[UPDATE Jan 11, 2019: RESULTS ARE POSTED AT THE BOTTOM]
Alright, I know this is a little last minute, but I thought it would be fun to poll people on their favorite Miles Mathis paper of 2018. In fact, let’s vote on 4 categories (please vote for at least the first two):
- Favorite paper by Miles from 2018.
- Favorite paper by Miles of all time.
- Favorite physics paper.
- Favorite guest paper. (I wont’ hold it against you if it’s not one of mine.)
And two more just for shits and giggles:
5. Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2018
6. Worst crisis actor.
Leave your vote in comments. You don’t have to vote for all categories but please vote for the first two. And if you find that you simply can’t choose just one, then you can list a few. And please number your votes corresponding to the categories above. Votes cast after Sunday night (Jan. 6) at midnight Friday 7pm GMT (2pm EST) will not be counted!
[Wordpress will ask for you e-mail in order to comment. If you feel uncomfortable leaving your e-mail, just make one up — they don’t check if it’s real. And if you don’t see your comment go through, then it probably means I have to approve it so be patient.]
RESULTS:
Best of 2018
1st place: Titanic (49 votes)
2nd place: 3-way tie between Blackrock/Vanguard, Modernism is Fascism, and Lawrence of Arabia (4 votes each)
3rd place: 3-way tie between Cool Moonlight, Leveson-Gower, and Jeffrey MacDonald (3 votes each)
Best of All Time
1st place: JFK assassination hoax/Hidden Kings (22 votes)
2nd place: Tate/Manson (19 votes)
3rd place: 2-ways tie between the Gurus paper (“What I Finally Understood”) and Hiller (“Hitler’s Genealogy”) with 9 votes, followed closely by Proof that John Lennon Faked His Death with 8 votes (It dawned on me counting votes that Lennon is basically an alternative spelling of Lenin).
Best Physics
1st place: Pi=4 (17 votes)
2nd place: Unified Field (5 votes)
3rd place: 3-way tie between Rainbows, Lift on a Wing, and The Trouble with (and Solution to) Tides (4 votes)
Best Guest Paper
1st place: Ancient Spooks (37 votes)
2nd place: Gandhi (12 votes)
3rd place: 2-way tie between Smedley Butler and Kent State (6 votes)
And the Silliest/Most Absurd Hoax of 2018
1st place: Roadster……in……space! (9 votes)
2nd place: Thai Cave (7 votes)
3rd place: 2-way tie between Thousand Oaks and Skripal (3 votes)
Worst Crisis Actor of 2018
1st place: David Hogg and his schoolmates (7 votes)
2nd place: Trump and his hair lost by a hair (6 votes)
3rd place: Theresa May (2 votes)
Miles chimed in with his vote in categories 1-3, which you can read here. (Short answer is Titanic for 2018 and his paper on building elements for both categories 2 and 3, since it will prove to be the most significant.)
Without a second of deliberation, favorite all-time: Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincoln. Why? I believe it shows us some very important things. 1. Conspiracies & mythologies can arise out of seemingly mundane circumstances (a president’s imminent death endangers the union) 2. The media (of the time) plays an active role in giving the myth legs 3. Government officials stage events to create scapegoats 4. It’s our event, an American event, 100 years before Kennedy 5. It seems to have served as a blueprint for many future fake deaths 6. It establishes military intelligence as legitimate manipulator of cultural events 7. It shows how much can be accomplished with unwitting participants or esp. with individuals who think they’re just doing the right thing for the right reason without overreliance on the sinister machinations of the ‘families’ And finally, 9. – it’s a shock. No one believed the official Kennedy assassination story but for me the Lincoln assassination was always sacrosanct. And Miles’ research into the constitutional situation at the time-brilliant.
Thanks for this input opportunity!
LikeLiked by 2 people
If one accepts the Lincoln hoax, it’s easier to accept the Kennedy one, in my opinion, as a repetition of a very successful stunt.
On that note, I do recall this: the television commentary in 1963 during the televised JFK funeral made a point of saying that Jackie Kennedy insisted that Jack’s funeral be modeled on Lincoln’s funeral, which it was. That impressed my naive 12-year-old brain so much so, I never forgot it. And over the years, I marveled at how quickly they could organize that elaborate funeral.
Now I see it as an inside joke — both assassinations being hoaxes.
LikeLike
RE FRANK NORRIS’ VOTE.
Would Frank or anyone care to mention what the Constitutional situation was at the time of Lincoln’s fake assassination? Was it the issue of state’s rights, or the right of states to secede from the Union? Or do I have to go reread that paper to find out?
LikeLike
Without going back to it, I recall it was the line-of-succession in the case the president would incapacitated long-term, that basically new elections could be held, that the V.P. did not automatically succeed the POTUS as is now the case.
LikeLike
It was this constitutional situation coupled with the view that Lincoln’s party would lose any such election that drove the decision to fake the assassination (I believe I got that right).
LikeLike
Lessee…President retires, there must be an election. President dies, Veep stays put. Expect more and better assassinations. And NetFlix seres.
LikeLike
I think the Blackrock article was the best
LikeLike
I haven’t noticed the two NRO papers and the Kingsman paper being mentioned. Any thoughts about them?
http://mileswmathis.com/nro.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/NRO2.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/kingsman.pdf
LikeLike
The orange suit coat is for William of Orange/House of Orange/Orange Men secret society that starved Ireland for fun and profit. “The Kingsman” PDF is loaded! Fane is the surname of the hetero-transvestite killer in Hitchcock’s B&W “MURDER!” and the last look at the Victorian slums bombed by request in World War Re-Deux.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Snappy but brilliant comments. Yes, Ireland has been a sandbox for these families for a long time. They have wiped the slate clean several times, including the Tudor wars against the Irish (genocide, basically) and the Irish “Famine” (there was no famine but the usual genocide). The current trend is to get the Irish populace excited about self-destruction via unrestricted abortion and unrestricted migration. 3rd Extinction incoming!
LikeLike
Those papers were great, that’s why I put them up.
LikeLike
Smiley, plz consider doing a paper on the intriguing Ross Ulbricht story. But then maybe the Ulbricht story is as real as it gets. One snip at a time.
LikeLike
My favorite papers:
1. (2018) Cats. How the best are fooled into contradiction: we make free animals pets and wonder why the Trillionaire Families make pets of us.
2. (all time) Bob Dylan.
3. (physics) 182a The Source of Gravity.
Miles regarding expansion: “I was open to suggestion for something better.” A new member’s first post at a physics forum asked about the spin of the universe. A Miles reader said this was interesting, and Miles asked why. The reader said but one word: “gravity.” Indeed.
Nature shows universal spinning about centers, causing curvature inward as the shove of gravity, balanced by the shove outward of E/M; the two forces resulting in a Unified Field.
The as yet Great Unknown physics is what is at the center/circumference causing Gravity and E/M, reminiscent of Pi=4 where circular motion reveals an overlooked dimension wherein the mystic God particle meets the physics Love particle of an expanded science of “Scio,” whereby “I know”–when I am “…open to suggestion for something better.” My favorite MM quote: “…I just created a universe that curves…and in which you would come back to where you were if you traveled far enough in ‘one direction.”‘ (The Source of Gravity).
4. (guest) Ancient Spooks.
——-
5. (hoax, 2018) 2016 US election.
6. (worst and best actor) Trump.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Miles regarding expansion: “I was open to suggestion for something better.” A new member’s first post at a physics forum asked about the spin of the universe. A Miles reader said this was interesting, and Miles asked why. The reader said but one word: “gravity.” Indeed.”
The opening of Greene’s books “Fabric of the Universe” might be focusing on the same issue, no doubt to completely misdirect. I could be wrong — I’m science-deaf and barely understood the book (it is supposed to be a popular text ffs!).
I just found it interesting that the author (who I assume is a spook) starts with that central problem and spins it away from the truth. The pun is deliberate but the intent is serious 😉 He looks at the spinning bucket of water on a rope experiment but I could be making an erroneous connection, I so poorly understand the mechanisms at work.
That Greene is a real pill though. To think I swallowed his decades long baloney on “super strings”; and Miles demolished it with a simple piece of logic.
LikeLike
Thanks for introducing me to Brian Greene. I knew nothing about Brian but I just watched his Public BS video on space. Your associating me with him is unwarranted. I am nothing like him.
Greene strikes me as a handsome actor groomed by Intelligence to create confusion, chaos, fear, uncertainty and apathy with no scientific understanding possible; all with seductive and entertaining half-truths.
Memorable quotes were: “Physicists do not have to be happy;” Mr. Higgs, another actor, laughing and saying “I enjoyed the party;” and “rip space apart”–in other words, a rip-off.
Miles’ “pool ball mechanics” is light years more true and secure, a physics necessary to launch into true metaphysics. I need both realms but I do not confuse the two. I’m not so Greene that I can’t spot the Greenbacks behind this project; or the Trillionaire Families with their air-head physics for the masses.
Thanks to Miles and Josh for helping me get my feet on the ground and out of the clouds in order to cut through the fog.
LikeLike
Happy to be of service. Green/e is one of the family names. See Miles’ paper on John Reed.
LikeLike
Lol. I did not associate you with Mr Greene. I was suggesting that he is misdirecting away from an issue which you highlighted earlier (the spinning universe). I don’t understand such topics but I was thinking that someone who did might be able to unspin Mr Green’s misdirection in the first chapter of that book, the one in which he looks at the spinning bucket of water experiment. But I understand how easily it is to misinterpret the text — do it myself all the time.
LikeLike
Best 2018 : Titanic
Favorite of all time : John Lennon
Favourite guest paper : Phoenican
Silliest hoax of 2018 – Skirpal Novichok
LikeLike
1. Electric Universe Controlled Opposition
2. OJ Trial
3. All the papers on planetary orbits.
4. Victor Nabokov
5. Route 99/Vegas Event
6. Everyone involved in the Thousand Oaks/Route 99 survivors event.
LikeLike
As a PS to the above – what I Iike most about Miles’s writing is that he encourages clear thinking based on facts. And where he is speculating he clearly tells the reader that. I too have a philosophy and fine arts background and hands down the most useful class I ever took in college was Symbolic Logic. I had a handful of teachers over the years in K-12 who applied logic in their courses and they really stand out as the best educators.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The depth of the commentary here is so rich and informative! The high quality of content here shines a bright light on the dark, money making fraud called the education (indoctrination) system. Thank you each and every commenter!
MM’s anger at the destruction of art, physics, the planet, animal life, etc. I also share. Individually, for most of this incarnation, my soul has been deceived. As a naive, trusting, and innocent child I swallowed everything hook, line, and sinker. If I could only go back knowing then what I know now. I suppose the pain and humiliation of being conned and deceived in the matrix is partially overcome by the progression toward the soothing warmth of light and truth.
I will cop out on the voting. MM’s content is mind blowing to this reader. No matter the subject, simply exceptional! The guest writers as well – so valuable and educational!
Thank you to Josh for the forum.
LikeLiked by 3 people
JC’S INCARNATION.
I never firmly believed in reincarnation, but I did mostly believe in it for a few years long ago. After thinking about it more in-depth, I decided that if it were real and if we are forced to incarnate against our wills, it would be like a prison instead of an adventure, so it seemed immoral. I don’t know if I ever bought much of any ideas hook, line and sinker. I’ve always been more flexible in my thinking. I was able to figure out that Santa Claus wasn’t real when I was about 7, with no help from anyone else. A few years later I made the same conclusion about Satan and eternal hell, though I was raised in a Catholic/Evangelical-Lutheran family. When I got out of high school I was intrigued when I came across non-mainstream claims. My college roommate introduced me to Velikovsky’s book, Worlds in Collision, which was discussed in his Art class, and I later inherited one of his copies of Ramparts magazine, which introduced me to anarchism and maybe alternative health, as I became vegetarian at age 24 after reading a Ramparts article. (I later became vegan and much later gave up both diets, though I still retain aspects of them, such as having many raw foods.) So the guy got me started on questioning science, politics and health. And I continue to have doubts about mostly everything, which I think is the best attitude to have.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Retiring Stephen Hawking. When you look at the DM article Miles links to it really makes you realize how much they were mocking us and laughing at our gullibility. The whole computer generated voice is absurd on so many levels, andI think like many I never thought to question it.
2. So hard, so many papers. In some ways I want to say the early papers ‘Stolen Century’ and the Occult paper as that is how I first got into Miles and it really laid the groundwork for his future papers. However, I think Karl Marx and Mussolini (Miles obviously had fun writing that) are my picks.
4 a Guest writer for 2018. Is the Alamo. So much uncovered and amazing how it referenced earlier papers and events.
