Below is a rebuttal and response to a recent attack on Miles Mathis, titled “Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Clowns.” Note that from the first word there is already an ad hominem attack in the form of childish name-calling. Apparently Miles is a clown, and the picture of him at the top of the post is supposed to prove it, I guess. Also note that the paper was first published on Mark Tokarski’s (now defunct) “Miles Mathis discussion site,” which is apparently just New Speak for a place where discussion is forbidden. The “About” section of the site no longer exists, but it originally stated that: “As always there are ground rules. No personal attacks. I have met him, he is a human being, even as some think he is a front for a committee. Be respectful of one another.” So much for that. I guess the next post he publishes will be a hit piece titled “Miles ‘Pantsload’ Mathis.” Oh wait, they’ve already used that one
[Update May 13, 2018: The link at the top to the commentary on Miles has been deleted from that site, which is now also vacant with a “for rent” sign hanging on the front window. I have re-linked to an archived copy of that page, which I made using the wayback machine before it was erased. That site was a spin-off blog started by Mark Tokarski, who has a regular blog called Piece of Mindful (PoM or POM or now lovingly referred to as POS). I was a contributor there for about 6 months in 2016-2017 before I parted ways and opened up shop here. Mark has now re-published that hit piece on his regular blog under the title ‘Down the Rabbit Hole’ and also added some scurrilous and libelous accusations against Miles. I will not link to the new piece, though you can easily find it yourself. I will have an update in the coming days responding to the new accusations but others have responded to it in comments.]
Two things I want to say before I continue. First: this response is long, and if you think I am trying to Waste Your Time™, then by all means don’t read it. Nobody’s forcing you to. If you think this is part of some manufactured fracas to further split the truther ‘community,’ you will be relieved to hear that the gambit cannot work if you close this browser tab now and ignore it. I sincerely wish I had done both of those things when I first saw the post authored by the pseudonymous “Robert Zherunkel.” But I didn’t and now here I am, unable to ignore it and allowing myself to be hoisted on somebody’s petard—maybe even my own. It is my hamartia. Or one of them, anyway.
Second: I think it’s perfectly legitimate to be skeptical of Miles and question whether or not he his genuine. My intention is not one of “how dare you!” and my response here is not a knee-jerk defense. It comes after having spent a long time wrangling with some of the same questions raised by “Robert.” But unlike him, I did not seek answers to my questions in rhetorical gimmicks. I prefer substance. So in responding to his accusations, I will also be offering some insight into how I came to believe, and still do, that Miles is a genuine person who is genuine in his intentions. That doesn’t mean I think he is perfect or that I agree with everything he writes or every conclusion he reaches. But it does mean that when I think he’s wrong, I don’t think he’s being wrong on purpose. In other words, I don’t think he’s trying to deliberately mislead or act as some kind of limited hangout.
Whoever wrote this pathetic attack piece wants you to dismiss the scientific work of Miles Mathis based on sophistry, since he is unable to show how it is wrong. I don’t think you can reach conclusions about the work (including deciding whether it could be the work of a single person) unless you have read it. And if you haven’t, then it would be best to remain agnostic rather than fall for the sophistry—and sophistry it is, starting from the ad hominem in the title.
Extraordinary Claims…
I think I might know who “Robert Zherunkel” is: the ghost of Carl Sagan. Who else would start out by admonishing that “Extraordinary claims, it is said, require extraordinary evidence.” Yes, that is often said. But remind yourself who says it. You always hear it from the (paid) guardians of the mainstream who try to discredit all evidence that contradicts the status quo. The fact that this writer’s first move is to pull out one of the go-to talking points of paid shills and mainstream gatekeepers is, in my mind, a dead giveaway. In my opinion the whole thing sounds like it was written by a fairly experienced JTRIG operative who has underestimated or utterly failed to understand his target audience. He thinks he can trigger the desired response in Miles’ readers using ad hominems, appeals to authority, and low-level stuff like dragging out this tired mantra. He flatters you as someone who is too sophisticated to believe what you read in newspapers, but treats you like someone who has just begun to question their daily dose of propaganda. His ploy is patently transparent and simply won’t work. Not on us. Can we please speak with your supervisor, “Robert”?
Look, I agree that it is hard to believe that a person like Miles exists. The sheer genius of his insights, the scope of his work, and the scale of his productivity are admittedly hard to believe. They are extraordinary. But that doesn’t mean they’re impossible. In the world our governors have molded, they have tried to marginalize and quash people like Miles, rob them of any incentive to do what they do. They want us to believe that it is no longer possible to achieve so much, especially without the promise of monetary reward and especially if it goes against the matrix of lies they have constructed. “Robert” cannot even fathom that Miles hasn’t copyrighted his work, it is so outside his corrupted vision of conceivable human action. And then he wants you to believe it is a sign that something is amiss. Sorry, but I’m not buying the vision of humanity and human potential that he’s selling.
‘Pataphysicist Extraordinaire?
“Robert” mentions how inconceivable it is that someone who lacks a laboratory, graduate student assistants, a high-powered computer, and an advanced degree could have achieved what Miles has. (I believe he errs in thinking that Miles has never had access to a research library, since much of his earlier work was completed while living near Amherst. And anyway, hasn’t he heard of the internet?) But it actually makes sense when you read his science work, because it is bears the hallmarks of an autodidact who started from square one and questioned everything as he went along. Do you think that most people with advanced degrees in physics these days have actually read the original works accredited to Newton or Einstein? No, they are taught glosses of their work in textbooks. People like that have the tendency to humblebrag that they stand on the shoulders of giants. But the problem is that they are not taught to question the work of those giants. They are taught to accept it as dogma.
Miles also stands on the shoulders of giants, but before trying to look further, he first peered over their shoulders and checked their work. And guess what? Turns out they weren’t as giant as we are taught, since he found a lot of mistakes. He explains these mistakes very clearly. They are not hard to understand and usually involve simple errors of algebra, variable assignment, or logical contradictions. Of course Miles’ work is not just a simple correction to this work: he brings to the table many deep yet straightforward conceptual insights and expands far beyond the work he corrects.
The suggestion that his physics work is a pastiche of different theories is only something that someone who hadn’t read his work could argue without being disingenuous, and it could only resonate with people who haven’t read it. The reason is that it is coherent. It is of a piece. Not only that, you can see how one idea or paper leads another, how later papers build on earlier ones (and plus his physics papers are chock-a-block with interconnecting hyperlinks). For example, his work on Pi follows from the work he did dissecting and correcting Newton’s Lemmae, as well as his work on deriving a calculus that was appropriate for describing the physical world, along with others. He then uses his reworking of Pi to correct many mainstream equations. It’s also worth noting that his argument about kinematic Pi differs from other “tired old math paradoxes” since it is derived from different postulates and is brought to bear only in some circumstances (to describe the path of moving objects). Thus although it may appear superficially to be simply a variant of the diagonal paradox, it is not.
To give you a point of comparison, consider Miles’ conspiracy opus. Imagine someone suggested to you that he had simply cobbled together a bunch of disparate conspiracies and alternative histories from all over the place and claimed intellectual ownership. I don’t think you’d buy it. First you wouldn’t buy it because you won’t find anything anywhere about many of the things he has (un)covered, and the way he approaches the things that have been covered elsewhere are always unique and usually far more decisive and illuminating. Is there anybody else out there, for example, who has ever said that major historical figures like Hitler, Mussolini and JFK were gay Jewish actors who faked their deaths. No, there isn’t. Now imagine someone suggested to you that each of Miles’ papers on those historical figures were all written by different ‘oddballs’ and Miles just revised their work to make it sound like one person wrote them. Would you buy it? Of course not. So to suggest he cobbled his work together from different sources is an obvious non-starter. And for anyone who has followed the progression of Miles’ work and seen how he built up to these and other conclusions and how intertwined his various papers are, stiff with interconnected hyperlinks, you would have to think that anyone claiming that his work was a pastiche had in fact never read it and/or was deliberately trying to mislead you. For those of us who have read and digested his work in physics, “Robert’s” insinuation is equally absurd. Either “Robert” has not read the work (and is therefore in no position to judge it) or he has read it and is deliberately mischaracterizing it in order to mislead you.
Oddball Comparisons and Appeals to Authority
Here we go with more ad hominems when “Robert” compares Miles to other “oddballs.” But just because the mainstream has discredited these people’s work, how can we be sure they’re wrong? Because the ‘experts’ say so? Whoever this “Robert” is he sure seems to put an awful lot of faith in mainstream knowledge and expertise, wouldn’t you say? There are many implicit and explicit appeals to authority throughout the piece, such as when he says that “any time that Mathis has written on a topic that I have direct, personal knowledge of, he has gotten it wrong. Dead wrong.” Yet he fails to offer any examples, so I guess we’re just supposed to take his word for it.
He makes a lot of claims about what characterizes oddball work (it “bends terminology to make [an] argument”) and charges Miles with the same misdeed without being able to point to a single example. His argument in a nutshell is this: “The mainstream has dismissed others because their work is ‘not even wrong’ and can be trivially falsified. And if that’s true of these others, then it must be true of Miles.” Frankly I’m surprised anybody would think this kind of sophistry would work on this audience, and I’m even more surprised that Mark agreed to publish it. I have defended and made excuses for him until now, but no longer.
Now, if “Robert” will only be satisfied when “experts in the field” are willing to confirm the value or validity of Miles’ physics work, I can point to at least three I know of:
One of them is Tahir Yaqoob, a PhD in Astrophysics who has held positions at many prestigious universities and now works at the University of Maryland and the Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA. Yaqoob was the one who encouraged Miles to publish his first science book and also wrote the forward and a blurb on the back cover. Of course “Robert” might object that the support of a NASA-affiliated scientist is a hug red flag. For that matter, one might argue that the endorsement of any mainstream physicist is a red flag. But in that case he has put Miles in a no-win situation. Also, to immediately dismiss Yaqoob on that affiliation alone would be a symptom of what Emerson called “the hobgoblin of little minds.”
Another supporter introduced himself on Clues Forum in 2015 as Gopi Krishna, who earned his PhD in physics at the University of Houston. In a thread on Miles at CF he wrote:
“I came across Mathis’ work at the end of 2012/beginning of 2013, for a completely different reason: his physics. Now, my background has been in studying physics, both conventional (as a graduate student) and alternative (as a hobby), and due to a reference given by a friend, I checked out the physics theories. Now, I do not know if you guys have checked it out, and that would probably have to be a separate topic to examine it in detail, but the long and short of it is that the theory was intriguing, and very effective in explaining most of the puzzling phenomena in modern physics without enormous amount of tensor theories and so on. Since I already knew from my research that the justification for many mathematical assumptions were on a very shaky foundation, I proceeded to examine his idea of a “charge field” … and it cleared up a lot. I emailed back and forth for about 6 months, trying to hash out my questions regarding the physics, and thereafter, I have visited him two times. Once for nearly 5 days for a Physics conference, at which time everything other than physics was restricted to over-the-table conversations. The second time was around the first week of this year.”
Gopi also says there that he got his degree from the University of Houston, and I have verified his credentials through a web search. So here we have someone with a PhD in physics consulting Miles in person to help improve his understanding of physics. If Miles was a front for a committee whose main task was to mark their work with a consistent style like some kind of ghost writer, would he be able to discuss such issues with Gopi one-on-one like that? Would he be able to host a conference to discuss physics? Would his minders allow him to do that? What if one of the conference participants asked a tough question or if Miles forgot something in the over 6,000 pages written by his committee and published on his science site? Seems risky and implausible. Remember these annual conferences were capped at 8 participants. So there doesn’t seem to be much upside, while the risks run pretty high.
