Miles just published part 1 of a 4-part piece on “Ancient Spooks” up at his site. I am starting a new post devoted to discussion of this series of papers, as it seems they will be important and spark lots of discussion. I’d rather have the discussion here rather than on the main ‘Defending Miles Mathis’ thread. I might do this as new important papers or topics come up.
Here is the link to part 1.
Here is the link to part 2.
Here is the link to part 3.
Here is the link to part 4.
the solar system is (already) a gigantic spaceship.
the earth travels (already) in the galactic or intergalactic space and “it” knows perfectly where we are going!
No need to spend money … the trip is for free!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cosmic!
LikeLike
do you think it happens like in the video ?
LikeLike
The graphic is obviously sped up. A friend of mine who used be into astrology and all that nonsense admitted that the constellations in Ptolomey’s time have changed/moved over the centuries, which would signify, albeit slowly, the sun’s traveling in space alongwith the planets.
LikeLike
That’s a great video and a good reminder that we live in a dynamic Universe where every thing is changing its position each nanosecond. The reality is far more complicated than shown in the video, as we are also orbiting the centre of our galaxy and our orbit will be influenced the other massive bodies we pass on our journey. Finally our galaxy is also orbiting around the centre of mass of the Universe, so trying to get a handle on our actual position in space at any moment in time is only ever a close approximation.
We still have much to learn.
LikeLike
this one is from the system solar in the galaxy,
with all approximations needed to make it visual 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shouldn’t the galactic ‘stellar wind’ be slowing the sun down, considering it’s a headwind? When our own solar wind suddenly increases due to a solar flare for instance, when it hits the atmosphere, the atmosphere is compressed and bounces back.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both videos depict the planets as dragging behind the sun. What would cause the drag? Would the cp sea do that?
Could that pattern of motion explain apparent gravitational attraction?
The videographer, DJ Sadhu, attributes the ideas to Keshava Bhat:
http://www.feandft.com/curriculum-vitae-of-dr-pallathadka-keshava-bhat/
Astronomer Phil Plait, who (according to the link he provides) “has appeared as a talking head on approximately a bazillion Discovery Channel shows,” argues against Bhat’s ideas here:
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/no-our-solar-system-not-vortex
Here’s an excerpt from Plait’s argument:
“The claim that the Sun is at the tip of the solar system with the planets trailing behind is also demonstrably wrong. The Sun does not really lead the solar system through the galaxy like the tip of a bullet as Bhat apparently claims (and as Sadhu’s videos show). The planets go around the Sun, and the whole shebang moves around the galaxy as a unit, tipped by that 60° angle. That means sometimes the planets are ahead of the Sun, and sometimes behind it along that galactic orbit.
“It’s a bit like walking down a path while spinning around your head a string with a ball attached at the end (and the circle it makes tipped by 60°). Sometimes the ball is ahead of you and sometimes behind you. It always moves with you down the path no matter how fast you go, and relative to you is always moving at the same speed. If you trace your own motion you make a line, and the ball makes a tilted helix. This is what Bhat and Sadhu are trying to describe, but get wrong.”
Hmm, OK, but that analogy makes the angle 0°. Spinning a ball on a string, while LEANING WAY FORWARD, wouldn’t that be a hybrid? With the ball ahead sometimes, but mostly behind?
Behind, unless we replace the string with a stiff wire, then the ball does not follow behind, but stays even, regardless of the angle. Which should it be? Which more closely models the behavior of the force binding the solar system, do we know?
LikeLike
The video is both correct and misleading at the same time.
The planets aren’t in the galaxy’s gravity “well”, they are in the sun’s. They follow the sun’s motion, and are indeed sometimes ahead of it relative to the sun’s motion around the galactic core. But the planets are “glued” to the sun, not to the galaxy.
In the same way, the moon is “glued” to the Earth, not to the sun. It’s in balance with the sun mostly but it’s not in the sun’s gravity well, it’s in the Earths’.
The moon has its own gravity well, also. Once one enters the moon’s gravity well, the Earths’ gravity is trumped and overwhelmed. The pull of the Earth has been nullified by the pull of the closer body, the moon.
Mapping motion trails is a tricky thing – they can tell you whatever you want them to, but they don’t necessarily tell us what’s actually happening.
GarrettDerner’s quote from Plait: “The claim that the Sun is at the tip of the solar system with the planets trailing behind is also demonstrably wrong. The Sun does not really lead the solar system through the galaxy like the tip of a bullet as Bhat apparently claims (and as Sadhu’s videos show). The planets go around the Sun, and the whole shebang moves around the galaxy as a unit, tipped by that 60° angle. That means sometimes the planets are ahead of the Sun, and sometimes behind it along that galactic orbit.”
…is correct as far as I know. The Vortex people just never really studied Relativity, I guess.
LikeLike
Where does Relativity come in?
LikeLike
GarrettDerner said, “Where does Relativity come in?”
Because it matter where you’re viewing something FROM. If you’re watching from the sun for example, the planets appear to move a certain way. The photons you receive FROM the planets telling you where it was will be different than the photons you receive from another vantage point.
Yes, the planets are spiralling through space along with the galaxy, but is that helpful as a model of how the planets spin around the sun? No, not at all. They are in the sun’s gravity well, not the galaxy’s. Or some balance between the two which effectively is STILL just the sun’s gravity.