4.b Best all time guest papers: Again so hard. While not popular maybe I gues K Starr, Strange Relations. It really opened the whole expose of the entertainment world and I think his genealogy work on how they were all related was eye opening. His series really opened up for me how much was fake, how much was based on family ties. Equal also was the Fakir paper. Not only did it expose an I CON, but the exposure was so well researched it was hard to refute. I shared the story with my mum,who didn’t miss a beat and agreed poor, unknown peasants don’t rise fame and power and take down an empire. Obviously the Fakir story being sold by the Fakir entertainment world deepened my understanding of how this is all packaged and promoted and Strange Relations series helped with that
5. Thousand hoaxs and loved the paper. LOL funny and the link to the comments on YouTube were hilarious. Many people are awake.
6. David Hogg
LikeLike
You mean Kevin S., not K. Starr. My writer was Kevin S. POM’s writer was K. Starr.
LikeLike
Actually POM’s writer was listed as kstarr1 (in my browser’s internet adress), then you have straightfromthedevilsmouth’s (tokarski’s muse) handle being tokyojoe1on CF, or gaia with gaia1sphere, which might all be coincidences… ha! Sorry I don’t buy it.
The guy behind questioningourreality (whoever he might be) has some interesting things to say about this nest of spooks, I think.
Happy new year to you all 🙂
LikeLike
This was meant to be under Miles’s comment, sorry. And no more stink, promised.
Thanks!
LikeLike
I’ve always preferred his brother Ringo, peace out
LikeLike
So they are not the same person?
LikeLike
Hard to say for sure but based on tone and style of their wiring they don’t seem to be the same person.
LikeLike
1 Favorite paper from 2018 on history/art/faked events
Titanic
2 Favorite paper of all time.
Sharon Tate (my first) just about edges JFK
3 Favorite physics paper (all time)
None, I never got physics at school. Had a pisspoor teacher, sorry.
4 Favorite guest paper (all time).
Kent State
5 Silliest fake event 2018.
Boys in the cave
6 Worst crisis actor
The last ever Stephen Hawking (was he the 3rd or 4th?)
LikeLiked by 1 person
#3: You don’t need to have taken high school physics to dive into Miles’ papers.
http://milesmathis.com/updates.html
Click around that page, scroll until you find a topic that looks interesting. I guarantee he’ll make you feel fine about the math. Even when it gets heavy, he explains it mechanically and UNmesses it up for us, and it’s really not intimidating. Awesome and inspiring, but actually far less scary than all the bullshit mainstream physics papers with their volumes of fake, falsified math. I can’t even keep up with HOW he does it all most of the time but he is great about helping us along, that’s what sets him aside from all those other assholes that just write that way to make one feel stupid. He makes you feel like you GOT THIS. With a little study, but it’s all right there for constant re-reading too. 🙂
You’ll try it someday and be glad you did, hope to see you at the other end too.
LikeLike
Thanks Jared, I appreciate your advice. I shall give it a go, but bear in mind that I’m starting from a low knowledge base. Maybe I’ll let you know how I get on….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I got a vote via e-mail from Betty K:
2018: Titanic
All time: Lindbergh
Guestpaper: Phoenician series
LikeLike
The first time I went to a museum and looked at bronzed dog shit within sight of a Rodin sculpture, I knew something was very seriously wrong with what ‘experts’ were saying about what art was and how it should be considered. I had the same horrifying experience all through college when I was cheerfully introduced by my art teacher to the ‘Shock of the new’ as being all that mattered in the artistic world, and that beauty and meaning outside of political indoctrination were dead.
When I started reading Mathis’ writings (starting with the science side) I knew I had stumbled across someone who might not always agree with, but who I could trust to have actually put some serious thought into his positions, as he demonstrated his thinking processes on HOW he came to his conclusions by showing his chain of reasoning instead of just asking me to trust him.
As to the greatest Mathis paper ever… that’s a hard one for me. It’s a draw between the incredibly applicable and relevant revelation that PI is not accurate in how circular motion works, The mind blowing discussion of how time must always be in a ratio of one second per second (no actual time warping in relation to relativity) or everything from velocity to calculations based on those velocities to determine distances goes out the window, to the rampant fudging with mind numbing complexity that goes on in the HEP community in the name of perpetual funding for yet more useless paper writing about untestable theory, to the idea of how unassigned math is now the unopposed mystical religion du jour of our time, it moves in mysterious ways that requires lots of unquestioning faith, lots of continual funding, and far more blind acceptance than actual understanding.
LikeLike
“The first time I went to a museum and looked at bronzed dog shit within sight of a Rodin sculpture, I knew something was very seriously wrong ”
It is deliberate. They have incubated that sense of wrongness until now it seems to emanate from everything. Perhaps they are trying to spiritually cut us off from the light.
LikeLike
Doesn’t Miles oft as not say that the families like to leave the truth in plain sight? In this case – Modern art is shite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol. Actually that says it better: in plain English, it is all shite now.
LikeLike
@ nada 0101
”………..It is deliberate. They have incubated that sense of wrongness until now it seems to emanate from everything. Perhaps they are trying to spiritually cut us off from the light….”
I think you’ve got it in one here. They are trying to negate our sense of beauty. The dark, the dirty , distorted and disgusting is the road they are trying to take us down and accept that this is normality.
Whilst there is true beauty in the world and whilst we can still recognise it as such we probably still have some hope.
LikeLike
It is very insidious, isn’t it? Not only do they promote the vile but they also insinuate a predilection for it in our own minds — they make us aficionados of that which we should find disgusting. That is the result of a culture saturated with lies: eventually it is our own minds that shuts out the light, and our masters job will be complete.
Which makes Miles’ work a matter of life and death itself.
LikeLike
2018: Titanic
All Time: I can’t decide upon the Salem Hoax, The Tate-Manson Hoax or Hitler’s Genealogy. So all 3.
Physics: Pi is 4
Guest: Phoenician Series
LikeLike
Josh, could I have your and miles permission to post here the linux wget command to download most of his pdf’s in one go… for digesting off line and for safe keeping for posterity? ( and in doing so asking people who do so to donate if they can ).
[ off topic – I am currently reading Revillo Oliver’s Origins of Christianity, which is in the same vein as miles stuff. I now call Christianity Judaised Zorostrianism, rather than Judaised Paganism – the pagans were by and large more honest and less fanatical
https://archive.org/details/TheOriginsOfChristianity ]
my vote off my poor memory would be
2018 The Tate Murders (thinking outside the inside the laurel canyon box, which , McGowan like Alex Jones, mentions only 2 Jews in all this – https://ia601908.us.archive.org/13/items/InsideLaurelCanyonDavidMcgowan/Inside%20Laurel%20Canyon%20David%20Mcgowan.pdf )
All time – Hitler (I need to convince myself of his role in the Jewish capers before I convert to Nazism – I am going to learn German this year if nothing else, and reread miles papers on it, it’s a very important area of study and temptation)
LikeLike
@pierre it’s fine with me if you post the wget command here
LikeLike
thanks, it is not guaranteed to get all the pdfs but it works well for most of them. linux/unix command from terminal.
wget –mirror -np –no-clobber -c –accept ‘*.pdf’ –directory-prefix=/ –adjust-extension –page-requisites –execute robots=off –wait=10 –random-wait –convert-links –user-agent=Mozilla -np http://mileswmathis.com
dont forget to donate if you can you bookworms.
also, would it not be a good idea to upload these to archive.org for posterity? I can try if you like but my singular attempt to upload somethone elses document gave an error. let me know here if ok for me to try though.
torrents too (I cannot do that one)
LikeLike
ok some of that wget did not come through. where there is the prefix=/ and before the adjust – which should have two — in front of it too.
you need to put in your download location. / would get you at the root location though.
eg –directory-prefix= /home/me/Downloads — adjust-extension etc.
LikeLike
I definitely appreciate your intent, Pierre, but there are much easier ways to do this.
Here’s a really easy one for Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/download-media/
Install the free addon, go to Miles’ page(s), right-click anywhere, then click PDF. Done. Check the downloads menu and watch them pour in!
It took me about 80 seconds to download every .pdf paper on his Writings Updates page.It won’t work on his older, HTML papers however. But I back up all his papers two or three times a year, on multiple computers, so if anything ever happened to his site at least we’d have archives. A few others do this as well – but it wouldn’t hurt one bit if everyone interested had them all saved locally. Go for it, people!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also Nevyn keeps a FULL mirror of Miles’ science page hosted elsewhere entirely, if anyone needs it someday:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/mirror/www.milesmathis.com/index.html
This is not to say your cause isn’t noble, Pierre, because it definitely is. Just some alternative methods for people with less tech skills; I myself couldn’t understand your Wget code stuff at all (how to use it), so maybe this will help people.
LikeLike
Jared,thanks, I tried it and it forked bombed on me, meaning it opened up a save as dialogue for each and every pdf on Miles 2018 page, and what’s more I saw many duplicates, I had to kill Firefox. Linux user here. I certainly miss DownLoadThemAll which was groovy, but Firefox 60 stuffed up that and other plugins. Author last posted intention to update DTA a year ago. also my method (not for the faint hearted I admit ) does subfolders, which is not a huge issue for miles page, and any filetype/extension that is nominated. such is life in the 21st century and idiocracy and spies in the machines.
Josh, would it be ok for me to try to put Miles pdfs that no on the web page to archive.org? I am not optimistic given the obscure error message I got trying to upload something else last month but it’s worth a try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, Pierre, we lost a lot of great add-ons when Firefox went “quantum”, but they’re all coming back now or being rewritten or bettered. Just thought I’d share one method to grab all the papers rapidly for anyone using a current-version Firefox. I’m sure Chrome has something similar but I try to stay away from Google as much as possible.
LikeLike
Thanks Jarred, that’s a great tool.
Do you maybe also know an easy way to combine all the pdf’s into one giant pdf?
This way it would make it very easy to search for certain words or names in one go..
LikeLiked by 1 person
August – there is for linux
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDFtk
has a windows installer too
adobe acrobat pro used to do that too.
LikeLike
Sure, I would just use NitroPDF myself but it’s a premium PDF program I use for work. Also the file size would make it too large to email, so there is that consideration, otherwise I would just do it for you. I wouldn’t have any way to get such a large file to you right now; haven’t been hosting much lately. Maybe I could piggback it on my work website but out of curiosity, why would you want them all in one big pile? It would be very difficult to search the documents that way, in my opinion.
LikeLike
CHRISTIANITY.
Pierre, my understanding is that original Christianity, which was called something like Nazareanism, was a very decent philosophy, promoting love or caring for everyone and everything, but was later paganized by the Roman church. Paganism is/was superstitious and the worst part was the promotion of human sacrifice, usually child sacrifice. The Jews were often pagan like that too.
The best evidence I know of for the validity of Christianity is the Shroud of Turin. I don’t believe in miracles, but the evidence on the shroud seems to indicate that the image was produced by some advanced technical skills, maybe angelic.
LikeLike
Angelic you say? You’re joking, right?
LikeLike
Sorry, the Shroud of Turin is a pretty obvious fake. The proportions of the face and body are all wrong. No artist would be fooled by it.
LikeLike
Well f**k you Miles.
*rips up plane ticket to Turin*
😉
LikeLike
I think the early ‘ photography ‘ experiment , to mass market Christ Relics is the best explanation I’ve read about , the camera housing is a light tight room with a single aperture window , exposing acid soak shroud wrapped a few times around the human model . But what the flip do I know .
LikeLike
And it makes perfect sense that the Roman Church went out of their way to prove you right Miles.. Besides, “Now this garment was without seam, and woven from top throughout”….makes it clear that Shroudy was wearing a comfy onesy to his crucifixion.Probably like a terry- toweling romper suit which are very absorbent.. Ideal couture if one faces a day of blood, sweat and tears.
His mum, or “The disciple who Jesus loved” probably nipped down to Marks&Sparks.
for it because Nazerites are known for their big babies, and I know the branch in Jerusalem always stocks accordingly. Anyway, it’s the only decent haberdasher open on a black sabbath..
LikeLike
Original christianity is from Egypt, its coptic gnosticism. However, imperial christianity’s shape has obviously been made by some team which had globalism as a motive as so many sources can be seen in it. To create a product which could replace all the local traditions.
LikeLike
Indeed that’s also what I’m reading in the history of the monotheistic religions (early history of Islam and Christianity). A ‘project’ to smash all the local cultures into one centralized and profitable enterprise.
In the books we are told the pagan temples were the proto-banks at the time (at least in Grecian/Roman/Jewish/Phoenician culture, I’m personally not sure about others) They housed the royal/national treasuries of the regional nobility and dynasties. So like the French Revolution and the raiding of the Catholic Church there, they raided the pagan temples for the loot as well.
