From Las Vegas, Pittsburg, Thousand Oaks to Russian Collusion and the Khashoggi assassination, false-flag hoaxes, conspoofacies, fake murders and other manufactured events are running non-stop around the world and around the corner.
A reader wrote in to suggest opening a comment section devoted to discussing current (faked) events. I thought it was a good idea and would provide a place where people could chime in on what’s going on in the news and even offer evidence for why they think the event was faked, hoaxed, manufactured, etc. (or why not). Have at it, unless you think it’s a waste of your time–in which case, don’t!
@L Kinder:
“TRUMP PROPHECY…”
Yes, you called it right, another load of old fanny produced as part of ‘The Don’ operation chaos project – at all costs keep every-ones eyes on Trump. The author of the book, Ingersoll Lockwood, had a spook father and was an obvious spook himself. Here’s a link to a couple of the ‘prophesy’ books supposed to have been written by Lockwood…
https://cdn.loc.gov/service/gdc/dcmsiabooks/19/00/or/la/st/pr/es/id/00/lo/ck/1900orlastpresid00lock/1900orlastpresid00lock.pdf
https://cdn.loc.gov/service/gdc/dcmsiabooks/ba/ro/nt/ru/mp/sm/ar/ve/00/lo/ck/barontrumpsmarve00lock/barontrumpsmarve00lock.pdf
The whole think looks like yet another fake event being pushed by the usual suspects onto their gullible slaves.
LikeLike
@Patrick:
Good summary of the situation in Venezuela. It is obvious that the boss of Maduro and Trump has instructed that none of the profit made from all that lovely Black Gold gets into the hands of the locals as it’s all needed to help pay for the fake reality most of humanity believes in. Yes, there’s no business like Shoah business.
LikeLike
Miles has added comments about the school photo in the Dunblane paper.
When was young, the boys didn’t wear sweatshirts to school, that was 90s onwards as I recall, we wore a pullover, shirt, and tie combination. Some laddies wore kilts on special occasions. Girls wore similar to the boys, pullover, blouse and tie with a skirt instead of trousers or a kilt on special occasions.
The photo is probably a mash-up of different eras, and most kids when I was at school bairns were blond, redheaded or mousy, only a few had dark hair, but that was the seventies/early eighties, we didn’t have any blacks/Indians, just Scots, a few Irish and on occasion an American we called Adolf because of his German surname.
LikeLike
Well spotted Lewis. The children’s uniforms in the more northerly Scottish schools are beautiful. The vibrant colours and careful matching makes English uniforms look drab and boring by comparison. They all wear exactly the same too, unlike the Dunblane photo which is a literal smorgasbord.
LikeLike
It was during the 70’s when I went school. The girls wore either cardigans of pullovers, and different schools wore different colored sweaters and blazers, and the lads wore short pants, which were fine on a normal day, but murther when it was hailing. No sweatshirts in my day tho’, no mobile phones and computers either, those were the days my friend, we thought they’d never end…
LikeLike
I was in grade school in the late 50s and early 60s but that was in the USA. If those were USA kids I wouldn’t date that group in the 1960s but I have no experience with UK kids in that period. They were probably more conservative over there so it may well be in the 60s. The teacher’s dress does look late 50s/early 60s. The kids’ shoes could be written off as part of their uniform, I think.
The thing that strikes me about the photo is that the kids look like they were hand-picked for cuteness. There isn’t a dog in the bunch. They look like they were sent in by Central Casting.
LikeLike
Spot on. The more cute the kids, the more this hoaxed even plucked at the public’s heart strings. They want us to feel these events in an emotional way, rather than using our brains. This is the secret to making a successful phsyop.
LikeLike
I’ve stared at that photo for hours.
It looks a mess – kids looking this way and that, stupid grins, weird bad haircuts, the mix of uniforms… I would expect to see a lot more discipline and order in a primary school photo, formal or not. Even more so if it was any time prior to the 90’s…
The teacher’s dress/big belt/bangle/hoop earrings/hairstyle combo is definitely 80’s style, NOT 60’s. So I think she is contemporary with the ‘event’. I can imagine Scotland, like many places, having fashion hold-outs from previous decades sticking with their established style as they mature.
Plus, what is that box thing behind the teacher, looks vaguely like a microwave, or is it an 80’s era computer or similar device, with a big modem thing sitting on top…?
Are they headphones on the table to the right? 80’s style can headphones. There’s even a kids’ drawing on the wall behind with some headphones in it. 80’s style, hanging over into the 90’s. Contemporary with the ‘event’ again.
Polo shirts and fleece sweaters weren’t big in schools until the 80’s and 90’s… before that was wool or acrylic sweaters over polyester collared shirts.
The handwriting style on the boards and the cartoon text balloons are all not 60’s style educational level, they’re more modern/touchy-feely/more in-tune with the kids/let-the-kids-express-themselves stuff.
All of which could be more evidence of a paste-up with deliberate placement of ‘modern’ items…
Whatever – it definitely ain’t 60’s. The shoes thing that Miles and the “perceptive reader” pointed out is a bit off the mark, IMHO. Those T-bar style girls school shoes come and go out of fashion, just like the Scout-style boys shoes. They’re actually hot again this year in schools all around certain parts… fact. I could walk 18 steps right now and snap a pic of a brand new pair in my house…
-Pre-post Update-
After re-examining the photo just now, I think it’s possibly a paste-up with kids from 2 or 3 different decades, 70’s through 90’s, a 90’s teacher, dressed like it’s still the 80’s, all against a mocked-up ‘contemporary classroom’ backdrop, with deliberate item placement to help fix the date. ? Maybe… There are a couple of other group shots of the kids on the net, but only 3 in total that I could find easily, which is weird. Plenty of cheesy collages. A manageable number of fakes, perhaps. If it’s not a paste-up, it was a messy set-up of the posing, for some reason that escapes logic.
And then I had to stop looking because something about many of those smiles (and pants in the front row) started to weird me out….
LikeLike
“The teacher’s dress/big belt/bangle/hoop earrings/hairstyle combo is definitely 80’s style, NOT 60’s.”
That’s what I thought as well. She might be a fashion hold-out as you say. Or it may be a paste-up mixing different kids from different ages. If it’s a paste-up, it’s some of their best work as it is absent many of the usual tell-tale signs.
LikeLike
Yes, they’ve got the shadows and tone pretty well sorted – looks like an umbrella reflector was used with the flash; light everywhere. It’s a good job if it is a fake, apart from the visual mess in the content.
LikeLike
Found this alternative Dunblane picture:
Is the lad in the back row second (or third if you count the teacher) from the left one of the Proclaimers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nah! They were born in 1962.
You made me giggle though…..
LikeLike
Hmm, the different poses… Double the work, at least, to mock up two sequential shots.
Just a ragged collection of child-actors – offsprings of the nobility and their cousins…
LikeLike
I reckon. The kid top left looks to have some Macartney genes.
LikeLike
I found a larger version of the photo (click to see full size):
It’s definitely been messed with in a big way.
Flash shadows appear painted in. They are also not consistent. Some kids cast no flash shadow at all.
Also, if their heads cast flash shadows then their noses should too but I see no nose flash shadows on anybody in the photo.
And one kid has 3 legs! Or, at least a leg that does not make sense. Look at the girl seated 3rd row down and 2nd from left.
LikeLike
After reading Miles most recent update about the fashion in the photo I did a quick search for Dunblane photos which brought up a Getty site with scores of photos and none of the shoes match what these kids are wearing. And none of the clothes match either so I’d agree this photo is from another era. Rather, the cut and paste images are from another era. I grew up in the early 70’s in the US and that could have been my elementary school decor-wise.
LikeLike
“Flash shadows appear painted in. They are also not consistent. Some kids cast no flash shadow at all.”
Agreed ROLLIEKIN. I thought that but didn’t want to chime in about the shadows and body edge mismatches until I had an ally. I’m a landscape photographer, and my expertise in portraits is limited to our children growing up, so sadly lacking.
The first pictures didn’t show enough detail for me to be sure I wasn’t seeing things.
But the whole photo looks weird in many ways.
LikeLike
The photos are real, in fact there are two different photos and both are real. Was first thrown off by the fact none of the children seemed to be touching but in fact there are a couple that are. The question that still remains is now a matter of, is this class real and in what era was the image shot. What follows are the facts as seen by the image.
First, there are two different photos. The children are identical in each photo and both photos are lit identically, though with the kids in different poses. As the photographer stands, his light source is off his camera to his left, slightly (probably on an L-bracket). There seems to be a single light source as evidenced by the flash reflection above the boy in the white shirt (back row, third from left). The shadows on the children are cast downward and to their left. The single source appears to be a bounce flash as an umbrella would be softer and not reflect so harshly off the blackboard frame. It’s possible the bounce was used either on the flash with a card or cover, or off the ceiling, as the two blonds on each end of row two hair is burned slightly above their foreheads. At any rate, the photographer’s light source is from height, not straight on. Also, the setup of the kids is such that yes, one girl appears to have three legs but in truth that leg belongs to the girl behind her. Question is, what are the kids in the last row standing on?
Seems a tad strange that each class would have a class photo taken in their classroom. Usually, a photographer would setup in a gym or cafeteria and the kids brought to him, not the other way around. Much more controlled environment for the children, school and most importantly, the photographer. None of the children are pasted in since having two different photos of 20-plus kids would be ludicrous, even by spook standards. Plus, Photoshop was still relatively young when this “event” happened and cut and paste could never be this good.
Next turn to the classroom. That box behind the teacher is indeed a microwave oven, circa 1980s. Yes, it’s entirely possible it was still working in 1996, as the early ones were tanks. Question is, why is there a microwave oven in a classroom? Most schools have cafeterias in the 90s, so why the microwave? The headphones to the far right seems to have a sign above with a headphone drawing and the word “here” on it. Why headphones in a first grade classroom and why are they just left for the taking? Sure they’d never just get legs and walk off.
The hodgepodge of uniforms is possible with new students early in the school year, but it’s doubtful that class and/or student photos are taken that early in the year, for this simple reason and for late arriving students. It should be noted, as the story says they didn’t even know who these children were, yet they have a class photo? Also, does the school year start in March over there? Here in the states, schools start in late August or early September. Certainly by March the school would know who was enrolled and all children would have proper uniform treatment. Not sure how uniforms work on the other side of the pond, but here there is one uniform only, hence the term—uniform. I went to school late 50s through the end of 60s. At no point in my schooling was a class photo ever taken. Individual, yes—class, no. Don’t even remember my kids having a class photo and they were schooled in the 80s/90s. Maybe they were for the school only…but not in my time.
As for fashion sense, this is definitely not the 60s, 70s or even the 80s. The hair styles are the dead giveaway. This photo is early to mid 90s. In the 80s girls would still be sporting the horrible Farrah Fawcet look and boys hair was getting shorter, even buzzed, this looks like the 90s. Can’t tell on the shoes or clothing since the uniform throws that out the door.
My guess is that these photos are some random group of kids set up in a classroom and quickly photographed. A real photographer would be setup and the kids marched in and a few images taken and bracketed, most likely using umbrellas and slave flash units for a softbox effect lighting. Just my opinion…take it or don’t.
LikeLike
Wayne, I agree with you about the third leg, but how do you explain the lack of flash shadows for most of the kids in the second and third rows, whereas the first and back row kids have them?
LikeLike
Look at the boy , third over from the right , front row . Look at his socks , polyester striped sport socks from the 70s – 80s , he also seems to be in much better focus .
LikeLike
Why are the kids on the back row so high?
LikeLike
As I see it, the kids in the front are sitting on the floor, the kids behind them are sitting on (kid-sized) chairs, the kids behind them are standing and the kids in the back are standing on (kid-sized) chairs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Josh said:
“As I see it, the kids in the front are sitting on the floor, the kids behind them are sitting on (kid-sized) chairs, the kids behind them are standing and the kids in the back are standing on (kid-sized) chairs.”
That’s what I thought also, yet if you look closely at the photo, you don’t see any chair backs as you do with the kids seated. The chair would be more visible to standers as opposed to sitters. Kids standing on kid chairs would also, more than likely, have disastrous results! Some kind of a riser for the back row which makes me more convinced the images are real, even if the kids are not who they’re suppose to be.
LikeLike
A riser makes sense. Like a bench. I agree with you that the pictures are real but that doesn’t mean the event was. I remember (though I may be wrong) that all of my elementary school class photos in the 80s were in color. And that was public (i.e., state) school. But that was in California, which is not the UK, so maybe B&W was more common across the pond.
LikeLike
All my school photo’s were in colour from at least 1969… The only B&W school photo I have is from 1966 but that was a one-off.
LikeLike
First, let me make it clear, under no circumstances do I believe this event to be anything but fake. However, these two photos are NOT paste ups, nor have the children been Photoshopped in. The photos are real, though it is seriously doubtful they are the actual “victims.” There’s too much detail between and around the children to be anything other than an actual photograph. This is a quick, down and dirty “flash on camera shot,” though in this case, the flash unit is mounted high and to the left of the camera lens (probably a 70-100mm lens) and bounced off the ceiling in front of the children. Hence the shadows casting down and to the kids’ left and fading as it falls to the floor. There are shadows on all the kids but the spacing between them defuses it, which is why the spacing exists. The photographer was not a rank amateur.
The fall off of shadows is how light from a bounced flash would fall on the children. Notice the reflection off the blackboard frame, that’s “hot” in flash terms, from a high mounted flash, more than likely an on-camera L-bracket. The light source is not directly center of the image. That’s why the two girls at the ends of second row and the teacher’s hair are burned in the front but not on top. It’s possible that the flash was defused or used as a fill-flash, but the fall-off of the shadows as the light gets further from the ceiling, indicates a bounce of some sort and seems too strong for an umbrella. An umbrella would cast much softer light much like a softbox. Plus two umbrellas would be required for the width and that would produce totally different shadows altogether and probably, no hot spot. The bounced light was hit off the ceiling in FRONT of the kids and why their faces are lit and again, why the shadows are cast the way they are. It was obvious to me because I’ve used this technique many times and have worked with many photographers who have, as well. Quite often, we would also cover the flash with a small bubble-wrap bag to diffuse the light even more. This is another reason to believe this is a singular one-off photo rather than a pro setup for school shots. It would take too long to set up, keep the kids occupied, do a test shot, then a few final shots with bracketing for each classroom. It’s possible, highly unlikely—though maybe, if the photographer was working by the hour.
I would say late 80s is a possibility, since the clothing and hair style of the teacher lends itself to that era. Had three girls exactly five years apart who all went to school in this era. The images fit this time frame. It’s def not the 60s or 70s since the hair styles are not of that era and early 80s the girls would have the horrible 80s hair and the boys hair would be longer. As for polyester socks, I wouldn’t know a pair if I tripped over them, and probably did, but that proves nothing in regards to how the image was shot and socks are not a fashion statement, specially on a fake little boy in a fake “uniform.”
