t it have been easier to swap and change names back then, than it is more recently. Celebs call it a stage-name. Before the time of the Magna-Carta how accurate were recordings of peoples details?
LikeLike
So did the Roman aristocrats pulled a switcheroo and somehow just changed their name to Franks?
LikeLike
Well lets be frank about this……
LikeLike
So why retire Alexander the Great before he could bring the Western Mediterranean into the new Macedonian Empire? Why break-up the Macedonian structure in favour of a Roman one? Perhaps Phoeny in-fighting as to which power-centre (i.e. Family branch) gets the cream.
LikeLike
An as yet unknown cabal who were coercing the different factions to fight each other, with the sole purpose of being the ultimate victor? Bit like the modern elite and their game, setting different countries against each other using political subterfuge, to attain the same ends…..keep control of the planet?
Hardly any of that old history played out how we were told, as Miles has made clear.
I’ll go with your family infighting, but the cause I think may have come from above (their hidden rulers), who seemed so clever to the common man, they were called sorcerers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is plausible that you have higher ranking family members stirring the pot of the lower ranks. But I would think envy would make some of the infighting quite real and ferocious. Wishful thinking also has me hoping that sometimes one or two of the scions “break free”, giving us a littoral schism. For example, Dionysius I of Syracuse always has a bad press within the Histories that have come down to us. I am thinking of the incident in which he destroyed the Phoenician part of Syracuse and slaughtered the merchants there. Apparently. What can we believe in the end?
Still, I always like to remind myself that the march of the Phoeny Empire was not likely to have been a smooth affair with everything going to plan, e.g. the Sea Peoples and all that. So within the published Histories perhaps there are echoes of the stories of those who rebelled. Note that this does not make the likes of Dionysius a good person but rather a Bad Phoenician 😀
LikeLike
also free masons are called “francs-maçons”
in french
LikeLike
Good post. The Phoenician Navy in space. Well, if they keep up this level of hubris then I hope Nemesis comes a calling.
LikeLike
In Thailand à foreigner/westerner is called a farang.. It is the same word used für guava, but I doubt if there’s a connection lol
LikeLike
Persian term Ferenghi, used throughout Asia..(Thailand?)
(compare older Feringhee), meaning “foreigners” or “Europeans”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ferengi blood is yellow, turning dark blue-green when oxidized
LikeLike
one of the symbols for France is the 🐓 rooster (cock)
gallus in latin.
that’s why france was the gaule during Jules Cesar time
that’s why our savior after WWII was de Gaulle, Charles of course, from charlemagne dynasty 🙂
the rooster is not exactly the phoenix, but he sings at the beginning of the day, at dawn.
like pharaon brings the sun Ra
the rooster announces the day
in french, the rooster says COCORICO
that could be translated as communists (coco) are rich:-)
my question now is
how many french people descend from phoenician ?
because, my boss is one, the boss of my boss is one, my N+3 is one and our big chief is called Pharaon…
FaRaoN
LikeLike
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallic_rooster
interestingly, the rooster is said to be an “unofficial symbol”, opposed to Marianne, symbol of the State.
Unofficial but we find it everywhere.
we even had a trial against a rooster. a neighbour complained about the early singing of the farmer’s rooster…
i don’t know who won…
the rooster is a fighter as everybody knows 🙂
LikeLike
For the Franks, I found another interesting explanation why that identity was used to break up the Roman empire: Similar words with the consonants P/F R/L G/K/Q/J mean “breaking up” in Latin, English, German, Arabic, and in garbled form even in Hebrew & Aramaic.
It seems to be an archaic multi-language-family root with derivations such as break, breach, breeches, brook, fraction, fracture. Being “frank” meaning being “open” may be derived from “breaking open”. Wiktionary lists the root as bʰreg. Note that the N disappears in the Latin forms already.