Did Jesus try to blow up their network from within but fail? Hence his links to the Nazerites, the money-lending table tossing episode in the temple and other sayings. That could explain a few things if true.
LikeLike
“..which is in the same vein as miles stuff.””
Not at all.
Not picking on you Pierre but reviewing this Revillo Oliver guy.
In my opinion he’s another one of those long list of controlled opposition agents sent in to get the revolutionary types out there to slit their own throats by focusing on the people’s religion. It’s hard to see through their shtick sometimes since they appeal to that university-student level skepticism that is prevalent in the younger college-bound generation. I dealt with these assholes in my 20s. They try to get you to equate your local community spiritual leaders (or anyone) with these professional ‘holy’ men, which Miles has shown were always double-agents in their own right. I say don’t fall for the ruling class tricks here.
I read (unfortunately but it allowed me to see through him better) his book on the Origins of Christianity. Reads like an eyes-off project or a cloaked Anti. Fills you with some interesting information, some of it true, but his vicious atheism, materialism, disgustingly smug aristocratic attitude and hatred of Christianity gives him away. He also pollutes with that ‘racial consciousness’ stupid shit which they know never sells in the modern world, black-washes Tolkien by association, and taints any sort of real, ancient or neo-paganism. I think he’s making paganism appealing only to further destruction of Christianity. I mean if these ‘Aryan’ supermen and women were/are so superior then why did they lose?
Also the fact that this guy is not only not downlisted in the search engines but promoted, with praise on all the top results. Strange for a supposed Anti-Semitite.
This book was supposedly published by Historical Review Press, founded by Anthony Hancock and member of the British National Front. I think Miles’ guest paper (http://mileswmathis.com/skinhead.pdf) and the other one on Norman Rockwell sheds some light that these fascist leagues are Intel creations and controlled opposition.
Again they are still at it with what I call the Marxist Trap. Molyneux on youtube is the most obvious example of this. Youtube is full of spooks like him. I wouldn’t be surprised if this Oliver is related to him. These vicious modern atheists and triple-traitor spook types always seem to come from the same Jewish merchant families. . Also when you go to his main site the first article you are treated to are on Homosexuality…? Telling (and he doesn’t look very Aryan too me) in the light of Miles work.
LikeLike
Oh just realized his first name is his last spelled backwards Revilo = Oliver. Revilo P. Oliver. Oliver P Oliver. What a fake name. His middle name Pendleton might be the real link to something.
LikeLike
I just saw his book “Jewish strategy” was published by Palladian books. This Revilo did also collaborate with W Pierce on National Alliance which was renamed and started as National Vanguard in Charlottesville. This city is also called the Capital of Freemasonry was the place where Albert Pike lived and spooked and launched his masonic top ritual, the Palladium rite. That’s the Luciferian rite, not known to many freemasons, but for the selected which can handle such a turn or flip.
Another fake was Frank Joseph Cohen, who called himself Frank Collin, and ran the American Nazi party. He called his father confused or something as he told publicly they both were Jews.
What else is noteworthy about Frank is that he released some books (in the name of Frank Joseph) on the theme of Atlantis. This is also on the agenda of culture revolution (destruction of history) I have not seen any of these but bet that they are useful for myth busters.
As i was young, i always wondered why these neo nazis looked so turkish.
LikeLike
Just been re-reading the skinhead paper, and wondered if the writer was going to update it with stuff about Ian Stuart (Donaldson) of Skrewdriver who died in 1993 aged 36.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Stuart_Donaldson
Ian Stuart founded the Blood & Honour music promotion network with links to Combat 18, a terrorist white power outfit. One of the bands promoted was No Remorse whose singer Paul Burnley was the son of Scottish artist John Bellany whose paintings include this self-portrait (lessons from Dylan?)-
LikeLike
Nada just outed Stephen R. Donaldson (author) on another thread, so we definitely have precedent. I can’t recall many Donaldson’s in Miles’ writings but I can’t really keep up with all the genealogies and names very well, except a few major ones. It would follow that the last name “Donaldson” should be on the watch list for these events.
LikeLike
@lewisreid: Your mentioned of Skrewdriver led me to American History X which tripped me down a deep rabbit hole involving Irish aristocrat spooks all over the place, including my own surname Cox. More on Cox and the O’Briens some other time though I need to do more search on those names.
Not sure if Miles or another writer has outed these spook families but just I’m doing my own research here..
Apparently Skrewdriver is referenced in the movie, which the Wiki page on it is covered in so many red flags they might as well put for the title “American History X, A race-baiting Propaganda film project brought to you by Usual Suspects™”. So the movie is directed by admitted Orthodox Jewish Tony Kaye (btw there’s a McKay playing as bass on Skrewdriver’s original lineup) and a David McKenna who has a scrubbed bio on wiki. This will be like the 3rd spook band we’ve connected to their families hoax projects in the past week..
Anyways I don’t remember the correct sequence of events that led me to the page for Shane Patrick Lysaght MacGowan (also a punk ‘rocker’ so maybe that’s how), who has all the hallmarks of being a spook baby reading his wiki.
Indeed these MacGowans/McGowans (see wiki page on this name) seem to be a hidden-ranking “Irish” spook family along with the Lysaghts, who have all sorts of variations in their name. Lysaght, Laysaught, MacLysaght, Lycett, Lyson, Lyle, which is a slur of the name Lisle. See the page on Baron Lisle. On John Lysaght’s (1832–1895) page we are told “he was born in Mallow, County Cork, Ireland, into a prosperous family of landowners; his father was William Lysaght (1800–1840), a distant relation of the Lisle baronets”. This John Lysaght had a grandfather Nicholas Lysaght who apparently was a lackey for William III of Orange. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lysaght,_1st_Baron_Lisle)
These Lisle/Lysaughts also inter-married with the Boyles and the Royces (one of John Lysaght sons was a Sidney Royse Lysaght (1856 – 1941). Royse=Royce. One of works publish is called The Immortal Jew (1931).
My gut is telling me Lisle may be another variation of Leger/Leveson and ultimately way back down the line to the Levis. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_St_Leger_(Lord_Deputy_of_Ireland). Also Gowans = Gowers?
LikeLike
Actually submitted that comment a few minutes too soon.
Maybe not Levi but Salinger?
The wiki page on the St. Leger family is a goldmine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Leger_family
“The St. Leger family (/ˈsɛlɪndʒər/ SEL-in-jər; Latinized to De Sancto Leodegario) is an old Anglo-Irish family with Norman roots, that in some cases transformed into Selinger or Sellinger”
Leger = Salinger or Selinger. These Selingers have been outed before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selinger
LikeLike
Robert David Steele & John Kiriakou appear to be frauds, I’m not sure about Ray McGovern. Snippin away.
LikeLike
2: Pi series
3: a=v2r
LikeLike
Best 2018 : Titanic
Favorite of all time : Kennedy
Favorite Physics Paper: Moon gives up a Secret
Favorite guest paper : Thai Cave
Silliest hoax of 2018 – Thai Cave
LikeLike
1. Favorite paper by Miles from 2018.
Modernism is Facism
2 Favorite paper by Miles of all time.
Yes the Leonardo Painting is a Fake ( 2 papers 2017)
3. Favorite physics paper.
Don’t feel qualified enough to comment.
4 Favorite guest paper.
Loved the Ancient Spook s Papers.
LikeLike
I already voted for the “best of” in the top 4 categories. Last night it popped into my head what to vote for regarding the last two:
5. Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2018
The continued saga of the metoo movement–so annoying!
6. Worst crisis actor.
All female and male celebrities (including politicians) who participate in the movement–so annoying!
LikeLiked by 2 people
“metoo movement”
I had forgotten about that. It is a high-profile spook project considering that they wheeled on and off the stage their big public stars, some to fall and some to rise. Good point. Project Chaos continues — throw-in all the LGPQ…LGBT…whatever the frickin’ abbreviation is… and transgender nonsense and you’ve got one confused populace. Smear on the icing of “all whites are racists” and that’s a hat trick.
White v Everyone (including Aliens, “Take me to your leader — no not the white dude!!!)
Man vs Woman vs ?!?
Parents vs Children
LikeLike
Don’t worry too much about the MeToo “movement”. Like any bowel movement, it passes soon enough and relief is achieved. Me and my social media pals have been dropping that on every damn thing we find, pretty much, so anyone actually clicking the hashtag ends up seeing a storm of bullshit that has nothing to do with the actual movement. If they want to play dirty, we just clean it up for them. Strain the silt, as it were. 🙂
“My kitty is so cute!”
#MeToo
“I’m so sick of seeing Drake’s face!”
#MeToo
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am embarrassed to say that I have no idea how a hashtag works. But if you can change the connotation of what the metoo movement is all about, I applaud you for your efforts! Pretty funny : )
LikeLike
I’m sure lil’ ol’ me isn’t having THAT much of a real effect, but the faux-movement has lost some steam. It’s more for humor.
A “hashtag” is basically just a clickable search-link. If you search #Physics for example, on a given site that has hashtags enabled, it will show you any posts with the #Physics tag in them. Mostly for Instagram, Twitter, or Facebook. I don’t use the first two and the third only to argue with idiots and post pics of my kitties and flowers, but we also invented to #MyHero movement, which is effectively the opposite of MeToo. Yes, it’s quite rude. I find no reason to be polite on social media, short of the aforementioned ban-hammers that are to be avoided.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Favourite of 2018: Titanic
Favourite, all-time: a 7-way tie between Salem, Lincoln, Manson, the Hillers, Kennedy, art/money laundering, occult/theosophy project.
Favourite, guest: Phoenicians (my new go-to word if trying to avoid the j word)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find droppin’ the P-word to be more effective in most conversations with strangers, though as Miles has said it doesn’t negate the Jewish connection. The original Takers became Assyrians became Phoenicians became Israelites became Jewish overlords, or something like that. I’m sure there are more connections along the way as well, but it seems like the original Takers set the template and the Phoenicians spread it far and wide.
LikeLike
“doesn’t negate the Jewish connection” is right, but this is problematic when attempting to share this information – that deliberate little semantic issue of the conflation of race and religion helps to ensure that any attempts to expose and explain the machinations and connections can be instantly tarred with the anti-Semitic brush and diluted by the more widespread plethora of ‘alt right crackpot theories’.
‘They’ use and hide behind several layers of protection, to divert us from exposing them fully and finally, and they’ve had millennia to practice their subterfuge…
Nomenclature is important, and I wish there was a better name/handle for them (TPTB, the elite, the Families, the 1%, the 0.1% – none of those descriptors quite do justice).
LikeLiked by 1 person
They ARE Jews, usually by their own admission, so why tiptoe around it? Just state things the way they are and if other people want to pussyfoot, or deny, or call you names, let them. We are not the deniers, they are. I get emails telling me the top Jews are also being used and blackwashed by someone, but I have seen no evidence of that. When I do, I will report it honestly. When I see some indication the alien overlords are making the decisions, I will let you know. Until then, I simply report what I find in my research. In my opinion, there is no reason to come up with another term. It would be like coming up with another word for blue, just to be polite. Blue will do for me. Or maybe I should say purple?
LikeLiked by 2 people
You don’t consider that they have, over time and by ‘inheritance’ and convenience, used ‘being Jewish’ as their main cloak to operate behind and be protected by? The ones doing the damage know that religion is all just hogwash, so by pretending and operating behind their ‘Jewishness’, they are guarded from exposure by a chorus of circling wagons defending the faith.
Definitely a fan of calling things how they are, but we do have to at least consider that the game is rigged in that regard, and all attacks are a dangerous journey into a minefield which has been so successful at destroying lives and reputations of truth-seekers.
For me, I like to separate the religion from the ideology/politic, because I see that the religion aspect is only a tool and a cover (as well as a trap). But that’s just me – if I was that scared of the Jewish aspect I would have stopped reading many months ago and run away to hide again in the warm embrace of the matrix.
In terms of the overall nomenclature for the current crop of elite manipulators, the most appropriate thus far, in my opinion, are ‘the Governors’ and ‘the Families’, but I’m happy to hear you call blue what it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I should have qualified my statement and preference, Miles. On SOCIAL media, which you rightfully eschew, one cannot say “Jewish” anymore. Ever. One’s posts get deleted and you get banned for 30 days immediately. And that’s not even the most heinous of such censorships – it’s happened to me at Techspot.com and other non-social sites as well as Facebook. I caught a 30-day at Techspot just for mentioning that Musk was Jewish, and another for talking about Jobs’ past. It’s not quite universal but it’s pretty close now.
And one might decide simply not to use those platforms at all, which I completely understand. My girlfriend doesn’t and my younger brother who lives with me refuses, and I’m fine with that too. But I enjoy the audience, which includes quite a few people I met here, on my stupid “Really Fake Science” group and it’s been a pretty effective way to help people wake up. Granted, they have to want to and be intelligent enough to in the first place, but I find it to be worth the tradeoff.