So we have so study objects from their own perspective and also screen them against the background of OUR perspective. The galaxy doesn’t care. The Universe, definitely not. To measure planets and their orbits you have to study the body that THEY are orbiting, not the bodies that their orbiter is orbiting. Sure that plays a part but it’s so tiny we can ignore it for initial measurements and maths. It’s fodder, it can be filtered out.
If you wanna know how the moon moves you don’t study Alpha Centauri or Sirius. You study the moon, the Earth, and the sun. In that order. When we find perturbations, we look to the nearest influences – which are Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Not Ganymede or Titan initially. Not Pluto or Mercury necessarily. You study the near objects first and determine if they have an influence.
LikeLike
Well, at least he’s saying rockets do work in a vacuum (I think). That’s an improvement on Shack. But, he seems to pontificate his own laws of nature, like that Boethius character from Cluesforum. And, like Boethius, he also doesn’t answer questions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The above is in reference to the gravity, gas, rocket, “Gaia,” space travel posts above.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What question? I asked a question in the appropriate thread on Space Travel.
I disagree with Simon Shack on many points and have been the only one (so far, which is quite sad) who reviewed his TYCHOS book in detail. And he was not responding well to the founded criticism.
Him calling me an “ESA shill” for pointing out the scientific inconsistencies in his book and model was quite ironic, as he himself allegedly has hosted ESA employees.
I have nothing to do with him whatsoever, other than liking his now pretty much dated September Clues work.
I have different areas of research. But let’s talk about space in the space thread. Curious to know what space travel you do and what you don’t believe in.
LikeLike
How can space travel be impossible if the Earth, Moon and other planets are traveling through space?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Space travel is mainly about entering and changing orbits. Naturally this is no problem, as there are evidently celestial objects in orbits and the changing of orbits occurs as well. Can this be done artficially? Surely, if you have enough fuel for the needed changes in velocity. But what if you don’t have enough fuel? Now, the reality of space travel as it is presented by space agencies and msm hinges largely on two questions: Are gravity assists real? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_assist) and are heat shields capable of resisting reentry heat at the reported velocities? Both are necessary to make mission critical velocity changes without any fuel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.americanelements.com/meltingpoint.html
So I doubt any metal or metal alloy is capable.
Carbon on the other hand is more than capable of withstanding re-entry temp’s.
Aerogel is perfect but much too fragile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Space travel is mainly about entering and changing orbits.”
So they claim indeed. But orbits are, according to the model they use, the result of gravitational forces. You cannot “enter” or “change” orbits. You can only be caught in one. Which you always will be; hence why space travel is impossible (both for us and for extraterrestrials).
People here really think that some space thingy can escape the same force [the only force existing all around in ‘space’] that keep the Moon, Earth, Sun, planets, asteroids, etc. together in an eternal beautifully predictable bachata?
Fuel?
The grapefruit satellite allegedly worked for ages.
The same ridiculous stories appear about “satellites” as about the rest of their space thingies.
“We designed this mission and thought it would work for 3 months, but [magically] things keep working [in the most hostile environment possible] for 5 times the planned mission span…”
Next car I buy I do at NASA. A normal car would run fine for like 10-15 years, but NASA’s Teslas in space (the Sandy Hoax of the Space Travel scam) run for 50-75 years…
.
.
.
.
WITH-OUT A-NY MAIN-TE-NANCE!
LikeLike
“You cannot “enter” or “change” orbits. You can only be caught in one.”
I…..erm…..I…..errrrrm…..I don’t know how to reply to that without getting banned from the internet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Russell, I see a list of melting points? I didn’t claim the metals (mostly the worst possible metal to choose in a radiated environment; Al) or alloys are melting at 300 C?
But the list is good; one of the lowest melting point is -188 degrees for propane. So everything including or ‘heavier’ than propane is not a gas at “just” those temperatures/
And then we are not even at -270…
As you see, Hydrogen melts at -259, so it is a fluid at the temperatures of space (according to their own claims). It is a not a gas (vapor phase) and thus they could never use the lightest element as rocket fuel.
On the rocket aluminum can in space; we have no materials that can withstand both extremes at the same time and all the time.
So how could they ever pull that off?
LikeLike
Not got the time right now but I’ll get back to you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well of course Mt. St. Helen’s was fake, that one photographer escaped with his Ford Pinto. What more proof do you want? Certainly better luck than this thread seems to have.
LikeLike
Certainly better luck than this thread seems to have.
LikeLike
The thought occured to me today, how heavy is the moon? Therefore the gravitational forces of the earth must be exceedingly strong to keep it in earth’s orbit. I’m no scientist or space expert, but a rocket to leave the earth must surely require a helluva load of thrust and be able to withstand considerable pressure.
Look at the size of the fuel cells on this baby:
LikeLike
How did the docking mechanism work on the return after it was attached to the lunar module? I guess NASA will have to get back to us on that one. Hat tip to Dave!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looking to be entertained by the LA Times about the Manson Project for 29 minutes?
Fake fauxtos and a whole lot more. Enjoy.
LikeLike
Book recommendation about The Normans, who seemed to follow in the footsteps of the Phoencians :
“Tancred de Hauteville, an obscure Norman knight living in northern France had little he could offer his twelve sons and most left to seek their fortunes in the south. …By the time the youngest Hauteville brother died, his relatives sat enthroned in Palermo, Tripoli, Malta, and Antioch, and the family possessed the strongest and wealthiest kingdom in Europe.”