Latin: frango, frangere, fregi, fractum = break, shatter, vanquish, defeat
English: break = fracture, separate, shatter
German: brechen = break, fracture
In Arabic, both L and R forms occur, with a trailing J, Q, G, Ayin. It seems to overlap with the פרע prˁ root I mentioned above.
faraja فَرَجَ = open, part, separate, cleave, split, breach
falaqa فلق = split, cleave, break
faraga فَرَغَ = empty, vacant, wind up
farʿ فَرْع = branch, section, subdivision, derivative
In Old Hebrew & Aramaic, both L and R forms occur, often even without the trailing G.
prr פרר = break, divide, defeat, dissolve
pll פלל = break, pierce
plg פלג = split, divide
plg פלג = split, divide, separate, allot
pgr פגר = break up, destroy
prg פרג = change, exchange, reverse, ruin
LikeLike
Surely Varangian has to be related or is it just a coincidence that it sounds similar?
LikeLike
Yes, the pronunciation seems too close for a coincidence. But the meanings don’t overlap. So either my explanation for the Franks is false, or the Wiki explanation for the Varangians is false, or the words are not just related and were used as a pun.
Since the spooks like to be “leaders”, the official Frankish / Varangian meanings cited in the Wikis are already a good match. Note that we also have the possible derivations “free” < “break open”, and “steward” < “exchange”.
Old French: franc = free, of noble descent
Icelandic: foringi = chief, commander
Gothic: fauragaggja = steward, manager
But the Wiki map shows a very vast trade network for the Varangians, and the Star Trek Ferengi are styled as merchants, not rulers. So the meanings of “exchange” from פרע prˁ and פרג prg would be a better primary pun.
This is what I found in Old Norse, but that dictionary is probably very limited:
bregða = alter, turn, change; break faith or oath; break off; shapechange, turn into
varningr cargo, wares
fara = go, move, travel; behave, act as
ganga = go, walk; advance; take place; extend; go on, last; turn out
(The Phrygians may be another variant of whatever it is.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good stuff. I’m incorporating some of this into a paper I’m currently writing.
LikeLike
Aye; looks like some punnery going on with those “Vikings”.
LikeLike
An abbreviation of Violent Kings?
LikeLike
Or “Vying Kings” 😉
Varangian is to Farangian as Venetian is to Phoenician. Obviously I don’t really know but these similarities are very, very suspicious to my mind. So if it all just more silly punnery from bored elites then fair enough.
LikeLike
a joke with vikings ?
i have an easy one
VI is 6 in roman numerals.
in french we write it « six » but pronounce it « si » or « sisse » depending of what is after
si kings
sea kings ?
LikeLike
the phrygian cap was symbol of freedom (free again) during the french revolution.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrygian_cap
a big symbol, official i think 🙂
and the french motto starts by Freedom, « liberté » (then éGALité where we find GAL again, and Fraternité because we are all brothers, frater)
liberté has the same etymology than “livre”, book.
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/liber
and « livre » is from the greek byblos, phoenician city, which gave his name to the Bible.
livre is also the english currency 🙂 and the egyptian currency.
back to pharao again 🙂
and you can translate currency by « fric » in french…
also in france, we have the FNAC, big shop of… books 🙂 where every french citizen should spend his « fric » 🙂
LikeLike
The Phrygian helm was also adopted by the Macedonian phalanx pikemen.
“I cannot fit this friggin’ helm on me head” as they used to joke in Old Vergina.
LikeLike
when i wrote that uk currency was « livre », it’s in french, of course.
in english, you say pound.
and about sterling, wiki says this :
From medieval Latin esterlingus of obscure origin.
It could, according to Du Cange, come from the word E (a) sterlingi (“people of the East”), which meant merchants of the Hanseatic league coming to London to do business in the twelfth century or a Saxon people whose currency is would be widespread in commercial relations.
This explanation is incompatible with the supremacy of the sterling form in the Anglo-Saxon domain.
We must also mention the hypothesis of an Anglo-Saxon type * steorling, derived from steorra (“star” → see star) based on the fact that the oldest Norman coins bore a star.
a star ? really ?
LikeLike
“….based on the fact that the oldest Norman coins bore a star.”
Good find.
You learn something new every day. Or on this blog several new things every day.
LikeLike
And let’s not overlook Frankenstein.
Or is it Frokensteen?
Igor: Dr. Frankenstein?
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Frokensteen.
Igor: You’re putting me on.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: No, it pronounced, “Frokensteen”.
Igor: Do you also say Froaderick?
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: No . . . “Frederick.”
Igor: Well, why isn’t it “Froaderick Frokensteen”?