I have no problems whatsoever with calling them Jewish, it’s other people that balk, hedge, dodge, apologize, and try to whitewash the topic. My kid brother gets pissed any time it comes up but you know? Fuck that guy, he lives with ME. I can choose to dismiss all of them or engage an audience, and it’s actually surprising how many people are waking up and heading over to your site, Miles, as a result of my efforts. But I completely understand with and agree with your position – it works for you, and you don’t have to care or worry about censorship. I don’t worry, but still get censored.
The Inquisition has flipped though. That’s what the Holocaust propaganda was all about to begin with – to whitewash their entire lineage and to blackwash all criticism. They won’t come for you because of your physics, history lessons, or art critique. They’ll try to burn you by painting you as anti-Semitic, and the people would let them and embrace it. I mean they better fucking not, but that’s the only angle anyone has on you, despite its outright fabrication.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the conundrum.
And it’s not just the Jewish angle that upsets people (people are so fucking precious…). I got verbally abused and blocked for sharing Miles’ paper, ‘launder.pdf’ on Twitter (admittedly under provocative headline), because ‘art is beautiful and how dare I question that’, even though that was nowhere near the point of the paper or the sharing…
The other component of the whole Chaos project that upsets people is when it brings into question the motivations and talent (or otherwise) of their ‘cultural heroes’, a la Bob Zimmerman, Elvis/Aaron, Beatles, etc.
At least a dozen ways to lose friends and alienate people…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Basically, using “Phoenicians” makes one sound more intelligent to the standard asshole. And then you have an “in”, and they’ll listen a bit more. It makes for an interesting conversation and in my experience about half the time their response will be something like, “So you mean Jews?” It steers them in the right direction without triggering their own censorship mechanisms.
I also love dropping anything Etruscan, but for purely humorous reasons:
LikeLike
This is pretty much my mandate, as I see it:
“Order your own world on simple principles of some sort and find a lover. Treat her well. Seek normalcy and truth and calm and subtlety and warmth and health. Shield your children from the vipers and monsters in the media. And get on with your life. Do not work for these people. Do something that needs to be done, even if it is just sweeping the streets. Make food, make clothing, repair things. And spread the truth. It is the most powerful weapon on earth, and the rulers rightly fear it.”
The “something that needs to be done” for me is to spread the word about the fallibility of modern science and do what I can to promote real science, as best I understand it. It was your gift to me and I cannot appreciate you enough for it.
But I also enjoy spreading the truth, and sometimes the mechanisms and forums aren’t very conducive to doing so. There’s a large audience on social media that doesn’t receive any truth at all, including hundreds of my real friends, some of who have been reading this site and your papers as a result of my efforts. I’m no hero, just saying THAT is why I engage on those shitty platforms. You have better things to do, or at least I sure hope so! I get a lot of downtime at work waiting for the computer to render yet another fucking kitchen so my fingers fly, and sometimes make an ally or find another Doomsayer or Truthseeker. It’s worth doing to me, but again, I don’t naysay that it would be a waste of your time.
So sometimes dropping a “#Phoenicians” or otherwise engaging people with a lighter version can be helpful and lead them into a better, deeper conversation. Granted, MOST of the time it’s a pathetic and heated attempt at trolling the dragon, but those always fail and your polemics have only strengthened my own. But SOMETIMES, you meet someone or convert an old friend to the cause, and that is very fulfilling to me. I just wish my little brother would step up and grow a pair too, so he could join us in these conversations, for he’s very intelligent but also somehow just more damaged than me. Or perhaps simply not angry enough.
LikeLike
And dont forget the Seapeople ! Those who made the Phoenician sailing and successful.
A friend of mine told me that he as a history student together with a few others dressed up for a party with paperhats and all sorts of mismatching 2hand clothes. On requests on what they had dressed up like, they answered “The seapeople of course”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree. Many people are starting to ask questions and where possible I link them to Miles. The Jewish reference can make it hard for people as it is perceived as anti Semitic, etc. I think the families have done a great job of creating and hiding behind the Jewish issue, and because they have done such a good job, some are turned off reading further. I don’t know what the solution is but it does make it harder to get newbies on board.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I suspect something alien, a teenager stranded in his games room under the great pyramid hoarding gold for the ship back home (Bowie did this somewhat in the Man Who Fell To Earth) … but show me the levitating brick or something before I let the poor Jews off the hook.
meantime, if it is if not the Jews, then through the Jews for sure.
God only knows, so let’s ask them. Like those German town hall meetings where Einstein bravely ran away from accusations of his plagiarism.
https://archive.org/details/ChristopherJonBjerknesTheManufactureAndSaleOfSaintEinstein
If I was born an anti-semite, I would still be here, but earlier and with less facts to back me up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, I have absolutely no interest in being Politically Correct, and am very far from that in almost every way. We should say what we mean and mean what we say, of course. The main reason I enjoy dropping “Phoenicians” is because it’s pretty damn hilarious to watch your opponent do a mad scramble to Google to see who the fuck you’re actually talking about, atop keeping myself unbanned to cause further fomentation in general. Of course I myself was only vaguely aware of their existence and timeline, prior to Gerry’s papers. But an opponent in polemics need not know that, so to the “audience” as it were, it scores multiple points with one shot. And when that opponent catches up and responds, “You mean JEWS?”, one can watch their own PC logic implode as the audience pounces on that opponent instead of oneself. Twisted, but effective.
Regardless, it’s pretty nice to have a forum (like this or Vex’s site) where one doesn’t have to do or deal with any of that shit. I’m really not in it for reindeer games; just, if they must be played, they should be played well. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
THROUGH THE JEWS! I just noticed the fake adopted orphan King Herod the Essau/Edomite was a massive blowout of the House of David through what I found was really a huge family that kept buying favor with the Romans after misfires, like backing Marc Antony. Herodians accidentally on purpose let the millennial Messiah thing get out of hand and got rid of Essau’s nemesis, Jacob’s kindred, the Jews, and tied up Rome; and Herodians got the seaport of Gaza. RINSE AND REPEAT MILLENIAL FEAR AND FERVOR!
Herod shoved Gnostic priests from blown Judaism in Alexandria, Egypt, into the Temple priesthood. This is their man-in-the-middle attack. Two birds with one stone. Punk Romans and Jews. Jews have been decimated by infiltration, second place losers being the Catholics, then Muslims, all technically outlawed from lending at interest, handy for the bankster control freak pretenders to the thrones. That’s the Miles Mathis edge, a new read on history. GURU/KABBALAH, and JFK GAY? are definitely favorites. More opium wars paid for at interest, please.
Oldest big blowout was Noah’s kid, Shem, the Shepherd-King who built the Great Pyramid per Sydney Bristowe. Shem got punked by the cannibal king, brother Cham. Shem, the red boar, escaped as Melchizedek. That’s why the ANCIENT SPOOKS/PHOENICIAN antiquity element is important as outing the money lovers as long-standing Satanistas. The techno-boobs are and were the bad guys, turning astronomy into astrology and the like. And the infltration was ancient, as Jesus Christ said, too thorough to wipe out the weeds as only endangering the wheat.
Assyrian bragging in MARX/JENNY MARX’s line of proud Assyrian Trier shows they know who they are, Syro-Phoenicians, Canaanites, anti-Godites corrupting like Baalam and his talking donkey. The Jews are an endangered species, replaced by similacrum, with Catholics and Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists following fast.
I COMMENT spam this on YouTube: READ MILES MATHIS PDF FILES ON THE GENEOLOGY OF THESE INBRED HOMOSEXUAL ROYAL GENOCIDAL GNOSTIC JEWISH LIFETIME ACTORS RULING THE WORLD. GOD HELP US! They aren’t Communists, Republicans, Catholics, scientists, terrorists, soldiers, mathematicians, artists, novelists, experts, average Joe’s or crusading Popes. Judge actions, not labels. They are the reactionaries fostering death and cursing to God’s life and blessing. God bless us everyone, even Shroud of Turin skeptics, so beloved.
nordskoven at Gmail if you dare…
AND MILES MATHIS IS AS COOL AS MOONLIGHT!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t really follow what you’re saying here, but a correction:
“The techno-boobs are and were the bad guys, turning astronomy into astrology and the like.”
Astronomy is merely the NAMING of the stars. Astro = star. Nom = name.
Astrology is the STUDY of the stars. Astro = star. Log = study, examine, view, describe.
Astrology has nothing to do with horoscopes until people start polluting the conversation with that nonsense. We have seen that the stars and planets do indeed have a great impact on us, via Mile’s charge field of real, bombarding photons. But that’s not remotely the same as grouping people into 12 sects and then pretending to predict their behavior without even knowing about charge or how it affects us. Horoscopy is bullshit; astrology is what we do. Astrology is part of physics, at the macroscale.
The twistings of these words are not an accident.
LikeLike
Hey everyone, I think this discussion regarding the nature of the Jewish role in all of this is interesting and important. But I don’t think it belongs in this thread and would rather the discussion here not slide too much in this direction. So I’ve taken most of the comments on this and pasted them into a new comment over at the Brief History of Spookery post on Gerry’s papers. If you want to keep discussing this issue, please continue the conversation over there: https://cuttingthroughthefog.com/2018/07/18/a-brief-history-of-spookery/comment-page-4/#comment-9639
LikeLiked by 1 person
First: Wishing you all a healthy and meaningful new year.
Second: Thank you Miles and guest writers for enlightening our view on the world and history.
So here are my votes:
1. (2018) Titanic – Hollywood Blockbuster busted.
(Honourable: Lawrence of Arabia / Leveson-Gower)
2. (All time) Thrones Infiltrated – Jagiellons and Medici’s..still ruling?
(Honourable: Phillip III and the Crusades / French Revolution)
3. (All time) Decoding Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry – G stands for Unification
I know not precisely physics papers but for me as a layman I find Miles is giving us a “shortcut” to the real works so I’m trying to get a grip on these things.
(Honourable: Beyond Velikovsky – Stephen Hawking’s Genealogy)
4. First I want to thank Josh and Kevin for their admiral work..I think most of us won’t be able to produce what you guys have.
Second: Thank you to all the “New (Guest) Writers”, well done guys!
Third: Ancient Spooks – Aka Phoenicians – did it for me… read like a boys adventure through ancient history lane plus all the language intricacies involved, thanks Gerry.
And lastly also thank you Josh for giving us this opportunity to give thanks in this way to Miles and the Guest Writers.
It’s really been a pleasure reading all the material and very eye-opening so far; can’t wait for whats more to come out of your brains this year…
Cheers guys!
LikeLike
1. Best 2018: “Harry Potter. . . ” spook authorship as propaganda publications committee-controlled; Titanic for a change of pace hoaxing insurance claims.
2. Best all time: “Hidden Kings” for photo analysis and stunning logic. There is more work to be done on after JFK’s death: another role as the mythic legend? Onassis is Jack/Jackie’s cousin. JFK illness and their infant’s death garnered sympathy, explain away her long absences and make them oh, so compelling. FAKE ACTORS all!
EVEN BETTER is “What I Finally Understood”. The matrix crumbles away and opens the blinds! It is aka Climbing the guru mountain. Miles receives his award for this one.
3. Physics paper: Several papers on the electro magnetic fields (EMF radiation) on earth. Sorry, I’ve forgotten titles but The Universal Charge Fields or Electric Universe.
4. Best Guest paper: The Fruitbearing Society by the “German” for its wit, intelligence and photos. Some chuckles too.
Also the “Ancient Spooks” by Josh for detail and logic interwoven with Biblical translations, puns and parables. Very excellent research but difficult to check. Well written!
LikeLike
I’m almost disappointed in myself for not smelling the JFK BS. We were told that every day he had a nooner with his glamorous wife but what young attractive couple has separate bedrooms? Then they told us he chased tail all day. Then he was supposedly having an affair with Marilyn. But he inspired the country with his focus on living up to high ideals. And JFK was presented as young and healthy when he clearly wasn’t.
LikeLike
I’m going to go with Titanic for my 2018 vote. As icons keep falling away one by one, I’m surprised that I’m still surprised when the next one gets its cover blown. I guess events remain part of world history and my own cultural identity until my attention is drawn to them–then another one bites the dust. Titanic was a paper that unraveled a sacred cow!
For most impactful paper overall, I must vote for Hidden Kings. My brain let me know the impact of that one from all the swirling that was going on as barriers to my known reality were being severely shifted! I was actually a little short of breath, too–probably from unconsciously holding it too long!
I enjoyed the guest paper Ancient Spooks for so many interesting tidbits, discoveries and associations, and so much excruciating uncovering of language. Kudos to Gerry!