And finally we have Steve Oostdijk who has a degree in electrical engineering, electronics and avionics from Delft University of Technology. Steve has been one of Miles’ most steadfast and vocal supporters. What’s funny is that many have accused Steve of being a Miles Mathis sock puppet. See for example the accusations by Kevin Bos in his review of Miles’ first book on Amazon, where he writes “Steven Oostdijk is a known Mathis alias.” Which is kind of weird since Steve has an extensive LinkedIn page and other presence on social media. Any doubts were put to rest of course after Steve posted a youtube video with an experiment confirming Miles’ work on Pi. Come to think of it, “Robert” also accuses some “Team Mathis” supporters of just being “Mathis himself under an alias.” I guess that’s another line he took straight from the playbook.
(There is also an e-mail exchange that Miles published on his site with a physicist working in private industry who seems very satisfied with the guidance Miles provided and the theories that informed it. And another e-mail with a different scientist who lauds his work. You could argue that those e-mail exchanges are just fabricated. I suppose they could be, but if not that counts as two more “experts in the field” who validate his work. They could all be wrong, I suppose, but it would be lying to say his work is appreciated only by dilettantes.)
Of course it would be hypocritical of me to condemn “Robert’s” appeal to authority and then suggest to you that you should believe in the validity of Miles’ work due to the support of these experts. I only list these examples as a rebuttal to “Robert’s” argument that Miles has no support from experts. It simply isn’t true. But here, as with anything else concerned with matters of truth, you ultimately have to trust your own judgment. (Although I admit that when I was struggling to trust my own judgment about his work, this support from people with training in the field helped me make up my mind. That and the shills coming out of the woodwork to attack and ridicule him in the most dishonest and childish ways.)
In light of “Robert’s” comparison to other “oddball” scientists, we also have to consider the very real possibility that some or much of anti-mainstream science is created by the mainstream in order to be easily debunked. The obvious example is Flat Earth. Another example can be found with some of the worst arguments about 9/11—arguments which seem to have been planted deliberately as low-hanging fruit for the debunkers to pick in order to discredit all skepticism about 9/11. In the case of the planted alternative scientific theories, the conclusion is, “See there is nothing wrong with mainstream science; oh and look what will happen to your career and credibility if you dare to question it. Really now, how could you have listened to someone with such a poorly designed website?” Here I’ll quote from Miles’ recent outing of the Electric Universe project (aka Thunderbolts):
“It now looks to me like the Thunderbolts are just a continuation of the old Velikovsky con. They hook you by admitting what you already know: the upper levels of the mainstream are composed of a bunch of liars and frauds, and textbook physics is little more than an embarrassing edifice of fudged math and bad theory. Using real plasma physics as ballast, they then cobble together an electric universe replacement for the old tinkertoy gravity model, and you feel like you have made some progress. But your progress is illusory, because the Thunderbolts were created to fail. Not only are their theories shallow and extremely limited, but they are purposely created to self-destruct upon any serious reading. Compared to me, these guys are one-trick ponies, who keep publishing the same ten sentences over and over. In 40 years, they haven’t solved a single actual problem. Conversely, in less than half the time, I have solved hundreds of major problems in physics back to the time of Euclid. While these bozos are wasting their time in conferences and chatrooms and Youtube videos, I am solving new problems, doing all the math and theory from the ground up.” [I should point out that Miles also offered a substantive critique of Thunderbolts several years ago.]
Then “Robert” links to a cluesforum thread on the Stephen Hawking hoax along with the accusation that Miles cribbed it – meaning he simply stole their work and passed it off as his own. I encourage you to go to that link. You will see some vague (and also unoriginal) discussion about Stephen Hawking being a hoax, along with almost zero evidence — just a lot of speculation. In fact, the two videos the original poster linked to are completely ridiculed by the forum members. And then on the 3rd page someone links to Miles’s work and the thread suddenly starts to take off with a lot of people presenting additional evidence, etc. Someone even posts the picture with Hawking’s big front bottom teeth sticking out, which appeared in Miles’ paper though they give no credit (if anything, they are the ones cribbing his work). Notice too that Shack tries to spin it to one of his ridiculous over-the-top theories by saying that Stephen Hawking is some kind of animatronic puppet. [By the way, for some reason people find it spooky that Miles Mathis is MM and Simon Shack is SS. But recall that Simon Shack is a pseudonym for Simon Hytten, so his initials aren’t SS.]
In any event, I don’t recall Miles ever saying the idea of Hawking being some kind of a hoax was original to him. But he does claim to have offered a decisive analysis, and in that I agree, especially if you compare his paper to that thread. On top of that, you also get from Miles what you don’t get from anybody at cluesforum: a very penetrating insight into why the hoax was perpetrated – an explanation that follows the conclusions he reached from over a decade of picking apart mainstream scientific bullshit (but then also reconstructs it without simply throwing up his hands and declaring that all science is bullshit).
Go, Team Mathis, Go!
People like “Robert” always try to sell you an inverted version of reality where white is black and up is down. In his telling, “Miles Mathis” is surrounded by a posse of flunkies who place their made-up hero on a pedestal and are always standing at the ready to shout down criticism and close ranks: a “web-brigade of friends [who] can shove [his work] down people’s throats in comment-threads far and wide;” “cyber-friends [who] charge into any forum and defend their guy tooth and nail.”
In “Robert’s” topsy-turvy version of reality, criticism of Miles on comment threads “far and wide” will be quickly shut down. My experience has actually been the opposite. Outside the realm of PoM, whenever I bring up Miles’ work, it almost always brings people out of nowhere immediately who try to discredit or dismiss him and his work. Even on a forum like Reddit’s conspiracy subreddit or fakeologist (just look at the comments on the black frosting post). And this is especially true with his scientific work. In fact, it was this experience I had on several occasions that helped to convince me that he was legit: If random, anonymous people were appearing out of nowhere trying to convince me that he was wrong using pathetic arguments without any substance, then to my mind it was a good indication that he was really on to something.
Here’s a personal example: when I posted my paper that tries to apply his theories to LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions AKA ‘cold fusion’) at a LENR discussion forum, the reaction was most curious. Within minutes, someone replied with “Pi=4?” The paper I posted made no mention of Pi, and Miles’ papers on Pi are way down at the bottom of his website. So how did he so quickly find, read, digest and refer to it? A few minutes later, somebody posted “Does he really believe that Stephen Hawking died in 1985 and has been played by an impostor since then?” While it’s true that his paper about Hawking does appear on his science site, it is also down towards the bottom. How could somebody so quickly have found and read that paper? It was clear that people were almost immediately chiming in with things that seemed purposefully designed to discredit him; and it was clear they were using ammunition they had at the ready. The other thing about that thread is that many of the people commenting were first-time posters, most of whom would never be heard from again. Now go ahead and look at the commenters on the thread about Miles’ genealogy. How many are first-time posters? A lot.
I quickly came to suspect that the site where I had posted that LENR paper was itself carefully monitored and that shills were being sent in to secure the breach. My first clue actually came when I e-mailed the site owner my paper for submission and he didn’t reply. I then wrote to him in a different comment thread, and he said he never got my e-mail. So I sent him again. He looked for it and said he found both e-mails had been diverted to his trash folder. Not his spam folder. His trash folder. When was the last time somebody sent an e-mail to you that found its way mysteriously to your trash folder? I have never had that happen before or since. That was the first time weird e-mail anomalies happened to me in connection with Miles, especially his physics work, but it would not be the last, and our correspondence has been repeatedly stymied. I know I’m not the only one who has had that problem corresponding with him. He didn’t change his e-mail address for nothing, you know.
I had a somewhat similar experience over at cluesforum when someone started a discussion of his work on Pi. It was just me and Vexman explaining and then defending Miles against an onslaught of substance-free and repetitive criticism, much of it from people who said they joined cluesforum just to chime in to that debate. (I’m not imagining things: to become a cluesforum member you have to submit a statement about why you’re joining, and IIRC at least two people stated that was their reason for joining.)
I’ll give you another example. Here is an entry on what appears to be a very obscure blog from July 31, 2013. A scarce 3 hours after the post went up, the “criticism” starts and just keeps rolling in. People appearing out of the woodwork to bash Miles and his work. Some of it really puerile, like: “Miles is out of his mind. He might think that there is a god but he is just a child. If this artist ever sees a 25 feet tall man walking to his house he would think that this 25 feet tall man was a real thing. So do people who take L.S.D. think. So we now know that this Miles Mathis is just a drug taker. Hey Miles. You could just smoke some pot and get high and see what is not real.” Um, okay…
Yes, there are supporters in the comments, but most of them arrived quite late to the party, probably after doing a web search for Miles Mathis, which is how I found that blog (on the 3rd page of google results). But supporters are still heavily outnumbered by denouncers.
This Quora post is another example. To my eyes the question seems to have been posed simply a set-up for them to post a derogatory response. And then there is his entry in Rational Wiki, to which Miles replied, with typically perspicacious logic: “If they are right and I am just a deluded crank … why the obvious and pathetic smear campaign? Do you really need to smear deluded cranks? No, logically and rationally, you can ignore deluded cranks, because they are no threat to any real science. Therefore, logically and rationally, the fact that they feel it necessary to slander me with this prominent transparent project is another sign they are threatened.” Ditto for “Robert.”
And no matter where you go on the web, the criticism sounds the same; it has the same form and tone. It rarely addresses substance, or when it does it frames his arguments in a disingenuous way in order to dismiss them or make them sound totally absurd. I have been told on multiple occasions from different commenters that they are in graduate school in math or physics and that they print out his papers and pass them around the department for a laugh. When I first heard that, it made me pause and question myself. But knowing what I do of graduate school life, I found it far fetched. Grad students usually don’t have time for that, and that doesn’t sound like how they unwind. But when I heard it a second time in another place, I realized it’s one of their scripted talking points designed to make you feel like you yourself are a laughingstock for giving his work any credence.
What’s the Point?
One of the things that is clearly lacking from “Robert’s” hatchet job is what he thinks is the point of this physics psy-op. (The same can be said for Kevin’s piece on Miles’ genealogy.) Is it merely a Waste Our Time™ strategy as “Robert” suggests? If it is, I’d say it’s failing badly. First of all, most people don’t even bother trying to read it because they feel it is ‘above their pay grade.’ So right off the top it wastes exactly zero time for most people. Some people start reading it but find they either don’t understand it or disagree with it, so they stop reading. So it doesn’t waste much of their time. And then there are those of us like myself, Vexman, Jared and many others who feel that the profound and penetrating insights into the physical world we have gained are well worth the time we invested. Do you feel you’ve wasted your time reading Miles’ conspiracy work, or do you, like me, feel you have gained profound and penetrating insights into history and politics and strategies of rule?