LikeLike
He sounds like just another fictional historic character based on the usual rags to riches stories. These mythical knights, kings et al were created by those, most often religious, institutions wanting to provide some written proof to justify their usurping of a piece of property, land or other wealth. Unfortunately our scant repository of history and religious books is mainly pure fiction and cannot be trusted.
LikeLike
That is true. I learned last night that the primary sources are records form monasteries that were founded by one of Tancred’s grandson’s so many years after the fact and of course the monks were beholden to the family for their existence. I’m taking it in with a very large grain of salt in the tradition of mythology.
LikeLike
RE: Bob Dylan’s ghost written music as described in Miles’ paper on Dylan
I was watching “No Direction Home: Bob Dylan,” the Martin Scorcese documentary. There is a scene in which Joan Baez reminisces about her relationship with him back in the 1960s. She tells an anecdote of being with him when her recording of the Dylan song “Love Is Just a Four-Letter Word” came on the radio and they listened to it. Bob commented that it was a really good song and acted as if he’d never heard it before. Joan said she laughed and said, “You wrote it, you dope.”
LikeLike
Yeah, sounds like a hint. I think probably you get clues about who wrote which Dylan song, by looking at who Bob was hanging out with at the time. “Love is Just a Four-Letter Word” would be by Joan, along with maybe all the Dylan songs she used to perform in her mock Dylan voice.
LikeLike
Like a complete unknown!
LikeLike
Time to draw a long bow and send an arrow at one of the big questions: where did these Jews come from anyway? If you’re not down for some super high octane speculation, better to just skip this. I can’t really give a TL;DR either, because I suspect it’ll sound like lunacy until you see the evidence as I came across it in the effort to answer simple questions. And what I found were strange, disparate pieces that must somehow fit together to form history. Apologies for the length.
What is the origin of the word “jew”? Gerry discusses this in AS5, but in my view it goes even deeper and comes from the Hebrew Yud. In the wiki “Yodh:Origins”, they tell us that this letter originated from a pictograph of a hand, which traces to Proto-Semitic and perhaps to the Egyptian hieroglyph of an arm or hand. Does this signify anything?
And what’s up with these “hamsa” amulets Gerry went over in AS5? Clearly they were quite significant as they were and are “popular throughout the Middle East and North Africa”, as wiki tells us. But let’s look further: “Early use of the hamsa has been traced to ancient Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) as well as ancient Carthage [Phoenicia].” Well, that makes their use very old indeed, and makes me think that their modern significance may be quite different from the original. So what is that significance? We’ve seen this “hand” thing twice now, both times in deep antiquity.
Do we still reflect this “hand” idea in English today? Sure, very commonly: “All hands on deck”, or “handyman”, or even “the long arm of the law”. But note the underlying usage: sailors are reporting to take orders, not give them; the handyman does small jobs around the house, he doesn’t own it; the policeman enforces the law, he isn’t the legislator. And if you’re a Game of Thrones fan, the Hand of the King carries out the king’s will but is not the king, correct? Let’s press on.
Does the word “Hebrew” mean the same thing as “Jew”? Oddly, there seems to be no firm answer in the mainstream. So what does the etymology say? Again, there’s no firm answer at all and it’s even foggier than the first question. I did come across this: one theory holds that it traces back to the word “ivri”. How interesting! You see, I had read elsewhere that a person of the Sumerian city of Nibru would hand been called “nibri”, eventually shortened to just “ibri”. Coincidence?
I suppose you know the Jews have their own calendar, but did you ever notice they have a super high year number? In 2019 it’s now the year 5779 according to them. In short, that means their “Year Zero” was 3760BC. Maimonides calculated that was the date of the “creation of the world”. Now the plot really thickens because there’s an ancient Sumerian calendar known as the “Nippur calendar” and what’s strange is that no academic seems to even want to mention that it must have its own “Year Zero”. You can find non-mainstream sources place it at 3773BC or even simply the same as the Hebrew calendar. Oh really? Also, the city of Nippur was originally known as Nibru. Didn’t we just see that?
Since we’ve been looking at so many Jewish surnames in our studies, have you ever noticed the patterns in them? They fall into a small number of groups and wiki even has a “Category:Jewish surnames” page. You’ll notice that two of the six are “Kohenitic” and “Levite”, and we have seen so very many of those among the cryptos, haven’t we? (See Gerry’s AS5 for a discussion of “Levi”.) And so many other Jewish surnames seem quite literally mundane, with many translating to simple occupations. It seems that even among the Chosen there are Chosen. We might think that today’s surnames are more or less random, but given that categories are still apparent among Jews, might there have been something like a more meaningful assignment when they originated?
And what’s up with Jewish laws against intermarriage? It runs from Ezra Chapter 9 through to the Israeli Interior Ministry, in addition to being deeply culturally embedded. It’s all quite bigoted, especially by today’s SJW standards, but of course no one calls them on it. Our social betters keep insisting all the rest of us are bigots (to which I do not subscribe) but this is way beyond that. Supposed ultra-racist and eternal punching bag David Duke only uses the word “miscegenation” when criticizing Jewish attitudes against it, which is about as far as you can get from advocating laws against it. So what was the genesis of this prohibition?