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: It isn’t, it’s “Frederick Frokensteen”
Igor: I see.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: You must be Igor. [He pronounces it ee-gor.]
Igor: No, it’s pronounced “eye-gor.”
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: But they told me it was “ee-gor”..
Igor: Well, they were wrong then, weren”t they?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 😉
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
I read all your interesting messages. I always wondered why almost all the Jew family last names look German… Rosenbaum, Mann, Guggenheim etc.
LikeLike
Because those are jews that lived in German speaking regions (mostly Ashkenazi, Sephardi lived in Spain) In the middle ages jews were expelled from territories like France or Italy while they were tolerated in Germany by decree of the emperor. Some jewish groups as well as people descended from Northern Europeans still used patronymic names which of course changed every generation and in the 18th and 19th century state authorities pushed for unchanging family names. Those names would be derived from professions or placenames. They would also choose German names that are straight translations of the meaning of an originally hebrew name or German words that sound alike.
LikeLike
@Gerry
after the rooster and the prygian cap, we can mention two others symbols for France
1) One is the frog… we are frog-eaters, as everybody knows.
http://vexilla-regis.com/textevr/Fleur%20de%20Lys.htm
According to Guenon, the emblem on the Clovis, standards was not a toad but a frog.
(Clovis is the official first franck king),
The confusion is easy but not free.
The toad is essentially a negative symbol (its pejorative connotation is not only old but universal since in ancient China it was supposed to represent the guardian of the abode of the dead).
The frog symbolizes, through its metamorphoses, the spiritual step towards perfection, resurrection and immortality.
At the beginning of the 20th century, popular belief still existed that frogs buried during an earthquake could survive for years, even centuries and even millennia set in stone.
I have clippings from the 1880s that relate the “discovery” of the digger who, breaking rocks to draw a road, see the escape of the stone block of “prehistoric frogs”. It was at the time, one of the most popular hacks of the popular press. And this belief was very old.
It was also probably related to the myth of the lost king, the sleeping king, the hidden king, the king under the mountain etc.
In any case, it is likely that the Merovingians used the emblem of the frog as a manifestation of their certainty of belonging to the immortal race of kings of France. (immortal because the king never dies, as you know)
The frog is also a symbol of fertility because the ancients believed (or pretended to believe) that these creatures attracted by their songs the rains beneficial.
That said, the symbolic figuration of the Merovingian frog is very similar to the fleur-de-lis of the Capetians, which can easily be transformed into a bee, the totem of the usurper, as we know.
remeber also how, in children’s stories, the frog turns into a charming prince if she gets a kiss… charming prince or merchant prince ?
2) the other is the lily
The Lys of France would have appeared towards the reigns of Louis VI and Louis VII.
They took this emblem as England took the leopard, Germany, the Eagle and Belgium, the Lion.
Is the lily a deformation of the bee that Childeric I wore in jewelry?
Does it come from the Iris of the waters, indicating the swampy character of the countries whence came the francs, and which had long since ornamented the royal sceptres?
Is it the reproduction of the spearhead, the angon, with its lateral fangs?
All the hypotheses are possible, and none is certain.
First in “sowing” on azure field, the number of fleur-de-lis was reduced to 3 under Charles V in honor of the Holy Trinity.
Father Ménétrier (Jesuit of the seventeenth author of “the temple of wisdom open to all peoples”) recalls that the primitive Franks bore on their signs a seedling of toads.
A legend tells that an angel appeared in Clovis to change the emblem of the toad in fleur-de-lis. (We note that the heraldic toad is very similar to the heraldic lily.)
In Greek, the toad is Phrynicé.
His tutelary goddess is Phrynia (Latin equivalent: Feronia.) She was the protectress of the freedmen.
She was represented wearing the traditional hat of her homeland: Phrygia ..
Thus the Lys and the Phrygian cap have the same origin … *
It is obviously rudimentary. The symbolism of the toad, lilies and Feronia is infinitely richer, more complex and more amazing by its implications especially in the History of France…
wouh !
LikeLike
…Is it the reproduction of the spearhead with its lateral fangs ?…
if the fleur-de-lys is not a lily, but a spearhead… you know what it means :
spearhead :
The pointed head, or end, of a spear.
One who leads or initiates an activity (such as an attack or a campaign).