Thank you Miles, for impacting all our lives in such a meaningful way–I am so grateful for your skillful work! And I am no less grateful for the laughs I get from your many acerbic rhetorical questions–no one can grind a point into its absurd proportions like you can!
LikeLike
I love miles mathis! I started with the lennon article but have read most everything. all of it is the best/favorite and is a constant source of wonderment and delight. my nitpick is: things cannot be “different than”. they can only be different FROM. greater than, less than, but different from. the few typos are fine and don’t impede but I always cringe when I see or hear “different than”. it’s like listening to jewish public radio where everyone seems to begin speaking with the word so.
in my studies of who wrote the bible and why I found that the key to the old testicle (put your hand under my thigh, ha ha) is in “the lord said to his anointed (Hebrew – messiah, greek – Christ) to cyrus, king of Persia… cyrus Christ??? reaaally. why would a jealous Hebrew god have a Persian messiah? why not choose one of his own ppls? it became obvious that there was no jewish bible before ezra was put in charge of compiling the mythology with a touch of real history. it is said that it was all oral history previous to cyrus. they sat around the campfire reciting thousands of scrollsworth of fables by rote memory? ezra read the law to the people, not moses, and they wept not because they had mysteriously forgotten their god but because strangers who had conquered them were taking the best land and scheduling heavy taxes, all justified by spurious stories which became yehudism. the word Judaism is a much more recent invention as the letter j and the j sound existed nowhere in bible times. ezra was a Persian priest in the employment of the Persian king. the Persians invented the Hebrew faith as a means to control their territory, which was their habit. all gods were ahuramazda to cyrus.
the Phoenician article blew my mind because I thought Hebrew was a religious language only and was never in common use. it’s really a variant of the Phoenician language so now I can see that the bestowers of crowns had their boy cyrus and his priests create a lynchpin religion according to their own purposes. so many things have become so much clearer thanks to the mm phenomenon.
LikeLike
why would a jealous Hebrew god have a Persian messiah?
A confession ? They have borrowed , aka stolen , earlier stories , Perseus , Gilgemesh etc ? .
All of which were based on astrology .
Jesus fish is actually the Age of Pisces marker .
LikeLike
1Titanic
2Hidden Kings
3physics – have not read them as yet
4ancient spooks
LikeLike
General Question – how should families protect themselves financially….assuming digital currency to the nth degree. Tangible assets? On occasion Miles seems to be negative towards bullion? The only original thought i have ever had (i think) is that the only way of comparing weakth from one generation to another is to divide the total sum by the price of a Sovereign and you can then compare the value of any asset since 1717 more especially. Also the on the first day of WW1 they took the sovereign out of circulation and obviously didnt give it back. Is it fair to assume that part of the purpose of WW1 to degarde the monetary system for the hoi polloi? good health mark
LikeLike
I feel like there are more voices we have yet to hear from. And although there are some clear winners beginning to emerge, I’m having a good time with this. So I’ve decided to keep the polls open until Friday, 7pm GMT (2pm EST, 12 noon in New Mexico). Cheers everyone!
LikeLike
Looking through the immense amount of incredible papers that Miles has written, it sure makes difficult to choose. It would be much easier to choose the papers I didn’t care for, as that list will be much much smaller.
As I can’t just choose one I’ll do some of my personal favorites, which had the biggest impact on me.
1. Titanic,
The Sword
My Genealogy
2. Guru (so simple, that I missed it for so long, until Miles pointed out ),
Hitler (Genealogy & Beer Hall Putsch),
MLK
Karl Marx,
Kennedy (Hidden Kings),
Lenin,
Stolen Century,
The Real Matrix,
Boys,
3. Pi, although, for me there’s much more to learn on the science side.
4. Gandhi,
Phoenicians
5. Tesla in Space
6. David Hogg
Josh, Thank you for doing this! And thanks to all great commenters here as well.
LikeLike
I’ve seen a couple people mention “The Sword”. To which paper does that refer? I searched a bit and am sure to have read it, but can’t find one with that name.
LikeLike
Jared, “The Sword” refers to the harpy paper
published 4/25/18
http://mileswmathis.com/harpy.pdf
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah yes, thank you! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
not a “current event” but I see they have really been pushing the “Jonestown” story with all the new shows, Documentaries etc. It seems like I’ve seen this touched on before in a critical way but can’t remember if it was Miles or whom. There’s a powerful story (and likely fairly easy one) there for someone if it hasn’t already been done. You don’t need 2020 vision to look at a few of the photos on the scene to see they don’t make sense. Any half-decent pair of 2019 peepers should do.
LikeLike
derp, meant to put this one in “current events”
LikeLike
1. Titanic
2. Nuclear weapons hoaxes won out for me over JFK, Lincoln, Salem, Napoleonic/european royalty or any of the other big ones. I still can’t believe there are countries out there with fake weapons.
3. Calculus papers. Pi as 4. Euclidean Point/No such thing as a point in reality. Blew my mind.
4. Personally, the John Nash paper, which I helped write. The Ancient Spooks papers were my favorite guest paper. Favorite Josh paper was the Gandhi one.
5. US midterm elections
6. Parkland kids
LikeLike
1. (Favorite paper by Miles from 2018): SOLAR CYCLE 25 has already begun
2. (Favorite paper by Miles of all time): What I Finally Understood
3. (Favorite physics paper): Pi series
4. (Favorite guest paper): Phoenican
5. )Favorite MM commentaries): MilesMathisMusingsAndCommentaries.com
LikeLike
Josh, I have a question on the etherpad at the bottom in section 4 at https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/zyx000cutfog (I don’t mind if others here see it too. I tried to email you, but it didn’t work.)
LikeLike
You can post on that in the comments here if you want, but please do it in the ‘current events’ thread or at least anywhere except the voting post. I don’t know if I’ll get involved. I’m already so busy and have so many things cooking on back burners. I appreciate you asking me first. I have no idea why the e-mail didn’t work. You can always use the ‘contact’ link at the top — those go to my e-mail.
LikeLike
Okay. Thanks, Josh.
LikeLike
1.) Lawrence of Arabia or Titanic
2.) Guru (immensely valuable for its insights). And I have a special fondness for the unveiling of the Stephen Hawking impostors as that was my first introduction to Miles.
3.) Reading Miles’ science papers is something I immensely look forward to but I have not done so yet. So, I’m afraid I can’t comment on which is the best.
4.) Gerry’s papers on the Ancient spooks.
With regards to fake events of 2018, I’d say the Qanon psyop was very well done.
LikeLike
My favorite couple of pages of Miles’ writing from my favorite essay: “Robert Anton Wilson: Spook-Baby”
“When I was a freshman in college at Haverford, I was part of a strange thing which I have never told anyone about. My new friends and I were hanging out outside
the cafeteria when these upperclassmen approached us. I figured they were after our girls, but I soon found out they weren’t. I don’t actually know to this day what they were after, though maybe you can tell me. The leader was a short good-looking guy, obviously very intelligent, and it turned out the group of them were from Princeton. They said they wanted to take several of us back to Princeton for a
party the following weekend, so that the two campuses could have some contacts. The leader chatted me up personally, and one of the things he said was that he had noticed I looked at everything. He said, “you see everything, don’t you? I see you looking around. What are you looking for?” I was impressed that he noticed that, though maybe it was just a line. I don’t know what I look like to other people. Who does? Anyway, he didn’t seem gay or interested in me that way, so I didn’t immediately
tell him to piss off. I wanted to see Princeton, and since none of us freshman had a car, that was the only way we were going to do it. I mean, we could have taken the train there, but once we got there we wouldn’t know where the parties were, right? So this seemed like a good opportunity. Several of us decided to go, so I wasn’t going alone. When we got there, there was indeed a party at Princeton, and we were indeed introduced to a lot of freshmen there, including a couple of very beautiful girls. I still
remember one of them. Being who I am, I immediately approached the ranking beauty in the room and struck up a conversation with her. She had amazing eyes and I told her so. She couldn’t have been less
impressed with that old line—although it wasn’t a line, her eyes really were amazing—and she replied
that she was trying to look as unwholesome as possible. That is a direct quote. “As unwholesome as
possible.” I said, “why?” She just looked at me with disgust and said something to the effect that she
wished to be left alone, so I said “good luck with that” and wandered off. At the time I thought, “Yes,
when I wish to be left alone, I always go to crowded parties,” but now I think she was probably just not
interested in little old me. She was probably looking for an older man to slap her around or buy her
drugs, and she could tell by my shining eyes I wasn’t her type. She was right about that. She probably
ended up strung out on heroin by the time she was 25. I would bet she looks very unwholesome by
now. Strange how you get what you wish for, especially when you wish for something like that.
Since our drive back was a couple of hours, we had to spend the night in Princeton, but our hosts had
arranged for that as well. They drove us to this big house in the country. When I say us, I mean the
four or five of us from Haverford plus several new freshmen they had plucked from the Princeton party.
Maybe ten people, equal numbers of male and female. And this is where it gets weird. Although there
were a limited number of beds, I found myself assigned to a king-size bed. The leader then suggested
to several of the girls that they should join me there. I said nothing of either encouragement or
discouragement, waiting to see what would happen. No one volunteered and no one climbed into bed
later in the night, which, honestly, was a relief. I like to pick my own bed partners.
At the time I pegged my hosts as voyeurs or orgy organizers, and didn’t go to any more of their events.
But I have since wondered if it wasn’t more than that. These guys didn’t need to drive all the way to
Haverford to organize orgies. More likely they were recruiting for something, and the sex was just a
side-effect. Did I miss my chance to be included in some spook project? I will probably never know.
Anyway, the internal point of that story is that I notice things. If you don’t naturally notice things, you
can teach yourself to notice much more than you do. The first way to do that is to ignore all the
implicit advice from society to not notice things. For instance, we are taught that it is impolite to stare.
Well, yes, it is impolite and impolitic to stare at a person to the point of making them uncomfortable.
That won’t do you any good. But if you aren’t scary and if you remember to smile, you can look at
almost anything or anyone as long as you like. In fact, it is your right. You have eyes and you have the
right to look at whatever you wish to look at. If people don’t want to be seen, they should stay home or
wear a burka. So, whenever you go out, look at everything. Do not look away from anything. If you
get caught, just smile innocently.
Also, it is OK to make judgments. As you look at everything, categorize it in any way you like.
Practice categorizing it in as many ways as possible. Just as it is your right to look, it is your right to
judge. I am not saying you should be damning people to hell, I just mean you should be free to go,
“Oh, he’s tall, she’s pretty, that dog is dirty, that sign is stupid, and so on.” Those are all judgments, of a
sort. It is just you seeing things and putting them in slots in your mind. Not only is that OK, it is
necessary if you are going to get any smarter than you already are. If you put something in the wrong
slot, that is OK, too: you can switch slots later. The important thing is that you have some opinion
about everything that you see. It is that feeling that will make what you see stick in your mind. If you
don’t allow yourself to have a feeling about it, it won’t stick. It will just slide through your brain like
beer through the bladder.
Another thing has helped me get where I am, and it is very important. It is the fact that I believe in
truth. I am not a relativist. Whenever I have been taught relativism of any kind, I have simply handed
it back to the teacher. We don’t even need to get into a long discussion about truth here, since even if
you don’t believe in truth, you should pretend you do. I happen to believe in it very strongly, but I don’t
think it is something you can convince someone of. If someone has no strong innate connection to the
idea of truth, it is unlikely I am going to be able to give it to them. So I will just argue in utilitarian and
political terms here. In my opinion, relativism makes you less intelligent, and it is sold to you for that
reason. Relativism prevents you from making those judgments I was talking about above. Without
those judgments, things don’t stick in your brain. If you are a relativist, you just don’t care one way or
the other, and if you don’t care, then your brain has no reason to hold on to data. So you have to find
some reason to care. Believing in the truth is the natural way to do that.
Some will say that you can’t pretend to believe in truth if you don’t, and that is probably true. So start
with those things you care about. Call them your truths, and build from there. You will find that those
things you care about require you to look at and care about other things, and as you widen your net,
your truth grows. The point is, you want to care about more things, and include more things in your
truth, not less. Relativism is sold to you to make you do the opposite.
OK, with all that, we can return to Wilson. Looking at his pictures immediately tells me he is probably
a creep. If someone looks like a creep, they are probably a creep. You are taught not to make snap
judgments and not to judge people on the way they look, and although that advice contains a nugget of
truth, it is also misdirection. It leads you away from looking closely at the physical world and from
making judgments. Yes, if you have no practice looking at people and no practice making judgments,
then it is not a good idea to jump to conclusions based on a glance. But if you have been studying the
world for 50 years like I have, then it is just foolish not to use your eyes. I have studied a lot of people
and I have met a lot of creeps, so you would expect that I might be able to put 2 and 2 together by now.