Finally, who was the first Jew? Some few would be able to name Abraham, and most of those would guess he was some random goat-herder plucked out of obscurity on a mission from God. I’ll have to cut a very long story short here, but it appears Abe and his father Terah were plugged in at the highest levels of the Sumerian priesthood, and that’s why he got the assignment. So… what, a Stone Age witch doctor? Who cares?
Take a look at a plan view of the ancient city of Ur. (Abraham was born there, making him a Sumerian. It’s also the location of the US military base Camp Adder. Another coincidence.) The temple complex takes up, to my eye, about 15% of the entire city. The buildings therein were much larger and more sophisticated than the simple one and two-story dwellings surrounding them. Also, take a look at the Ziggurat of Ur, restored by Saddam, which is quite impressive even in 2019. For perspective, the temple complex scaled up to modern Rome would be 100 Vaticans (yes, I penciled it out), and there was a temple complex in each city. Abraham Terah were heavy hitters. Why is this all overlooked by historians and theologians?
So how does this all fit together? Buckle up.
About 6000 years ago in Sumer, human civilization was opened up for business ex nihilo. Some of the Neolithic humans were “chosen” and brought together to serve TPTB, building and moving into cities for the purpose. These were the original “jews”. They were trained and given assignments, and were not to intermix with the “wild-type” humans. Certain of them were given managerial (“kohen”) and administrative (“levi”) functions. All within the city had a task and a place in the hierarchy, and all outside the city might as well have been cattle (“goyim”). Although elaborated, occulted, and diffused, do you not think this system still exists today?
Bonus coincidence #1: I just heard about a recent book called “The Fall” by Steve Taylor. While his thesis is nothing like mine, he recognized that 4000BC saw the introduction into human society of: war, patriarchy, massive inequality, class system, gods/organized religion, and violent invasion.
Bonus coincidence #2: In 1650, Bishop James Ussher, working from the Old Testament, calculated the date of Creation as 4004BC. For the record, I’m not a Young Earth Creationist but it’s still pretty weird, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“About 6000 years ago in Sumer, human civilization was opened up for business ex nihilo. Some of the Neolithic humans were “chosen” and brought together to serve TPTB, building and moving into cities for the purpose. These were the original “jews”. ”
That’s something I thought also, since Gerry came up with Jew being another name for ‘leader’.
You’re also basically describing one of the underlying plots of Battlestar Galactica, the new miniseries. The underlying plot is said to be based on Mormon religion, but we now know Mormonism goes deeper (crypto-Jewish) than that. One of the subplots is about the Cylons and humans intermingling and then seeding the Earth. The Cylons almost wiped out the humans in an apocalyptic, deluge like catastrophe (nuclear Armageddon). They’re are a monotheistic race based on a very numerologist set of clones, and chase the 12 colonies (based on the zodiac) all the way to Earth. When they get here they inter-breed with protohumans who were already here, and 150,00 years later here we are.
The spook-a-nomics behind the show is interesting, including show-creator Ron Moore and that a couple of the actresses were later caught up in some silly sex-cult scam. Some top Family names in the cast roster and not just Moore, including a Forbes, Rhodes, and Campbell.
LikeLike
Welcome back Miles….yep, you heard that right folks!
LikeLike
One more *tiny piece of evidence supporting a wide-spread Phoeny merchant empire and one of the sources of its power…
https://backend-484.uni-heidelberg.de/sites/default/files/styles/img_free_aspect_1024/public/2019-09/zinn_map_c_c_daniel_berger.jpg?itok=Vzx7tfLS
LikeLike
Ze link to ze article..
https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/en/newsroom/enigma-bronze-age-tin
LikeLike
As for not-so-ancient spookery, I just found this little gem:
Until I saw the documentary “The Revolutionary” at the Philadelphia Independent Film Festival, I mistakenly thought that China during the revolutionary period was one country that had not felt the Jewish embrace. In fact, 85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs, who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home to assist the Chinese.
Laura Goldman(!!): A Jew in Mao’s China
Does anyone know which daughter of which founder they’re referring to? Somehow I don’t feel like buying the DVD just for that, because they probably won’t tell you anyway. This may even be an advertisement especially aimed at truthers.
And just for the record: I think they felt that “embrace” long before Communism.
LikeLike
Bruce Lee was a Ho Tung Bosman per the narrative of course. Here’s one of his more famous cousins…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Ho
LikeLike
Bruce Lee was the son of a Ho?
LikeLike
Yes he was. A ho full of grace. His father was a famous actor of course…
https://www.wingchunnews.ca/geraldo-rivera-interviews-with-bruce-lees-mother-in-her-only-tv-appearance/
LikeLike
There was a Godfrey Ho who was a notorious film-maker: he made god-awful martial arts movies that are so bad they are very funny to watch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Ho
LikeLike
If actress Sandra Oh married filmmaker Godfrey Ho her name would be Sandra Oh-Ho.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I like the look on peoples’ faces when I tell them Bruce Lee was (is) a Jew. It’s almost as fun as telling folks that bob marley was (is) a Jew.
LikeLike
Bruce used a stunt double on “Enter the Dragon” in the scenes where his character does acrobatic flips such as in the film’s opening scene where he does a flip over his buddies’ heads. Also in his fight with O’Hara where he does a back-flip and kicks him in the crotch.
I believe he did have legit skills though that were exceptional.
LikeLike
Ho Chi Minh comes to mind. Chinese traditionally put their surname first.