The leading military unit in an attack.
(sports) A player who initiates attacking moves.
spearhead \ˈspɪɹ.hɛd\
“Diriger, mener, conduire” (= Leading, leading, driving)
so, may be we have to understand that the 3 lilies of France are other lies :
no flowers, but a spear with metal head, to drive the herd and lead the earth.
LikeLike
He who shakes the spear is nothing but a coxcomb; a herald in harlequin delivering the point.
LikeLike
Hear is something interesting that I’ve never noticed until it was brought to my attention.
How come the ancient cave paintings have very detailed paintings of animals and yet no detailed paintings of humans doing with they do…. and also good portraits of cave people?
Wasn’t there a Miles portrait painter in the cave days?
Why just animals?
Strange!
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/dec/12/humans-were-not-centre-stage-ancient-cave-art-painting-lascaux-chauvet-altamira
LikeLike
Animals were sacred? Animals were easier to paint?
Painting humans was taboo? Maybe they thought it brought bad luck?
It reminded them of their next meal, cos they were always living on the edge of starvation? So animals were sacred because they kept you alive through the cold, dark winter, so they painted winter food?
Or the paintings – at least some – are fake?
LikeLike
Or the paintings were about visualizing the next hunt, so they were of the intended prey ?
LikeLike
Something like this would be nice.
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/devol/5706944/205675/205675_original.jpg
LikeLike
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.meme-arsenal.com%2Fmemes%2Ff2f9ef21cb87608db65e509037929d3a.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.meme-arsenal.com%2Fen%2Fcreate%2Ftemplate%2F951481&docid=IPffvMLJEm4u7M&tbnid=MThSL6BLLSfveM%3A&vet=12ahUKEwiG-tCC5LDmAhXHGs0KHZuyC1M4ZBAzKFYwVnoECAEQYQ..i&w=1000&h=749&bih=608&biw=1218&q=portrait%20of%20ancient%20man&ved=2ahUKEwiG-tCC5LDmAhXHGs0KHZuyC1M4ZBAzKFYwVnoECAEQYQ&iact=mrc&uact=8#h=749&imgdii=jyHwGKEqgBxfDM:&vet=12ahUKEwiG-tCC5LDmAhXHGs0KHZuyC1M4ZBAzKFYwVnoECAEQYQ..i&w=1000
LikeLike
I really don’t understand why you would even say such a thing, Tony, or post it here without researching it outside of a shitty Guardian article. Even the most cursory Google search betrays the lie:
People have been painting and drawing each other since painting and drawing began – and nobody knows when. As pigments and techniques and mediums evolved, so did the paintings. The artists CAUSED that evolution, not the other way around. There could be many masterpieces of fine art lost to the ages simply because they didn’t survive the ages. It’s absurd to think that people didn’t paint each other the entire time, to me. And even more absurd to think anything from the fucking Guardian website would hold even a shred of reality or truth.
You know better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I knew about the stick figures.
I’m talking about an accurate facial portrait since some of the portraits of animals showed a lot of artistic detail.
Maybe like this.
LikeLike
PS
I’m talking about 30,000 years ago and older.
The faces of the women are from Sigiriya 3rd century BCE.
LikeLike
PSS
I’m not defending the Guardian at all.
The article didn’t mention anything about portraits.
I thought of that on my own.
There had to be someone around that could paint faces accurately.
Or maybe not ….I don’t know.🤷
LikeLike
It’s The Guardian 😀 Sorry, could not resist the irony.
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2006/06/06/cave372.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=239fb9d0aacf93b3ca59189ef6d3cfac
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2006/jun/06/art
Is it a face; is it not a face? Who knows. Looks like a lion’s face if anything at all.
LikeLike
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2012385.stm
Sorry but that’s the crappy article that turned up in the search. The so-called “ancient images” look like contemporary doodles and sketches to me. Lol.
LikeLike
Purported 10,000 year old representations of faces…
https://www.donsmaps.com/lenehara.html
…and that’s the end of my cursory, crappy research. I think some of the art is genuine, but some of it must also be fake ’cause thems the times.