The time frame would also underscore the reason why this photo was shot as B&W, since it would have been film, not digital. B&W film was cheaper and could be developed in any darkroom, pro or otherwise. Color would have been transparency/slide film or if print film was used, still more expensive since it would require outsourcing for developing. Digital photography was still new and most pro photographers were very slow going that route. Again, the time period would depend on when this “event” was actually “developed” then put to finished product, which we’ll never know, but late 80s to mid 90s makes more sense than anything else.
The photos are “real” in the sense they were shot with a camera and flash, with actual (random) children, though I do believe the kids are a setup because of the differences in the uniforms, which also why I believe the 90s is more apt, since these events are never very well thought out.
LikeLike
There do seem to be differing focus qualities on side by side kids .
LikeLike
@df said:
“There do seem to be differing focus qualities on side by side kids.”
Arrrg!! There can be a multitude of possibilities, none of which would have anything to do with the images being “manipulated.” Add to the fact, if you are so inclined, Photoshop was only eight years removed from its introduction when this photo hit the papers, IF, the image was even shot in 1996. If you ever used early versions of PS, you would know it wasn’t then, even remotely close to what it is now. I know, I used it. It took years for creative/art directors to begin to use PS regularly and longer for them to become proficient. No matter how you slice it, the images are real photos, there is no way anyone can convince me otherwise.
I was working with photographers/photos daily well before and during that time period as well as working “on a computer” in 1986, I knew what was going on. Focus can be influenced by lens quality, focal length, flash, lighting, f-stop, film speed, squirmy kids, etc., not to mention the developing process. We’re not talking Hasselblads or 2¼ or 2¾ pics here, this is 35mm equipment and a tiny negative. Plus, the image has been digitized, scanned, probably from a print, which would add jpeg compression and artifacts to the image we’re now looking at.
The kids are real. The images are real. The story is fake.
LikeLike
Just found this photo of same class, perhaps from the previous year? Sory the quality isn’t great.
This feels a more natural shot to me than the later photo and the ‘microwave oven’ is missing.
LikeLike
@Boris
Nice catch. Was hoping we could find another class from around that era and see how these class images might play out across the board. In this new image the kids look younger and there are more of them, but what’s with all the different uniforms and some without. What’s the purpose of a uni if there are so many differences? (Oh stupid me, duh, someone’s making money). I also thought they were all first graders upon their untimely demise?
Still can’t believe a photographer would go classroom to classroom for each class photograph. Must have been paid hourly or it’s a very small school. But again, in my experience at three different grade schools in Massachusetts, not a single class photo ever. Granted, I am older than dirt, but still I don’t recall a class photo for any of my three girls in this 80s–90s time period. It’s possible they were never offered to parents but that would be a terrible slight to capitalism.
What makes this weird is it means the children weren’t a random bunch of kids since they look younger than those in the original image and most are identifiable. How does this work in light of this being a fake event? If they’re registered and mourned as dead they can’t return to school and nobody notices. I assumed from the original article that the photo was published but now I’m beginning to wonder if that was the case?
LikeLike
Ok, here’s the thing, further down from this thread is one posted by “pw” that shows a bunch of images of the aftermath of this “massacre.” The images are telling as for being a fake event. Headstones on the school grounds, yet not a single image of one supposedly dead children to be seen. Of course the usual no tears and other fake event BS. There’s also a pic of a cop patrolling the grounds supposedly after the event and children can be seen looking out the windows. Seriously? This thing is shadier than Shady Hoax,
Sorry to say, the class photos above have no bearing on this “event” other than being total misdirection.
Amazing how quickly those headstones were crafted. Here’s the “pw” link:
https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/dunblane-massacre?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=dunblane%20massacre
LikeLike
Could be an accurate article but there’s that 33 sticking to my eyeballs again!
I guess it depends what the guy allegedly did that got him suspended….so a fake death would be the most appropriate dodge rather than a career damaging court case.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-coughlin-figure-skater-dead-one-day-suspended-allegations-cause-of-death/
LikeLike
Reminds that Scott Weiland was being sued for $20 million in damages before his ‘demise’:
‘The lawsuit filed by Vince Votta was to recover the $230,000 and asked for an additional $20 million in damages. Vince said the final straw for him was when Weiland called the band a scam. Scott Weiland counter-sued Vince accusing the company of unlawfully using his name and image to promote the band. The matters were dropped a month later due to the death of Weiland.[13]
On December 3, 2015, Scott Weiland was found dead on his tour bus around 9PM, one day before he was to go on stage in Minnesota with his band The Wildabouts.[14] On December 22, 2015, “In memory of Scott Weiland…”, Art of Anarchy made their album available free online for their fans.[15]’ (Wiki)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t really follow any of that back then, because the guy sucked and had like two good songs, but that’s some interesting shit. Even the Tyrants don’t have it all easy, so it’s nice to see them struggle. Even if a lot of that struggle isn’t what it seems.
So we can assume Weiland is still alive, and his death was faked? Much like Cobain and *Staley and all the rest of that era, whose music was so bad there’s no way it could have been popular without massive promotion…
*spooky or not, Alice in Chains’ is WAY better than any other grunge band as to not even qualify to be in the genre. Not all of it, but most of it is still pretty damn well-written and the guy could actually sing. Ann Wilson didn’t waste her time singing with him either, in my opinion, though I haven’t looked into Heart to see any spookiness. They are also very, very good in my opinion, both lyrically and musically.
Point being, the difference between good music and horrible, intolerably garbage is pretty blatant. Any time we see garbage “making it big”, we might be seeing more red flags. Not a revelation, I just considered Stone Temple Pilots to be particularly useless at the time and it was surprising they lasted more than one album. Or one year.
LikeLike
After looking up Art of Anarchy on wiki, I found this –
”In February 2018 Art of Anarchy members, Jon and Vincent Votta filed a lawsuit to the New York Supreme Court against bandmate, lead vocalist Scott Stapp. The $1.2 million suit alleges that Stapp has failed to live up to his contract with the band citing he had not performed with the band in scheduled concerts and tours.”
Another rock star death looming? Two former singers sued by the rest of the band?
LikeLike
I’ve never heard of Scott until someone mentioned here that he and a few other grungers all died young. Then I watched an old 30s film the very same day and one of the characters in it was called Weiland, and that set my spider-sense a-tingling. In the chill of the night, well late afternoon at any rate, I checked out a few of his videos on youtube and he looks like two different guys, the first one in the Plush promo looks heavy set, while the second one looked effete in comparison.
Ann Dustin Wilson whose father was a major in the U.S. Marine Corps, I wonder if she is related to any of the other Wilsons in rock/pop? The B-52s or the Beach Boys, for instance.
LikeLike
Yes , Ann and Nancy followed their draft dodging boyfriends into Canada * and ta Da , FAME ! , they are very talented musically but , same old story same old song and dance my friend …
( like Major Daddy wouldn’t go Rambo and drag them back )
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry…I misread that or a split second.
You wrote “draft dodging boyfriends” but I saw daft dogging boyfriends!
Same thing I guess….
LikeLike
Oh, for sure. It’s not a meritocracy at all. I’m just saying that even spooks can exhibit some talent, now and again. I don’t listen to Heart much but they’re decent musicians, for example. Not my genre at all. But I can respect someone who plays actual instruments and sings well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Richard Hall has done a pretty good demolition job ( DVD ) on Brexit and the Jo Cox ‘murder’. Worth a watch. Not sure of your opinion on RH here.
LikeLike
Hi Anna, Richard Hall came up back in June. Here is a link to my comment from back then on his work trying to debunk some Simon Ballsack’s September Clues video. A short excerpt:
“Richard Hall comes off in his presentations as very genuine, but his website sounds plenty of alarm bells for me. I don’t think he’s any more genuine than [Ballsack]. I note only quickly his link to the Disclosure Project and his active involvement in the UFO psyop. He also seems to take events that I believe were hoaxed and runs with the ‘false flag’ narrative where it was the military (or whoever) doing the killing. To take 7/7 as an example. He also treats the “assassination” of Jo Cox as real, but says we have been lied to about who really killed her and why.”
In his favor, I should note that he has promoted Miles’ work on Hawking and given him due credit:
LikeLike
While he points out several holes in the official storyline, he still wants you to believe that Jo Cox, a novice politician who came out of nowhere, actually died during this fake event. Exactly the same stunt was pulled over a decade ago just before the Swedish EU referendum….
“Swedish politician’s death 13 years ago mirrors murder of UK lawmaker”
https://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/17/swedish-politicians-death-13-years-ago-mirrors-murder-of-uk-lawmaker.html
The clincher for me was her puny stage name – Joke Ox, a phony sacrifice to stop the UK leaving the EU. I’m sure that this spooky actor now has a new role to play, probably on the other side of the pond or in Israel, time will tell.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well at least she’s not dead. Phew. The slimy cow.
LikeLike
@ Boris
No, he actually DOESN’T in his latest DVD. He has come to very different conclusions some of which I’m currently trying to figure out. He acknowledges that she probably was an ”asset” with a fictitious background and thinks she may have been behind the leak of the Panama Papers. He also acknowledges that she may well still be alive with a new identity of a male. He leaves us to decide after presenting the evidence.
I have no problem with this as that way he can’t really be accused of ‘leading’ his followers and also I can understand the change of heart. Mine changes all the time and I see that as a positive thing if new evidence supports it. I like him and think he’s genuine though like us all he is human and gets thing wrong occasionally ……IMO.
LikeLike
I think RH has his moments. Really enjoyed the astronaut statement analysis. Thought he went a bit overboard with the Madeleine McCann stuff tho.
LikeLike
STEALING PATENTS.
This video is from last week: Fake History is DEADLY to all of us on the planet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw-IDZN-wzY
It says the bankers, government war departments and psychiatry joined forces to steal important patents (like Tesla’s), gain monopoly control and use propaganda to make unjust wars since WW1. The host said he was in the NSA. Part of the blurb under the video says: From Cecil Rhodes to Mark Zuckerberg, our telecommunications history has been one of propaganda and control.
LikeLike
Here’s a website that goes with the above video: https://patriots4truth.org/2019/01/25/fake-history-is-deadly/
The video was another one that YouTube recommended for me, and I don’t know yet what angle they’re pushing.
LikeLike
From the website list of past articles, it looks like they’re Trump supporters.
LikeLike
Looks like yet another ‘controlled opposition’ site to me. They take you so far, then duck-out before revealing anything new. Compare this to Mile’s approach, which takes the story to it’s logical end, and it become apparent that Patriots for Truth is a limited hangout at best. After all the guy doing the vid claims to be an ex-NSA agent and, as you will probably know, nobody is ever allowed to leave the security services.
What’s your view on this?
LikeLike
Since they side with Trump, I assume they’re controlled. But organizations have people at several levels of authority. He didn’t say what level he worked at in the NSA. Surely the lower levels aren’t lifetime members, i.e. secretaries, janitors, errand boys etc.
LikeLike
Once you’ve scrubbed one toilet at Langley, there’s no escape! 🙂
LikeLike
I think it’s safe to say that he’s not touting his “former” NSA credentials because he used to clean the toilets. Anyway, even if I could believe that people do retire from these places, I simply do not trust the principles and judgment of someone who would go into that line of work in the first place.
LikeLike
Perhaps I am being a little unfair, it seems to me to be limited hangout without even looking at it. Which I am not going to waste the time doing. If any great secrets which we were not already aware of have been revealed, please feel free to correct me.
LikeLike
Assuming the NSA works a similar way as the British Secret Services, then it depends on whether or not you have to sign the Official Secrets Act to be able to do your job. Once you sign, it would seem you’re in for life, although not necessarily doing an active role.
LikeLike
As a ray of light shining on the struggle for Truth , the rickety wheels are falling off this current hoax .
LikeLike
Well it works for the Jews, so no surprise that repressed coloured, exploited women or any other group are adopting the same tactics. Operation Chaos reunning at full steam ahead!
LikeLike
Boris , did you catch the ” Victims ” first name ?
Jussie Smollett , another pun / same background ?
LikeLike
MORMONS, OATHKEEPERS, TRUMP.
I just posted the following at https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=18632.msg301030#msg301030
It covers Miles’ paper from last summer a little. Does everyone concur that the Mormon thing is a deep state project? I haven’t tried to see if Romney and company need to be looked into too, but I imagine they’re also a concern.
FORGET OATHKEEPERS [my warning to FSP].
Although Oath Keepers has or had a good list of statements of what they’re about, as can be seen in the second post of this thread, I no longer support Oathkeepers, as I believe they’re likely trying to turn the U.S. into a Mormon country and thus only pretending to be patriotic supporters of the Constitution. I began to suspect this a couple years ago when I learned that a local member is a Mormon. I knew that Richard Mack’s wife was said by him to have been a Mormon, so I assume he is too and I began to suspect that many members are Mormons.
“Stewart Rhodes is the charismatic Executive Director of Oath Keepers and a former Mormon turned Evangelical.”
That’s from https://edberry.com/blog/polymontana/party-tea/the-four-faces-of-the-republican-party/
I suspect that Rhodes became Evangelical only to prevent further distrust of his motives as a Mormon.
The Mormon religion is surely based on lies and its leaders promote the same lies as well as promoting abuse of members via cultish means.
Miles Mathis outed the Mormon Bundy’s last year in his paper “Bundy Ranch Standoff Fake” at http://mileswmathis.com/cowell.pdf which I posted on this forum at https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=28418.msg300809#msg300809
A messianic (“Christian”) Jew in Israel (he’s suspect too) made this video a couple years ago at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFIUnHMahKM . He thinks the Mormons, who wanted a large part of the West before Utah became a state (they called it Deseret), still want to take over the West, but I think they want to take over the entire U.S. He thinks the Mormons have been starting militias all over the U.S. and putting Mormons in charge of them and those are the people who came to the aid of Mormon Cliven Bundy in Nevada in 2014 at his ranch. Since Trump pardoned Bundy’s son last year for a confrontation with the feds in Oregon after the ranch confrontation, it’s apparent that the Mormons are a deep state project.
So let’s be wary of Oath Keepers, which is surely a deep state project too, like many others, such as the many fake shootings. See http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html for more details about many of them, which helps prove they’re fake. I posted links to many of his papers in another thread here about terrorism and tyranny.
LikeLike
The Deseret logo is a honeybee.
I grew up Mormon, and yes they are another offshoot Jewish sect posing as Christians. It’s a pretty passive religion compared to most, but the goal is to take that 10% no matter what.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never considered it a deep state project per-se, Just another tribal goy crop rotation scheme. Put insiders at the helm, and then use them for tithing and other jobs suitable for useful idiots. Keep in mind, that the wild bunch and the whole connected rustler’s syndicate operated in their territory with little or no interference. Meh, just another cloak of many colors. Nothing to see here, move along.
LikeLike
PROJECT TO LIST DEEP STATE PROJECTS.