Zhang Jue, leader of the Yellow Turban rebellion, has an interesting name, also spelled Zhang Jiao (Zhang is one of the seven Jewish surnames conferred by Ming):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_Jue
LikeLike
Talking of Ho Chi Minh:
‘North Vietnam’s Politburo chairman, Ho Chi Minh, suggested to David Ben-Gurion in 1946 that he proclaim a Jewish Government in Exile, and establish such a government’s headquarters in North Vietnam.’
https://www.jta.org/1966/11/08/archive/ben-gurion-reveals-suggestion-of-north-vietnams-communist-leader
LikeLike
Yeah the Internet wouldn’t tell me either after about 15mins of searching. She would have to be either Ella Goldman, Rebecca Dreyfuss, Rosa Sachs, or Louisa Sachs if I’m reading their tree correctly. I would not be surprised if we came across their names if we read up on the seemingly hundreds of rebellions going on in China during the 19th century. I probably already did but didn’t notice.
LikeLike
As for the historical operations in China of the Phoenicians (or any of their numerous proxies), I have the sneaking suspicion that one of them was the Taiping Rebellion of 1850-64. I suspect only a handful in the English-speaking world have ever even heard the name, but Wiki describes it thusly: “It ranks as one of the bloodiest wars in human history, the bloodiest civil war, and the largest conflict of the 19th century. Estimates of the war dead range from 20–70 million to as high as 100 million, with millions more displaced.” I’ve never once heard it mentioned by the mainstream.
But why would I think the Jews might have been behind it? “Led by Hong Xiuquan, the self-proclaimed brother of Jesus Christ, the goals of the Taipings were religious, nationalist, and political in nature; they sought the conversion of the Chinese people to the Taiping’s syncretic version of Christianity, the overthrow of the ruling Manchus, and a wholesale transformation and reformation of the state.” Sounds kinda like he was Trump Christ, and I think we all know how the Phoenicians feel about Trump and Christ.
Might it be yet another war that was managed and largely faked? Possibly, as that certainly seems to be the rule for wars. But then we have to answer the question of why they would fake it then flush it down the memory hole. Haven’t we also learned that our attention should be drawn most acutely to that which is most pointedly ignored?
LikeLike
@Matt
““Led by Hong Xiuquan, the self-proclaimed brother of Jesus Christ, the goals of the Taipings were religious, nationalist, and political in nature;”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/church-of-sweden-announced-greta-thunberg-successor-of-jesus
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay now THAT is hilarious!
LikeLike
Why do we need them to tell us? It’s totally self-evident. Similar hairdos and so many other things. As I heard it, the elite Jews all loved that guy and were anxious to do exactly what he said, so obviously we should do whatever Greta(TM) tell us to. Anybody ever hear what happened with that Jesus character? He sorta fell off the map.
LikeLike
@Gerry: Yes the more reading I do on ancient history, the more it seems like the colonization/globalism project started from the very beginning.
Disclaimer: The Buddhists in the room.. I don’t mean to insult you. Also, I was never good with boundaries.
Anyways, I’ve been trying to ‘fill the gap’ so to speak and been doing some light readings on Greco-Bactrian, the Indo-Greeks, and early Buddhist/Mauryan history.
I’m sure some people out there have already figured this out, especially since it’s fairly easy to figure it out on the Wiki pages… but Buddhism was an Ancient spook project.
First clue: Buddha’s bodyguard was Vajrapani, or Hercules.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajrapani#In_India
Also the reason I say this is that early Buddhist history is fuzzy (of course), and doesn’t seem to get active until after the “Greek” invasions in India.
Nah, Alexander the Great,The Project, didn’t stop at the Hyphasis. They really try to oversell the idea in causal mainstream history that Alexander’s army mutinied and all the Greeks went home save for a few colonizers. Mainstream also says Buddhism was a true Indian invention..
Yeah I’m not so sure about that anymore.
Ashoka the Great was also a spook project, except on the other side. However he barely exists in the archeological record.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka
“According to Roman historian Appian, Chandragupta had made a “marital alliance” with Seleucus; there is thus a slight possibility that Ashoka had a Seleucid Greek grandmother.[17][18] An Indian Puranic source, the Pratisarga Parva of the Bhavishya Purana, also described the marriage of Chandragupta with a Greek (“Yavana”) princess, daughter of Seleucus.[19][20] Although there are no evidence showing if the Seleucid princess, as one of the many consorts of the Mauryan harem, had any children, let alone giving birth to Bindusara.[21]”
I’m not sure if I read it here or on another Wiki page, but Ashoka would be at least a quarter Yona, or “Greek” (or 100% spook). It was his grandfather (I believe), Chandragupta Maurya, who had a handler behind his throne named Chanakya, also known as Kautilya. He would write a political treatise called the Arthashastra, that honestly after reading a few chapters, makes The Prince read like a book for wee children. It’s crazy psychotic, and the whole point of it is to set up and maintain totalitarian spy regime.
A lot more on this later (especially the connection to Christianity). But I saw this at the bottom of Ashoka’s page, and I think here’s what a map looks like to the hidden rulers:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Phil, thanks for sharing that, and sorry for my delayed answer. I only stumbled over Greco-Buddhism recently, and haven’t yet read much about it. My entry was when I was searching for occurrences of Semitic vocabulary, and came across the Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription in Greek & Aramaic, also allegedly by Ashoka.