LikeLike
That isn’t a face. The nose would be upside down. ANyway, faces are very difficult to paint or draw. Yes, drawing animals is much easier. Most contemporary people can’t draw or paint faces at all, beyond a smiley face, so we should not expect cave people to be doing it. You need the right materials for a start, which they didn’t have, then you need a conceptual base, which we are given by recent art history. They also didn’t have that. Developing the arts also takes a lot of free time, which they also didn’t have. They didn’t have rich kids sitting around with nothing else to do but develop various arts. They were busy surviving. But we don’t need to argue about cave people from 30.000 years ago, we just look at Natives a couple of hundred years ago. AMerican Natives didn’t paint realistically until after they came into contact with us. They could learn to do it (some of them) so the ability was there, but they didn’t. Why? I don’t know. I guess it never occurred to them to try. Their free time was given to things that seemed more important to them, like telling stories, smoking, shagging, whatever. Same as most people now. Maybe one or two did create something along those lines over the centuries, but it was lost. Most art is very impermanent, and they didn’t have museums and libraries.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Maybe one or two did create something along those lines over the centuries, but it was lost.”
That’s what I was thinking.
Couldn’t someone at least paint a profile so we could at least see how the shape of nose and chin were?
LikeLike
Well, we’ll not get a more authoritative answer dan dat. Cheers.
LikeLike
just now i realize that Donald discovered lucy in 1974 (24 nov.) and Scarlett played lucy in 2014 (06 august).
Both are johanson, the first with one S, the second with 2 S.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Johanson
everything is “family business” with these people 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
“with his student Tom [GRAY], he discovers a skeleton”
LikeLike
so, we have to understand that lucy is a hoax, one more…
😦
what about neandertal and others homos ?
hom-hoax ?
LikeLike
I don’t know…… I’ve seen a couple of guys down on 125th Street late at night that just might fit the bill.
LikeLike
I think a lot of what we’re being told about Dinosaurs is a load of codswallop. I believe in evolution and fossils like the amobites…amerliorites…[sigh gotta look ’em up] Ammonites etc But I no longer believe everything we’re being told about the big fellers, like T-Rex and Brachiosaurus. I type this as a Dino-fanatic, so it was a big disappointment to start doubting the paelo-dudes. To be precise — I no longer know what to believe regarding this field but I would not be surprised if there are fossil factories in China and most of the larger creatures are fabrications.
I think Darwin’s theory also sucks balls because even a moment’s consideration reveals it to be ludicrous. Miles is on the right track in that there has to be some sort of feedback mechanism, a reaction to the environment. So there’s evolution alright but not Darwin’s method. Besides he stinks of spooky propaganda anyway.
Yeh, I’m off topic by a billion years or so by modern science’s reckoning, but considering they might be off by billions more then I don’t care 😉 Just kidding. Sorry it is off topic, mostly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I think a lot of what we’re being told about Dinosaurs is a load of codswallop.”
When I read stuff about the largest dinosaurs, I get the feeling it was written by Bill Bailey (comedian).
You have religious types denying dinosaurs because they aren’t mentioned in the Old Testament or Noah’s boarding list. You have some creationists stating that man lived with dinosaurs. Then there’s the paleo’ version of history, with the largest evah dino’ being built from a single humerus and a few vertebrae.
There are some damned weird animamals kicking around today but come on, a 60ft long neck, and weighing in at 65 tons. And what’s with the tiny arms and massive head on the biggest carnivores?
I wish someone would find a perfectly preserved ultra-mega-humungosaurus frozen in ice. Now that would prove that they were real, and dump a hundred years of speculation.
I wonder what might be under that Antarctic ice??
I want to believe, I really do, because if they did exist then wow….what amazing creatures. But my sceptical, doubting brain says that the official story is like like chicken wire fencing…more holes than substance. Far more impossibilities than possibilities.
Don’t just give me fanciful stories, give me solid proof.
“I worship the Sun because I can actually see it.”
George Carlin
LikeLike
yes, since MM I doubt also about dinosaurs.
i saw a video on youtube where à paléontologue find a small piece of bone and asks a specialist to build the whole skeleton from this bone…they said there are really few specialists like that and few paléontologues also… so now i understand these people are from the families
then, the skeleton, a huge dinosaur, was given or sold to a museum that exposed it as a true one…
then they explained that in china there is a big business with this building-dino-as-true-one…
after this, i don’t believe anymore in dino.
also i doubt about cave paintings.
there is a controversy about lascaux, some people pretending the paintings have been made recently.