Would this be worth our while, for some of us? The idea occurred to me while I was writing a bit about the Mormon Project. That’s what I’m calling the apparent project that Miles discussed last year at http://mileswmathis.com/cowell.pdf where Mormon Bundy’s confronted the feds a couple times in recent years and were not jailed for either confrontation. I consider Oath Keepers to be probably part of that project. And Trump confirmed it if he pardoned the younger Bundy last year as Miles stated.
Is it okay to call them Deep State Projects? Or is there a better term?
Does anyone want to start listing some such projects that you’re aware of at least as possible projects?
The Shooting Hoaxes certainly seem to be a Project. I was following the Q-anon thing for a while and that seems to be a Project, but I don’t know if it’s still going on. Maybe it’s part of the Human Trafficking Hoax Project. The Fulford-Wilcox-Hancock-Etc efforts seem to be a Project, regarding Spiritual Hype. The Clash of Civilizations Project is what seems to be behind the War with Islam crap that the U.S. has been involved in since the 9/11 false flag event.
If we expose all of the projects, will we finally overcome the JTB?
LikeLike
Be quicker to list probable non-‘deep state’ projects’ as the spooks have to be everywhere to maintain control and usually take over genuine organisations very quickly using the usual methods – infiltrate, corrupt, and coerce; if this fails then black-wash.
I’ll start off what I think will be a very short list with Miles Mathis and his supporters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I tend to agree with Boris: what isn’t a project? We’re surrounded by projects. We are born into an enormous, all-encompassing project with deep historical roots. It truly is a matrix.
But if you want to do such a thing, I would suggest not using the term “deep-state.” Just a few years ago I would have said go for it, but the term has been totally hijacked by the pro-Trump right wing conspiratorial talking points. I think it started back when they tried to spin the Sandy Hook hoax as a gun grab by Obama. Well now that their savior Trump is in office, they can’t very well say he is behind the gun grabs. So they blame it on “the deep state.” They would have us believe that the Democrats are in charge of the CIA and other nefarious elements that are out to get Trump and grab your guns and other things like that. For example the whole Charlottesville hoax was blamed on “the deep state” trying to make Trump and his supporters look bad, or something like that. Suffice it to say, “deep state” is now a tainted term.
No, we won’t overcome TJTB just by exposing their projects. But you’ve got to start somewhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
DEEP STATE ALT.
Okay, Josh, I could call the “deep state” projects JTB Projects. Right?
LikeLike
PS, I’ll try to list both sides, the JTB ones and the anti-JTB ones. I’ll show what I got later.
LikeLike
The term JTB has not been tainted as far as I know. But you can call it whatever you want.
LikeLike
Like we’re supposed to believe there is a slightly less deep state and we’ll cheer for that , there’s either THE STATE , which ironically knows no borders , or your mind is free from those trappings .
LikeLike
The “State” initially meant the People organized as self-government. I think it still means that in legal cases.
LikeLike
Really Kinder? That was the original meaning of the state? What is your source on that?
LikeLike
STATE=PEOPLE.
My source is my memory of what I read in some books by James Woods on how to beat traffic tickets etc. It contained a lot of legal info. I got a ticket in 2003. It said I was driving without insurance or a license. I didn’t realize that my license was canceled, since I wasn’t notified. There were a few other minor charges as well. The fine was supposed to be $1,000, so I decided to buy some expensive books in order to help learn more of the law. I learned that a lot of basic law is actually very logical and sensible, but government officials are largely incompetent or corrupt. Most don’t know the law themselves. I succeeded at the hearing in getting my fine dropped for doing 20 hours of community service. I decided to accept that rather than go on to trial.
You can also find online that the state still means the people, such as at https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/state . But in the early days of this country, the U.S., I read that it was more widely understood that the state means the people.
LikeLike
@Anna:
“…He has come to very different conclusions some of which I’m currently trying to figure out. He acknowledges that she probably was an ”asset” with a fictitious background and thinks she may have been behind the leak of the Panama Papers. He also acknowledges that she may well still be alive with a new identity of a male…”
The video I saw on YT is ‘The Jo Cox Assassination – An Independent Investigation’, so you must be referring to a newer video. From what you say it sounds like the guy is getting onto the correct wavelength now, and as you note, there’s nothing at all wrong in changing your mind. Though he doesn’t mention this important change to the story on YouTube, or allow any comments
I’d be grateful if you could do a quick synopsis of what changed his mind and why Joke Ox is behind the Panama Paper leak? I don’t want to have to shell out £14 for his DVD just to understand where he;s coming from.
LikeLike
Will do
LikeLike
I doubt if I’ll be doing Richard Hall’s theories justice but here goes…a VERY QUICK broad outline.
Jo Cox was a champion of the EU . In 1998 her ‘husband’ Brendan states that she went to work for an organisation, ‘ Britain in Europe’ to set up to prepare for a possible referendum on the single currency.
She attended Cambridge and at 24 years old held a top position in Oxfam and at just 35 was advising Sarah Brown, wife of the Prime Minister, Gordon. It is alleged that she and Brendan Cox were secret service assets working as change agents for global interests to destroy national identity.
Cox was campaigning heavily for Britain to remain in the EU.
On the 3 /4/2016 2.5 months before the Referendum the Panama Papers were leaked. These threatened to show that it was predominately British activities that involved tax havens and that Britain had ‘off shore trusts ‘worth trillions . Possibly Crown involvement. Regulators in the EU supposedly wanted to make it more transparent so the rich would pay more tax. The British Establishment was worried.
Cox was still writing articles about’ financial equality’ in 2016.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/11/forget-nigeria–david-cameron-needs-to-tackle-tax-secrecy-in-bri/
NOTE THE ‘’ Careful readers……………..’’ comment from Cox from that article above . A threat to the Establishment?
At this point the Panama Papers had not been published.
John Doe’s Manifesto was then published by the Panama Papers whistleblower to explain why he/she was whistleblowing.
https://panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/articles/572c897a5632a39742ed34ef/
Hall notes that whilst the narrative does contain Americanisms it also contains British influences. For example ‘Tories’ which is usually the term used by Labour Supporters.
Also it contains Cox’s unusual habit of separating phrases and words with hyphens.
She then became a threat.
Either she was killed by those she was endangering
OR
The killing was a hoax and she was given a new ID as she was no longer a useful EU asset.
Reasons to believe it was a hoax killing include
The ‘’ Britain First ‘’ cry from the ‘killer’ gives it a ‘Far Right’ twist.
The killer was most definitely NOT Mair. Hall provides very good evidence for this.
The body was taken directly to London
The same old corrupt officials were employed
No photograph was ever produced of the body in court for the jury to see.
That’s it in a REAL NUTSHELL. Hope I got it right.
Certainly food for thought. No one believes for one moment that there is anything philanthropic about the EU’s intentions. Sounds more like The Families fighting for the spoils to me. Probably the sole reason for Brexit.
LikeLike
I guess we better keep hybrid cars rather than pure electric ones due to this major stumbling block. I know li-ion battery cells work down to -20C but we only use them in very low power circuitry like outside weather sensors.
Powerful car systems are another matter entirely.
Well Mr Musk….how are you going to address this wee problem … hm?
https://www.iceagenow.info/good-night-bonjour/#more-27946
LikeLike
Say, is there a Dunblane section or can I just drop this here? Did a search for “Dunblane photos” and got this link:
https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/dunblane-massacre?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=dunblane%20massacre
Of note: There is not one actual tear drop on any face in the photos nor even a drop of blood anywhere. Just adults trying to look sad as far as I can tell. And what looks like many children being dragged to an event they have no interest in. In reading the story and looking at the pics I feel nothing, whereas a story I read recently about some girl scouts picking up trash on the side of the highway who were killed by a teenage dope addled driver in Wisconsin immediately brought tears to my eyes.
LikeLike
Dry eyed grief stricken family members are par for the course with these hoaxes. It’s hard to cry on cue. The Hollywood actor heavyweights have an easier time with it because they can just imagine their paychecks bouncing. Or, think about what their career will be like when they get old. 🙂
LikeLike
Hey pw thanks for the link. The Dunblane conversation is up near the top of this page. I copied your link and pasted for others to see. If ya want to join in scroll almost to the top, you’ll see pics of the class there. Again, thanks for the link.
LikeLike
NEWS.
– I spent a few hours posting links to recent articles for the FSP forum.
– Here’s my latest post on “Prep for Hard Times” (Any preppers here?)
https://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=24272.msg301036#msg301036
– Goodie. Here’s the most interesting article on internet matters I found today, which I think could provide a lot of benefit to society.
Tactile Internet a step closer to reality
https://phys.org/news/2019-01-tic-toc-technology-tactile-internet-closer.html
– Baddie. Here’s the scariest article I found.
20,000 satellites for 5G to be launched sending focused beams of intense microwave radiation over entire earth
https://www.sott.net/article/406089-20000-satellites-for-5G-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth
This is from that article (after explaining how thorough and dangerous 5G exposure will likely be):
These are the companies with the biggest plans to deploy satellites:
SpaceX: 12,000 satellites
OneWeb: 4,560 satellites
Boeing: 2,956 satellites
Spire Global: 972 satellites
– Will those all be fake satellites I hope?
Here’s another quote: (cities do not have the right to “say no” to 5G. FCC regulations prevent cities from objecting on the basis of health concerns – they only can speak to issues of esthetics and the practical matter of the placement of equipment.) But that’s not true. Cities and towns can pass ordinances as explained by http://CELDF.org which has been helping cities do just that.
– Relevant. This one should interest art and Miles fans.
N.H. Company Offers New App To Price That Picasso
https://www.nhpr.org/post/art-deal-nh-company-offers-new-app-price-picasso
– JTB. This is another scary one which is kind of personal, as a “friend” has problems with CPS crap.
[Jackass] N.H. Child Advocate [says]: Not All Realize They’re Required To Report Suspected Child Abuse & Neglect [which is pure BS violation of 1st Amendment etc]
https://www.nhpr.org/post/nh-child-advocate-not-all-realize-theyre-required-report-suspected-child-abuse-neglect
So I realized I need to add CPS (Child Protective Services) to the list of JTB Projects.
– This adds schools to the mix.
Public Schools And The Weaponization Of CPS
https://www.offthegridnews.com/current-events/public-schools-weaponization-cps/
LikeLike
If that’s too many links to post, I can post just one next time which could lead to the rest.
LikeLike
Well, why am I not surprised the scariest article comes from sott.net? Nice slicky alternative news page, eh? Nothing is as it seems Lloyd 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the news today, controversy over the showing of a film about Fred West.
Not another fake surely?
LikeLike
Now the media are saying it was the wife Rose who led Fred to murder. Changing the script, a good sign it’s a fake.
LikeLike
SOTT.NET.
What’s wrong with SOTT, Leaky? Here’s their main members:
https://quantumfuturegroup.org/about.html
LikeLike
Knight-Jadzcyk is a new agey channeller for the “Cassiopaeans” – some 6th density – “we are you in the future” beings. Looks like a cult to me (nested in France). They separated their forum from the main “news” page some years ago…
Jay Weidner and Jay Dyer were early members but had a “fallout”… same pig, different lipstick.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“same pig, different lipstick”
LOL
LikeLike
Hard to decide where to start, Kinder. But on second thought I’m not going to let you waste my time. I’m surprised you can’t see through that intelligence front. Assuming you can’t. The mention of quantum alone in the name is enough to blow the cover. And the mysterious sources of funding for such a bogus organization.
LikeLiked by 2 people
SOTT.NET.
Josh, I ain’t trying to waste anyone’s time. Their science articles seemed better than most, like better than Phys.org. I didn’t know about what Leaky said about Knight-Jadzcyk. But that doesn’t mean all of their articles are useless, does it? If there’s a better source of science articles online, please let me know. I’ve looked around quite a bit and don’t find much. Phys.org is pretty good, despite their ridiculous mainstream slant.
LikeLike
You linked to a website What’s called quantumfuturegroup, which operates sott.net. My comments were directed at qfg. What is publicly posted at the website you linked to is enough for me to seriously call into question anything they do, including sott.net. No, it doesn’t mean that all of their articles are useless, but it does mean that everything they do is intended to misdirect, so you’d better be careful.
Their science articles seemed better than most? Which ones? Would that be Jadczyk’s book Quantum Fractals, From Heisenberg’s Uncertainty to Barnsley’s Fractality, “What is Time in Quantum Mechanics,” “A Comment on the Rotation Matrix in Minkowski Space-time by Ozdemir and Erdogdu,” or his “Comments on Chapter 5 of G. I. Shipov’s ‘A Theory of Physical Vacuum’ Part I”?
“If there’s a better source of science articles online, please let me know.” Here’s a suggestion: http://milesmathis.com/
There you can read a guest writer’s paper on how the charge field explains fractals, the Mathisian Reevaluation (and redefinition) of Time, a disemboweling of Minkowski’s four dimensional space-time math, and a paper that shows how the qualities modern physics attributes to the vacuum are misrecognized aspects of the charge field. Key quote from that last one: “Space and the vacuum only take on characteristics when you fail to give characteristics to your primary qualities.” And while you’re at it go ahead and read his paper on planetary atmospheres that Jared linked to in another comment.
Overall your post of links from sott.net really irked me because I had just asked you to be more judicious in pasting links. And although that request was seemingly provoked by you linking to a youtube video about Trump and time travel, in fact the request had been brewing for awhile as I saw you linking (mostly uncritically) to one source of misdirection after another. If you would like to continue being a part of the conversation here, I ask (again) that you be more judicious when sharing links. This isn’t the place for all of us to simply link out to all the garbage we see and hear on the world wide web.
I feel like you are piling up (obvious) garbage here and then pointing to it and saying, “Hey everybody, does this look like garbage to you? Really? Why do you think it’s garbage? Surely it can’t all be garbage? Or at least not as bad as all the other garbage.” And you seem to be doing that on a daily or nearly daily basis. I don’t like it.
If this was your house and I started dropping by every day piling up garbage on the curb and you complained, would it be OK for you if I answered, “Well surely there has to be something valuable in this garbage?” “This garbage isn’t nearly as stinky as most garbage out there.” No, it wouldn’t.
On top of that, every link you post here increases the page rank of any site you link to, so not only are you filling up these pages with garbage, you are also increasing the visibility of said garbage. Now, I’m not saying that everything you link to has been garbage and that you should completely stop. What I’m asking you to do is to be far more judicious and also to accompany your posts with some kind of appraisal of what you are posting: which aspects of it seem to be misdirection? which aspects of it seem to be on target? You are doing a lot better with that latter aspect, but less so with the former.
LikeLiked by 2 people
@Russel
Argh, busted 🙂 I stole that line from Patrick Jordan, so credit where credit is due.
@L Kinder
I don’t really care for the links you’re trying to push here… I mean you said the stuff you read there scared you, or not. I think the only one with brains at sott is nedlud, a loyal commenter but I fear his wisdom is pretty much lost on you.
You’re wasting your time, that’s just my opinion and my Gut tells me you’re not kosher, whatever that means… mainly because of your strange university idea. Do you have a military backround Lloyd?