You might counter by saying the putative “Miles Mathis project” is the same as the Electric Universe gambit, a way to steer critics of mainstream science down a dead-end alley. Well if that’s the case, then Miles certainly doesn’t act like someone who is trying to build a following. “Robert” finds it inexplicable that Miles never joins the discussion on a physics forum devoted to him in order to have his “huge” ego stroked. But he fails to point out what is really inexplicable: if Miles was the face of some larger project aimed to divert these people into a dead end, wouldn’t he (or someone on the committee pretending to be him) get down in the trenches to rally the troops? I think the answer is obviously yes. And yet, Miles certainly doesn’t seem eager to rally the troops or recruit as many people as possible into his camp. Remember that the Electric Universe folks spend their time in conferences and chatrooms and Youtube videos. If this was a committee running a project, you’d at least think that someone would be assigned to hob nob with the hoi polloi as Miles’ internet persona. But he doesn’t seem to be trying to make friends or enlist allies, as anybody who has e-mailed him is keenly aware. He ran a few physics conferences, capped at 8 guests, but has discontinued those as far as I know. That’s about the extent of it.
And speaking of those conferences, didn’t Mark attend the last one in 2016? That’s actually how I was first drawn to PoM. As somebody whose thinking has been profoundly influence by Miles’ work (both physics and history) I had been feeling ‘alone in the wilderness’ because I could find nowhere to discuss his work in a friendly environment. Everywhere I turned was a shill-fest. Then I stumbled on Mark’s comments in the fakeologist comments on ‘black frosting’ that I linked to above. Aha! Here was someone defending Mathis against charges (which were absurd to my mind) that he was just a fabricated identity fronting a committee. A quick google search on Mark’s name brought me to PoM. (There was someone else on that thread, Brandon, who had also attended and later sent me some pictures from the conference. He also defended Miles against charges of spookhood.)
I won’t rehash my brief history with PoM here. I will say that at first I was delighted to find a group of like-minded people who seemed to admire Miles’ work and take it seriously. So I find it very surprising to see Mark publishing this latest piece. He was there for four days at a conference where people were discussing Miles’ work in physics. Did Miles seem like he was working from prepared notes? Did it seem like the questions he got were planted or that he hemmed and hawed or found it difficult to answer them? Or did it instead seem like he was spontaneously relating knowledge he understood at a deep level, as if he himself had come up with those ideas himself? Was there any hint or indication that the physics work was not of his own creation? And again, if you were fronting this psyop, why would you open your house up to a bunch of strangers to ask you questions about an immense corpus of physics papers unless you felt you could answer them and discuss the work competently and confidently? That doesn’t sound like something a clown would do. Maybe a high-wire trapeze artist, but not a clown.
And speaking of artists, let’s not forget that before Miles started writing on physics, he was writing scathing critiques of modern art and artists and art critics. That the CIA has exclusively promoted modern art during the 20th century (and that their plutocrat masters have profited handsomely from that promotion) is well known. It is not even ‘conspiracy theory’ anymore, since the CIA has admitted their promotion. So are they also behind his critiques of modern art? Why? And if not, why would they choose Miles of all people as a vehicle for their scientific pastiche?
And so again I ask: if Miles’ work on science is the product of an elaborate psyop, what is the point of it? All I hear are crickets.
Coda
I have been corresponding with Miles by e-mail for a little over two years now. Part of my conclusion that he is genuine comes from the texture of those e-mails, which is something that is inherently difficult to relate. One thing that stands out was that when I sent him my paper on Gandhi, he wrote back saying that he had sent it to a friend of his who was from India, and conveyed to me his friend’s reactions. Later when I posted the work on cluesforum, I would learn that the friend he was referring to was none other than Gopi (who commented on my post, identifying himself as Miles’ “Indian friend”). You will remember that Gopi is the guy with the PhD in physics who had sought out Miles’ scientific advice and traveled to Taos on at least two occasions. Does that sounds like the way a big psyop is run? You may say it’s all part of an elaborate charade. Fine. But I don’t think so. There are many other things I could detail from our e-mail conversations, but this rebuttal is already getting long enough, and anyway I do respect Miles’ right to confidentiality when it comes to our e-mail correspondence.
I should add that Miles knows who I am and where I live, and that is part of the reason he does not entirely trust me. In fact, early on in our correspondence he said he thought I was running a project on him and nearly cut off contact. At some point I asked myself, if he himself was running a project, why would he be so suspicious of me? Wouldn’t he try to enlist any and all possible allies to misdirect them down a dead-end limited hangout? Of course you might think that I’m making all this up and that I’m in cahoots with him and a ranking member of the Miles Mathis committee. And I guess writing this defense will only serve as confirmation of that. I don’t know what I can say to change your mind, but I will point out that it doesn’t make a lot of sense to have Miles discover a worldwide conspiracy controlled by Jews who promote Zionism, and then assign him a sidekick who is Jewish and lives in Israel. It doesn’t exactly add to his credibility, now does it? And he has told me he has lost supporters for publishing my work. (For the record: I grew up in the US in a non-Zionist reform Jewish household and am decidedly not a Zionist nor do I believe in Judaism. I live in Israel because my wife was born here. And no, I’m not his sidekick).
Frankly, I cannot say that I begrudge him his mistrust. From his perspective, I can see how the red flags stack around me (though I don’t come from wealth and nobody in my family has been involved in intelligence work or anything like that). But as Miles wrote in his paper on PoM:
“It would be unfair to ditch [Josh] just because he is Jewish. Some people have claimed I jump to conclusions, but I don’t. I require a high level of evidence in everything I look at. Once I get to that level, I can make a fast decision, but I don’t proceed on hunches. Like anyone else, I start with hunches, but I don’t travel on them. I travel on a compilation of facts. Honestly, Josh is the toughest call I have had to make in my short career as a Truther. He admitted from the start he was in Israel, and my gut reaction was to dump him based only on that. Given what I have been discovering, the odds were very high he was trying to run some sort of confidence trick on me. However, odds don’t always pan out. Odds can give you a hunch, but they can’t provide a final decision. In Josh’s favor he has written two long and well researched papers on Gandhi and Dreyfus, in neither of which could I find any spin. They were good enough to publish, and I published them.”
So ask yourself: do you have enough facts at hand to conclude Miles is a limited hangout or the front for some kind of intelligence psyop? I myself have a lot of facts and evidence to suggest the opposite. Just because he has reached a different conclusion than you on the subject of the occult, or elite pedophilia, or transvestites, or chemtrails, or whatever doesn’t mean he is trying to direct people’s attention away from that. It just means he has a different opinion. To quote again from his paper on PoM: “Not everyone I disagree with is perforce an agent.” Plus, it’s not as if there isn’t a ton of other people covering those other topics, right? So why would Intelligence want to (mis)direct people away from those theories, which they appear in fact to be so heavily promoting? I believe he deserves the benefit of the doubt.
And if Miles is misdirecting or is a limited hangout, does that mean we should dismiss his entire corpus of work? That’s the implication we get, where “Robert” tells us it means that we can get some of our heroes back, even transparent propagandists like George Orwell. What? First of all, if Miles is a limited hangout, that means he has offered much good material along with false or misleading stuff. That’s how LH’s work, remember? So it’s quite a leap of logic there. You would want, I think, to go through and state exactly where you think he’s right and where you think he’s misdirecting so you don’t make the mistake of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. But “Robert” would have you believe that if Miles is a false guru, then the other gurus he has outed as false are actually real. Again, what? Look, if you want to reclaim a hero, you don’t have to prove to yourself that Miles is misdirecting. Just go back to whatever paper they appear in and figure out if and how Miles was wrong. You’d have to do that even if you think Miles is intentionally leading us astray.
In closing, I want to point out that “Robert” also claims that Kevin Starr’s recent piece on Miles’ genealogy shows us that “Mathis lies.” That’s funny, I don’t remember Kevin showing that in his paper at all. He asserts a couple of times that Miles has been disingenuous in hiding things he “must have known” about his ancestors, but has nothing to substantiate it with. In other words, Kevin doesn’t show that Mathis lies, he claims it. But through “Robert’s” alchemical sophistry, empty claims have somehow turned into convincing demonstrations. I for one, am not falling for it.
Update: Miles has a few cutting remarks to add in the latest addendum to his earlier response about his genealogy. And Vexman has now chimed in as well.
Later update: Mark Tokarski promises that more hit pieces are on the way. And I promise not to respond to them. This one took way too much time to compose as it is. I refuse to be baited into losing any more time on this subject. And anyway, judging from what I’ve seen so far I can already tell that whatever they have to say will be “not even wrong.” Just a lot of jealous bluster and disingenuous patter.
One thing I will say: I have never complained about not being able to comment over there. I simply pointed to the absurd hypocrisy of starting a blog whose purpose is “discussion” (it’s in the name of the blog for crying out loud!) and yet to forbid discussion. I believe this is the same point Miles is making, where he has seen on more than one occasion where discussion about his work has been shut down on forums that were created for discussion. But if your site was never created to allow discussion in the first place (see e.g., www.mileswmathis.com), then there is no hypocrisy, is there?
Also note the reason Mark gives for closing down discussion: “Team Mathis sits outside the gate waiting to be let in, and once that happens this blog will become a moonscape littered with debris.” Why is that? First off note the topsy-turvy depiction of reality. He gives you the impression that the site is being circled by Team Mathis jackals who will flood the gates once comments are enabled. But if you look at the comments of the genealogy post at the “discussion” site before they were shut down, it runs very much in favor of Kevin. Roughly 3 to 1 if not more, depending on whether you count posters or posts. No, the reason it would become a moonscape is because “Team Mathis” has the better of it and would continue to tear apart the “arguments” of the other side, littering the comments section with the debris of demolished sophistry, obliterated fallacies and dismembered straw men. Like in every other case where a discussion board has shut down discussion of Miles’ work, it is an act of desperation.
I could care less if Mark doesn’t allow discussion at any of his sites. I certainly won’t be commenting at any of them in the future even if he does open the gates. In fact it would be better if he didn’t allow comments, since he has allowed a once disciplined comment section at PoM to turn into a complete shill fest.
I turned off comments on this particular post since I did not want to be baited into wasting more of my time on it. I know my weaknesses. One of them is the urge to respond to disingenuous, poorly reasoned criticism about things I care deeply about, like, you know, the truth. So the only way to protect myself from that weakness is to close comments. It’s the same reason why I don’t keep any sweets in the house, either, since I know I won’t be able to resist. Will power is not my strong suit, and this second update is a testament to that. However, the comments on all the other entries in this blog are still active. And as always you can contact me directly via the contact page if you wish to pick up the gauntlet.
Further update: I woke up this morning with the realization that it was a mistake to close comments here. I knew that it might give the impression that I, too, am afraid of criticism and counter-arguments, whereas in fact I simply didn’t want to be bothered swatting flies. But the realization I had this morning is that the arguments on the other side are so bad that they defeat themselves. I don’t even need to respond. So I’m taking this as an exercise in self-control. Maybe it will even help me kick-start my diet. So I’ve opened comments — have at it! But keep it civil.
Update May 22: I’ve been meaning to get to this for awhile. Apparently after seeing that their attack on Miles (the one I responded to above) failed to land any punches or be taken seriously be all thinking people, they followed up by doubling down on some even more ridiculous, illogical and libelous accusations. These include the accusation that Miles is either a pedophile or a pederast who agreed to act as a front for TPTB in exchange for an easier sentence, namely house arrest. On top of that Miles is accused of having taken naked pictures of a young girl and put them in a book that he keeps in his house. At the same time they also accuse him of being homosexual, so go figure. The whole thing is beyond ridiculous. It is easy to look up people who have been convicted of sex crimes. I’ve done it. Miles isn’t on the list. Nor does he have a criminal record. That is also easy to confirm. You would have thought the snakes at PoM would have done that before posting such accusations and opening themselves to a libel suit, but as Miles has lamented, “How do you sue Intelligence?” I remember somebody once insinuated to Mark that his brother had probably been a pedophile since he was a Catholic priest. He was fit to be tied. But apparently it’s OK to accuse others of that based on zero evidence. The whole thing is really sickening.