Lascaux sounds like « last hoax » now 🙂
i really would like to know the truth, i’m fed up with F-lies 😦
LikeLike
All I was really thinking was there had to be someone around that could paint faces….. since they were painting all kinds of stuff anyway!
So why no faces?
LikeLike
It is the best of questions — simple and logical. Why no faces?
I wonder what is the oldest drawing or representation of a human face? It would be interesting to see the answers mainstream History of Art has to offer. It could provide some sort of benchmark, either for bulls**t detection or a legitimate claim with which to being answering your “why no faces in the caves, biaches?” question.
LikeLike
Probably because it’s easier to fake animals then to fake faces.
Someone might get upset if you don’t paint them in the way they want.
Back in the cave days that could be fatal?
LikeLike
PS
What I really meant to say was it would be hard for all the (counterfeit) cave artists to be able to fake the same type of faces all around the world.
And if they were not fake… that might be an explanation of why ancient man didn’t paint faces.
LikeLike
Fake? Possible. Who knows?
What I was told at school is that drawing an animal was a pre-attempt of capturing it. An other aspect of this was that by capturing an image of someone you basically took part of their soul away. I heard those stories even during the early times of photography.
So, the drawing was a hunting ritual. They didn’t hunt people.
LikeLike
For the Dinos all I have to add is this:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lancashire-31623397
Sir Richard Owen: The man who invented the dinosaur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Owen
Good lord that forehead and those eyes. He looks half-demon/half-human.
LikeLike
yes, the wiki of Owen is rich and art :
With Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins, Owen creates the first realistic life-size sculptures of dinosaurs.
Some of these were created for the Universal Exhibition of 1851,
so before blackholes, the hawkins family was specialised in dinoholes, which, as everybody knows, are much deeper than rabbitholes 🙂
LikeLike
Owen is a name MM I believe has discussed previously. Owen’s timing of the creation of the word dinosaur (mid 19th century) is curious as wiki states that the petroleum industry was in its early stage at the same time. I’ve read evidence that the earth is constantly creating oil and there never has been a shortage. Diamonds are another example of a natural resource we are told is rare but the evidence suggests otherwise. If true, this has giant scam written all over it and probably orchestrated by the same old family scammers MM has documented. Dropping “Dino” in the Flinstones constantly reinforced the idea in boomers of my age of the fictional connection between dinosaurs and oil, “fossil fuel”.
LikeLike
Humanity has always been like little children at Christmas time….. believing their most trusted parents are not lying to them about Santa Claus.
LikeLike
I read about that abiotic theory of oil production within the earth. The idea that they would invent Dinosaurs as part of a wheeze to convince us it is a finite resource would not be surprising. The spooks love taking the p*ss with their con-jobs.
Twas Russian or Soviet scientists that pushed the “abiotic” theory. Given what we now know about the Soviet Union (thanks to MM) then that source is about as reliable as mainstream Western scientists. But I still like the theory.
LikeLike
Having found actual dino bones myself, I can’t honestly swill ALL doubts about them – but SOME remain. A field that’s self-fulfilling but doesn’t really pay that much? I mean, I guess that works. It’s possible.
But I mean my ancestors were actual dragons so my bias is going to be absurdly strong here in their favor. In my opinion, there was no asteroid cataclysm – the dragons just flew in from space and ate all the dinos, and turned the Earth into a fucking McDonald’s. Then they took off again to do the same to another world. Dinosaurs are stupid anyway – they don’t even have seven limbs. Obviously trash as species go, inferior and pointless.
They had it coming. 🙂
LikeLike
in the french wiki, we have this also :
« The asteroid (52246) Donaldjohanson, which is located in the main belt and is one of the targets of the space probe Lucy, was named in honor of Donald Johanson by the Center for Minor Planets in December 2015 »
does the space probe lucy exist ?
now i doubt…
LikeLike
I came across this book last week, The Shemetic Origin of the Nations of Western Europe: And More Especially of the English, French, and Irish Branches of the Gaelic Race (1879) by John Pym Yeatman, which can be read here: https://books.google.com/books?id=ToEBAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
I’m linking this up since Yeatman is heavily blackwashed on his Wiki, as he might be getting too close to the truth in some parts. Still full of misdirection, especially when you read Yeatman dedicated it to Napoleon Eugene Louis John Joseph Bonaparte. But it might be worth picking apart. Page 101 is where it gets interesting and misdirect-y, but tread lightly. Of course the main misdirection here is the focus on ‘peoples’ and ‘nations’, where the real action lies where the spook rulers tread i.e. the Families.