And I can tell you looking at Wilson gives me a bad feeling. Why? Well, to start with, he has a smug
overfed look many of these people have. His eyes are shifty and dead at the same time. When he
smiles, his eyes don’t smile. And his smile is always more a smirk than a smile. So I encourage you to
study people: the way they look and the way they sound is important. Some of these famous people are
charismatic and they can fool you, but most of them are creepy and don’t hide it very well. Trust your
feelings.
Notice I said you should study people. That is the opposite of a snap judgment. A lot of people snap
judge people based on really stupid things, without studying them at all. For instance, a lot of young
women seem to see any single guy and assume he is a creep, no matter what he looks like. Or they
judge on shoes or a haircut or something. I am not recommending that, obviously. Judgments like that
won’t do you any good. In fact they will harm you immeasurably. No, you have to learn to judge
based on more important cues. Start with eyes and mouths, and listen to voices. Those are the three
most important cues.
But let us move on to some things that are more quantifiable. As you know, I never just give you a
feeling I have and expect you to trust me. We are going to go through Wilson’s bio with a fine-tooth
comb, as usual. The first red flag comes quickly at Wikipedia, where the fourth sentence is this:
His goal being “to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about
God alone but agnosticism about everything.”[2]
Sounds OK on a first reading, but you have to think about it a bit. Is agnosticism really a worthy goal?
No. It is a good starting point, maybe, but as a goal it stinks. What I mean is, doubt is a proper place to
begin an investigation. You want to be free to ask questions of both sides or all sides. But the whole
point of any investigation is ultimately to sort fact from fiction, truth from lies. Wrong from right. If
you continue to doubt everything, you can’t learn anything or make any progress.
Also, most problems aren’t as difficult as the God problem, so generalizing that sort of agnosticism
doesn’t make any sense. That problem is pretty hard to solve, but most real-life problems are much
easier to sort through. Take some court case, as an example. There is a truth there, and the judge or
jury can often or usually uncover it with some effort. If judges were Wilsonian agnostics, no case
would ever get decided.
But you can see how this sort of agnosticism would be the perfect misdirection for those running the
country. They want you to think there is no right or wrong answer, no right or wrong, so that when
they get caught with their hands in the cookie jar, they can weasel out of it. People that believe in truth
will demand that criminal cases have a definite outcome, but agnostics will be less strict. They may not
even follow up to be sure sentences are served, as we have seen. The US public is very undemanding,
and the reason is because they have been taught to be that way. Wilson is one of the ones that taught
them, via this generalized agnosticism.
We find the same thing here:
“Is”, “is.” “is”—the idiocy of the word haunts me. If it were abolished, human thought might begin to
make sense. I don’t know what anything “is”; I only know how it seems to me at this moment.
That is from the Historical Illuminatus Chronicles. Wilson wanted to purge all forms of the verb “to
be” from the language. Seriously. That wouldn’t be very convenient, would it? It would cause untold
confusion, right? Precisely. That was the goal. Just as we saw in my recent paper on The Matrix, the
spooks have been trying to dismantle reality for millennia, and still are. Remember how we saw Plato
selling you the idea that this world was only a shadow on a cave wall, and how Kant repeated the same
idea—teaching you that everything could be divided into noumena and phenomena. Phenomena were
“how things seem to me at this moment”, while noumena composed the reality behind that. In the 20th
century, they made the same split, but then threw out the noumena, teaching you only the phenomena
existed. This had the effect of disconnecting you from any reality. There was no truth, only
appearance.
Again, this is very useful to the governors, since it immediately disempowers the governed. If you
think there is no reality, your ability to make judgments is decimated. They still make judgments, since
they don’t believe this crap; but they want you to believe it. They want you to believe there is no truth,
since it takes the ground out from under you. You are swimming in quicksand at that point. You will
do nothing but waffle the rest of your life.
So while appearing to tell you something profound there, Wilson has actually flipped the world on you.
It is not the word “is” that is idiotic, it is his project to remove it from the language that is idiotic. It is
a cloaked destruction of language itself.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry for the poor formatting. Pasted directly from the PDF.
LikeLike
yes, I forgot about the RAW paper, definitely one of my favorite ones
LikeLike
I think that was one of the first papers that I read from Miles, and it struck me hard because at 11 years old I bought Wilson’s “Quantum Psychology” and basically bought his entire spiel hook-line-and sinker, down to the very idea that we should remove the verb “to be” from the English language. I even remember reading the idea myself, not having nearly the amount of skepticism that Miles had at a younger age, and thinking how intelligent a man he was. These ideas ended up influencing me in untold ways, and they likely played a large part in the severe pain I ended up enduring in my teenage years.
Reading his evisceration of these ideas in such a clear and logical manner drew me in, and in this sense showed me how different he was from any other author or internet critic or conspiracy theorist I had ever read before. He cuts through bullshit like no one else. Here I am thinking “Jesus Christ, I can’t believe I actually purchased this book, read it, and swallowed the propaganda willingly.” I also love how he wrote this essay like he is talking to a younger brother or something, and just telling you how it is and what you need to do, and why you shouldn’t feel bad about doing so. There’s a lot of love in that essay. Like shit, nobody ever told me before that it’s okay to use my eyes. You would think you wouldn’t need to be taught these things, but in this world, you do. You are always told to look away, to shield your eyes, for a million different reasons. You end up looking away from everything because you were trained to do so by a ton of little cues. And then Miles just says: it’s okay to look. To categorize things. Who else suggests such simple things, or would even think to?
LikeLike
1) Titanic – as it reveals the complex insurance fraud mirrored in 9/11 event *vital
2) guru – as it summarizes so much of his work
3) unknown – but some good suggestions in the comments here
4) Ghandi paper and Bitcoin scam
5) Hogg – I smelled a rat as soon as I saw him speak… and he wouldn’t go away.
Honorable mentions that affected me –
Harry Potter (my first exposure to Miles work). Lincoln, Salem Witch Trials, Hidden Kings, Tate-Manson, Bezos, Musk, Zuck, Lennon, simply too many to recount here.
Random observations: From Miles ‘Making the Connection’ paper
“So it would appear that I am more sensitive to Solar cycles than most most people. Probably that is because my immune system is weak, so I respond to any weakness in the cycle immediately. My stomach is like a bellwether to Solar activity.”
Miles comment here reminds me of this paragraph from an obscure document I came across relating to activating the solar plexus chakra (aka power chakra)
“The opening of the navel center opens the great subconscious mind, which is not good if you do not intend to keep balance. Most phenomena are done from this center. This sphere of consciousness when fully developed becomes as a SUN to the body about as large as the average dinner plate in diameter. Reactions and thoughts in the minds of those surrounding you are vibrated through their emotional natures and understood on reception into this center. This is the emotional body of man and it is so much more.”
LikeLike
Satya, that’s an interesting connection regarding the insurance angles on the Titanic and the 9/11 event. I wonder how many other fake events involve insurance payoffs.
LikeLike
Anywhere there is loss or destruction of property… we’ll probably find evidence. And the art world? Thefts of art?
Someone commented here about the current news about hackers of 9/11 documents, which looks like another project, but IF that information implicating the insurance claims (Lloyds) comes out… could be an opening to 9/11 unwinding?
I think 2019 is going to be explosive. Families are attacking each other like rabid dogs, they’re self destructing. I think it will take a few years, but it’s in motion. I blame the muses, they touched Miles, and its a cascading event.
Personally my interests have always been focused on the muses – lots of interesting info on how they operate, how they are invoked etc, if you click through to the site linked at my name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Satya, I have a question about your blog and the breathing exercise you mention, but your contact page does not work. Any chance you could tell me how to contact you so I could email you?
LikeLike
Is this you Satya ? nice .
http://satyamama.com/calming-breath-techniques/
LikeLike
BluestRaven – contact page is working now… when I get your message I’ll make contact. Thanks.
DF – nope, but that name is a clever play on words as Sachamama is a forest goddess known to the indigenous peoples in South America… the shaman access her frequency and receive guidance on how to develop their plant medicines: Ayahuasca for example. She also takes form as a rainbow serpent as described in the excellent book Cosmic Serpent – DNA and the Origins of Knowledge by: Jeremy Namby.
LikeLike
Ok , thanks , I was thinking it was a pun like , Sasha Paine-Diaz ( or – such a mama ) 😉
LikeLike
“BEST OF” ANTI-MA(THIS) AWARDS! Comments welcome on these alt-wrong awards!
Best Anti-Ma(this) Project: U.S. Congress, that passed the Quantum Anything fake science give-away funded at a billion bucks and change. The surprise upset of fan favorite “nano” shocked the nation. Yet, we’re only one hacked, stolen election away from Miles Mathis as Quantum Czar.
Best Dated Anti-Ma Debunker Jargon: “Crackpot!”
Another upset with “kook” losing out! The modern AD HOMINEM timeline roughly runs:
“crazy” from the Freud/Jung psy-op, popular from 1920’s-1930’s;
“crackpot” as in literate but crazy for rejecting mainstream history, science etc. 1940’s
“kook” as the 1950’s-1960’s hipster beatnik slang for “crazy”;
“nut” as hip but housewife-friendly “crazy” put-down from 1970’s-1980’s;
“conspiracy theorist” cobbled up by the CIA as a paranoid crazy from 1990’s;
“fanatic” variant of “crazy” for the 21st Century atheist college crowd as oft paired with “religious.” NOTE: Dissin’ lingo smearing Miles Mathis always has a strangely ESL/English as a Second Language inaptness and/or wrong-generation mustiness, probably because Ol’ Grandpa Soros can dig it, and so he cuts the check.
Best Anti-Ma YouTube: Jeff/DraftScience, with “For the Idiots, especially Miles Mathis” where Jilted Jeff doubles-down on Pi=3.1415926 and Nils Bohr with all the street cred one can muster from colorful whiteboard jottings. Seems JJ doth protest Mathis as a c_ _ t too much for someone having a blow-up of the Mathis self-portrait…
Best Anti-Ma “Praising With Faint Damns” Internet Essay: PANTLOAD. Swiss-educated governors of the Sly Stallone ilk never notice that this clunky blackwashing of Miles Mathis they constantly uplist provides enticing blurbs and hot & juicy links to the man himself. Another secret crush like JJ, and featuring the award-winning smear “crackpot” and also-ran “conspiracy” appellation. Don’t hate, congratulate.
Best Anti-Ma “With friends like that who needs enemies?” award goes to: POM.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gerard, sounds like you know your anti-Mathis projects. Maybe you should co-write a paper on that with someone.
LikeLike
That was hilarious!
LikeLike
Been a few threads I tried pulling on to write a guest paper in the last year. All I ended up doing was covering myself in mountains of thread. It just kept unraveling and unraveling. The comically obvious fakery kept jumping out, like clowns from a car. I found myself with too much source material, and not enough left to prove to myself after having read every paper on Miles’ site.
I still have hundreds and hundreds of pages of factoids lying around, just no motivation to string any of it together into a publication. People in my daily life aren’t interested, and people on the Internet who’d be interested feel far away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We may feel far away, but we’re right here. Take your time, but Josh and Vexman would likely host or help if you like, or Miles perhaps. If we’re seeking the truth together, definitely give it a shot and add to the discovery!
LikeLike
Greetings to all. I never post on a forums but I believe this one is important enough to break that rule.
1. DID BLACKROCK/VANGUARD BUY THE ENTIRE WORLD?
(Sums the current scam up nicely and his closing sentiments are spot on)
2. John Lennon
(Because it made sense of something strange that i heard)*
3. PI = 4 in a spiral
(Proves seeing is believing)
4. Phoenician series
(Also the worst but that’s what happens when you go into so much depth)
5. In the UK has to be Skripal
(How stupid do they think people are and they may also be correct)
6. Everyone involved in the Netflix show “Making a Murderer”
(That show set my ‘Milesy Senses’ tingling )
* An old family friend was lucky enough to be in the local band that supported the Beatles in his home town in 1963. Lennon was his hero and he couldn’t wait to meet him. The local band had also done the ‘Hamburg thing’ at the same time as the Beatles (allegedly) did.
When they met on the stage before the gig the friend said to Lennon “Do you remember ‘so and so’ in Hamburg?” Lennon got angry and said “What am i supposed to remember every ‘f*****g ****’ in Germany!” He said that even the other Beatles looked embarrassed never mind the locals, the whole atmosphere went bad. It irked him to the day he died.
As he spent the greater part of his life in the music business and saw a lot of weird things and he probably would have ‘understood’ the Lennon paper and the that the discrepancies go away back.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Favorite…
1. from 2018 – “The Bitcoin Scam”
2. of all time – “Watergate Unstoppered”
3. physics – “The Solution to Gravity” or the series on tides (“The Solution to Tides,” “More Trouble with Tides,” etc.)