And as for the book, well, of course they don’t let convicted sex offenders keep naked pictures of little girls around, do they? On top of that we have heard from Brandon, who attended the last conference that Miles hosted in 2016. Miles showed the “Tess Book” to Brandon on the last day of the conference, and Brandon says the pictures and paintings in the book are innocent and fully clothed. You can find many of them on Miles’ website and judge for yourself if they look sexualized in any way. How do we know Brandon was really at the conference, you ask? Because he sent a pictures he took of Miles sitting around a table at a restaurant flanked by conference attendees, including none other than Mark Tokarski.
With respect to house arrest, Mark was at the conference and left the house with Miles to go out to lunch on several occasions. If anybody should know that Miles isn’t on house arrest, it’s Mark. If anybody should know that Miles isn’t wearing an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet, it’s Mark. Why he would allow these absurd accusations to appear on his site is something I can’t explain. Maybe he’s still out to lunch.
I won’t bother responding to the rest of the stupidity with which they’ve padded their attack, but I will counter the whole thing with an equally plausible theory: I believe John Candy faked his death, lost some weight, dyed his hair, and re-emerged a few years later as the persona known as “Mark Tokarski.” They’re about the same age. And it would explain the Zamboni parked in front of his house on Google Earth satellite photos. Also note their striking resemblance and the way their ears, teeth, chin and nose match up. It’s a million-to-one shot, doc, million-to-one! Remember folks, face-chops don’t lie, only people do:
[Edit: It has come to my attention that some people aren’t getting the joke. They think I’m actually arguing that John Candy faked his death and was reassigned to the persona of Mark Tokarski. I am not. I am trying to make a point about the absurdity of the attacks against Miles by making an equally absurd argument about Mark. The inside joke here is that Mark used to use this same method where would take two famous people and line up their faces in this way. His hypothesis was that many of the old rockers and famous people from the 60’s or later faked their deaths and then were later re-assigned to a different role. So Janis Joplin became Amy Goodman, Jimmy Hendrix became Cornell West, Freddie Mercury became Dr. Phil, etc. etc. It says something about Mark’s discernment, which in turn tells us something about the merits of his recent decision to turn against Miles. The Candy-Tokarski “face chop” is a parody. It isn’t even original to me; I took it from here.]
Update May 26: In a separate post, I have collated information on the amount of people who visited and viewed this post in the first two weeks, as well as their countries of origin. I have also collated the supportive comments from this post and put them together here.
Update June 13: I am reprinting here a slightly edited version of my response to Allan Weispecker’s “open letter,” which he published on his blog in March 2017. I am also including some additional material from comments I have made here and elsewhere. He does not allow comments there, so I posted this originally in the comments at fakeologist (which devoted a post to the open letter), and also e-mailed to Allan, following which we had a brief back-and-forth over e-mail. Allan said he would correct the obvious errors that I pointed out in his original open letter, but since Allan is not a man of his word nor someone to be trusted, he of course never did. I am not going to link to his original letter nor to my response, but they can easily be found with google.
Allan showed up at some point in comments on this post, claiming that nobody had ever responded to his open letter, which of course was a lie. So why am I posting this now? Well the blog was just hit with a tsunami of trollish comments that refer back to some of Weispecker’s arguments. Although I don’t take these trolls seriously, I am adding this as a way of showing that they are full of shit. They claim nobody has ever responded to their points, but that’s false. They are deliberately lying. I am also adding this so that nobody can come to the comments section making the claims that they do. So without further ado, here is my original letter with some minor edits plus additional material:
I find your crusade against Miles to be misguided. And frankly many of your arguments just don’t wash. Now if I wanted to follow your method I’d say that because I find many of your arguments specious, it means you’re trying to use NLP to convince me that Miles is an LH when he’s really not. But I chalk it up to sour grapes. You wanted to come to Miles’s conference and he slammed the door in your face, so to speak. He said you’d ask questions no one would want to hear and be disruptive. So in the first case he doesn’t find what you do very interesting, which has got to sting. And as for being disruptive, well, you did write a book about yourself called “Can’t You Get Along with Anyone?” Is it any wonder he might think you’d be hard to get along with?
So let’s take a look at your arguments against him, starting with the weakest one, which appears in Part 2 of your open letter:
As background, it should be noted that you boasted that you don’t post much but when you do “it’s on the money.” You said that his “Paper Updates” are identical to the previous drafts. “In other words, his boasting on new information is totally bogus.” I literally did a face palm when I read that. The reason they are identical is that both the original links and the updated links point to the same document. You see, he doesn’t put up a new document with a new name for each update. He simply updates the paper, saves it with the same name, and uploads the new document as a replacement for the old one. So when you click on the original document, it links you to the updated one. You do understand how these things work, don’t you? Yes, you should. You seem to be pretty computer savvy. Plus, if you’ve ever read through one of his papers before the update (as I have on many occasions), then after the update, you can very clearly see the new information (which he always puts in [brackets] with the date of the update).
Now, if I were to use your “method” of deduction, I would say something like this: there is no possible way that this Allan character (or whoever the jokers are on the Weisbecker committee) could have made this mistake. He’s (they’re?) always telling us how careful he is and how it takes him forever to post because he waits until he’s absolutely sure and “on the money.” Plus he’s obviously very savvy with computers, having edited many videos on his own computer. He has his own website! This can’t possibly be an honest mistake. There is no way he could be that completely and utterly stupid. He’s clearly using deceit and NLP to make us think that Miles is deceiving us on that. No, it’s obvious to me now (although it took me awhile to suck in my gut and admit it to myself), that he’s LH. But why? Why the bald-faced lies?
Almost all of your other criticism chalks up to: I don’t agree with him or I think his argument is specious, therefore he is using NLP and trying to misdirect. Can you see how the conclusion doesn’t really follow from the premises? What a non sequitur it is? (Miles tried to show you that in his “beautiful logic” response to you [“Because I don’t know everything I am a limited hangout? Beautiful logic.”], but it obviously didn’t sink in.)
See, I just caught you lying to your readers, didn’t I? You seem to think Miles is infallible and therefore any sign of fallibility is clearly a sign of misdirection. That’s a pretty high bar and one that you’ve just hit your head on in an unforced error, ya dingus! Or rather I should say, you lying hypocrite!
You say that he must know why the JFK assassination was hoaxed, and is just misdirecting on the reasons why. Again, it’s a non sequitur. Why should he know? You might disagree with his argument about the motives for it (as I do), but that doesn’t mean he’s trying to misdirect. In all your flailing and finger-pointing, did you offer us a better idea of what the motive is? Instead of just saying: “I disagree, here’s why, and here’s a better hypothesis” all you can do is shout “NLP!” and dance around pointing fingers.
The real irony, though, is that you take his inability to provide a convincing motive for the JFK assassination as evidence of misdirection, while you yourself offer up not a single argument about what Miles’s motives are in his misdirection. You say his genealogy work is bunk and his focus on Jews is unimportant. So if you think he’s pointing us in the wrong direction, can you tell us what he’s misdirecting us away from? Or, as you did with Corbett, what lies he is trying to get us to unthinkingly accept? If you’re so far ahead of us, why don’t you tell us what his motive is? And if you can’t or if I disagree with you, then by your standards that means you must be a LH.
Same thing with your arguments about what you call his “guilt by association” tactics, his “faulty” inferences about genealogy, and most of your other criticisms as well. You’re grasping at straws, which you take as “big clues,” and then have the temerity to say that Miles is a LH because he does the same. It would be far more constructive, and in my view, to engage in a substantive critique. It is actually possible to disagree with someone and tell them “I think you’re wrong about this” without saying “therefore you’re obviously an LH engaged in NLP.” That would actually be far more interesting. And mature.
As for your assetion that Clues Forum is in cahoots with Miles: I agree with you that CF is a limited hangout and part of what I call “operation fantasy land.” Flat Earth is part of operation fantasy land. So is the CF position that rockets don’t work in a vacuum. But your attacks on them are completely irrelevant to Miles. What, because you don’t agree with their criticism of Miles it’s evidence that they are colluding with him? Come on! They have trashed him and his work every which way and left. By the way, your time would be better spent reading Miles’s work on physics than coming up with a hatful of specious and tenuous (and disingenuous?) arguments for why he’s an LH.
Your pinpointing of his British-isms is very tenuous. Yes, it’s true that you wouldn’t expect someone from Texas to use those colloquialisms, but the words “nobody from Texas would” could be used to describe most other things about Miles. He’s very unique, to say the least. And not just for a Texan. If you’ve read his poetry, you will see that he has a very broad vocabulary. So I don’t find it impossible to believe that he peppers his language with British slang. And if he has spent time with British people in the past, he might have picked up on a few expressions. It seems to me to be just as plausible that it is a quirk—even if he is from Texas.
[Here I’m going to add parts of my response to a troll named “Ricky” who brought up the Britishisms in a comment, which is also something the latest wave of trolls are coming back to:
“Alright folks, we’ve got a live one here. His IP address pins him to Arlington or Alexandra, VA, which is of course spitting distance from Langley. And he uses a non-existent e-mail address….
Miles later wrote to me about [the Britishisms] in an e-mail, which I will share here:
—-
“I don’t feel like I have to explain everything to trolls, and most times prefer not to answer them, but on the topic of my “Britishisms”, it is really no different than my occasional use of French or Latin. I know this stuff, so I sometimes insert it as color. I do that less than I used to, one because some readers see it as showing off and two because others see it as chaff. They don’t know these things and don’t want to look anything up. The Britishisms are somewhat different, because I use them for a slightly different reason. I usually use them to avoid American obscenities, since–being foreign–they seem slightly less raw. Some of my readers complain any time I use the word shit or fuck, and shite just seems to me to be a one-step tone down, for example. To my ear, it is a little less raw and a little more funny, just because it is British. Maybe that is just me.
“I did live in Europe and hang with Brits, so these words did jump in my bag, so to speak. The other thing is that I have read a lot, as anyone can tell, and that reading has been heavy with British novels, going back centuries. Also, I wrote the Lord of the Rings sequel, putting it as far as possible into British English, down to the spellings, in order to match the feel of Tolkien. Some of that rubbed off, like the way I usually put final quotation marks inside the period, for instance. In some cases, the British usage makes more sense to me, and I have never understood why American final quotes are hanging outside the period. But since I am not anal about this stuff, it can vary depending on my mood. I get emails from people bothered by this, but I just ignore it. If, given all my content, they wish to talk about that, I can’t be bothered.”
—
Well, to his credit he can’t be baited into wasting his time responding to these idiotic “arguments,” but I can unfortunately. What he said rings true to me, because I can relate: I had an advisor in grad school who was Australian, and some of his expressions have rubbed off on me. I still find myself using them some 15 years after graduating. Words like “reckon,” “wombat,” “get stuffed,” and “dingus,” As in: “I reckon you’re a right dingus, ‘Ricky.’ Get stuffed, you wombat.”]