@Josh
What does “kosher parve” mean? I read it on my yogi tea bag, but honestly I prefer coffee (sadly.) Thanks for your prompt answer, last week was a bit hectic and not being a native speaker is sooo frustrating sometimes. Being German sucks 🙂
LikeLike
Kosher parve means it is both kosher and non-dairy. If you keep kosher it’s important to know if something has dairy in it or not — god forbid you’d mix meat and milk. BTW I fixed the typos and deleted your follow-up comments.
LikeLike
Thanks!
LikeLike
I think Knight-Jadzcyk and her crew at SOTT are crypto-Marxists, i.e. Spooky McPhantoms. I used to swear by their site; now I swear at their site. I was also banned for pointing out their hypocrisy and silliness.
LikeLike
@Josh & Leaky.
No need to tell me I’m bringing garbage into your home here. I’ll try to avoid being offensive. My idea for FutureSchool is not so different from Miles’ papers and maybe this forum, trying to share insights with the public. I guess a disadvantage of being “woke” is that some of your collaborators will always be suspicious of you. To answer Leaky’s question, I was in the Air Force for a year. I didn’t have much choice. The Vietnam War was going on and there was a draft. I was in college for a couple years, but I got fed up with it, so I quit and then had the choice to get drafted or join the Air Force or go to Canada or to jail or hide somehow. Mohammed Ali chose jail but I’m guessing he didn’t really go there. I settled for the Air Force, but when I got to Thailand to be a base radio operator, I found I couldn’t stand the noise and the boredom (I felt like I was in prison the whole time I was in the “service” anyway), so I informed my “chain of command” and they sent me to get physical and mental evaluation. That resulted in them saying I was schizo after a few months and giving me a 30% service-connected disability pension, which started at under $100/mo and is now 310/mo. While waiting for my flight out to get evaluation, I met a fellow “airman” who had gone AWOL and then returned to base. He also got out of the AF. He told me the U.S. had no right to be in Vietnam. I didn’t believe him, but I decided to look up the history of Vietnam in the base library encyclopedia. I was surprised to find that he seemed to be right, which is ironic, finding the info right in their own library. So I became a conscientious objector to the war, but I hadn’t said that initially when I went to the chain of command and they never asked me during evaluation, so I didn’t tell them. Otherwise I probably would not have gotten the pension. I decided in 1982 that it wasn’t right for me to have the pension, so I wrote to the Air Force and the V.A. saying I wanted to end it. But my letters were ignored. Then I decided I could probably spend the money better than the government could anyway, so I might as well keep getting it, although there may not have been a choice.
So I’ve been able to donate to people occasionally.
LikeLike
Thanks for holding back on the offensive, L Kinder. I’m sorry if I offended you but I felt like I wasn’t getting my point across by being gentle.
LikeLike
I keep seeing “quantum” more and more in entirely unrelated areas. On the Botany page over at ScienceDaily, for example – every time they can’t explain an effect from data, they dodge of into “quantum-this” or “quantum-that”. It’s pretty much a red flag now, especially as Miles has shown us how to quantize stacked spins and exactly what the fundamental quanta (the photon) is to begin with.
It’s sad though as well, because the phrase and concept still dots all kinds of literature. I just finished reading “Aurora” by Kim Stanley Robinson, the amazing author of “Red Mars”, “Green Mars”, and “Blue Mars”. Sure, it’s just sci-fi. But this book is different for two reasons. The story occurs in 2800 or so, some 800 years after his Mars Trilogy, but it’s evidently not from the same fictional universe, because KSR backpedals on Mars entirely in the story, admitting that it’s impossible to “terraform” the little red guy. He gives us three or four reasons but not the RIGHT one – that it’s simply too small to float an oxygen atmosphere. But it’s still interesting that he dissociates his newest story from his most famous ones.
But the other thing that’s wack to me is that the main character in the story, the ship’s AI itself, runs on powerful regular computers but also a “quantum computer”, a’la the current lies they’re pushing with their qubits and whatnot. But then later in the story, this same AI with it’s ultra-powerful computers has trouble navigating the Solar System itself, bouncing around between planets for gravity-assisted deccelerations.
So I tried it, in Kerbal Space Program. And sure enough, even my lowly 8-core Piledriver with NO “quantum computer” has no problem calculating and executing multiple deccelerations maneuvers. In fact as many as I wanted, enough that I just got bored. So what that means is that Kim Stanley Robinson lacks a fundamental understanding of orbital dynamics (not weird, just he seems on point in many other ways and is among the current sci-fi masters in my opinion) but also every time we see “quantum computers” in NASA or spacefaring (SpaceX), we can be sure we’re getting hosed there as well. Why? Because “quantum computers cost millions of times more than standard electron-computers do. Which is to say, every quantum computer existing now is probably just another techno money-pit, like CERN or BiCEP2 or Lie-Go. They probably don’t even do anything.
LikeLike
Linus Pauling brought the psi symbol to chemistry. He learned from herr psi symbol himself…
Linus Pauling, his wife Ava Helen, and his two-year-old son Linus Junior moved into a small rental house two blocks from the Caltech campus. His first office was nothing more than a desk in the corner of the x-ray lab, from which he could directly oversee the activities of his first official graduate student, a diligent young chemist fresh from Texas named J. Holmes Sturdivant. The small x-ray lab was dedicated to using a new technology called x-ray crystallography for the investigation of the structure of molecules in crystal form.
Pauling began preparing for his first course as an assistant professor–”An Introduction to Wave Mechanics with Chemical Applications”–by writing out 250 pages of notes in longhand. He would later turn them into a book on the subject.
Wave mechanics was of special interest to Pauling. Although trained as a chemist, he had spent his time in Europe studying theoretical physics — a passion that ran so deep he had seriously considered switching from chemistry to physics. The science he learned in Munich, Copenhagen and Zurich was a new approach to the field called quantum physics. Pauling learned about it directly from its discoverers Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli, and from its greatest teacher, Arnold Sommerfeld. Schrödinger’s approach, based on the physics of waves, especially interested Pauling because he saw that it might throw new light on questions he had pondered since he was an undergraduate: What forces held atoms together to form molecules? How did those forces give the molecules particular shapes and qualities?
http://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/coll/pauling/bond/narrative/page3.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Is_Life%3F
LikeLike
Snap! I have a piledriver too.
Have you over-clocked your GPU?
My son is a computer tech and over-clocked mine a few days back. No artefacts, running about 2C warmer but has almost doubled the fps on graphics heavy games.
Well worth doing. He’s going to over-clock my CPU soon but suggests a better cooler before he does.
Another one of those things the computer companies scream at you, “DON’T DO IT…IT’LL EXPLODE AND KILL EVERYONE WITHIN A 10 MILE RADIUS”!
Nope! But what it will do is give me a similar performance to your $400 card but from my $200 card. Ch’ching…thank you very much and goodnight!
LikeLike
@Jared, re TERRAFORMING MARS.
You said it’s not possible to terraform Mars, because it can’t hold oxygen. But that’s surely not true, since Titan, a moon of Saturn, much smaller than Mars, has a dense atmosphere, mostly nitrogen, like Earth. N2 and O2 are nearly the same density, so I think terraforming Mars would be possible, especially using greenhouses.
I agree with you about quantum computers and almost anything quantum. Phys.org often has science news articles that have quantum in the title. I almost always ignore those (when I post my weekly list of links on forums). Quantum entanglement is especially ridiculous (i.e. a particle existing in two places at once). They’re trying to say now that scientists have discovered quantum-entangled life forms of bacteria or something. It amazes me that so many scientists can be hoodwinked into believing in such nonsense. If they use “quantum” to refer to real photons, then their info is more likely to be useful IMO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alas, Mars is simply too small to ever float a breathable atmosphere. You could fill a dome or tent with it, but it would still not “float” and of course could become an explosive hazard along with all kinds of other problems. You may or may not have read Miles’ paper on the topic of planetary atmospheres, but he does the math for several planets and even Venus could never float a breathable atmosphere.
“We can use the same math on Mars. Mars has a gravity .376g. What gas has a weight 1/.376 that of argon? That would be an inert gas with a molecular weight of 106.4. That is about the atomic weight of palladium. Since there are no common gases that match that profile at Martian atmospheric temperatures, we have a simple explanation for Mars’ tenuous atmosphere. Most of Mars’ atmosphere is CO2, we are told, but on Mars it doesn’t fall, it rises. We can see the plume behind Mars as its atmosphere is blown off into space. We are told the Solar Wind blows it off, but we now know that it would blow off even without the Solar Wind. CO2 and the other Martian gases are simply too light for the unified field of Mars. In other words, Mars is too small to have ever had a permanent atmosphere. That is, unless you can compose a gas at 106.4.”
http://milesmathis.com/atmo2.pdf
As for Titan, we would have to know more about it and its composition as well, but at that size everything we’re told about its atmosphere is likely false. It may float it for other reasons, as in ammonia or something similar. I can run the math on Titan if you’d like and we’ll see how it goes?
LikeLike
@Jared. You said: “As for Titan, we would have to know more about it and its composition as well, but at that size everything we’re told about its atmosphere is likely false. It may float it for other reasons, as in ammonia or something similar. I can run the math on Titan if you’d like and we’ll see how it goes?”
Sounds good. I think I read most of Miles’ papers in Sections 3 and 5-9 plus a few in the other sections, as well as most of the updates. I know I read the paper on atmospheres where he showed why Earth can hold O2 and N2 etc. My impression was that by his findings smaller bodies should not be able to hold O2 or N2 etc. You probably haven’t looked into Catastrophism much, other than what Miles has written, but I find abundant evidence that the Earth and most of the solar system has undergone catastrophic events in fairly recent times, a few thousand years ago being the most recent, unless you count events like Tunguska too. The ancients saw Saturn as the Sun, with Venus and Mars between Saturn and Earth, so it appears that Earth, Mars and Venus were moons of Saturn and the Saturn system may have come from outside the solar system. So that may explain how planets or bodies sometimes obtained or lost atmospheres. Earth likely had a denser atmosphere in the past which would have made large animals, like some dinosaurs, partially buoyant so they could survive in Earth’s gravity.
LikeLike
I’ve actually read up on catatrophes for many years. I came from the Electric Universe camp previously, you know – and studied all their theories for many years before encountering the limits of their dogma, and ended up finding miles since he was/is the only one who knew what electricity and magnetism were. You implying that all I’ve ever read was Mathis’s work is a sweet low-key “diss” though, buddy. 😉
L_Kinder said: “So that may explain how planets or bodies sometimes obtained or lost atmospheres. Earth likely had a denser atmosphere in the past which would have made large animals, like some dinosaurs, partially buoyant so they could survive in Earth’s gravity.”
Except the physics doesn’t support that theory, and rather contradicts it. You touch on that yourself in your comments about the Atmosphere paper, but then miss the point. It’s the density and radius of a planet COMBINED with its composition that create the atmosphere, and its incoming charge. You state that “Earth likely had a denser atmosphere in the past” but that’s a completely unsupported opinion. Why was it denser? What were the concentrations, and why? Was there more Argon afloat back then, or more CO2? Why? Vulcanism, perhaps?
LikeLike
I took a detour coming to work (road works) and went passed a building that had a sign with an emblem featuring a beehive in the lower left quadrant and the words ‘Odd Fellows’. I googled ‘Odd Fellows beehive’ and found this (among others):
Oddfellowship is descended from the same roots as Freemasonry, which is why the two share many of the same symbols. The beehive for both “illustrates prosperity and the rewards of hard work”. This seems have been inspired and popularised by Jonathan Swift’s 1704 book The Battle of the Books. In it, Swift argued that classical thought, as exemplified by bees working together for the common good of the beehive, was superior to modern scientific thought, which he represented with a spider, which by working alone is self-centred. The beehive thus symbolises working together for the common good, the declared purpose of the Oddfellows.
http://manchesterbe.es/index.php/2016/08/18/the-oddfellows-beehive/
(Miles mentioned that John Nash was a Freemason and an Odd Fellow in his nash.pdf.)
LikeLike
Gerry mentioned Lloyds Bank have a beehive logo, and that both Jonah and Columbus mean Dove in his Phoenician papers. Couldn’t find any mention of a Lily however.
Reading up on the Rebekah Assemblies Oddfellows, what do we find? Their headquarters address is 422 (8) Trade Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US –
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Association_of_Rebekah_Assemblies#Theta_Rho_Girls_Clubs
LikeLike
I think”real” news stories are scarce as hens’ teeth. MSM organizations are obviously propaganda factories so why would they push anything real? It’s not their job.
Even a real story that seems to parallel their purposes would be a risk for them because they wouldn’t have the control over the parties involved like they do with their own projects. It would be too easy for the whole thing to backfire on them. They could also have lawsuits to contend with. Far too messy. Much easier to simply grown their own and have total control.
And, yes, I’m talking about stories that have mass propaganda value. Not local gossip in the Podunk Gazette. (necessarily) 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right. At this point it’s safer and more accurate to assume that ALL the MSM stuff is fake, or at least spun far enough to be close enough to fake. They might use real humans in the stories (probably not all CGI just yet, since it’s still pretty obvious) but that’s about it. And most of them aren’t who they say they are at all.
LikeLike
Looks like the Flat Earthers have stolen our Phoenician tag and are using it to surround me with noise, as usual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK-IKjlSHYs
Some of you guys may want to go there and tell them we are onto them.
LikeLike
Jesus Christ. Talk about shameless.
LikeLike
Sounds like someone struck a nerve. Gosh, ya know, it must really suck for those sea people to have had to learn spherical trigonometry to make their navigational charts. If only they had known.
LikeLike
WEB SEARCH NOISE.
I was thinking lately that it might be pretty easy for the JTB to surround all good terms with noise online. And if that happens sooner rather than later, I wonder what could be done in response. Maybe two or more words would need to be used in searches.
LikeLike
I feel sorry for any poor souls misled by this man.
Saying that, I had a relative start quoting Russell Brand at me the other day. I warned her not to listen to him; he is a fake and a phoeny; he is of the families. But no, she thinks Russell Brand has changed 😉 Yeh, changed roles and that’s about it.
LikeLike
That is what they are passing off as an astrophysicist these days. She looks like she is about to lead a seance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Skipped through it on mute so as not to get nauseous, but it looks to me much like they’re using that program “Universe Sandbox²” to do the visuals. But of course it’s presented as some new, powerful tech and scientific innovation, when actually it’s just $24.99 for any damn person.
Their choice of actor is also telling. Damning.
LikeLike
Isn’t she cute with that Cyndi Lauper-like voice.
@ 2:50
“You need science which is real. Not that fake news. It’s real news.”
[audience cheers and applauds]
I guess she means that “science” is real but news is fake? I’m not sure but she got an instant response from the audience with that line.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FAKE NEWS.
Phys.org has a lot of articles about what they think is fake news, but of course their own news is about as fake as they come.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was a presentation for kids, right? I’ve seen this video crop up in my youtube recommendations for months and studiously avoided it until now.