4. guest paper – “Kent State Hoax”
5. Silliest/most absurd hoaxed event of 2018:
5A. The Mueller Investigation (Watergate 2.0)
5B. All mainstream news
5C. Covered in a (guest) paper – “Thousand Hoax”
LikeLike
@ SMK
Interesting anecdote. Did your friend say whether he recalled ever seeing the Beatles in Hamburg? Or having any other first hand knowledge that they were there (other than through word of mouth)?
LikeLike
Maybe this will help SMK shake loose a memory or other details: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_in_Hamburg, or otherwise be worth picking apart.
LikeLike
@Josh
No he never did. And he had lots of stories to tell and wasn’t afraid of a little ’embellishment’. To be fair though, it seems Hamburg was as crazy then as we’ve been told and the Beatles would have just been just another (unknown) band in a lot of bands there.
@Tidewater
I did read that before posting and noticed the Beatles were paid £100 a week or £15 each. The only reason this band could go there was that one of their older sisters worked in a NAAFI in a US airbase (good money seemingly – the rest of the world loves your US tax dollars) and it was only because of her they could survive. And because of her they got a job touring the airbases doing all the old fifties classics or as the friend put it “good money for old rope”.
I did read a book about the Beatles years before I heard this story and remember the Hamburg story as being a bit ridiculous but that was pre-awakening and I just put it down to exaggeration to boost sales.
@Josh
I like the term you used ‘anecdote’ because that sums it up for me. You can read (and see through) the mainstream nonsense. You can follow the genealogies (i struggle with it) but its when you see it personally or hear the anecdotal evidence from someone you know and trust that it hits you hardest. The con is real and is affecting good people everywhere.
LikeLike
1. Favorite 2018 — “Modernism is Fascism”
2. All Time Favorites–
“The Tate Murders Were Faked”
This one was the 1st “Faked” I dared myself to read.
Like the line in the movie Vanilla Sky, “Open your eyes”.
Why do I like that movie???
Also “Retiring Stephen Hawkings”
And “Lucky Lindy”
3. Favorite Physics–need to read more of them before commenting.
4. Favorite Guest — “Ancient Spooks”
5. Silliest Hoax 2018–“Thai Cave Rescue”
6. Worst Crisis Actor– All the “ordinary” bystanders associated with hoax events.
Need to get a better class of actors but then I guess they really don’t need to.
LikeLike
I’ve had some time to read the comments and chew on things a bit. As I thought about some of the older projects, I realized that my very hip grandmother was onto some of them and she really pointed me in the right direction for alternative reading. The older people had something that most folks today lack, which is common sense. She “exposed” Dylan to me as a teenager, saying that he was a fake. She didn’t get into his genealogy but everything else lines up with what Miles said. She also hated John Wayne movies because she was an excellent horse rider and said he rode like a f*g and walked funny. Not that she hated gays, but she just couldn’t buy him as a manly cowboy.
LikeLike
NO MORE WIRE HANGERS! Best Untrue Crime Expose: FATAL MISTAKES The Spinning of the Jeffrey MacDonald Case
Mathis distinguishes himself with a multi-jurisdictional mashup fraught with fright that includes the outing of Ted “Too Little Too Late” Gunderson, former FBI queenpin. The title pic with a crease from a wire hanger on Jeffrey’s uniform jacket collar, and the wavy epaulet and hapless lapels are proof MacDonald is neither an officer nor a gentleman.
HELLFIRE CLUB ANTICS! Best Biography: BEN FRANKLIN
Started the U.S. Post Office…Franklin’s obviously evil. This PDF file is the one that has been backsucked off my drive several times, so either must be the most damaging to the governors or most attractive to colonial boy porn lovers. Oh, those lips! To think he scraped by on day-old buns per his official story…
BEACHES! Best All-Time Opium Cartel Cover-Up: KENNEDY GAY?
JFK as part of a fractured virtual family makes Rose Kennedy a candidate for Catholic Mafia wife sainthood, and proves Mathis is a straight arrow for missing the matching swimming trunks. Miles wasn’t looking, you know, down there.
POST-MORTEM FLICKS! Best Dead Act: JOHN LENNON & HIMSELF IN “LET HIM BE”
Unless Tupac is cranking out indie films somewhere… Useful photo analysis skills include observing subtle scars, great for putting the belay on buying that she-man with a shaved Adam’s apple a drink.
CHARGE FIELD FOR DUMMIES! Best science project: COOL MOONLIGHT
Picnic table, thermometer and a full moon. The papier maché possibilities are endless for a sure-fire blue ribbon at the science fair.
RINSE & REPEAT! Best non-stop looting of a country: FRENCH REVOLUTION, NAPOLEON, DREYFUS
No wonder they hate tourists.
LikeLike
Hilarious!
LikeLike
Hi.
My pick is:
1. Titanic
2. Tate
3. Tides
4. Ancient spooks
5. Thai cave
Many thanks to the admin and commentators of this blog.
All well onboard.
LikeLike
This is a great thread. Apart from reading everyone else’s fave papers and reasons, it has directed me to many other papers I hadn’t got around to yet.
For example, many scientific papers. I’ve recently devoured Miles’ work on the structure of the chemical elements, and the brilliant diagrams. Apart from the usual insights, they explain the bonds in a simple and understandable way.
Thanks again Miles.
LikeLike
Looks like this is winding down. I got a few votes in email that I will add to the pile here. Those who voted email only hit the first four, for some reason. Guess they were already giggled out.
1. eight votes for Titanic, two votes for Modernism is Fascism, two for LEveson Gower, three for Jeffrey MacDonald, three for Lawrence of Arabia, one for the Post.
2. four for Kennedy, four for Tate, three for Lincoln, one for Beat Generation, two for Hitler’s Genealogy, one for Salem, one for Lenin, one for Lennon, one for Napoleon, one for The Occult,.
3. two for Pi, one for Hawking, one for Schrodinger’s equation, one for long Relativity, one for nuclear diagrams, two for Unified Field, one for LIEGO, one for Rainbows, one for Lagrange, one for Calculus SImplified, one for Cool Moonlight, one for Superposition, one for Drude, one for Third Wave, one for Plate Tectonics.
4. four for Phoenicians, three for Gandhi, two for Kent State, one for the Alamo, one for Stephen King, one for Thai REscue, one for Smedley, one for NEd Kelly, one for Dreyfus.
I will be voting on the first three tomorrow just for fun, but it won’t count. I won’t be voting on the fourth one because I don’t want to show any favoritism.
LikeLike
Thanks!
LikeLike
I vote for the “The Double Slit Experiment” because this is the fundamental success for QM and Richard Feynman in which he had explained it.
Since only Mr. Feynamn can use mathematics to describe it perfectly in probability terms and as a result it became the foundation of QM.
Right now, Miles Mathis can have a more mechanical and logical answer to get it explained and done and worked well. Extremely Incredible success by Miles!
Ken NG
LikeLike
Josh, when the results are all in, may I suggest perhaps a new poll, and Miles/your permitting, of the top events (for want of a better word) that commentators that would like Miles (or any guest writers) to unravel?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the idea! Only wish you had thought of it earlier so we could have ridden the wave of traffic Miles sent our way.
LikeLike
OK, here are what I think are my best papers in the three categories.
1. Titanic. I had no idea what I would discover going in, and was constantly surprised. Biggest surprise surely was finding no icebergs at that latitude. That made me realize the Titanic didn’t sink at all.
2. This one is a lot harder, as my readers have said. If we were judging on the paper that is best researched and written, it would probably have to be Tate/Manson. I really got into that one, and it is better written than the earlier Kennedy paper. But I think it is better to judge on import, and that event just isn’t as important as a lot of others. The further back we go, the more important they seem to me to be, since they broaden out and become more inclusive. For this reason, I think the most important fake events paper I have written would be the one on the Crusades. Who would have thought that the Popes, Kings, Crusaders, Templars, and Byzantine Emperors would all be from the same family? THe research there covered many centuries, and it tells us what is going on now, since the same family is still in charge. I think it was this paper that prompted Gerry to do his research on the Phoenicians as well, taking us back many more centuries. However, I still don’t think that is the most important paper I have written overall. Since the near future is always more important than the past, I think many of my science papers are more important than any of my history papers. Which means that my final answer for 2 and 3 will be the same. The pi paper is bigger than most people realize, since it will allow for the correction of thousands of bad equations. But that isn’t the most important. The correction to the calculus will allow for the correction of even more equations, but it still isn’t the most important. The Unified Field papers are fundamental, and will create a revolution in physics by themselves. However, they still aren’t the most important. The most important is my diagramming of the nucleus, since it uses what I discovered about unification to rewrite the Periodic Table. It links physics and chemistry, taking my ideas out of the theoretical and firmly into the practical. The future applications are nearly endless, and even I can’t begin to imagine what they will be.
Thanks for all the votes, though. There were no wrong answers. I especially liked the votes for things like Art of the Lastman and My Genealogy, which warmed my heart. My Genealogy was definitely a defining moment in my oeuvre in 2018, and it flavored the entire year. And I am still proud of my old art papers, though they don’t have the flash of the newer ones. I took more time composing them, and they have a polish the newer ones often lack. I hate to see the art question buried by the science and history questions, but I guess that is how it is. It might have been better had I been born as at least three people, so that I wouldn’t swamp myself, but what are you gonna do? In hindsight, I probably should have created at least two pseudonyms to keep the works separate, but it is a little late for that. It is difficult to get paid under pseudonyms, and I once had the naive idea I might make some money from these things. Silly of me, right?
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t think it’s silly of you to have hoped to earn a living doing (something else) you love to do. At the same time, and this is selfish, I’m glad you haven’t been hired on by Lockheed-Martin for your Lift paper or Proctor & Gamble for your nucleus work or some other vile industrial-military corporation to stifle you and end all progress. So there is that! Thanks for not selling out.
As a fellow struggler in finance, I can only hope you’re doing okay and by Jove, better than myself in these matters. The Art Struggle is real for me as well – but at least you’re GOOD at your artwork, Miles. I’m still a novice at best and struggle with composition and technique. You’re doing fine there from the standpoint of the art itself!
Your art papers are just as devastating as any of your others, to the arts anyway. The social impact won’t be as broad, but that doesn’t mean they weren’t worth writing and you’ve probably helped far more struggling artists than you think! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Thanks for not selling out.”
There it is. Well said.
LikeLike
I too would have loved to see a voting category for the art papers. Being that way inclined, I have read more of those than your physics papers. I chose Pi = 4 because I was able to use it in email discussion with a NASA scientist to prove an equation he used with his photography was wrong. What are the chances an artist like me who didn’t take science beyond about the age of 15 could prove a NASA scientist wrong?
As an artist I look forward to the odd take down of modern art, papers like prose masquerading as poetry, jerry saltz, taos art, modernism is fascism. Also the odd positive review, like Black Swan this. Comparatively its small fish, but a welcome bit of variety, and is nice being pointed in the direction of good work (on film, painting, poetry or otherwise) by someone with taste. But of course, I’ll take whatever is offered!
LikeLike
Perhaps I should have had a separate category for art and counter-criticism papers instead of including them by default in the best of category. There were some votes for some of those papers but they were overwhelmed by the others.
I will say for myself that I’ve benefited from the counter-criticism papers. With few exceptions, I’ve never liked modern art, but I always thought the problem was with me, that I just didn’t “get it.”
I found reading Miles’ evisceration of modern art very empowering, in addition to his advice not only to trust your own instincts and judgment but also to cultivate those capacities (such as in the long passage from the Robert Anton Wilson paper that R.T. quoted from).
One reason it was empowering was that I finally felt emboldened to announce to anyone within earshot that I don’t like modern art. And the problem wasn’t with me, it was with the art.
More generally his advice emboldened me to trust my judgment and instincts. The irony here is that my growing confidence in my own independent judgment–inspired by Miles’ advice–was the main reason I became an outspoken supporter (even at the risk of sometimes coming off as a bit of sycophant). I surveyed all the bits and pieces of evidence I had before me and decided that not only was he right about an overwhelming number of things, but also that he was a genuine person — not on the payroll in service of spooks. So if my unflagging support appears at times to be that of a sycophant, it should be understood that my actions are really those of a person who has stopped doubting himself and decided to defend and promote the truth.
LikeLiked by 3 people
“I’ve never liked modern art, but I always thought the problem was with me, that I just didn’t “get it.””
Me too!
Some of Miles pictures are simply stunning.
How the heck do you paint single backlit hairs on a girls head?
Come to think of it, how do you paint eyes that show emotion?