<Back to my original response:>
One more thing: you repeat again and again in the Part II post that nobody on the Clues Forum thread addressed your argument about the microphone shadow. (Frankly I’m still confused about what your argument is as to why he didn’t point that out.) But that’s also a lie. In that thread I responded to your specious argument about his “impossible” word count, and in this comment I specifically responded to your shadow argument:
“And as for the microphone shadow, I’m not convinced you’re right, mainly because it’s a bit difficult to say exactly what position the mic is in. If you look at the shadow cast by Jack Ruby, it goes behind him and to the right. Well the shadow is also behind the mic and to the right. The angle looks a little off, but it’s hard to say for sure given that the location of the mic vis-a-vis the lights is hard to triangulate. But if it’s off, it’s only a little bit off. Maybe MM didn’t answer you because he also didn’t think you were right.
“If you’re right, then it’s hard to say why someone would have added that in there. Your conclusion is that it is a sign that the clues pointing towards a hoax were placed deliberately for us to think the event was hoaxed when in fact it was real. In other words, you’re saying the hoax is a hoax. I suppose it’s possible, but I doubt it. If it was indeed pasted in, I would guess it’s one of those little details they’ve added to troll us. They love trolling us.”
Do you realize how badly you’ve torpedoed your credibility with these demonstrably false accusations? Why should anybody believe any claim you make if you can’t get basic facts straight? Or as you would say: Your claim that nobody ever addressed the microphone shadow is another lie. But why, Allan, why the bald-faced lie?
I could go on and enumerate other problems with your argument and provide you will all the other evidence I have and reasons I believe that he is NOT an LH. (Though of course I cannot rule out the possibility). I could also go on and dissect your arguments to expose the “hidden” workings of your NLP. But I think I’ve made my point, and I’ve got better things to do.
[That’s the end of my response, but I want to add something else. If you look at the video coverage of the Oswald ‘assassination,’ you’ll see that there are bright flood lights in front of the scene from different angles. This means that the camera flash was not the only thing lighting this scene. I just went back to the JFK paper to look again at the picture in question and found this addendum Miles added to the JFK paper in February: More indication of that was found by other researchers after I published this paper. Although I used very little of the research of others in compiling this paper originally, a small amount of good research has come out afterwards, possibly in response to my findings. A YouTube video posted by Amy Joyce in 2017 compares the still photos to the films, tracking the camera flashes. She finds flashes for the photos of Jack Beers and others, but none for the iconic Bob Jackson photo above. I will be told he shot without a flash, but we can see that isn’t true. The shadows we see are from a flash, since they are cast directly backwards. If he had been relying on the lights above, the shadows would cast down. This means the event was run at least twice, which explains the discontinuities I find just below.]
Now nobody can come a callin’ parroting Weispecker and claiming in good faith that his points haven’t been addressed. They may not find it satisfactory, but if so they should say why. Therefore it is with a clean consciences I can say that henceforth, ANY comment that repeats Allan’s specious arguments without substantively addressing my response or Miles’ addendum–and especially any claims that Allan’s points haven’t been addressed–will be deleted. It’s that simple.
Probably like Todd R. said…. I hate my ‘freakin’ ISP….. lol
LikeLike
An update: trying to find a new ISP, but having problems. I hired a local ISP to install a new box, but after three weeks of no action, I fired them. I think they were instructed to stall. Now moving on to a third ISP. If Comcast is blocking me from above, there may be nothing I can do about it. THey own the local lines, and the ISP just ties into it. Since COmcast is CIA, we may have our culprit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the update. You might have to eventually take the legal route if you’re being deliberately blocked. Stupid question: is it possible to use a “satellite dish” to connect to the internet? Cannot wait to read the new batch of papers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are dish ISPs. I don’t know if they exist in Miles’ area and, if they do, they may still be ComCast controlled.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Even the best satellite companies limit your bandwidth and don’t offer unlimited access, that I’ve seen or found. 50GB caps. Tiny up/down speeds, and generally for more money than a wired ISP.
If Miles has a DSL provider in his area that might be the way to go. Up here, we basically have Comcast (cable) and CenturyLink (DSL). Although both spooky, they are definitely competitors for service and clientele. The DSL I had at my old house was effectively twice as fast as cable anyway, and for $25 a month or so. CenturyLink was the obvious choice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup, if there are other “land-based” alternatives then definitely try ’em out.
I earlier made a joke about Miles’ Librarian probably being spooky, turns out that wasn’t funny at all.
LikeLike
Yes, this library is definitely spooky, like the town, state,country, and world. Century Link is the primary provider here, but they are my problem. I think Comcast/Century Link are blocking me. I tried Kit Carson, a local ISP, but they went spooky on me as well, dragging their feet and giving me no customer service even before installation. Just awful. I don’t want wireless. TaosNet offers wireless only. So my options are dwindling. Another reason to move. Lawsuits won’t help, since Comcast and Century Link are CIA fronts, owned by the people who own the courts. They can’t stop me from researching, writing, and posting, unless they close the entire internet.
LikeLiked by 4 people
You may be able to use an ethernet wired connection from a wireless cell phone type of repeater or reciever that you can keep at some distance from your living quarters. I’ve known some mountain folk who with a $150 or so investment of equipment on top of a pole could solve some rural communication problems. 4G appears to provide adequate speed. Could you put up with the wireless if that part of it were kept a good distance from your body?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are you really wanting to move? I mean, that’s kind of a personal question and none of my business, but if you haven’t seen the Pacific Northwest much, come visit sometime. At least do coffee and climb Mt. Rainier or something.
(joking, I can’t even try to climb that beast!)
LikeLike
I’m a bit surprised they are trying for censorship. Like hell they can censor you now! Bit too late for that. As you said they would have to censor the entire internet at this point.
@Jared: How’s the cost of living up there? I’ve been looking to move out of Ohio and I’ve been researching acupuncturist/herbalist schools in the area.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s not like Miles is going to be streaming 4k video, Jared — he just needs enough bandwidth to connect to his website, Wikipedia, Geneanet, and maybe some reruns of Cheers. A satellite connection could probably provide the necessary bandwidth to do all of that, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That experience with your local provider sounds very nasty indeed. I’m reminded of that moment in High Noon when all the locals behave like hypocritical cowards. I am a bit surprised and wonder what lies were told, what pressures were brought to bear.
Moving! I never considered such a drastic solution. You could pursue other options before taking such a step (e.g. see Alan Ackley above) unless you’ve had enough of the tao of Taos.
Surely not everyone in Taos is afraid of the spooks? There must be someone local — doesn’t have to agree with your world view — who would defend your right to free expression. Maybe time to publicise your plight?
Or just get the f**k out of there 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Philip Cox said: “@Jared: How’s the cost of living up there? I’ve been looking to move out of Ohio and I’ve been researching acupuncturist/herbalist schools in the area.”
To be honest, it’s terrible unless you want to live in the near-wilderness, which I just so happen to want. Seattle is a joke, I mean seriously don’t do that to yourself. Bellevue (the ritzy city) is obscene. Tacoma is cheap but ghetto, and Olympia is kind of a middle ground. I prefer to live as far away from the big cities as possible but am back in the middle, between Seattle and Tacoma, but only about 100 miles from Mt. Rainier. It’s gorgeous up here. I mean, just beautiful. I could spend all summer hiking around the Mountain!
@ RT: To be honest, I hadn’t presumed to contemplate what Miles would or wouldn’t do with his internet. I’m all about people having privacy on stuff like that, but I sure know what I do and it’s fucking hilarious. I mean, if I really stop and think about it!
Present company/topics excluded, that is! The Gods probably think I’m a fool. Also the regular folk, with any luck!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Aye that’s what everyone says unfortunately. Sometimes I run into coastal ‘ex-pats’ around here, who moved here almost entirely due to cost of living. Usually doctors and the like. I have a friend moving out to Seattle soon (but with roommate) and I’m going to wish her the best. It’s a hard choice.. live somewhere much more awesome but likely in poverty, at least for awhile, or stay here in relative but incredibly boring and dull comfort. Ohio is so incredibly institutionalized.
However I’m more like you and would rather live in a small town anyways. It’s just the cities are where all the jobs are. And women, hah.
Nice pictures. There’s almost no wilderness near me and I look at these like a sad puppy.
LikeLike
We could mail Miles a jetpack https://www.google.com/search?q=verizon+jetpack&oq=verizon+jetpack&aqs=chrome..69i57.2055j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. He could plug directly into that device meaning he wouldn’t even need to use wi-fi to connect to the internet. However, that device receives internet just like a normal cell phone, so it wouldn’t really avoid the whole wireless debacle.
I’m racking my brain for a solution, but coming up with nothing..
LikeLike
This device will receive 4G from AT&T or T-Mobile, and deliver the internet to a cord, not wireless. Waterproof for outdoor install. Power over Ethernet, so that the one hardwire internet cord can power it. It does not have a wifi broadcaster as part of it. You’d have to buy the ethernet cord separately, and maybe a dab of silicone caulk to waterproof the connection. Then pay for the use of a T-Mobile or AT&T sim card.
But if “they” are really after you, can’t say that any cell internet provider would be immune to interference.
https://www.amazon.com/Yeacomm-T-Mobile-Compatible-Computer-Adapter/dp/B079K6WFYQ/ref=sr_1_4?keywords=4g+outdoor+modem&qid=1565900048&s=gateway&sr=8-4
LikeLike
@Alan Ackley
Hmmm, didn’t know things like this actually existed. Very interesting. However, no matter what, Miles tracks have to be masked, otherwise they’ll eventually catch up to him again and throttle. He just wants to be able to upload his papers and doesn’t really care about security but I do—for his sake.
My assumption here would be that this unit is still going to be subject to basically having a smartphone account attached to it, so he may as well go that route, no? He still needs to understand that without a VPN, they can track his traffic to his website. Therein lies the problem. They have his number and the trolls haven’t worked so this is the phase two and an easy one at that. Creative deviousness needs to be completely considered. BTW, great find.
LikeLike
Does anyone know if free WiFi hotspots allow uploads? And if so, is there a limit? I rarely use them and have no idea what the limitations are.
LikeLike
Yes, all WiFi connections allow for two-way connections. His papers are usually tiny , often less than a megabyte.
LikeLike
Is Xfinity an option there, Miles?
LikeLike
If CenturyLink and even his local smaller ISPs are screwing him, you can be sure Verizon will too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wayne, I’ve already gotten him an iPhone, and a laptop. I’m just sourcing some burner SIM cards and then shipping it to him. We are thinking exactly the same solution here! I figure using a personal hotspot from the 4G, and then using a cable to tether that connection directly to a laptop that I’m sending him as well. This will allow him to connect directly with 4g connection instead of needing to hop again to a personal area network, cutting down on the latency. Please go for your solution too, don’t let the fact that I’m trying stop you, because maybe mine won’t work for some weird reason, but yours will, or vice versa. We all have to come together to get Miles up and running.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Xfinity is Comcast, but yes Verizon is just as bad as the Commies or the Linkers, in terms of outright spoopery.
LikeLike
Miles, this is crazy.
CenturyLink has been your provider to this point and iirc, told you the issue was inside your home. The only possible issues inside would be your computer, the cable modem or Ethernet cables themselves. Even at ten-years old, I seriously doubt your Mac Mini was the culprit. I’ve fired up even older non-Intel Macs, had them work perfectly and connect to the net. The first issue to solve is to make sure the Ethernet cables are ok. They can be fun chewy items for kitties. Next is to absolve the cable modem from the equation. Cable modems (from ISP’s) are always the weakest links in a network. Request a new cable modem from them. Start there.