I skimmed through the vid but later she mentions a project she’s in called Backyardworlds.org, some sort of off-shoot of Planet Hunters, and visiting that re-directs you into something called the “Zooniverse”:
https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/marckuchner/backyard-worlds-planet-9
Which was apparently co-founded by a Chris Lintott:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Lintott
Apparently they are now out-sourcing data-processing to “citizen scientists” in mapping out exo-planets or whatever.
I’ve seen this type of project run in other fields like cancer research (Folding @ Home), SETI, or the gaming industry which out-sources all it’s QA work to it’s paying customers. Plenty of cultivated fanatics out there willing to do their (busy) work for free.
For some reason I doubt SETI is finding any aliens, nor are computations curing cancer.. yeah not feeling too confident about this one either. I was always suspect of the universities current obsession with virtualization and computer modeling of everything. Even at my time in college I wondered how can they be so confident in making such models of the real world, when they can’t even get the fundamentals right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Damnit everytime I post too soon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooniverse
Out-source all the science!
Apparently citizen scientists can now participate in..
“Scribes of the Cairo Geniza – A new project on Zooniverse where users help classify old scripts written in Hebrew and Arabic. This helps prepare the scripts for annotation. The second phase of this project is being planned to launch in Spring 2018, which includes annotation.[11] This project was launched by University of Pennsylvania Libraries, the Princeton Geniza Project, the Library of the Jewish Theological Seminary, and the Genizah at Cambridge University Library”
“Modern Muses -Users can help transcribe letters between Lawrence Alloway and Sylvia Sleigh. Users transcribe one page at a time. ”
Alloway apparently coined Pop Art.
“Shakespeare’s World – Users help annotate and transcribe many documents from William Shakespeare’s time. This project helps users and Oxford learn what life was like for Shakespeare and his comrades. ”
“AnnoTate – Volunteers on Zooniverse can help transcribe/annotate papers from many British artists. This project has over 50,000 documents from the Tate Archive.”
Uh yeah.. I much prefer the homegrown “citizen” science done by Miles, the guest writers, and others here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
EXOPLANETS.
I read that what they call exoplanets are just vague signals that could be almost anything, like not even solid or liquid objects.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Correct. “Exoplanets” are entirely hypothetical, and are “mapped” as blips in photon streams coming from distant stars, which have some repetition or other. It’s a wild assumption beyond “blip”, and spectroscopy at these distances is insanely inaccurate. They don’t even know the distances to these stars much less what may or may not be orbiting around them. The margin for error on exoplanets is so vast it’s just laughable that they promote it so heavily. They haven’t even found all the moons around Jupiter or Saturn yet, for Pete’s sake.
Over on the Space Fakery blog page I think we discussed why they never photograph even the nearest stars – because they apparently cannot. Even Sirius, the brightest stars in the sky at an alleged 8 light-years away cannot be photographed, even with such powerful tools as Hubble, etc.. Why not? Why can’t they use the same filters they use on our Solar Dynamics Observatory which obviously work, but fit such filters to a larger or longer-range scope?
Sometimes it seems like these people don’t even know how cameras work. It’s pretty crazy.
LikeLike
Dr Voodoo Presents…
I’ve seen that series 😉
LikeLike
MIND READING?
I came across these two articles today for my weekly posting. It looks like they may be getting close to being able to read people’s minds. It’s a scary thought.
*Engineers translate brain signals directly into speech [Sounds like the ultimate Invasion of Privacy]
– https://techxplore.com/news/2019-01-brain-speech.html
– https://www.sott.net/article/406101-Neuroengineers-create-technology-that-translates-thought-into-speech
*Graphene-based sensors can hear your brain ‘whisper’
https://www.sott.net/category/14-Science%20&page=1081?page=2
This is from the first article above.
“This is the same technology used by Amazon Echo and Apple Siri to give verbal responses to our questions,” said Dr. Mesgarani, who is also an associate professor of electrical engineering at Columbia’s Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science.
LikeLike
No, it’s not. Echo, Siri, Bixby, and Cortana use voice recognition based on Dragon’s “Naturally Speaking” program that has been around for over 20 years. I first used it back in 1997, I believe. We set up a voice-control system for a buddy’s computer I built for him so he could record music and control the mixer with his voice when necessary. It was barely functional though and has improved a lot, but I don’t use any of those spy-state garbage toys myself. Android is bad enough on its own.
LikeLike
@Jared, do you suppose many of their readers know that (that the software mentioned is wrong)? Do you suppose Dr. Mesgarani is keeping secret the real software? Or is it more likely that the whole story is fake? And, if so, what might be the reason for planting that story? I see I got the link wrong for the 3rd article. It should be here: https://www.sott.net/article/405938-Graphene-based-sensors-can-hear-your-brain-whisper
LikeLike
Well it’s blatantly false that these voice-assistants read brainwaves or interpret them in any way at all. Everything i said above is admitted and in the open. Nobody at any of these companies believes their VAs read or interpret thoughts into words at all, and this is the first time I’ve ever heard anyone suggest that. They are voice assistants. That’s it. That’s all they have ever been.
Now if we want to talk about charge profiles from individual minds being different and potentially the answer to “reading minds” via technology, that’s a different thing. I believe entirely in everyone having unique and complex charge emissions – and every creature as well. But any mind-reading capabilities involved are way off. These guys can’t even figure out what heat is, electricity, and so forth as I’ve said before. There’s no way they have mind-reading technology when they don’t even know what charge is.
They also have graphene wrong. It’s always sold to us as one or two atoms thick, when these guys are so far off from that scale it’s more like thousands thick. So why do they sell it to us like this? And as we’ve seen, so far graphene hasn’t really done much at all. Germanium is a far more interesting material but it’s rarely brought up, even though it could give existing microprocessor tech a boost of 100x or more in speed just by switching from SoD to GoS or some other relevant incorporation of Germanium.
LikeLike
hahahahahaha … yeah right!!
LikeLike
“hahahahahaha … yeah right!!”
That was in reply to Kinder’s mind reading post by the way.
LikeLike
JTB PROJECTS LIST.
I worked out a list at http://futureschool.boards.net/thread/16/jtb-projects-list
A couple folks here suggested a list of non- or anti-JTB efforts, as they said almost everything is a JTB project. I started listing non/anti-JTB briefly as follows: “POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS
1. Expose these projects — via e.g. mileswmathis.com/updates.html – milesmathis.com
2. Brainstorm —
3. Try Local Sovereignty = Community Rights — via e.g. CELDF.org
4. Seek Allies — ”
I need to add CuttingThroughTheFog yet, also FutureSchool etc.
Under JTB Projects I list:
Project Labels; Purpose of Each Project; Subdivisions
For example, the top JTB Project I show as follows:
Controlled Government: [Purpose:] Maintain Ruling Class Power —- [Subdivisions:] Fake Revolution, Corrupt Campaign Financing, Fake Elections, Fake Courts, Controlled Administration, Unjust Imprisonment, Controlled Major Media
Another example is this:
Terrorism Hoaxes: [Purpose:] Divide the People; Increase State Power —- [Subdivisions:] Crisis Actors, Media Directors, DHS
Since I’d like to help educate people with FutureSchool or something similar, I think such a list would be good for that purpose. We want to teach True History partly by exposing Fake History. We want to teach True Science etc as well. I believe it’s worthwhile to collaborate and plan things out, despite JTB obstacles.
LikeLike
@ Philip Cox:
“…I’ve seen this type of project run in other fields like cancer research (Folding @ Home), SETI, or the gaming industry which out-sources all it’s QA work to it’s paying customers. Plenty of cultivated fanatics out there willing to do their (busy) work for free…”
Yeah, there have been a few of these, including volunteers using TOMNOD trying to find missing Malaysian passenger plane MH370 in the Southern Indian Ocean…
“… Tomnod, lets anyone with an Internet connection help in the search for MH370. Harnessing detailed satellite images of the region in which the plane is believed to have disappeared…”
What a waste of time that turned out to be. No surprise really as I’m almost certain this was a spoof operation and in fact the aircraft never even departed Kuala Lumper Airport in the first place.
I think there is more to these sort of schemes than just getting free labour. They are trying to get people invested in the various fake projects as it helps give them sell the event to their friends and social media followers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Anna:
“I doubt if I’ll be doing Richard Hall’s theories justice but here goes…a VERY QUICK broad outline.
Jo Cox was a champion of the EU . In 1998 her ‘husband’ Brendan states that she went to work for an organisation, ‘ Britain in Europe’ to set up to prepare for a possible referendum on the single currency…”
Thanks Anna, I think RH is reading it right now, just a shame he didn’t do a bit more research prior to releasing his first vid on the Joke Ox project. All the info needing to show both her and her husband were spooks is easy to find.
Regarding the Panama paper release, I think it’s a big stretch to show that she was involved. I found it surprising how little pubic reaction there was, despite the hate against the medium-rich being pushed by the media. Perhaps this hoax fizzled out is that everyone already knew what was going on and the Panama ‘revelations’ came as no real surprise. That was certainly the reaction from most of my family and friends.
LikeLike
MAJOR CHILD ABDUCTION MURDER.
I watch quite a bit of Youtube for entertainment, as well as info. I came across a video about what kids in the 80s could do that kids can’t do now. It’s things like sit in the back of the stationwagon with no seats or seatbelts, eat candy cigarettes, go anywhere on bikes all day and be home before street lights came on, hear music on MTV, ring people’s doorbells then run & hide & watch their reactions etc. I read a bunch of the comments under the video. Many point out that kids had a lot more freedom then and weren’t treated like snowflakes that could melt. Here’s one of the comments that goes to the cause of the end of kids’ freedom.
“We live in a very mentally-ill and violent society now. In the 80s and before people were nice to one another and kids played for hours in the parks, rode for miles on their bikes, etc. Now, parents can’t take their eyes off their kids for even a second for fear that a stranger will touch their child’s genitals. Never forget Jason Wetterling. One of the first milk-carton kids. Left to ride his bike to the gas station, was abducted, raped and had his head blown off at the sweet age of 11 years old. That ended freedom for kids. It was 1989.”
I see the name was actually Jacob, not Jason. Here’s the Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jacob_Wetterling The murder led to the national registry of sex offenders in 1994. The boy’s body was missing for 30 years but remains were found in 2016 when the apparent murderer told where to find them after receiving a plea deal. Jacob was with 2 of his brothers. The murderer told the other two to run to the woods or he’d shoot them.
I guess, like most things, the crime could have been faked. It reminds me of the Franklin Coverup in which a boy, Johnny Gosch, from Des Moines, IA was kidnapped from near his home in the 1980s, I think, and became part of a national sex ring with other kids used to bribe politicians, including in Washington, DC. My neice’s husband is a cop in Des Moines, so I recently asked him if he heard of the Gosch case. Surprisingly, he said yes, the boy’s mother told her story of her son’s kidnapping to the cops. He said she’s still very emotional about it. Actually, the two cases are kind of opposite. One was publicized, while the other was covered up, if both stories are true.
I have some familiarity with CPS (Child Protection Services) because I’ve been helping a young woman who was in a women’s shelter with her daughter to rent an apartment. She said she had to be out of the shelter by a certain time, or she could lose custody of her daughter. So I can relate to the loss of freedom since the 80s and before that.
LikeLike
Abduction of young children has been going on for a long time, particularly in cities. They were abducted for various immoral purposes and often never found…
https://blogs.bl.uk/untoldlives/2014/12/victorian-children-lost-and-found.html
Nothing new under the sun. The underlying storyline of the Script is repeated endlessly, with a few tweaks here and there to keep it relevant in changing times. It is designed to instil fear amongst the masses and make them dependent on the authorities for protection. They are well aware that parents have an inbuilt emotional mechanism that makes them worry about the safety of their kids and will sacrifice anything to protect them.
LikeLike
@Boris, what was new in the 90s was using child abductions as a reason to register sex offenders and to increase the power of “Child Protective Services” so that people now think they’re required to snitch on anyone they suspect may be abusing kids, including parents, which is a huge lie, and the government engages in lots of wrongful prosecution and wrongful imprisonment of innocent people.
LikeLike
PORN.
This young woman Youtuber, Grace, aka ReallyGraceful, is pretty good at uncovering hidden history, though she still probably has quite a bit to learn (as do I). Her channel is at https://www.youtube.com/user/reallygraceful/videos – I liked one she did on Public School a few months back. I hadn’t checked out her channel before, but I looked through it a little now. She started posting videos 7 years ago, then stopped 5 years ago and started again 2 years ago. She delves into corruption and conspiracies quite a bit in recent times. She did one on Porn, so I checked it out. She said about half way through that video that Jews have long played a big part in Porn, or at least they claimed to be Jews. That got me to thinking. Miles has said that he refers to people as Jews who call themselves Jews. But it might be better to call them self-proclaimed Jews. After all, they could be false flags, at least some or much of the time. A little after that she gives her impressions of what the real purpose of Porn is when it’s free online. She thinks there are likely 4 most likely purposes: 1. depopulation; 2. destruction of traditional families; 3. sabotage of individual intelligence; 4. data collection for blackmail etc. She says Porn also fuels the demand for sex trafficking, but I question that. Violent video games have supposedly been found not to increase violence in gamers, so I’m skeptical that Porn increases the demand for sex trafficking.
Anyway, I’m thinking of posting a comment on the most recent video (not Porn) to reference Miles’ findings on the JTB, as I call them. Since a lot of Youtube channels are probably employed by the JTB, maybe hers is too. I don’t know what subtle signs to look for to make such a potential determination, but even if a channel is controlled, comments may still be worth leaving for other viewers. Eh?
LikeLike
I find this kind of adolescent, to be honest. “Free porn” exists as a marketing tool chiefly, to funnel people into buying the full videos or full sets of pictures. They straight tell us that on almost every site and have since the 1990s. It’s not news at all, and I find it odd that this YouTuber chick isn’t aware of how marketing works. Granted, some people still don’t buy the saleable material (why would you?) but this leads us to another interesting aspect…
Why YouTube? Why bother with such a managed, manufactured, and full-of-shit platform at all, L_Kinder?
I run into people all the time who want the truth, or at least as close as they can get, but refuse to read a fucking paper because it’s not in video format. I even had one guy who was really cool and intelligent otherwise claim he was too autistic to read a paper from Miles. And then just today, he messaged me asking how I felt about the Wall and the dissolving White race. I of course told him I had no interest in those topics, but now I’m wondering if he isn’t just another Spoop outright. I’ve never said or done anything to make anyone believe I would give a shit about that drivel.
I’m not saying YOU are like that guy, L_Kinder, but am saying perhaps you should spend less time on YouTube and more time reading. Please don’t take that as an insult, but you’re being misdirected on these topics and it’s really obvious.