You’re right: The fact that Buddhism needs is also proclaimed in Greek & Aramaic puts a question mark to the “true Indian invention”. The empires of several merchant overlords may have overlapped in the region, and perhaps they wished for a merger into some silk-road joint-venture. The Susa weddings were another such puzzle piece earlier on.
“The usage of Aramaic reflect the fact that Aramaic (the so-called Official Aramaic) had been the official language of the Achaemenid Empire which had ruled in those parts until the conquests of Alexander the Great.”
LikeLike
As for possible punnery in the name of Buddha’s “protector” वज्रपाणि Vajira-Pani:
वज्र vajra means “thunderbolt” & “diamond”, but also hard & mighty
पणितृ pani means “hand”, but also trader & seller
So the guy lurking behind the image of Buddha could simply be a mighty trader. Or a diamond merchant.
And in the Greek design also a “hidden leader”, with the Hercules imagery. Must’ve been difficult for the ancient spooks to keep up with all the multi-lingual punnery.
LikeLike
And eerily, in the Semitic languages the root בדה √bdh means to invent, fabricate, concoct.
But I wouldn’t go so far as to call Buddhism itself a “project”. It was & is a tool just as much or as little as any other religion. All religions were founded on true & useful ideas, but were institutionalized by the spook overlords to be means to commercial ends.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought about that statement for awhile after writing it. I have a bit of difficult time writing about religion, since I don’t want to give anyone a serious bout of cognitive dissonance or lose the positive aspects of their faith. But it’s hard to know where to draw the line, since every time I look into the beginnings of the major religions I keep finding the same type of shady people behind it or around it, and the same type of tricks being pulled. So ‘Bdh’ means to invent or fabricate!? Ooo wee..
But you’re right. These spooks are ‘untapped’. They have to hijack and corrupt the real thing and twist it to suit their own evil purposes. Reading about the Buddhism, my guess is that whatever was real back then came out of the Sramana movement, and they hijacked this. The Brahmins definitely represented old Indian aristocratic, moneylending & priestly spook class (think rabbis), and the Sramanas were their new enemy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Arama%E1%B9%87a
“The śramaṇa refers to a variety of renunciate ascetic traditions from the middle of the 1st millennium BCE.[11] The śramaṇas were individual, experiential and free-form traditions.[11] The term “śramaṇas” is used sometimes to contrast them with “Brahmins” in terms of their religious models.[11] Part of the śramaṇa tradition retained their distinct identity from Hinduism by rejecting the epistemic authority of the Vedas, while a part of the śramaṇa tradition became part of Hinduism as one stage in the Ashrama dharma, that is as renunciate sannyasins.[11][27]”
Reminds me of early conflict between early Christianity v. Judaism right around the same time Buddhism was getting hot and its conflict with Hinduism. The parallels are striking. My knowledge on the Vedas and Hinduism is close to zero though.
LikeLike
While reading about Buddha’s son, Rāhula, I was reminded he and Gautama were from the Shakya</> royal family. The amount of times they’ve re-spelled or shuffled up this name throughout history is immense. Reading up on Scythian history will connect to you just about every other single nomadic empire in history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
“Some scholars, including Michael Witzel[44] and Christopher I. Beckwith[45] argue that the Shakya were Scythians from Central Asia or Iran, and that the name Śākya has the same origin as “Scythian”, called Sakas in India. Scythians were part of the Achaemenid army in the Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley from the 6th century BCE.[46] Indo-Scythians were also known to have appeared later in South Asia in the Middle Kingdom period, around the 2nd century BCE to the 4th century CE.[47]”
Plenty of other wiki pages and elsewhere that confirms the same, despite the amount of obfuscation on these pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka
“The Scythians (/ˈsɪθiən, ˈsɪð-/; from Greek Σκύθης, Σκύθοι), also known as Scyth, Saka, Sakae, Iskuzai, or Askuzai, were a nomadic people who dominated the Pontic steppe from about the 7th century BC up until the 3rd century BC…
The Scythians are generally believed to have been of Iranian origin.[5] They spoke a language of the Scythian branch of the Iranian languages,[6] and practiced a variant of ancient Iranian religion.[7] Among the earliest peoples to master mounted warfare,[8] the Scythians replaced the Cimmerians as the dominant power on the Pontic Steppe in the 8th century BC.[9] During this time they and related peoples came to dominate the entire Eurasian Steppe from the Carpathian Mountains in the west to Ordos Plateau in the east,[10][11] creating what has been called the first Central Asian nomadic empire.[9][12] Based in what is modern-day Ukraine and southern Russia, the Scythians called themselves Scoloti and were led by a nomadic warrior aristocracy known as the Royal Scythians”
Remember Cimmerians = Gomerites = Gomer = son of Japheth from the Table of Nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gomer
“In 1498 Annio da Viterbo published fragments known as Pseudo-Berossus, now considered a forgery, claiming that Babylonian records had shown that Comerus Gallus, i.e. Gomer son of Japheth, had first settled in Comera (now Italy) in the 10th year of Nimrod following the dispersion of peoples. In addition, Tuiscon, whom Pseudo-Berossus calls the fourth son of Noah, and says ruled first in Germany/Scythia, was identified by later historians (e.g. Johannes Aventinus) as none other than Ashkenaz, Gomer’s son. ”
Biblical Ashkenaz is usually derived from Assyrian Aškūza (cuneiform Aškuzai/Iškuzai)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians#Descent_claims
“A number of groups have claimed possible descent from the Scythians, including the Ossetians.[19] Some legends of the Poles,[71] the Picts, the Gaels, the Hungarians (in particular, the Jassics), among others, also include mention of Scythian origins. Some writers claim that Scythians figured in the formation of the empire of the Medes and likewise of Caucasian Albania.”