You are NOT required to use their equipment, you can purchase a cable modem online, contact CenturyLink, give them the MAC address of the unit, connect to your computer and see if a connection can be made. If not, than more than likely your issue is one of two things, the computer and its OS or CL is lying through their collective teeth. Which presents a spooky, in nature, issue. This is assuming the Ethernet cables are ok.
You also do not have to use WiFi as a wireless network. I connect via Ethernet my (mostly unused) TV and home NAS (server) via a CONcast wireless cable modem. Almost all cable modems have a wired side, they have to. You should then wire a router and created a secure network via that router. The cable modem should act only as a mule, though have a massive weird password of at least 14-characters.
Damn, if I didn’t live on the other side of the country, I’d have already been to your home to sort this out. I’m also sending you a Proton mail to Proton mail with my info and phone number. I have a server with unlimited bandwidth and storage that’s basically lying fallow at this point. Hell, we’ll take up a collection, buy you the modem and a couple years VPN subscription or I’ll buy them for you myself. Don’t care, just want you up and running…securely.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I second this, Miles let us know how we can help.
LikeLike
A postscript to the above.
Though you can and really should purchase your own cable modem, the ISPs may still throttle your service just to make it look like your modem is the culprit—so they can continue collecting their rent for using their equipment. Cause they’re sooo service oriented and we aren’t allowed to OWN anything.
LikeLike
Hi Wayne,
I went through this information with Miles as well — it seems they’ve severed his connection or something. He purchased a new router, new cables, all of the things that I would recommend he has already tried, including contacting their support. They seem unwilling to help, as if they’ve been instructed to let it happen. I would offer to call the support line myself just to hear what those assholes are saying, but I don’t want to intrude on Miles’ privacy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks R T. Been in contact with him so just found out about the throttle issues. Trying to figure out some workarounds. Been concerned about this from the beginning. We’re exploring some options that I will not go into here, since I have serious trust issues and don’t want to spill anything publically. If you have some input, I’d love to discuss, just not sure how to get info between us without it being public. Is there a secure area here?
LikeLike
Going for access over the landline is easier to trace and disrupt, especially when 99,9% of the infrastructure can’t be physically checked to be trap-free.
I still think going over the air (4G modem with a WiFi router able to be wired as well), just like Alan has linked to above, is the least traceable and most likely to function at 100% connection speed. Going mobile for access would solve changing the provider as well. Leaving personal preference aside, the focus here is to have a continuous access to the web.
If there is actually an attempt to block his landline-based access, he/we/nobody won’t be able to stop this from happening again and again. Going mobile would still be the best option, as one can easily buy a new pre-paid (!) SIM card*, change the number and thus IP (and eventually a provider) and re-gain the access in minutes. Maybe regular SIM change would be even the best option or highly recommended at this point, so they wouldn’t even have a chance to interrupt the access by blocking it (as they’re eventually able to identify the SIM card and attach it to a physical location).
If he used a different proxy for each single access to his web page, his tracks would be more than well covered, combined with an IP granted to the SIM AP. Most of his readers are probably US based, with USA IPs, so coming over a proxy while using a US-based IP is preferred – it would cover his tracks in the best possible way, while using their own tools. That’s the part I love the most.
I’m convinced prepaid data SIM cards can be even more easily purchased in the USA market than around here, for less dough. That’s what I’d do, anyway.
LikeLike
I agree that Mile’s complete internet solution (for getting started) may be to have a “4G modem” (that was the search term I had used) as well as the use of prepaid data sim cards and a quality VPN service.
I would like to have a source for prepaid data sim cards myself…
LikeLike
From the little bit of digging done, it appears Taos has some serious issues across the board with ISPs. He is on a landline and assuming that CenturyLink is his ISP, there’s a good probability they also provide his (land-based) phone service. Double whammy.
There are plenty of MVNO and VNO vendors of prepaid cards available in the US. The one major issue is that all either work off AT&T/T-Mobile or Sprint/Verizon. Currently the cable/internet providers (or at least one) seem to be blocking his access points, including his landline. What’s to stop those four other than switching companies/numbers constantly?
The 4G unit mentioned above is a great alternative and agree 4G is most likely the best way to go. Would need to run some numbers to figure out his needs for pricing. The reality of which is, he would need to have spare sim cards with new numbers available at all times. Not sure if they are by date of purchase or by use and what happens to over/under use. Basically, with this unit he’s running a “burner” phone to provide internet service. Plus all his research may take a large chunk out of his data plan quickly, no?
Just for a quick look, Mint Mobile offers unlimited talk/text and 10GB data for $25 per month. There are cheaper and more expensive companies but it certainly is cheaper than the big four per single line and could offer reasonable protection when paired with a good VPN.
It’s all the ifs, ands, buts that make this precarious. They know his number and his physical address. Don’t know if he has a credit/debit card but doubt it, so how does he pay for this and/or what happens when delivered to said physical address? Even through PayPal they have him pegged. I don’t really think they want him gone as he serves a purpose for them to redact/blackwash anything he discovers but they’re intent on making his life miserable in the process. Their intent is to create as much noise as possible and he’s just pesky collateral damage.
LikeLike
I’m willing to commit up to $100 to help with hardware,sim cards, data plans, VPN service or more if Miles decides to go for a “mobile” wired network.
LikeLike
@Cory W.
Thanks for your kind offer it’s much appreciated. Gonna try to do this for Miles’ in the most secure way possible as well as trying to keep it simple so he can do his thing with minimal distractions, changes and maximum security.
@Vexman @Alan Ackley
Have access to an iPad at little or no cost. Haven’t yet seen it, but it’s brand new, still in the box. Hoping it might be both WiFi and SIM card enabled. If not, I’ll see if I can cut a deal to get the SIM card version. With that version, he can go mobile and use the iPad as his internet connection using the “burner” phone principle outlined above by Vexman and Alan. He would be able to write and layout his papers on his Mac Mini as before, then using the built-in Airdrop app, transfer the finished PDFs to the iPad and upload them directly to his site. It would basically replace the 4G modem you all suggested, still using third party SIM cards the same way the 4G modem would. Will put all the necessary apps onboard including a VPN. This will also give him mobility so he could use any WiFi hotspot available around where he lives which may help with research time not burning up too much data, though I think 10GBs should be sufficient per month.
Will also create a mirror of his site on my server in case things get weirder. The mirror will be behind closed doors and serve only in case of emergency. Every update he makes will be made to the mirror site. Might also secure another URL as close as possible to what he is now using, again, just in case.
Would really like some input on VPNs from y’all. I’m currently using Private Internet Access (PIA) and like it so far but any other offerings would be much appreciated. Welcome any and all input on this and open to any pros or cons. Feel like this way gets him up and connected with minimal changes to his way of doing things. Will still need backup SIM cards/numbers. The iPad would also serve as a phone as needed. Feel his landline is now also compromised.
Would like to get input ASAP and then have these posts deleted if at all possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I believe Miles prefers not exposing himself to wifi radiation. That is why I selected a device that allowed only a wired ethernet connection, without wifi, but was still a sim 4G connection in order to allow him to avoid the limited selection of wired internet carriers in his town.
Otherwise he could just use a series of burner cheap android phones or like you say, an ipad.
LikeLike
@Alan
First, not being defensive here, just looking to get Miles up and running as quickly as possible and as painlessly as possible. Have you ever used or setup this 4G modem you have linked to? Haven’t had the time to really investigate this unit and see if there are any best concepts online. Certainly would rather he be wired but…. The reviews say there are no real instructions and the placement may need experimentation. It looks simple enough to me but have a networking background. Also not sure about 4G coverage near his home.
Maybe as a temporary fix/test, we should just get him a burner phone until we can figure out a more permanent use for this solution, as he’s certainly not going to get any help from on the ground solutions. This way we can see what his coverage is and where the modem’s best placement may be in his home. Would prefer this device to be indoors if at all possible, if for no other reason than to keep prying eyes at bay. Would rather spend a few bucks to experiment with a burner device than a buck seventy if 4G isn’t our answer. Which will severely handicap things if true.
Do not know anything about burner devices, so basically clueless in this area.
LikeLike
After a month or so of consideration, that is the exact same idea I came to as well, Vex. Great minds think alike!
LikeLike
Miles’ papers are never that big in byte terms so why not cycle/bus away from his home phone masts, then upload using a pay-as-you-go mobile phone? He can switch the phone on, use it, then switch it off until he needs it again. Very cheap and could possibly by-pass any usual internet blocking techniques – if that really is what’s causing his problems, and not a mouse chewing through a cable somewhere.
Also, 99.9% of the time the phone would stay in his home, switched off, so it’s not like anyone could track him when he went out & about, and he wouldn’t have any radiation to worry about.
Copy and paste the files from laptop to phone via connection cable….job’s a good ‘un!
LikeLike
A few points. Miles’ only way of having an internet connection (short of moving) is through a mobile device or through the SIM card modem Alan suggested. In either case the device or SIM card must be GSM—attached to either AT&T or T-Mobile network and at least 3G/4G enabled. CDMA phones (Verizon/Sprint) are locked, literally and figuratively to the device via the number, through the provider. Simply put they decide what you can do. The coverage of both GMS services in Taos looks good (on paper). He doesn’t need to be attached to either AT&T/TM as there are third party SIM cards available. See Mint Mobile for one. It would be wise to buy a couple of different cards to have on hand. The one caveat with the 4G modem is if Taos doesn’t fall into the 4G bands the modem handles, 4G won’t be available. Need to run an app there to find out. Also, since he’ll be running a third party Sim his speeds may be less than thrilling at times as ATT and T-M will favor their customers over third parties.
Miles is on a Mac Mini. Know he bought a newer one, if it’s a 2012 or newer model with an OS from 2012 or newer he can use Airdrop to move files between the Mini and mobile device via internal Bluetooth. The mobile device should also be able to provide a hotspot that the Mini can connect to. A strong VPN would be needed for both devices. Remember also, the ISP hosting his site could be forced to surrender logs pertinent to his account.
A pay as you go phone is great for uploading etc., however Miles needs to research as well. He cannot always head to the library. So he’ll need a SIM card that has a good sized data plan as well, again, with a good VPN. Uploads shouldn’t be huge but any needs for apps or system upgrades will eat into the data plan.
A PDF cannot be copied and pasted. It’s a portable document that encapsulates fonts, images, links, etc into the doc. It is used as a proofing system for most everything that gets printed and is an excellent medium for Miles’ works, as it requires a full blown Acrobat program to edit. Any mobile device will need a PDF reader app as well as an FTP client.
At this point I’m stepping aside and letting you all take it from here. If you need help with money or Mac knowledge I’ll do all I can. Someone needs to get in touch with Miles and find out what he can and will deal with and get the ball rolling. I’ve emailed him the basics I’ve outlined here. To be honest this mess has gone on far too long. He needs to be protected, any devices, apps or cards may need to be bought through an anonymous account. I think that SIM cards may also require telling where it will be used as well. Thanks for reading. Good luck.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Forgot two important points. First, the GMS mobile device must be UNLOCKED. That unlocked thing being very important, it cannot be tied to any carrier. Secondly, the Airdrop feature of exchanging files via Internal Bluetooth only works with another Mac device. Files can still be exchanged with Android OS via email and text. Which I’m sure will thrill Miles noend. Make a decision with or for him but GET THIS DONE.