Porn doesn’t lead to sex-trafficking, it leads to orgasms then you go on about your day with a clearer head, generally. I’ve never heard anyone go any other route, when it comes to masturbation. Granted depravity may be increasing over time and fantasies may or may not lead to criminal and harmful activity, but if any of the historical accounts are remotely accurate on this topic people were ALREADY depraved as fuck and have been for millennia. Religion tried to reign this in and to some extent did a decent job, but then pushed the depravity in other directions.
I do however agree with Miles that these things can erode value in actual sex and actual partners, yet at the same time I maintain a lovely lady myself and that hasn’t changed anything there, for me. Perhaps an isolated case.
LikeLike
We were told that your “thingie” turns black and falls off if you engage in such frenetic and clandestine activities. Ah, an Irish Catholic upbringing — an education in second thoughts.
LikeLike
I suppose indulging in modern Art, Literature, Science and History is a form of mental masturbation. I should warn people that if you engage in such activities, your brain turns black and pops out.
LikeLike
I would like to nominate Miles’s quote for best of 2019…….It was in the US and covered by the media, therefore it’s fake.
LikeLike
@Jared Magneson:
“…Porn doesn’t lead to sex-trafficking, it leads to orgasms then you go on about your day with a clearer head, generally…”
Good post Jared. As well as the a clear head, the after effects of an orgasm also produce a warm relaxed feeling and and inner peace. This as testosterone levels slide down. I think those running the Shoah are trying to target post-pubescent male teens and those in their early 20’s with porn to encourage regular masturbation. This is done to try and reduce the incidence of more violent/rebellious/obstinate outbursts that this group can be prone to. Young adult males are not used to handling the large amounts of testosterone hitting their system after puberty, and reducing it’s levels help keep them more placid. Of course they also want their share of the profits made from selling porn so they can keep the perpetual Shoah running smoothly.
LikeLike
Porn helps keep human population figures down.
So does the promotion of LGBT and pet ownership and some health scares like AIDS.
LikeLike
This one isn’t exactly current, but Tsutomu Miyazaki is one of Japan’s more famous “serial killers” who I believe to be a fake. It seems like Japan was testing out their version of Fearism and Project Chaos, using scripts similar to the ones in the UK and US. I saw him on a serial killer show (which was basically a presentation of fakeries, unbeknownst to the idiot narrator) along with Dahmer, Bundy, and the rest of the Shoa guys and immediately it stood out. The story is crap and makes no sense, with the “killer” storing body parts and whatnot in his own home and other preposterous mistakes that nobody older than four would make. He’s basically the Japanese Dahmer, only he preyed on children instead of gay guys.
born of incest
had deformed hands (fused wrists)
ate his grandfather’s ashes
“Another one of his perversions was his love for child pornography, which he started watching in 1984 at the age of 21. Child pornography was legal in Japan at the time and therefore was normalized in Japan’s culture, but it’s a perversion nonetheless, especially in today’s culture (both American and Japanese).”
https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-disturbing-facts-about-tsutomu-miyazaki-the-little-girl-murderer/
the media blamed anime and porn for his four heinous crimes (kinda like various groups blaming Slayer and black Metal, over here)
during the “trial” he presented an alter-ego: “In showing no remorse for the families, his actions, or the lives he had taken, Miyazaki proceeded to blame everything that he did on a hybrid creature that forced him to kill and which he called Rat Man. According to Miyazaki, Rat Man promised him that if he could abduct and kill the children whose lives he took, then Rat Man would bring his beloved grandfather back from the dead.”
“On July 23, 1989, Miyazaki attempted to insert a zoom lens into the vagina of a schoolgirl in a park near her home and was confronted by the girl’s father. After fleeing naked on foot, Miyazaki eventually returned to the park to retrieve his Toyota car, whereupon he was arrested by police who had responded to a call by the father.”
But wait, jsut a year prior they had Miyazaki fleeing to his NISSAN car, a Nissan LANGLEY, which is sold abroad as the Pulsar. Coincidence? It seems like an error in the script, I mean yeah he could have bought a new car in that timespan, or not.
And what girl, of any free culture, would let a weird strange man with deformed hands shove a camera lens at them at all? It doesn’t even make sense.
LikeLike
Another one not current but after typing in wikipedia the number 33, this caught my eye about Los 33, the 33 trapped miners in Chilean Copiapo mining accident (forerunner to the Thai cave, et al):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Copiap%C3%B3_mining_accident
Fenix was the name of the rescue capsule, and they made a film about it. The Chilean president Piñera (fudge on Pinheiros, Peron, et al) and his wife presented a souvenir rock from the mine to Elizabeth II on 18 October 2010. She must have been ecstatic.
LikeLike
I can’t vouch for ” Moe ” , or Gnosticism , this article is from October 12, 2015
https://gnosticwarrior.com/33rd-degree.html
LikeLike
Gnosticism….isn’t that the worship of the potato?
LikeLike
Chocolate , Chocolate Ganache-tisism !
LikeLike
DF: that was an interesting paper on Gnostic Warrior but looking deeper on his site reveals his presentation of hoaxed shooting events as being real events perpetrated by people possessed by demons. Come on, spare me. So Moe is a schmoe. So adios gnostic warrior.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mr Gnocchi Head Gnostic Warrior….!
LikeLike
I think you should reserve judgment on Moe until Larry and Curly have had their say too.
LikeLike
I just noticed how Jesuits actually sounds like JesuWITZ !
At this point who the heck do they think they are fooling ?
https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/francis-chronicles/pope-tells-young-jesuits-be-courageous-prayerful-creative
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+33&version=NKJV
Ezekiel 33 New King James Version (NKJV)
The Watchman ( literally Spy ? ) and His Message
LikeLike
Sounds like god is running a protection racket – do as I say or the hitman will take you out of the game. Perhaps the bible is the manual for those in charge?
LikeLike
Example : Thou shalt not utter the Don’s Real Name , Capiche !
LikeLiked by 1 person
A watchman is not just literally a spy, the Semitic term in Ezekiel 33:2 is ṣph, and the nisba form ṣpy may be the etymological source of the English word spy.
ṣpy צפי: watchman — (CAL)
ṣpy צפי: watchtower, lamp — (CAL)
ṣpy צפי: to look out, observe — (CAL)
LikeLike
Is this paper an example of someone attempting to rip off Mile’s Charge theory?
Discovery & Proofs of a Nucleus of Mass and Charge in the Photons/Quantum Particles
https://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=87794
LikeLike
They get closer and closer each year, yet of course never mention the foundation. It’s pathetic. It’s also why they can’t solve a goddamn thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well it does mention spinning photons and to this ignoramus that triggers a very quiet alert within me. They are dirty scumbags if they’re claiming his theory as their own. I’m just sayin’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are definitely dirty scumbags – at best. Of course they know of MIles’ theory. Any cursory Googling of “photon spin” will yield some link to Miles sooner or later, and anyone in the cosmology world who hasn’t heard of him yet is just living in a cave. But we know how these types are. They won’t admit a goddamn thing, and in my opinion we don’t need them to. They are irrelevant, even more irrelevant than we are in science, since at least we’re LOOKING for the right answers. They aren’t even trying. They just get paid to write whatever pushes their own hegemony, and it’s all useless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
QED
LikeLike
”…………….And did those feet in ancient time,
Walk upon England’s mountains green?
And was the holy lamb of god
On England’s pleasant pastures seen?
And did the countenance divine,
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among these dark satanic mills?
Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear, oh clouds unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!
I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand
Til we have built Jerusalem
In England’s green and pleasant land…………………”
A poem from William Blake from the preface to his epic Milton: A Poem in Two Books, one of a collection of writings known as the PROPHETIC BOOKS.
Can’t say we weren’t warned in advance!
LikeLike
Lol. It is blatant when you look at it from a certain angle.
LikeLike
WOW. Although not sure how it is being achieved if you look at what is going on there. Makes me think we need to understand what they mean by “Jerusalem”
LikeLike
OE Yer = Jer = maker
salem = shalom = peace
Jerusalem = peacemaker, nice name for a city which has seen/caused so many wars since it was invented by those running the Shoah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Baghdad” is known as the “City of Peace” in the Arab world, allegedly. But the etymology I can find calls it “Gift of God”, from the Russian root “bog” (god).
The irony is incredible.
LikeLike
‘Gift of God’
Gift is German for poison, from the verb geben, to give.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awesome connection there, Lewis. Not being very familiar with German I would have never caught that.
LikeLike
Jer maker? Jamaica?
LikeLike
So a cruel joke in more ways than one….nice one IHSW.
Something on BBC news tonight about how damaging conspiracy theories are to individuals and society as a whole. Here come da censorship monitors!
LikeLike
Jerusalem, written yrw-šlm, could by a nasty, spooky person be meant as yrš-šlm, which means to take possession of everything.
yrš ירש: to take possession of, inherit, dispossess — (Strong)
šlm שלם: complete, completed, completely, entire, full — (Strong)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who’d have guessed?
We used to sing this song ………………….and beautiful it is too……………….every morning at school assembly and I could neve quite work out why we were singing about rebuilding a far off city in the neck of MY woods. What had Jerusalem got to do with England? We are told the same old story that it refers to Jesus’ visit(?) to this island but quite why this peace loving movement would want to fight with minds, , fire and weapons to forcefully take it over is anybody’s guess. Other interpretations come to mind.
LikeLike
You’re right, Anna. Lol. You might aswell have a Phoenican spokesman giving a Press Conference…
“Yes, that is correct; we chose these islands as our new rapacious HQ of global operations. Obviously we’ve expanded exponentially in the last two centuries and are HQ is now you, you, you and you. Y’all have those smartmetres…I mean smart phones don’t you? There you go. Next question please”.
LikeLike
“and our HQ is now you”
Gaddamned grammar gets my mule all riled up 😉
LikeLike
Don’t forget the connection to Salem. 🙂
LikeLike
There was a piece on Luton Town Fc today on telly. Their badge is very interesting, spook-wise, bee and a beehive – they used to have a stylised L and T logo afore —
LikeLike
Does Miles have anything on the Climate Warming/Cooling/Change hoax?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not that I’m aware of.
LikeLike
Read his papers on the atmosphere. There’s at least three now, if you include his recent one on the magnetism of Venus. All his magnetic papers are helpful really on this topic but this one is also critical:
What Causes the Earth’s Heat?
http://milesmathis.com/core.pdf
The atmospherics are dead-on too but make much more sense after reading that paper first.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good suggestions for reading but as far as I remember they don’t deal with the AGW hoax. I believe somewhere he has mentioned the scandal involving the climategate e-mail scandal in passing. (Quick search for climategate on his site shows he mentions it in his papers on Thoreau and ‘Yes, the Leonardo Painting is a Fake.’)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, he doesn’t really propose a stance on AGW proper, but I assume that’s because it’s so obviously a financial scam and money-pit, much like CERN and Bicep2 and LiGO and other fake science projects.
He shows us the chief heat inputs and outputs and for me that was enough to go on. While human pollution is definitely a big deal, a huge one, over-heating the Earth itself is hogwash. Those models are all based on falsehoods regarding the Earth’s heat itself, since they magically generate it with a “dynamo” instead of the charge-recycling solar/Jovian/galactic inputs Miles gives us. And as we’ve seen many times, if you even ask one of “those types” what heat is they lose their marbles and dodge off in every direction but the correct one.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I stumbled across these statements by Miles on Global Warming…sorry I mean Climate Change 😉
http://milesmathis.com/hawking.pdf
The guy is an eloquent genius. I chuckle to myself reading his stuff; such a joy to read.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s been a couple of months now since I’ve done a start-to-finish reading of his entire website. I’ve done it twice now, and I may have to start my third reading soon. There’s so much wisdom to absorb in all of his writings; each time I re-read his compendium I find several hundred things I missed in my prior read-through.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And liked by me: Miles IS an eloquent genius. His bit about ‘truth’ was outstanding.
(I don’t seem to be able to ‘like’ through the official channels.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anna.
I can’t ‘like’ a post from my pc but I tried on my lap top the other day and it worked.
LikeLike
Malcolm Lowry’s wiki page is almost comical in the number of red flags crammed in there.
The reason this is a “current event” is that Albert Finney just died, and he starred in the movie version of Under the Volcano. I had thankfully forgotten about that book. Someone gave it to me as a present ten years ago, and I dutifully slogged through it because it was supposed to be a “great novel” (it is No. 11 (yes) on the list of the 100 best novels according to the people who determine such things). But I hated it, one of those novels I was grateful to be done with. Just a dreary, confused mess about some alcoholic who dies. I found nothing redeeming in it.
Now that I’ve read enough Miles I know that if some piece of crap is too famous it’s because it’s by a spook being pushed by spooks. So I went to the wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Lowry
A few choice bits:
“the fourth son of Evelyn Boden and Arthur Lowry, a cotton broker”
“In autumn 1929 he enrolled at Cambridge to placate his parents…During his first term, his roommate, Paul Fitte, took his own life. Fitte had wanted a homosexual relationship which Lowry refused.”
His first wife: “Theirs was a turbulent union, especially due to his drinking, and because she resented homosexuals’ attraction to her husband.” Not that he had anything to do with it!
His father gave him an allowance with which he was able to spy–I mean, live–all over the world while taking a decade to write his magnum opus.
He wrote two books in his life:
Ultramarine – 1933 (!)
Under the Volcano – 1947 (!)
The latter is about the last day of the life of the British spy–I mean, consul–in a Mexican city on the Day of the Dead, 11/1/38.
Finally, Lowry dies “by misadventure” at the age of 47.
LikeLike
STOLEN HISTORY.
I’ve been checking out their site for a couple of days and it seems like some or many or most of the members put a lot of stock in Fomenko’s radical revised history, so I just posted this on a Fomenko thread there.
“FOMENKO VS MATHIS.
_I looked into Fomenko around 2005 or maybe a little before that. I was familiar then with his theory somewhat. At the time I was following Richard Hoagland and he or someone convinced me that Fomenko was wrong. So I never looked into it further till now. Not long after that I read Gunnar Heinsohn’s theory in Catastrophist circles. His theory was similar to Fomenko’s and may have been partly based on Fomenko’s claims. But Heinsohn’s theory seemed to be discredited by other Catastrophists. I found Mathis’ math and science site Homepage for Miles Mathis science site around 2010 and Mathis has found a lot of errors and falsehood in math and physics and astronomy etc. About 2 years ago I found that Mathis also has a history & current events site at Updates where he started finding that a lot of shootings and other major events were faked. He seems to consider the Moon landings as faked and nuclear weapons he considers faked too, but I’m slightly inclined to think the latter 2 are true. But it occurred to me that the JTB (Jackasses That Be) may have wanted some people to think they were fake, at least the Moon landings, because they may have secret missions going to the Moon and beyond. I’m open-minded though.
_Last June Mathis posted a paper called Anatoly Fomenko and New Chronology at http://mileswmathis.com/newchron.pdf . He gives good reasons to suspect that that’s all a covert ops project designed to confuse the public and to keep us from finding the real fakery such as what Mathis has been finding and posting on his sites. In a similar way, Sitchin, Drosnin, Icke, Graham Hancock and numerous others are likely covert ops projects too, i.e. they’re misdirection to waste people’s time and keep them off of the real paths to truth.”