Skill……
LikeLike
I know some people who have always loved Andy Warhol. My husband and I could not even believe anyone could like that garbage. We never understood what was going on with modern art. Once I read Miles’ papers, I understood the mind control. I cannot even begin to tell you how much it meant to me because we were brutally criticized for not “getting” art. HA! Not that anyone will listen to me. But at least I know the truth.
Josh, thanks for expanding my vocabulary today! Now I know what the words evisceration and sycophant mean! You know I do love your style of writing : )
LikeLike
I’m just proud to have translated “Titanic” in French (two parts):
https://bistrobarblog.blogspot.com/2018/10/limposture-du-titanic-par-miles-mathis.html
https://bistrobarblog.blogspot.com/2018/10/limposture-du-titanic-par-miles-mathis_9.html
And this paper has been viewed for now by almost 2000 people.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well done. Those French readers will find more truth in that paper than any amout of bulls**t spouted by the Yellow Vests. Unless, of course, those 2000 people are zee French spooks scrambling to get a look at what all the Anglo-Saxon Spooks are wailing about 😉
LikeLike
If you bundled your texts after theme, like fake right and fake left, false flags and fake deaths, or however you would like it, and maybe went over the material, added a little, then you would have a typical product which we call a book, and they can be pushed everywhere. You can send them to Oxford publishing houses as exquisite insults, or you can have them printed and even sold at amazon. (“Jobs book” by Miles Mathis incl. Bozos, Musk, and various other G.I. Suckersteins )
But yes, i would like to send off the Mathis book on Marx, Engels, Owens, Jenny and the others to many people, a perfect Christmas present – even in 10 years, and probably even longer.
I think it could reach many more, if you started as your own manager and made products out of your collection, and pushed these. Don’t fear the sell out, its just books.
LikeLike
I don’t think you are a sycophant, and I doubt anyone else does either. You may have been accused of it, and we can guess by whom, but that doesn’t make it true. THere is a wide margin between a defender and a sycophant.
LikeLike
OK, I’ve tallied up the votes. Here are the results:
Best of 2018:
1st place: Titanic (49 votes)
2nd place: 3-way tie between Blackrock/Vanguard, Modernism is Fascism, and Lawrence of Arabia (4 votes each)
3rd place: 3-way tie between Cool Moonlight, Leveson-Gower, and Jeffrey MacDonald (3 votes each)
Best of all time:
1st place: JFK/Hidden Kings (22 votes)
2nd place: Tate/Manson (19 votes)
3rd place: 2-ways tie between Guru (“What I Finally Understood”) and Hiller (“Hitler’s Genealogy”) with 9 votes, followed closely by Lennon with 8 votes (It dawned on me counting votes that Lennon is basically an alternative spelling of Lenin).
Best Physics:
1st place: Pi=4 (17 votes)
2nd place: Unified Field (5 votes)
3rd place: 3-way tie between Rainbows, Lift on a Wing, and the Trouble with Tides (4 votes)
Best Guest Paper:
1st place: Ancient Spooks (37 votes)
2nd place: Gandhi (12 votes)
3rd place: 2-way tie between Smedley Butler and Kent State (6 votes)
And the Silliest/Most Absurd Hoax of 2018:
1st place: Roadster……in……space! (9 votes)
2nd place: Thai Cave (7 votes)
3rd place: 2-way tie between Thousand Oaks and Skripal (3 votes)
Worst Crisis Actor of 2018:
1st place: David Hogg and his schoolmates (7 votes)
2nd place: Trump and his hair lost by a hair (6 votes)
3rd place: Theresa May (2 votes)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oi, wait a minute — you telling me the Titanic was a fake? Ffs! 😉
Seriously though, thanks for the all the hard work Josh (and providing the forum). With hindsight, I’m not that surprised by the results. Nothing else to say except well done Miles; you’ve achieved more in a year than any number of scientists, social scientists, political scientists, historians and journalists will achieve in a lifetime (in fact, most of ’em will never realise they are wading in a vat of poo and they’re poohing in the poo!).
LikeLike
By the way Gerry wrote to me last week that he was going to be away on vacation for a week and so wouldn’t be able to comment when the results came in. I expect we’ll hear from him in a few days.
LikeLike
I’m back, and would like to thank all of you here for the many nominations I got. It is very, very encouraging to receive this kind of feedback for my research on the “Ancient Spooks”, which took me almost a full year.
Of course the title “best” guest paper doesn’t quite fit overall. I think we can all agree that while many other guest papers are truly Miles™ style & quality, the “Ancient Spooks” made an impression mostly for the chosen topic — how our world became so thoroughly spooked — and hopefully for contributing some new angles to tackle it. But it was mostly a confirmation of all the existing research.
I’d therefore like to donate all the kudos I earned here back to Miles, and to all my fellow researchers & guest writers. I’ve been standing on the shoulders of giants, but it was not the historians who wrote tall tales, but all you truth-seekers, who taught me how to decode them and what patterns to seek out in them.
For me, your research about present & recent spookery were the key to the ancient past. I hope that some day my research can also be a key to the present & future. Because that’s what counts most, obviously: To start rolling back spookery here & now, by laying bare the full truth about it.
If you liked the “Ancient Spooks”, I can promise that at least a little more will be coming your way. I also vow that I will finally grow up this year, and set up a website of my own, so that all the tiny tidbits of punnery that don’t fit into a paper won’t get lost. Apart from that, I can only encourage you to start researching history yourselves. The more eyes on the topic, the better.
For once in my life I have the feeling I could contribute a meaningful part to a meaningful effort. Thank you all for that! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Gerry, welcome back! I knew your series was going to be special from get go and generate a lot of buzz and provoke a lot of thought and conversation, which is why I set up a special post for discussing the series after the first paper was published. Congrats!
LikeLike
Before I forget: It made me especially proud to see some of you even remembering my debut paper, the “Fruitbearers”. It was the first time where I could not only confirm that the official story was fake, but also see what was really behind it. That’s what I’ve always admired about you guys! Since I was so sure about this one, I was able to write it more funny. Though I have to admit that the final punchline is from Miles. Thank you, Miles, for bearing with me and publishing all my weird stuff.
(In case you want to see more of THAT (*shudder*), even the “Fruitbearing” pattern may be found with Ancient Spooks: Look for the plant allegories in the “Garland” by the Phoenician-Greek poet Meleager of Gadara.)
LikeLike
Thanks, Josh. Now we just wait for Miles’ own selection 🙂
LikeLike
See above. It came in 6 minutes after Josh’s tallies, but it got superlisted somehow.
LikeLike
to the guest writer about Hungerford – page 3 – £25 in 1903 was 25 sovereigns – current price for them £246-£285 dependent on whether you are wanting to compare like for like sovereigns of that time or ones made more recently (£6150-£7125). Its one of the ways they system hides the price inflation in the UK since 1914. Government statistical bollocks covers up the fact the an old £1 is a sovereign and enables a direct comparison with our past
LikeLike
I’ve read only a few of the science math papers. Read the periodic tables one just a week or so ago. Didn’t understand it, of course, but I could tell…. Sent it to my 87 yr old former radiologist father with the subject title: A truly beautiful mind.
Anyway Miles. Get the two books out, targeted to two audiences: the fairly educated and the not so fairly educated. I’d consider broadening the Asian and Latino appeal probably with a couple geneologies of a currently famous Asian and Latino celebrity. This should appeal to the younger crowd, too. Alright Miles, keep up the great work.
LikeLike
@Josh
I wholeheartedly second “ihatestarwars” in opening a new post on topics that readers would like Miles or guest writers to post on. In fact, you may need to periodically post a new entry to call for input on requested new research topics once older entries have attracted too many comments, making following the conversation difficult After getting enough votes, you can post separate entries, one for each important topic, for people to contribute tidbits. Useful tidbits can be quickly compiled by Miles or guest writers into essays worth reading.
A potential downside to this approach would be a flood of misdirection in the comments to waste the time of the curious or attempts to steer investigative efforts toward less important topics. However, these attempts will almost certainly fail against Miles, and his regular readers have already had their critical thinking skills sharpened courtesy of Miles.
Eventually you could set up a wiki to which only Miles and guest writers selected by him are allowed to post. Wikis are great for collaboration. The end result will be that Miles and his carefully selected guest writers could, regarding specific topics, do their own research, utilize interesting tidbits posted in the blog comments, and collaborate on wiki pages. If all wiki pages are open access, each wiki page would have the disclaimer that it is a work in progress such that the picture being sketched is not final or near final unless Miles has posted it at his website. In an alternative, wiki pages being worked on, far from final shape, could be locked for viewing by only the contributors.
I would like to see all the output of Miles in wiki format. This way the internal search function of the wiki can facilitate much better understanding of Miles and discovery of the interconnectedness of many topics/issues. For instance, when Miles notes that the Stanleys come up regarding a topic, he does not have to remind the reader about the Stanleys showing up in other contexts. All that needs to be done is to link the name Stanley to the internal search function of the wiki wherever Stanley comes up: the output would be a list of all events in which the Stanleys appear in the genealogies of the actors involved.
LikeLike
@Magoo: While I find your cause a noble one, the enactment seems to me a bit… unactionable? Currently, anyone is free to ask Miles or Josh or Gerry or Vexman or anyone else to write for them – or to even do it themselves. One can compose videos or audio clips or commentary or any other medium as well, as we all have those tools handy if need be. Most people have phones, computers, and the internet around here, yes?
I think your potential downside point is stronger than you might think.
Regarding a “Wiki” style compilation, all these authors have given us their words freely and without restriction other than bibliography, as far as I’m aware. Anyone is free to database or compile these writings however they like. Several of us have already; Nevyn even offers a full mirror for Miles’ papers over at his site, https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/mirror/www.milesmathis.com/index.html. As for a databased and searchable compendium, it’s a lot of work and the .pdf format is hardly helpful. But it is the most solid against outside incursion, which is why I believe Miles chose it. Josh and Vexman’s sites I simply back up myself once a month just in case something goes awry (minus the comments, alas).
What I’m saying is that if you’d like to see them databased, jump in and get on it! Put in the time yourself. Many would help, but it’s not a small task and it certainly isn’t going to do itself. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Magoosh
I’m going to basically say ditto to what Jared wrote. What you are proposing sounds like a lot of work, and I’m a busy guy. As Jared noted, you are more than welcome to create a MathisWiki. I agree about the advantages it would confer.
As for voting, I have decided the window for that has passed. Perhaps if we do a ‘best of 2019’ at the end of the year I’ll include a category for topics for future research. Anyway I’m not going to do a new post for that, but people are welcome to add topics they’d like to see in comments. I believe Miles has already been inspired to write a few papers based on comments here, but knowing him as I do, I don’t think suggesting topics for him to write about will do much good. He follows his muse…
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d personally love to have such a database on hand, and/or even a family tree database to track and study The Families. I’m always down to help out from a tech standpoint but am meanwhile knee-deep in the physics studies and simulations and trying to get past that pesky fourth (Z1) spin in my modeling – which others have already done, so it’s daunting to be so far behind. But again, if I can help on the logistics involved, anyone can email me or whatever.
Meanwhile, if you’re looking for a compilation of Miles’ Charge Field work in action, cruise on over to Nevyn’s site and poke around. He’s just incredible. Here he has diagrammed every atom on the periodic table, simulated in 3D motion in your browser using Miles’ charge field; it’s even got a fancy UI to boot:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/app/AtomicViewer/periodic-table-3d.php
Here’s his shiny brand-new Atomic Viewer app, same style, 3D animated model in your browser:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/app/AtomicViewer/AtomicViewer.php
And here, Nevyn has written Molecular Bonding Language (same rendering engines, browser-friendly, nothing else needed) to show how atoms connect via charge:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/app/mbl/
I can’t think of anyone or any way a person could have done more complimentary work on this topic and the guy is just incredible. His own theories are just as devastating as Miles’ work and a very powerful addition in the same fashion. This paper offers a simple yet potent contribution to the charge field and I can’t read it enough times:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/papers/spin-velocity.html
LikeLiked by 2 people
“it’s daunting to be so far behind”
Yah, you’re so slow 😉
Now please stop distracting me whilst I try and learn my times tables, ’cause if the likes of you are slow then I’m comatose.
LikeLike
1) Charles Manson / Sharon Tate
2) Abe Lincoln
3) JFK
4) Tupac Shakur
5) Bitcoin
6) Marilyn Monroe
7) John Lennon
8) The Mob (mob.pdf)
9) Boston Marathon bombing
10) Martin Luther King
LikeLike
I did a little looking into Dr. Benjamin Spock this morning. His family tree has some familiar names. His book “Baby and Child Care” came out in 1946. I would love to see the full Miles on this guy.
Maybe my wish will come true. I was curious about Jonestown, and that paper appeared not long after. 🙂
A belated Happy New Year to all!
LikeLike