“The Scythians also feature in some national origin-legends of the Celts. In the second paragraph of the 1320 Declaration of Arbroath, the élite of Scotland claim Scythia as a former homeland of the Scots. According to the 11th-century Lebor Gabála Érenn (The Book of the Taking of Ireland), the 14th-century Auraicept na n-Éces and other Irish folklore, the Irish originated in Scythia and were descendants of Fénius Farsaid, a Scythian prince who created the Ogham alphabet.
The Carolingian kings of the Franks traced Merovingian ancestry to the Germanic tribe of the Sicambri. Gregory of Tours documents in his History of the Franks that when Clovis was baptised, he was referred to as a Sicamber with the words “Mitis depone colla, Sicamber, adora quod incendisti, incendi quod adorasti.” The Chronicle of Fredegar in turn reveals that the Franks believed the Sicambri to be a tribe of Scythian or Cimmerian descent, who had changed their name to Franks in honour of their chieftain Franco in 11 BC. ”
Finally, see the bee/fly symbols on Scythian jewelry.
Look at the object on the right, center below the human figure:
And here, also center:
There is a book I came across awhile ago, written in the 19th or early 20th century, which was a conspiracy/revisionist book claiming the Scots were actually Scythians, and that the Ashkenazi Jews and the current Sachs clan are descended from them. It read like mis-direction at the time, but now I’m curious to read it. I couldn’t find it the other day searching for it, but if anyone has a link I would appreciate it.
Sooner or later I will find the connection to the Hata clan in Japan and it seems I’m inching closer every month. Plus we need to look at other spooky Japanese names like Akizuki, Osaka, and Obama.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hata_clan
LikeLike
‘Hata – this name was changed to Koremune in 880.’ A slur on Komnene?
LikeLiked by 1 person
At the bottom of the page there is a link to a Hata no Kawakatsu, sometimes called Hada no Kōkatsu. (Khosrow, Khusro, Khosrau?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hata_no_Kawakatsu
Here’s what wki says about the theory on the bottom of the Hata page. I might have posted this before:
There is no evidence available, including modern DNA analysis, to support this hypothesis. A recently published study of the genetic origins of Japanese people does not support a genealogical link as put forward by Saeki.[5] Researcher and author Jon Entine emphasizes that DNA evidence excludes the possibility of significant links between Japanese and Jews.[6] “
Remember it was the Nestorians who stole sericulture from the Far East and brought it back to the Byzantine Empire.
This Jon Entine = high ranker spook. Miles might have covered him before. Graduated from Trinity College in Hartford in 1974. Directed McGovern’s 1972 presidential primary campaign, won 19 emmys, producer for NBC, ABC, and founder of the Genetic Literacy Project, supporter of GMOs, fascist think tank bot and it just goes on and on. Sure we can trust him! /sarc
LikeLike
Guys, please be careful with the Twelve Tribes. I personally believe they’re utter hogwash. I already showed you that most of the 12 names are obvious puns about finance & power.
But that’s not all. Most of spook numerology is also puns.
Ten means wealth. It’s even related, through tithing.
ˁšr עשר = fortune, riches, wealth
ˁšr עשר = ten
Two means disguise. It’s also related, through doubling & imitation.
šnh שנה = alter, change, double, duplicate, disguise, pervert
šny שני = two
And tribe really means scepter. It’s the same entry even.
šbṭ שבט = rod, staff, club, scepter, tribe
So the ten-and-two tribes are really the scepter of hidden wealth. Why do you think the European Union is symbolized by 12 stars?
I haven’t looked too closely on the Genealogies of Nations, but I don’t think they should be taken literally either. The spooks are not about ethnicity & religion, they’re about power & finance.
LikeLike
I’m with ya, but let’s be more specific here. All the work we’ve done here and on Miles site, strongly suggests that having Jewish/Phoenician blood in your veins is a significant part of the power structure.
But I don’t think the Table of Nations isutter hogwash. To me, the 12 tribes stuff reads like a gameplan for re-taking over the world after the Great Catastrophe(s). For example, I found the Cimmerians or “Gomerites” geographical location seems to line up nicely with Yamnaya culture. See this map gif here:
Also why doesn’t Yamna culture occupy Crimea? If it did, might it suggest maritime origin for this culture?
Interesting how these migrations are ending up exactly where we are finding centers of spooky power., all around the world
Iran, check. Anatolia, check. Macedonia, check. Armenia, check. Tarim basin (Scythia, Silk Road), check. Lower Scandinavia, check. That far eastern culture right where Mongolia is located (the name is too blurly on this map.. Alanosavo culture?), and where the Han Chinese fought off centuries of “nomadic” empires, check.
But yes, I’m not studying this history as an ethnic history first. IMHO, they are hidden tribes based on wealth, and maintain this by keeping all power in the ‘family’, and by, for thousands of years, holding an intelligence/knowledge advantage over the rest of the world.
LikeLike
Afanasievo culture, thats what I meant. Not exactly where Mongolia is, but close enough. The history of the Silk Road empires in this whole region is very interesting (and spooky).