LikeLike
To the extent anyone cares (if there even is one), I do not think that anyone who read even one of Fomenko’s many volumes on chronological revisionism with an open mind would dismiss his life’s work with an airy wave of the hand. That there are likely errors and misconstruals in anything that correlates the sheer mass of data the Fomenko team has goes without saying. But the work has to be judged as a whole, if at all.
LikeLike
All I had to do was read Miles’ paper on the topic to decide not to waste time studying Fomenko. One will say that’s not very scientific of me, to let someone else’s review sway me so easily, but here’s my rationale: I have work of my own to do, and Fomenko or Velikovsky or any of those types can’t help me. I’m talking about work detailing and delving into the charge field, my own contribution of videos and simulations being small but hopefully helpful someday to someone. Real physics, with hopefully a real impact someday, somewhere people still wish to study such a thing.
So while Fomenko may have some decent stuff, it’s still an obvious Limited Hangout and I for one don’t have a lot of time to waste on such things. By all means, read and study what you like of course – nobody needs my mandate for that or anything else. But meanwhile there’s real work that CAN be done, and isn’t a bunch of speculation.
LikeLike
Seeing as it’s apparent you have nothing to do, maybe it would be a good time to teach your old Pops about charge particles, charge field and how they relate to his physiology as some semblance of a human bean…er…being.
You can turn me into a “science guru” and I’ll kindly repay you next lifetime or as soon as I become technically proficient to overthrow our benevolent benefactors and abscond with their cash. Can do it here online, via text, email, live chat or when it warms up there, I’ll drive AND buy copious quantities of local brew for the aforementioned lessons. Will have to bring the yak obviously. Just need a couple of decent size trees 15-feet apart for the camping hammock.
LikeLike
Sure Pops,
LikeLike
Sorry, I hit “Post” too soon.
So there’s one particle, the photon, right? I mean we can agree that it’s not electrons, neutrons, and protons that give us vision, so let’s just start with the photon. It’s tiny, it spins, and it collides with shit. If it collides with a certain “shit” it flips end-over-end while spinning still, and effectively doubles its radius, or potential contact radius – all while still going light speed linearly. If it gains enough flips (stacked spins), its radius becomes recursive enough that it starts to bounce other photons around inside of it and it’s called an electron. A few more collisions, a few more stacked spins, and it’s a proton. If that last spin is reversed, it’s a neutron.
And then all other larger matter is just built on spins and configurations and charge pressure upon those original photons. All matter is effectively the same particle, with more or fewer stacked spins. Every damn thing is made of light essentially, and that’s what charge is. It’s photons that are still small enough to zoom around, where larger matter is too big to zoom without colliding into other shit, but it’s all the same fundamental particle basically.
Gimme that beer and I’ll shut up. Or continue. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t shut up. Beer can wait.
Is Photon energy?
LikeLike
That just made more sense than 17 reads and rereads. Don’t leave me now.
LikeLike
Yes, the photon “has” energy. Energy is just a measure of the motion transfer in a collision, effectively. E=mc², right?
Energy = mass * speed of light linear * speed of light at the tangent
That’s where the c² comes from – it’s telling us that a photon has two compound vectors: its linear motion and its spin motion. The “tangent” is the spin motion, which is also at light speed but a different direction than its linear speed, most often.
Energy is simply a transfer of motion from one body to another, with the variables being mass and velocity. We see this in a slightly different way in the “Kinetic Energy” version, KE = ½mv², which is telling us the same thing but without using light speed as the velocity reference. Photons have tiny mass but great velocity, of course.
Here’s a video which might help. I tried to show how the photon collisions “tip over” the photon and induce the stacked spins, with some motion trails to show you what’s happening:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Keep going if you’re up for it. It’s the only way I’ll get it.
LikeLike
That’s pretty much the basics of Miles’ Charge Theory. Once we accept that photons are real and have mass, spin and chirality (handedness, or clockwise/counter-clockwise spin, relative to another photon), we have a field of real particles mediating everything by direct collision. This charge field is in vector opposition to gravity, meaning charge EMITS from matter and gravity of course exacts an apparent pull upon that matter.
So all matter and bodies larger than the photon (from the electron to the atom to the molecule, to cells, moons, planets, and stars, all the way up to galaxies) recycle and emit these tiny, fast-moving, spinning charge photons. All photons contribute to the charge field, but the average photon is of course infrared, or “heat”. But visible or radio or microwave or gammas and x-rays also contribute, with more or less energy according to their wavelengths (which isn’t an esoteric attribute anymore – the wavelength is literally formed by the spinning photon’s motion). The wavelength is just an observed shape an observer might see, which is created like this:
But back to charge recycling. All large bodies have some inherent spin, and this spin generates a centrifugal force closer to that body’s equator which is spinning faster than the poles. This creates a field potential to incoming charge, where more charge photons will enter at the poles and then re-emit from the equator zones. Near the equator (30° N and S), an incoming photon has a greater chance of colliding with outgoing charge or the spinning matter itself, if that makes sense.
That’s Miles’ simplest diagram of charge recycling. And as he’s shown, we see it at the atomic and subatomic electron/proton levels, and all the way up through larger macro-scale bodies as well. Here’s a heatmap of the Earth:
And here’s one of the sun:
We even see it in radiation maps of the galactic core, but it’s so big here that at this distance it’s curving up in response to the intergalactic universal charge field:
The proton itself is much smaller, but recycles charge in much the same way, since it’s still billions of times larger than the photon. Here’s a simple crappy video I made to illustrate the directions and potentials:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Since you weren’t here, nor I there, was forced to consume the copious quantities of liquid bread myself. Wasn’t sure if you could deal with Oyster Stout anyway.
Thank you. This means a sooo much to me, it’s the only way I’ll ever begin to understand the process. Just don’t think scientifically. Technically, yes, mostly. Illogically, definitely, always. But you hit all the right bells and whistles and I basically comprehend. Your first vid of the spinning, crashing photons reminded me of driving in Florida during tourist season. Love your vids.
In the process of the back and forth, the television, iPad and iPhone all decided to auto update even though they aren’t set to do so. Happened 33-seconds after your initial post and lasted 47-minutes. Upon your final installment, as I clicked on your vid, the internet went down. Wasn’t exactly sure what to make of the predicament, so I blamed the dilemma on rouge photons. Not totally a joke, it all happened. Still dragging the place for recording devices.
This is the part I hate…have to ask the inane, ignorant questions.
You said; “If it collides with a certain “shit” it flips end-over-end while spinning still, and effectively doubles its radius, or potential contact radius….”
What is that certain “shit” ? The contact radius is due to its linear movement?? It’s spinning wildly every which way? Corn-fused.
In Miles’ diagram of charge/photon, he shows anti-photons entering the top pole and photons entering the bottom, then meeting/exiting at the equator (+/- 30°). Thought the particle was the photon and what’s entering the poles to be charge? If so, than we have a positive/negative charge concept or at least opposing charges, no? If so, what determines which is which?
What is charge?
Is the spinning causing the charge or the charge causing the spin?
Where did the photon come from? Conversely, where did the charge come from? My pat question that so endears me to science-type teachers. Sorry.
Will stop here, as I’m still digesting your full dissertation. Unfortunately, there probably will be more questions. Can you deal with me? If not, I’ll send more snow your way.
LikeLike
Wayne G said: “You said; “If it collides with a certain “shit” it flips end-over-end while spinning still, and effectively doubles its radius, or potential contact radius….”
“What is that certain “shit” ? The contact radius is due to its linear movement?? It’s spinning wildly every which way? Corn-fused.”
What I meant was that if a photon collides with another photon, or an electron or proton or neutron or atom, it won’t always cause another stacked spin. Head-on collisions would be the fewest, but those wouldn’t cause any new rotations necessarily. But oblique angles and impacts can, and I tried to illustrate that in my video.
For a new stacked spin to occur, the direction of collision must be along a different axis than the current top-level spin. So if our particle is spinning in the Y axis for example, another Y-spin particle colliding with it won’t add a spin, it will just toss both off in different directions:
But if our particle spinning in Y is hit along the X or Z axis at the right angle, we get a flip which is outside the gyroscopic influence of that original Y-spin. It’s much like nested gyroscopes. The different spins have to be 90° to each other, along one axis or another, or else they just augment or dampen that original Y-spin.
I don’t mean to get too technical here, but back to “contact radius”. Our particle (the photon) is moving at light speed c, right? Well it’s also spinning at light speed, but as the stacked spins increase the radius of this spin it takes a little longer with each new spin-level to traverse that distance. It’s still moving very fast but also sort of “wobbling” about itself as it spins, all the while moving linearly (like a ray) at light speed still. But since it’s taking up more volume in any given timeframe, there’s a greater chance for our particle to interact with other particles around it or in its path. It’s radius is wider; the particle is effectively larger, as a function of mass.
If we forget about the linear speed for a moment, a particlewith multiple stacked spins looks something like this when you trace its path:
Kind of like a spirograph. So this is what I meant by “contact radius”. The particle itself is of course only at one point along that path at any given time, but its PROPENSITY to collide with other particles has increased since it’s basically casting a wider net. If we draw it as just a single line (a ray), then its propensity for a collision is vastly decreased, since it’s taking up a much smaller space along its journey.
Does that make sense?
LikeLike
Wayne G said: “In Miles’ diagram of charge/photon, he shows anti-photons entering the top pole and photons entering the bottom, then meeting/exiting at the equator (+/- 30°). Thought the particle was the photon and what’s entering the poles to be charge? If so, than we have a positive/negative charge concept or at least opposing charges, no? If so, what determines which is which?
What is charge?
Is the spinning causing the charge or the charge causing the spin?”
No, these aren’t the same as positive/negative charges. Photons and antiphotons are simply upside-down to each other, regarding spin. That’s all that any anti-particle is, basically. So if we observe a photon as spinning clockwise, an anti-photon from that point of view would be spinning counter-clockwise.
Charge is the motion of photons, implicitly. Photons are charge, and charge is photons. Heat is another expression of charge/photons, as a density or “photons in a given volume”, chiefly infrared photons. The terms are roughly interchangeable, but this is the key difference between Miles’ physics and the mainstream.
To those assholes, charge is left unassigned, and the photon is a “virtual” particle with no mass. Those idiots can’t even see, by their own theories, since photons aren’t real except as math to them. Yes, they are that stupid.
Wayne G said: “Where did the photon come from?”
Nobody knows. It’s just the smallest particle we have discovered, and that’s as far down the rabbit hole we can go unless we discover a smaller particle. For now, we can consider the photon the fundamental quanta, the building block of everything. In fact it’s the only particle, since all larger particles and matter are composed of these photons only with higher spin-stack levels and configurations created by the charge field of regular, tiny photons.
You could even consider the larger particles such as the electron and proton to be charge-eating animals or engines, if you will. They “eat” tiny photons and then shit them out around their equators, or with the neutron, at its poles. I don’t think Miles would like that analogy but there you have it. 😉
LikeLike
“They “eat” tiny photons and then shit them out around their equators, or with the neutron, at its poles. I don’t think Miles would like that analogy but there you have it.”
LMAO!! Miles may not like it but if it’s the only way to get through this thick skull…well…. The words and visuals work nicely on this end!
Again thank you so much. Gonna take all this updated info, combine it with your previous masterpieces, feed it back into the void between the ears and see how it shakes out. So far, think I’m getting it. The “charge” was throwing me.
Making me look at everything very differently. Will try to leave you alone for a bit and see if more rereads going forward start to make more sense. Kinda also like these crazy-ass, out of control, speed demon photons being part of my makeup. Explains a lot!
BTW, you actually speak fine, proper Bostonian, though a little lacking on the f-bombs for up here…er…over here for you!! Remember that snow I threatened you with? Well you tossed it back at me! First accumulation we’ve had here this winter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jared, great synopsis!
Wayne, you know how when you take a bunch of iron filings and put a bar magnet on them, they start to wiggle and move around? Guess what’s pushing them around: charge photons coming out of the iron. Mainstream says it’s “magnetic field lines” working their magic in some magic fashion. Miles says it’s tiny spinning balls, aka photons.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Wayne & Josh. I find that trying to explain it all in my own words (sometimes over and over, to different people/audiences) also helps refine my understanding of the physics. I’m not a trained physicist of course, so it’s often a struggle to me as well to wrap my head around it all. But Miles is a great teacher and exhibits great patience in his writing, generally hitting a point from several directions to help different people visualize or understand it. I’m just paraphrasing his work and writing as best I can, ALL credit on this topic should go to him* and to Nevyn for his work where applicable. I didn’t come up with any of this, I’m just doing my best to express it. I still have a long way to go on my videos to help others learn and isolate/expose any issues that may arise, but hopefully these things will help someone out there.
*disclaimer for anyone thinking I’m remotely taking credit for another man’s work
Also Wayne, fuck yer’self for sending this awful snow! Obviously all I’ve taught you so far is how to control the weather with your personal charge field, and ya shoved it right up Washington’s bung? RUDE. 😉 (joking, people)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jared,
Been laughing for twenty minutes!! Your proper Bostonian is getting there.
LikeLike
Ok Jared, one last question (at least until the next one). In your…ahem…statement that those nasty, mf-ing electrons, protons and neutrons basically devour, then “shit out” these tiny, fun loving, crazy-ass spinning photons at their equators or pole (always gotta be an exception, huh?) what happens to them?
Do they become electron, proton and neutron fecal matter, end up in a shitter, eventually to be flushed. Or do they somehow manage to, ya know, live happily ever after? Still spinning wildly, creating more and more larger matter that’ll devour them, shit them out, etc.? Obvious asking for a friend.
Must admit you have done wonders with me and this science-y weather thing. Stopped the snow early last evening at just under three-inches, turned it to rain and by morning…barely a trace of the white stuff is visible. Plan on working with winds later. Should be kayaking in gentle breezes, 75° temps with perfect tides and currents within a few days.
Like this science stuff, kinda magical…. Can we work on world domination next?
LikeLike
What happens to photons after they’ve been recycled and emitted from the larger particles? They zoom off, spinning and speeding until they hit something else. There are billions, nay, trillions, nay, MORE! times photons than anything else. Miles has calculated that the proton itself emits 19x its own mass per second in charge photons, and the photon is so much smaller than the proton we’re talking trillions or quadrillions of photons. I can’t recall his exact number off the top of my head, but we and all matter are effectively swimming in a sea of photons. That 19x number isn’t a coincidence. 19/20 = 95%, right? And that right there is the alleged missing mass that the mainstream attributes to “dark matter”. It’s not dark matter, it’s fucking light. It’s the opposite of dark matter.
But back to the emitted photons – they come in two basic flavors: electricity and magnetism. Photons traveling along the polar vectors (up and down, relative to the main body’s spin axis) create the electric field and all its effects. Photons traveling out from the equatorial regions create the magnetic field, and all its effects. Charge underlies electromagnetism and is the foundational cause of both fields.