LikeLike
Wayne “Big Poppa” G said: “A PDF cannot be copied and pasted. It’s a portable document that encapsulates fonts, images, links, etc into the doc. It is used as a proofing system for most everything that gets printed and is an excellent medium for Miles’ works, as it requires a full blown Acrobat program to edit.”
One counter: .PDF files can be altered or edited by a number of progams, NitroPDF being by far the best one. Integrates fully with Word/Excel/etc., and you can basically rework a .PDF in the same way as any other document. This isn’t really a counter, just more information.
But Miles uses .PDF files on his sites now because they aren’t HTML and are much, MUCH harder to tamper with from without. You’d have to access his server directly and RE-UPLOAD an altered .PDF, which would create a file record as well. All of that can be done, and silently too, but it’s FAR more difficult than simply tweaking some old HTML remotely, which any decent hacker COULD do. His site seems pretty solid. I think he’s doing it the best way possible, under the circumstances.
So I agree with you Wayne, that the .PDFs he’s using are probably the best, easiest way to do things. But it’s also very good that he has printed, actual, physical books of his papers – and some faraway pals to back up his site monthly and archive it all, too. We got’chu, buddy.
LikeLike
Miles isn’t the only person in Taos having serious ISP issues. Check out the comments for Comcast in Taos:
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=taos+new+mexico+caomcast
If planning a move for better communication infrastructure, major cities that are also tech centers are more likely to have better internet services and more competition between providers.
Denver has one (ok two) saving graces, the electric grid and internet connectivity are always on and, knock on woo, I’ve had no serious issues with either in the nearly 10 years I’ve here. Nashville was another story, full of gnashing of teeth, power outages, poor customer service and tornadoes.
Last year I opted for the comcast phone and internet plan because it was actually $10 less a month than internet only. Spent that saved $120 on a comcast compatible phone modem, set up the new account, made sure the discount was applied, forwarded calls from the comcast number to my cell, returned the modem to amazon for a full refund, put my Motorola Surfbaord modem back in place and haven’t had any serious issues, especially after replacing my old Asus wifi router with a new wired model from MikroTek with enterprise level security. That coupled with a reliable VPN and a protonmail account and I’m as protected and private as one can be at this point in time. Yes I could go to virtualization of my OS, but honestly I’m too lazy. And no I don’t use Tor because it was created for and by the NSA. Besides, a VPN that doesn’t keep logs already makes you untraceable so why use a free tool created by Them?
LikeLike
In a different arena, there is another guy like Miles: Martin Armstrong. I’ve read his writings for 9 yrs. Armstrongeconomics.com. He knows coins like you know art and he knows computer code like you know physics. Interesting mind.
LikeLike
@Meri, Armstrong’s name alone is a huge red flag (Neil Armstrong, Lance Armstrong, George Armstrong Custer).
Looking at his bio at his website raises more doubts. “Martin Armstrong was born in New Jersey the son of a lawyer and Lt. Col under General Patton in World War II. Martin was encouraged by his father to get involved in computers during the mid-1960s….after being offered positions by a government contractor RCA in Thule Greenland, Guam, or Vietnam, he decided to go back to gold business that he had first began working while in High School to earn money for a family trip to Europe in 1964 for the summer.”
His dad was Lt. Col. And if his dad was a lawyer with a military pension living in a nice area of New Jersey, why did Armstrong need to earn money to help his family take a trip to Europe.
The misdirection continues, because in this bio (unlike his wiki bio), it says that he got interested in markets by watching a movie on the 1869 crash, which was brought on by deliberate market manipulation. But then instead of working towards an understanding of how market cycles are the result of market manipulation, he decides to study boom-bust cycles as mathematical phenomena and, eventually, as a function of Pi.
So he manages to sell two lies in one: first the lie that market fluctuations are not a result of deliberate planning (as if he’d really be able to precisely predict the crash of 1987 without insider information); and second the idea that Pi=3.14 and has some kind of mystical number.
LikeLike
Meri Perkins said: “…and he knows computer code like you know physics.”
Honestly, that’s just absurd. “Computer code” isn’t anything like physics, and anyone can write or read “code” once trained. Literally anyone. It’s not hard at all. Young children can do this. My own could, at a young age. “Computer code” isn’t just a series of numbers or binaries, it’s actually a collection of languages, from C to MEL to Python, HTML to CSS, covering many spectrums of usage. It’s not like people just sit around coding computers in hexadecimal or anything.
It’s nothing like Miles’ ability to dissect and explode physical phenomena with logic, reason, and rigor. They aren’t anywhere near the same field. Millions of people can write various computer codes, perhaps hundreds of millions. Not one of those people restored and revived physics.
I don’t believe you were attacking MIles here but since this is his Defense thread, figured I’d add my two cents for our silent readers. Coding is NOT theorizing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am still writing papers, BTW. I have about ten new papers and updates. I plan to put them on a disk and upload from a friend’s computer soon.
LikeLiked by 11 people
Oh YES Mister, please hurry 🙂
LikeLike
Aye, it’s been a gye lang time since the last ‘un.
LikeLike
Good to know things are ok. More than a few here worry when you go quiet…
LikeLike
I’m chafing at the bit already.
LikeLike
Good to hear Miles will be back soon…even stuff like the ‘Lolita Express’ or ‘Halloween Brexit’ would turn an interesting color through Miles’ lenses
LikeLike
10 new ones. Very nice. I feel like like those folks waiting for the next Star Wars. I wonder if others are beginning to camp out in front of their computer. 😉
LikeLike
no camp out, but check every hour, yes 🙂
LikeLike
I’m breathing a great sigh of relief and anticipation.
Watch out for angry Phoenicians and keep your photons fully charged ; )
LikeLike
A phoeny thing happened on the way to the Forum…
I’ll get my coat.
LikeLike
A tie in here. In A Funny THing Happened on the Way to the Forum, the lead is Miles Gloriosus. The Braggart Soldier. That was my Latin Club name back in the late 1970s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol. Strange synchronicities because you are a bit of a braggart soldier.
LikeLike
Please, I’ll take as much genealogy as is humanly possible to absorb with all 10. Thank you.
Some levity:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Play at :52 seconds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh the sparks of happy anticipation igniting arrival of such goodies for our minds to feast on; an unceasing well of knowledge you generously share with us appreciative souls!!
LikeLike
Is it significant, I wonder, that Miles was cut off just after he posted his article on the fake space shuttle program?
LikeLike
“Is it significant, I wonder, that Miles was cut off just after he posted his article on the fake space shuttle program?”
Are we seeing a straw breaking a camels back?
Or…some disgruntled Steven Hawking fan could have a hacker friend mess Miles around I guess. If you’ll excuse the pun ‘It aint rocket science’!
Doesn’t have to be the ‘men in black’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But those would ALSO be the MiB, you know? Most assets don’t even know they ARE assets. It’s far easier to keep a secret when nobody knows it’s a secret at all.
LikeLike
I do have the impression that the specious space program is currently their most important (to them) project. It may also be the most vulnerable to exposure because it is so outrageously false and silly (bubbles in space, tinfoil rocket ships to the moon, hairsprayed ISS clowns, etc).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t forget the ludicrous “Car in Space” shot that was so shoddy they even messed up the shot, i.e. they had a brief shot of the car in the studio. On reflection, I sometimes wonder if that was deliberately, just to prove they could get away with it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes rolleikin, other than the nukey business, the space shuttle bank is one of the best spook boons to hit this generation of earthlings.
LikeLike
They have now cut off my paypal account, but I think it is easily fixable. They simply called Yahoo and told them to disable my email linked there. But I just went to paypal and switched to a different email, which should solve it. Curious this is all happening at once, though. I don’t think it is an accident. My paypal email is now mileswmathis@yahoo.com instead of melisasmithus@yahoo.com, pass the word. I am changing the links on my site, but of course can’t upload the changes from the library. But it will get done soon.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Thanks for the update MM. Yup, it is definitely a “campaign”. Right, f**k this, I’m buying one of your books even though I will not understand most of the maths coughallofthemathscough
LikeLike
And no explanation as to why not.
LikeLike
Ah, there is a reason given…
LikeLike
Oh here I go feeling perplexed again!
So NADA are you saying that BN can’t send me books from an Amurican supplier if I live in Europe? I do see an increase in that error warning: Not Available In Your Location sooooo….
So should I assume that sending Miles a check/cheque and having him personally gift wrap it for me is the best option from the UK?
And another thing. Once free from the shackles of the EU/market/union/trade treaty etc, etc, are we still classed as part of Europe? Geographically I don’t see how we can become detached but then our government reckon that we somehow own the Falkland Islands around 8,000 miles away. And Amurica owns Alaska which is the other side of Canada….all very confusing…..just the way it’s meant to be! d;^)
How about this for a workaround Brexit? Amurica buys the UK, then, being part of Amurica, the EU will be forced to keep trading with us or Trump will tariff the living daylights out of ’em!
I know…..an over-simplification but……
LikeLiked by 2 people
There are companies based in the US that will purchase from suppliers and ship to a European address, e.g. skypaxus.com. But I’m hoping to donate to MM’s webkitty once he updates the address from “Melisa”, and then he’ll send out a copy of zee desired tome.
LikeLike
@ Russell Taylor:
If you’re really stuck on this then we can always figure something else out. I could purchase them and send them to you or something like that. I got’cher back, homie. Just an idea, an option if you need it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The WebKitty is still demanding for melisasmithus@yahoo.com.
LikeLike
Anybody have an old laptop they aren’t using? Looks like I will have to try to upload papers to my website using free wifi areas in town.
LikeLike
Evidently RT and a few other folks here are sending you some goodies, or trying to, that would solve your issues. Wish I could have helped, but if RT hasn’t contacted you or you haven’t received his emails…
R T said: “I’ve already gotten him an iPhone, and a laptop. I’m just sourcing some burner SIM cards and then shipping it to him. We are thinking exactly the same solution here! I figure using a personal hotspot from the 4G, and then using a cable to tether that connection directly to a laptop that I’m sending him as well. This will allow him to connect directly with 4g connection instead of needing to hop again to a personal area network, cutting down on the latency. Please go for your solution too, don’t let the fact that I’m trying stop you, because maybe mine won’t work for some weird reason, but yours will, or vice versa. We all have to come together to get Miles up and running.”
I’m not sure what Wayne or Alan are working on for you, but if anyone needs another pair of eyes on this problem just hollar. And if you get the stuff and still get stuck, you’re more than welcome to call, though R T and others seem to have more networking experience than I.
LikeLike
Posted two comments above outlining what needs to be done and why. Please read them, this is IMPORTANT. There are specific needs/actions that need to be taken into account, specially in lieu of the latest shut down.
On the fence about getting too many devices to Miles. Just creating more things to go wrong or be compromised. Had an iPad lined up until I did some research—it’s a freebie from Verizon—would be better served kissing a grizzly than take any device from Verizon and their CDMA blotted, locked devices. An unlocked iPad with (GMS) mobile capabilities would be the best approach. Could serve as both mobile connections via SIM card and WiFi for free hotspots and it’s not a heavy laptop. He has a Mini or two and can write, design and layout on the Mini unattached to Internet, then transfer to mobile iPad. An iPhone will work as well, but the iPad cuts the equipment down and he can browse it easier than the iPhone. Again, implore you to read my posts before committing.