LikeLike
Gerry, very interesting! So what’s the hidden ancient spook meaning of 18? And 33? And 47?
LikeLike
the simplest
1 ==> A
8 ==> H
1818 ==> ah ah 🙂
but there must be a smartest meaning, of course
LikeLike
Answer below, space is getting narrow here. 😉
LikeLike
Since you brushed up against it a couple of times above, I thought I’d bring the Aryans into the conversation. The mainstream admits that’s where Iran gets its name, but they do not do so for Ireland. I think we can see the connection just from the information you mentioned above: Ireland <- Scythians <- Iran <- Aryans. Note that the Aran Islands lie at the mouth of Galway Bay.
So who were these Aryans? Good question. and good luck trying to sort fact from fiction on its wiki page. (Although I did notice that according to Blavatsky: “The Semites were a subdivision of the Aryan root race.” Haha!) All that we good slaves know is that as soon as someone speaks the very word we are to turn our heads and spit on the ground.
A ginormous cloud of noxious smoke went up over the Aryans in the early 1940’s, courtesy of the fake Nazis, who also very effectively blackwashed the swastika. Do you imagine this was happenstance? Me neither.
LikeLike
Yes I believe they shit-canned the Aryan theory (and Phoenician history) because it was leading to everything we are finding out here.
Furthermore, per the page on the Shakya dynasty, they were vassals of the larger Kingdom of Kosala.
Kosala was the ancient kingdom founded by the semi-mythical Ikshvaku or Solar dynasty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_dynasty
The primogenitor of this dynasty is alleged to be the sun god Suyra, or Vivasvan and his son Vaivasvata Manu, who was the king of Dravida, and just like Noah, was warned of the Great Flood and built an ark.
“In Vishnu Purana, Vaivasvata, also known as Sraddhadeva or Satyavrata, was the king of Dravida before the great flood.[3] He was warned of the flood by the Matsya (fish) avatar of Vishnu, and built a boat that carried the Vedas, Manu’s family and the seven sages to safety, helped by Matsya. The myth is repeated with variations in other texts, including the Mahabharata and a few other Puranas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu_(Hinduism)”
So Buddha’s genealogy takes us right back to the origins of Hinduism and the Vedas. Ooof.
LikeLike
Also to note, 24 Jain ‘tirthankaras’ or spiritual teachers, are descended from this dynasty. Just a reminder of Jainism main symbols:
It seems part of the project of Nazism was not just to blackwash the truth about the Jews, Phoenicians, but to blackwash and obfuscate all of human history.
LikeLike
If it aids the debate;
The ARyans – ARmenians of ARarat
https://aratta.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/the-aryans-armenians-of-ararat/
Ancient Armanoids
https://www.facebook.com/pg/ancientarmenoids/photos/
Armenoid race
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenoid_race
LikeLike
The book ‘Deadlier Than The H Bomb’ (1956) by Leonard Young.
https://archive.org/stream/deadlier-than-the-h-bomb-leonard-young/deadlier-than-the-h-bomb-leonard-young_djvu.txt
Excerpt from chapter 2, p.12;
The teaching in the synagogue incited the Jews to a thorough exploitation of
their Gentile neighbours and the doctrine was eventually embodied in a book,
called the Shulchan Aruk. A few quotations will suffice to show its character:
‘When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches another Jew may go to the same
Gentile, lend him money and, in his turn, deceive him so that the Gentile shall
be ruined. For the property of a Gentile (according to our law) belongs to no
one, and the first Jew that passes has the full right to seize it.’
‘When a Jew makes a deal with a Gentile and another Jew comes up and
deceives the Gentile no matter in what manner, whether he give him false
measure or overcharge him, then both Jews must share between them the profits
thus sent by Jehovah.”
‘Although it is not a direct obligation for a Jew to kill a Gentile with whom
he lives in peace yet, in no case is he allowed to save a Gentile’s life.’
‘It is always a meritorious deed to get hold of a Gentile’s possessions.’
‘Marriages taking place among Gentiles have no binding strength,
i.e., their cohabitation is just as the coupling of horses therefore their children
do not stand as humanly related to their parents.’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sunshine, I was not raised religious and learned some but not a lot about Judaism. My feeling is that the families are not very religious either, so I don’t think we’re likely to learn much by trying to figure out what kind of religious laws are followed by religious Jews.
Having said that, some of the statements you repeated did not ring true to me, despite my limited knowledge. So I looked up the issue of stealing from gentiles and not saving the life of a gentile. I found that neither of them seem to be true.
http://halachayomit.co.il/en/default.aspx?HalachaID=3359
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh
I live in a country where every day seven million jews wake up every morning trying to figure out how to screw each other over.
I don’t know by what code or beliefs the ruling families live, but I’m pretty damned sure it isn’t halacha (Jewish law).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey Josh! Thanks for the message. I’m glad you added these links to help the bigger picture. Admittedly, I haven’t read Shulchan Aruch as the author states to establish my opinion on this particular question but I will try and find an English translation. Any suggestions?
LikeLike
Type in shulchan aruch English translation into any search engine and I believe you find it.
LikeLike
In recognition of Yom Kippur, now just a few days past, I would like to share with you the declaration of the Kol Nidre, recited before the evening services for the Day of Atonement by every congregation in every synagogue:
“All vows we are likely to make, all oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.”
Does anyone think the ruling families would go along with that one?
LikeLiked by 1 person