Check out Nevyn’s 3D web app to see a good demonstration of magnetism:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/app/ProtonViewer/ProtonViewer.html
His site has a ton of other similar 3D apps he’s written to help demonstrate and explore charge, including this awesome Periodic Table. Click an element to see its charge configuration in glorious 3D, right inside your browser! The guy is amazing. He’s helped me on almost every one of my videos, digging in deep and pointing out my mistakes as necessary. Without him, I’d not get anywhere close to the accuracy I want. I really don’t want to mis-represent Miles’ theories in any way so as usual, ALL errors coming from me are mine alone, not his or Nevyn’s. But here’s that rad Periodic Table:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/app/AtomicViewer/periodic-table-3d.php
And an inverted (negative) screenshot of one of his 3D charge models, this is Oxygen:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Holy shit, that 3D rendering of the Oxygen charge field is fuc… er…absolutely beautiful. As are your continuing explanations. Who be-ith this Nevyn?
Somehow you manage to make this easier to comprehend and actually fun. With this latest update…I. Get it. Will now go enjoy the links you’ve provided and delve deeper into this mysterious (to me) beauty of things science, sans fear. Gonna take all your writing here and create a note, PDF or something that I can keep it handy. Old age still sucks.
Seriously, thank you for your patience in helping me grasp this one concept. Understanding this means everything to me and to moving forward. You are a great person amongst a mass of others here. Think we might be dangerous together.
Once in while the universe shines on me and I actually pay attention. Thanks. From. My. Heart.
LikeLike
@ Wayne
“Gonna take all your writing here and create a note, PDF or something that I can keep it handy.”
If you do that, please e-mail me a copy: joshg99@pm.me
LikeLike
Quite welcome, happy to help! But Miles deserves all the credit here, I just regurgitate his writing in my own words at best. “Nevyn” is another character, a legend among circles, who is an amazing coder and thinker. You can see his apps on that site I linked, or read our various discussions at the Unofficial Miles Charge Physics forum, here: http://milesmathis.forumotion.com/forum
Some of that’s pretty dry but lots of good stuff there, including the evolution of these videos and Nevyn’s apps and a few really great folks who have taught me a lot. It’s also very nice to see/find anyone receptive to this kind of stuff at all. I think one of Miles’ chief contributions is one of mentally empowering his reader, giving them some confidence that they can understand physics too, and that all the needless complexity we’ve been sold from the mainstream was just more gate-keeping, to stifle minds and convince everyone that they were stupid. And that to “get smart”, we HAVE to pay them money and go to their indoctrination-camp schools and universities. Hogwash.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is certainly no cut on Miles from this end. Would not be here if not for Miles W. Mathis and would have never had the chance to meet and interact with one Jared Magneson and all the rest here. Can read until blue in the face or dead from exhaustion. Does no good IF I cannot discuss, bounce ideas off another or play in the sandbox. Miles has enough on his plate and I certainly appreciate his even taking time to answer my few emails. Knew about the asswipes with whom he has had to deal. Knew, also, my place—had to prove my worth, if not to him at least to myself, thanks to him and now, everyone here.
I am self taught, but have been fortunate to have people around with whom I could interact, learn with and from. From little old Florida Cracker farmers, to printing craftsmen, to computer wizards, good photographers and even a few, probably spooky, artists. Give me a place to start, teach me the basics and let me fumble my way through—but be willing to let me question, set myself on fire and definitely expect some bloodletting.
If it’s any help to you, the reason everything finally came together was the explanation of the electromagnetic fields and the visuals that accompanied them. Nevyn’s beautiful contributions notwithstanding. Charge to that point was still vague. Sure anyone watching this house today saw blasts of lights emanating all over the place. Everything just clicked. The pieces from yesterday were baking but something wasn’t quite there. Today you frosted the cake and I gorged . All on a potty joke from yesterday I was still laughing about this morning. That little bit of confidence is now self propelling, though it will still need interaction. So take your teachings, copy and paste, hone them to your liking and know you hammered it.
That’s my gratitude to you and everyone here who wouldn’t let me fall by the wayside, encouraging me to keep plugging away. Am humbled and thankful to be here and a very small photon…er…part.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fomenko rhymes with Lysenko, and he has a twisted puny name, (For men, OK?), nuff said?
Think it is highly probable that both characters were put in place to stop others questioning the validity of the mainstream paradigm of our history and are both obvious controlled opposition. I’ve read some of Fomenko and while I found most of his ideas about a ‘New Chronology’ complete rubbish, some bits of his work are useful as they identifies some huge holes in the current chronology; as does the equally spooky Gunnar Heinsohn. However, I think some of Heinsohn’s ideas, particularly regarding the Roman and Saxon period, have some usefulness and are worthy of further investigation. Need to take anything they say with a large pinch of salt.
LikeLike
Fomenko’s mother’s surname was Markova, patronym Markov, related to Marx by any chance?
LikeLike
Miles has added some photos [and words] to his Titanic pdf, page 21 onwards.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Miles has also updated the Dylan pdf, bringing it all back home…
LikeLike
“…Eugene Zimmerman of Cincinnati, railroad tycoon who was on the board of Standard Oil. His daughter Helene became the Duchess of Manchester (Montagu)..”
click the daughter Helene link , click forward 10 pics ( black and white , dark dress , snugged in tight at her waste )
Bloody flip if that does not look the :” Bob Dylan Family face ” on her .
I need to see a side by side .
LikeLike
Test…
LikeLike
She looks like an ancestor of my old Technical Manager. Gulp;.
LikeLike
Thanks Nada , I didn’t think the hair would be the best match .
Maybe Bobby’s lips would look different if he was wearing the corset .
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I didn’t think the hair would be the best match ”
Lol.
LikeLike
DF — great find!!
LikeLike
What the real stinger is that this Crypto-Regal Creep who inked his name to
” Masters of War ” was secretly inbred to the eternal war profiteers and the
aristocratic human chess pieces machinating these crimes , and fooling the public everytime .
Here’s back at you Zimmy ” You ain’t worth the blood that runs in your veins ” – ” All the money you’ve made will never buy back your Soul “
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said. The guy is such a fraud and it shows in ALL of his images that show up on an “interweb” search.
Of course, the real takeaway for me is that my old Technical Manager is Helena’s ancestor! 😉
LikeLike
Crypto-Regal Creeps — you’ve done gone and coined a phrase dude.
That would make a great reality TV show; one to be pulled after the first episode….
“Welcome to this first episode of Crypto-Regal Creeps!”
cue credits and Sympathy for the Devil soundtrack
“That’s right folks. You always wondered about Jagger’s cryptic question, “what’s the nature of my game?”, well we’re going to answer that over the next 24 episodes of Crypto-Regal Creeps!
cue credits and Sympathy for the Devil Soundtrack
“Only kidding folks. This is not “It’s the Mind”…this is “Crypto Regal Creeps!”
*cue credits….
“Okay, sorry about the poor humour folks. So what is the nature of the Devil’s game? I mean surely we can see the results by just referencing the Rolling Stones’ lyrics — revolution, death and destruction. But what if these events are not as they seem? What if they never happened as historians would have us believe? What if the main actors in these events are literally actors?”
“If the Devil’s are actors then the game is surely to deceive? But who would have such power, and why would they use it in such a despicable way? You will see that what we have here is a kind of unholy feedback loop.”
“Our first Crypto-Regal Creep is none other than Bob Dylan. In today’s episode we will be using Mr Dylan as an exemplar showing why these actors are literally Royal Deceitful bastards….”
END TRANSMISSION
“The BBC would like to apologise for the absolute garbage that was that last programme. For the remaining time-slot we will be showing a repeat of “Conspiracy” starring Kenneth “I’m fecking’ Norn Irish” Branagh, Stanley “I’m Italian” Tucci etc etc etc
LikeLike
The Greek deity, Typos, is laughing at me. I must dedicate this correction:
“If the Devils are actors…”
LikeLike
what we have here is a kind of unholy feedback loop
yes and also Media feedbag loop ?
Following your lead ,
A game of ” Let’s Pretend We’re Not Jewish ” ?
Next contestant , Mary Shelley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Shelley
Middle name , Wollstonecraft , we are supposed to see this as Left-Hand Black Majick or Freemason reference , actually looks like a wool garment reference .
LikeLike
Re: Mary Shelley
Did she or Percy write Frankenstein, a book that launched a thousand films?
LikeLike
I got this picture for Helene Zimmerman – a wee bit like Samantha Bond, the actress –
I clicked on the previous pic and got this bloke, Dr A Castleman, who looks more like Bobby Dylan –
LikeLike
Samantha Bond, aka Miss Moneypenny, had a distant 4-times great uncle who was called James Bond:
https://roystockdillgenealogy.com/samantha-bond/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Where Trump’s idea of a cool hairdo originated…
LikeLike
Well, I’m glad I could get you guys going, but I don’t see much resemblance between Bob and Helena myself. I don’t even think the two pics of her above match. I think they have mistagged one of them, or both.
LikeLike
I think the first lady may be Mattie Mitchell, who also married a Duke.
LikeLike
Un-girdled story of the Dylan haired heiress
is the second story down :
http://mrsastor.com/content/page/2/
” Mattie Elizabeth Mitchell, born in Portland, Oregon, 28 August 1866, died in Paris 20 February 1933, was a daughter of U. S. Senator John H. Mitchell of Oregon. He was born John Hipple in Pennsylvania but left his wife and children there and moved to Oregon where he changed his name. In his first of three terms as U. S. Senator, his opponents tried to prevent his being seated, …”
Each Term of a Senator is 6 years so 18 years , wtf !
LikeLike
If you want to see a better match, see ANita Rhinelander Stewart, who married the Prince Braganza. She is a dead ringer for Mary Steenbergen, probably because they are closely related.
LikeLike
There are web sites that specialize in photos of celebrities who look like other celebrities. There are lots and LOTS of these lookalikes and I see more almost every time I watch TV. Not only current lookalikes but some that look like others from earlier eras.
Hardly anyone in the general public seems to take note of the significance of this even though it’s right in front of them. 🙂
LikeLike
Hello everyone ! Will NEOM be the new paradise on Earth ?
https://www.neom.com/
LikeLike
Judging by the advisory board, I would say it doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in the Arabian desert of being the new paradise on Earth. If you’re rich enough to live there, I guess it will be a sort of paradise. Like Elysium.
LikeLike
The $500 billion NEwhOMe is MbS, the Sudi crown prince’s NeoLib wet dream,and likely a Ponzi scheme – shades of the 1MDB affair anyone? Anyway, I expect after the inevitable post collapse fire-sale this could be the ideal place to set up another New Jerusalem.
LikeLike
@DF:
“…Bloody flip if that does not look the :” Bob Dylan Family face ” on her .
I need to see a side by side,”
Good find, and I also think there are similarities. By coincidence I contacted Miles last year after reading his brilliant ‘Potter’ paper and noticed that JKR’s parents,Anne & Peter Rowling, had a similar looks in the picture Miles called out as a very poor Photoshop creation…
After a few minutes of flipping, stretching cropping and over-laying I came up with this…
Which I think looks a lot like Dylan?
They do seem to enjoy playing with our heads.
LikeLike
SPINNING WHEEL.
I’m a little out of touch here since dealing with a tragic private issue. I’m still reading the new paper. Miles mentioned unnamed people behind the spinning wheel (i.e. the wheel of change, I guess, viz. Rothschild’s, Rockefeller’s etc). That inspired me to look up the song lyrics for “Spinning Wheel” here: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/bloodsweattears/spinningwheel.html
Here is one stanza:
“Did you find a directing sign on the straight and narrow highway?
Would you mind a reflecting sign?
Just let it shine within your mind
And show you the colors that are real”
LikeLike
It’s a Family tree with very little branching , being gay and marrying your gay cousin , or sister is a simple explanation .
Not much of a bedroom roll for those two Rowlings I’d say .
LikeLike
Oh no, not the face chops. Leave that to POM and Chiarini. By the way, every time I post here I have to fill in my details again, so I am being fucked with once more. Not accusing Josh, just saying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Miles, I have the same problem if I just open the site and try to comment when I’m using the Chrome browser. It’s the same for me on all WordPress sites. In fact I can’t even post comments. It was not always like that. At some point is just went haywire and I have to technical explanation. Explorer works fine for me, though. Thankfully the “back-end” dashboard I use here allows me to comment, and I don’t have to log-in anew every time.
LikeLike
Fire-fuchs does not automatically show my e-mail and name ( have to enter it each time / if I type the first letter I see there is a record ) , as it used to before this week , posts do not show me that they went to moderation , again it used to give me that message . Nerd problem ? Is it CosPlay Season ?
LikeLike
Weird. On Firefox Quantum (the latest version, build 65.0.1) it will keep me logged in so long as I keep the site open in one tab or other. Are you using the latest Firefox, DF?
If I’m not logged in currently, I just click the WordPress icon below the comment box and it pops up a new window, logs me in automatically, then that little window closes and here I am.You have to have history enabled for stuff like this to work, obviously, and saved passwords and such. I think the difference is I have an actual WordPress.com account tied to my main email, but I don’t know why that would be any different on other browsers.
My guess is that whoever can be is fucking with Miles and Josh specifically. It would have to go through WordPress.com, but it seems like they would just ban this entire site outright if they didn’t want you guys writing or commenting? I don’t know. It shouldn’t be possible from without, as far as I know, to mess with someone like that. It seems also like it would have to be tied to an IP, since it’s happening to specific people repeatedly.
LikeLike
Not sure if my WB is FF Quantum or ” latest ” but it does do updates .
My guess W.press wants me to start an account with them and sign in .
It’s not a problem for me , just weird that it changed .
LikeLike
Click your hamburger icon top right, click “Help ->” then “About Firefox” at the bottom of that list. Firefox “Quantum” is just the new nameology for their public stable release. The current version is 65.0.1.
But yes, if you don’t have a WordPress.com account it will likely make you log in each time.
LikeLike
Have to login first time posting each day. Sometimes can post multiple times but sooner or later have to login yet again, even with multiple Cutting tabs open. Sometimes get moderated, sometimes not. Have a WP account, used mostly as a sandbox for design from the old days. Forgot it even existed. Have never been “fond” of WP. Also, depending on where WP is hosted it seems to work differently.
None of the links from any of Miles’s papers downloaded or otherwise, work on my iPad, yet do on my laptop. Have tried multiple browsers and it still doesn’t seem to matter. Ironically, the WP account was the only way I could setup an account with which to post. Here and with Vexman.
Have a shared server that I’ve “owned” since ‘03–‘04-ish. Unlimited in nature, and just wasting away now. Has encryption, though basic.. I’m open to helping in any way I can but haven’t messed back or front ends for ages. Josh, you have my email if you or anyone trusted wants to discuss this further. Very serious on this, but not here publically.
LikeLike