This also brings up British Israelism.. and Nordic Israelism, French Israelism, etc. and also “Pyramidology”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Israelism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Israelism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramidology
All reads like damage control and misdirection. Especially if you check out the “Christian Identity” movement, which is a made up term by the spooks used to blackwash their Anti actors:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity
“Another source describes the emergence of Christian Identity from British Israelism as a “remarkable transition”, while also noting that traditional British Israelites were advocates of philosemitism which paradoxically changed to antisemitism and racism under Christian Identity.[9] In fact, British Israelism had several Jewish adherents, and it also received support from rabbis throughout the 19th century; within British politics it supported Benjamin Disraeli, who was descended from Sephardi Jews.[10][11] However, Christian Identity, which emerged in the 1920s, began to turn antisemitic by teaching the belief that the Jews are not descended from the tribe of Judah (as British Israelites maintain), but are instead descended from Satan or Edomite-Khazars.[12] The British Israel form of the belief held no antisemitic views; instead its followers held the view that Jews made up a minority of the tribes of Israel (Judah and Benjamin), with the British and other related Northern European peoples making up the remainder. ”
It “paradoxically changed to antisemitism and racism under Christian Identity” because it was meant to. Just read Wesley A Swift’s page for a taste, including the fact he was a FBI KKK member and “died” on Oct 8th in Mexico.
And it just goes on. The entire Christian Identity movement Wiki is one giant red page.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Philip
What do you think happened to the lost 10 tribes of Israel after they were carried away captive never to be seen again?
LikeLike
Dragons! See Jared’s post above…
LikeLike
about israël etymology
french wiki says this :
In Arabic, the term Israel breaks down into two words: Isrâ (from the root S R Y) = travel in the dark, and îl (from the root ‘YL or’ L) = God
travel in the dark… this is exactly what did the 10 tribes…
while two stayed in the light, 10 disappeared, rolled in the shadow and did their job.
veni
vidi
vici
LikeLike
Israel means.
IS= isis Egyptian mother goddess
RA= Egyptian sun god
El=supreme god of the Canaanites
LikeLike
What mantalo said. Two stayed and 10 spread out across the world.
At least that’s my current theory. Jews (and Jewish-Christians) were the main front after the Phoenicians. Again the focus isn’t on the tribes or peoples themselves, but their spooky leaders. But I found it’s worth picking apart their histories. Even if it’s all bullshit, all the lies stacked up together points to a common source. I’m working a paper now that will add to the pile of proof that these clans were always international.
LikeLike
How do we know there were 12? I know it’s in Tanakh, but besides that?
LikeLike
As for evolutionism, Lamarck has also something to say. Worth studying Lamarck vs Darwin.
LikeLike
I just remembered an interesting tidbit from a documentary about Jeremy Irons and his living in Ireland (I was listening to some youtubers roast The Wokemen series). It turns out, quite by chance, that in moving from England to Cork Jeremy had returned to his family’s place of origin. Apparently some of his ancestors hailed from Cork and he coincidentally had moved house almost next door to his family’s ancient seat. Something like that — I’m probably “misremembering” the details. Anyway, with hindsight of double-M, I now see that as another tiny piece of evidence of who these people are, where they are from, when they are from and with the usual nod and a wink.
LikeLike
So perhaps he’s already a Duke or whatever is the “rankiest” of titles?
LikeLike
Jeremy Irons – Ayn Rand – Rand Corp. All equally spooky in their own way, with a connection to jewish actors / organisations ? Dot to dot to dot, they ove their strange connections.
LikeLike
If the tsar of Russia was Jewish, which Miles has proven to be, why would they need a revolution?
Miles says this:
“It should give you a long chuckle, since we can now see that both sides in the Russian Revolution were Jewish, including the Tsar himself. It is clear the Russian
Revolution was a total fake, used to cover the Jewish takeover of the government and country.”
Weren’t they taking over from a Jewish tsar who was already in control of the government and country?
I understand most revolutions happen because the governors sense something is brewing in the population and they pre-empt an uprising. Was that the case in Russia?
Sometimes these things are hard to grasp.
LikeLike
Preempting uprisings. Taking control of existing oppositions. Exposing and eliminating troublemakers. Misdirection campaigns. And keeping the status quo under the guise of change. These are all reasons for their revolutions. Dumb rulers destroy their enemies. Smarter ones make use of their enemies.
The word itself has a contradictory definitions. Everyone already knows this. Like compare definitions three and four on dictionary.com:
“(1) a sudden, complete or marked change in something: the present revolution in church architecture.
(2) a procedure or course, as if in a circuit, back to a starting point.”
Revolution is a poor word choice if anyone wants actual change. We don’t want to go back to the same starting point, we want to break the the cycle. It’s like calling your resistance organization a Front. This all looks more like clever word play by the rulers, which they can get away with cause they’re at the top of the pyramid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To create a false narrative it is easier if you control all sides. So you have the fake revolutionaries overthrowing an existing government that seemingly gives up without a fight. Miles has shown that with the French, Russian and German (the overthrow of the Kaiser) revolutions, the old regimes just seems to melt away. The populations involved will be much more compliant if they are invested in the story of the uprising. Of course the real story behind each is that the ultra rich concocted another wheeze to steal even more power and wealth from the people, doing whatever it takes to cajole the populace, e.g. peddling communist bulls**t, or “free markets” that are actually lawless corporations doing whatever they like to us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And what about fall of the Soviet Union in 1991? What was that all about?
That always seems a little bit too easy to me.
LikeLike
Look at the wikipedia page for Michael Collins, the “Irish leader”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Collins_(Irish_leader)
Every photo involving him and others appears to be a paste-up. He comes from a wealthy family and goes from being groomed as a banker to suddenly becoming a guerrilla strategist and trainer, ‘commander-and-chief’, then briefly a politician (only lives to be 31), then killed after his role has been fulfilled after the Civil War (upheaval and the subsequent Anglo-Irish Treaty). This military strategist orders the vehicle to stop and jumps out so they could “fight em”… while being fired on during an ambush, gets shots in the head, and the ambushers conveniently run off right then. The whole story reeks heavily of manufactured hero-worship, and of course the promoted rebel forces (or controlled opposition) keep escalating the dialectic so the British can openly occupy the Irish people with arms.
The whole conflict seems manufactured- one instance being the the British just opening fire on an Irish soccer game in response to their spies being assassinated! Real smooth, though I doubt ANY of that really happened (“hey my grandmother was killed at that soccer match how dare you!”). I’m not even getting into the meat of the subsequent Anglo-Irish Treaty that created the “Free State” govt of subjects sworn to the Queen (like Canada), hmmm… So the super-patriotic Irishman Michael Collins who fought tooth and nail for Irish independence just agrees with giving it all away so Ireland can be a dominion of the UK? He doesn’t storm out and re-gather all his willing and war-hardened soldiers to “re-negotiate”? Seems so very similar to every sell-out and born-fake leader in history.
The part early on about him escaping being interrogated/executed as a rebel leader by simply moving to the other side of the building and leaving with a group of prisoners to a Welsh detention camp is laughable! Putting aside his free movement, the British wouldn’t have figured out he must have left with that group and identified him at the detention camp? Of course all those prisoners were set free after about 7 months (still not identified?!) due to “public outcry”.
I’m saving that wikipedia article RIGHT NOW. Just quote certain parts with minimum commentary, look up the genealogy (I’m not an expert on all the families like Miles is), and there’s your expose.
LikeLike
Miles’ guest writer said Collins is a variant of Cohen recently (gboro.pdf), I wonder if Connor and Carroll are too. Brendan O’Carroll’s ”Who Do You Think You Are?” stank to high heaven.
LikeLike
Yes, we’ve suspected the “Big Fella” for quite some time. The Cohen-Collins connection only adds to the scepticism.
Let us not forget the strange pronunciation of Colin Powell’s first name. Sort of makes sense now, i.e. Cohlin Powell 😉
LikeLike