The kicker—keep it simple, since we may have to revisit this again.
LikeLike
PS. Website needs to be backed up, offsite, like pronto.
LikeLike
I do this monthly (locally) on my main workstation, and have another friend (Nevyn, the only OTHER physicist I trust besides Miles) who backs up all Miles’ physics papers and hosts an entire mirror of his science site for us just in case:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/mirror/www.milesmathis.com/index.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Jared
I am so glad to hear this, might actually be able to sleep tonight. Thanks.
LikeLike
BTW, it looks like the Earth/Venus/Mars opposition occurring right now is causing another charge drop. I felt it hit yesterday. Did you?
LikeLike
if you’re commenting on here you already have internet access – can’t you just upload them using whatever mechanism you are using to connect just now? or is there something else going on I’ve missed? I heard your ISP was blocking you – are they specifically blocking access to your own web site? let me know if I can help in any way cheers
LikeLike
Once Miles does upload his latest, it’ll be like Christmas. We’ll all no-doubt be up night and day reading. If the “charge drop” doesn’t get us, his papers will. Haha. We’re all chomping at the bit, heh? Yeah. Do you know how many times I’ve gone to his site and was disappointed to see nothing new. His hits have gone up, just from everyone checking. Sigh. Maybe this is a good time to reread some of his old PDF’s—it doesn’t hurt. I’m sure even Miles benefits from rereading his writings.
LikeLike
That would be a wise thing to do while we wait. There is much to absorb in his papers in addition to removing the layers of programming and conditioning that it takes more than one reading to digest and comprehend.
LikeLike
Extreme zombie like fatigue mentally and in the body bone pain; could barely finish gentle evening walk; beyond weird. Husband walks through the door around 7:00 in evening, exhausted, states how strange the day was. Yes, and it did begin yesterday morning around 7:00 a.m. Nice to know it was EVM opposing, thank you MM!!
LikeLike
If Miles has a landline he can also use a dial-up service like NetZero which has what they call “Accelerated Dialup” that is 5X faster than regular. Since his PDFs are small files, it shouldn’t be a big deal to upload them that way. I haven’t used NetZero so can’t vouch for them; I’m just saying …
If it works out, he wouldn’t need to use any wireless hardware or phones. Just a modem plugged into his phone jack (I think). They say the charge is $30/month for unlimited access.
Or, according to their website NetZero also has a free10-hour per month dialup plan which might work as a backup. I think I’ll look into that one myself. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, happy to hear it’s a provider issue. I thought it might have been something worse by now, phew :):):)
BTW, I’m gonna start my internet charm offensive (incl. some Miles supportive action) sometime.. … soonish … waaiit for it… 🙂
As soon as this Solar Minimum & other hassle has subdued a little bit.
LikeLike
Though it seems to be more than just a “provider issue”, sorry, I’ve read up the thread just now a bit.
LikeLike
It’s been 56 days since Miles posted on his website.
I’ve always been concerned about his personal safety. Angry Phoenicians can get nasty…
Can any of the people posting here visit him in Taos to check up on his well-being?
LikeLike
I feel that I must post this.
It’s my opinion. Free speech (cough-cough) and all.
Miles last name means ‘Gift of Yah.’ He is.
Miles foremost shouter-outer’s name means Yah’s Salvation. (Thanks Josh.)
So, while I’m still ‘camping-out’, waiting for the ’10 New Papers’ from Miles, I’ll share something about the BIG 10 from the Father of us all.
Our Creator is the one who wrote them on stone tablets. They have been found. (No joke.) As has Noah’s Ark, Joseph’s granaries, Red Sea Crossing site, Mt. Sinai, Horeb’s split rock, 70 Palm trees, 12-wells site, Sodom & Gomorrah, crucifixion site, Ark of the Covenant (which had the King’s blood on the left side of the solid gold mercy seat). If you want to verify this watch the videos referenced on http://www.JesusChrist.com.
So, apparently, our Father REALLY means for us to obey His Big-10. It’s a sign we are clinging to Yah, and not some other world beast religion or system. That means to honor His 7th-day, daytime Sabbath (rule #4). Get to know and love Dad (rules 1 & 2). Be real good all the time (rules 5-10). And do not minimize His Name (rule 3). His Name is Hallelu ‘____’. (See, the whole world knows it already. Most just don’t know they know.)
So, why is His Name (YAH) hidden? And why and is it so Holy and Powerful, you may ask.
Yah’s name means ‘Behold Arm’ = Creator.
His favorite Title (Vah) means ‘Behold Nail’, which holds stuff together.
The words: ‘Is’, ‘Was’ and ‘Will Be’ are all in the 4 letters too (yod-hey-vav-hey).
Put together, His Name and Title mean ‘Behold the Eternal Creator, who holds ALL things together.’
You all may want to look into Yah’s 10, while waiting for Miles 10. The evidence is overwhelming. Yet, detractors are legion, just as they are against Miles.
BTW, the posers in Black with useless bowls on their heads, who run the Synagogue of Satan, are NOT descended from Jacob!
Yah’s blessings to all. Especially friends of MM.
LikeLike
Pretty hard to take the “Big 10” seriously when he missed rape entirely.
It’s just like the Mormons, waiting until the 1970s to allow black people into their church. Sorry, none of these religions are real. They are all merely Tyrant fronts to push one agenda or another, mass-control mechanisms.
And Statism is by far the most deadly of them. But at least the State gets it right, regarding rape. The gods never did.
LikeLike
‘thou shall not commit adultery’
Considering rape is a moral crime and coming from Christendom rather than a property crime everywhere else. Statism owes quite a bit to it’s Christian historical vestiges.
I think you maybe looking at the ‘big ten’ through a modern statist narrative. Rape and adultery are mutually exclusive.
LikeLike
Sorry, but rape is taking something that doesn’t belong to you—it is stealing. That’s one of the TEN. It also violates Jesus’ command, love one another. After all, Jesus said that all the commandments (the Ten, or everything else), were summed up in “love your neighbor as yourself.” In other words, do unto others, as you would have them do unto you. Honestly, who here cannot agree with that? I would guess no one. This is also the whole point of the libertarian or “anarchist” axiom of non-aggression (although I don’t fit into those camps—I’m non-political and don’t participate in the normal B.S. that most people do—like a lot of people here, since most of us are awake by now). Once you realize that most everything you are told is a lie, you can move on with freedom. And yes, all institutional religions are no-doubt controlled systems of “lording it over others” which Jesus specifically warned against. But just because institutions want to control people, it doesn’t negate the basic principles of love, which everyone here would agree with.
LikeLike
Rape isn’t taking something that doesn’t belong to you in Christianity.
Rape was a moral crime in Christendom. No where else is that the case.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And Jared, aren’t your comments laden with presumption? Who’s the “he” you refer to? In the Bible, God is presented in analogy, in both male and female terms, and he even is said to have created both male and female in his image. That doesn’t win the argument for “he” in my book. And what does doing good to your neighbor or God (via the TEN), have anything to do with Mormonism, a construct of the PTB? But you already know this. After all, “doing good” is what the Ten is about and really, as I’ve stated in another comment, the TEN are summed up in the entire concept of love, which I don’t think you have an argument against—am I correct? Who doesn’t want to be treated with love and kindness? Is it love to rape someone—obviously not. Is it not taking something from someone else that doesn’t belong to you? Obviously. Rape is the opposite of love. It is not doing good, but evil.
If I were to guess, since I don’t read minds yet (hehe), I would say you don’t like the tone of Ramsay (or what he writes), who seems to be quite into Zionism (a lot of Jewish mumbo jumbo). I don’t like all that nonsense either, since if he believes in the Bible and especially the New Testament, and if he knows his history, the city of Jerusalem and the temple were completely destroyed by the armies of Titus in AD70, along with all the genealogical records. Thus no one today could actually know if they are Jewish. And besides, the guy who wrote most of the New Testament (Paul), says that there was no longer a distinction between Jew, Gentile, male or female, etc. There are no special chosen people in the world—other than those who think they’re chosen (the Bastards we talk so much about here).
The prophets in the Old and Jesus and his Disciples in the New, all said that Israel had become God’s enemy and was “about to” (Greek mello), be destroyed. Only a new remnant would remain true. Jesus said it would happen in his generation, and 40 years later, the city and the entire country side was utterly desolated, along with two thirds of that nation. Take that to the bank, you lovers of Zion! Destruction predicted, destruction realized—never to rise again! All these “Christians” today that promote Israel (which has nothing to do with the Israel of old), are dupes and idiots and don’t know their Bible or history. And yes, they’re being duped by the same Bastards we talk about here. They think that God is coming back in the future, when the Hebrew writers like Paul and Peter were simply using Hebraic judgment language (heaven and earth shall pass away), which language was never literal in the Old Testament. The judgment language only meant what any Jew at the time would know it meant (and as Josephus said), that “heaven and earth” was the temple, the place where God dwelt on earth among men. Josephus was witness to the total desolation of the “heaven and earth” (temple and city), and said if was deserved! Zionists and Christians both are duped and dumbed-downed idiots and both think Trump is their savior—God help us all!
And then you say that the state get’s it right, but they actually in the past acknowledged and codified laws against rape, because they specifically violated the moral codes of the Bible (as well as other codified systems). In fact the moral code is intrinsic to the nature of man, since most, other than the elite bastards who have seared their conscience, still seem to have some semblance of right and wrong. My neighbor never steals from me—but then I don’t live in Watts either. Some places are not safe, but that also is by design. The intrinsic nature of right and wrong is the reason why people, whether Christian, Buddhist or what have you, know the difference between right and wrong and are not daily “raping” us. We all know here, who is “raping” us on a daily basis. Although I would agree, that more and more people are being dumbed-down dail, as their conscience is eroded via the media and the rest of the lies and nonsense spewed out by the controllers—so called. End of rant.
LikeLike
Ddkuehne…..Do you believe the Bible is the word of God?
Josephus was working for the Flavians you know. He was one of their favorite pets.
I wouldn’t really trust too much of what he says.
LikeLike
In Caesar’s Messiah, Atwill wrote:
“This Imperial family, the Flavians, invented Christianity.”
By this he meant that the Flavians (and their court intellectuals) created the religion in the form that we know it, and wrote the Gospels as they have come down to us.
https://postflaviana.org/introduction-flavian-origins-theory-christianity/
LikeLike
Paul was related to the Herod’s. That invalidates Christianity and Jesus being God. Paul never met Jesus, wasn’t interested in talking to the only people who ever met and lived with Jesus. He made up his own version of the godly Jesus. It should be named Pauline Christianity.
Paul saw Jesus in a vision of thunder and light. Why do we worship Paul and not Joseph Smith who had identical experiences.
LikeLike
Mini-rant head firmly screwed on and…….here we go then……..
I would like to mention the fossil record and a few billion years of animal and plant evolution. If God is responsible for creating humans, then he certainly took his time about it, and kept making many millions of mistakes along the way. So if he/she/it is all knowing and all wise, then why the millions of serious cock-ups? And how does any religion explain mass extinctions? An unforeseen event from someone all-seeing? The excuse is that it is all part of God’s plan. Well if the past billion years of life on this planet are anything to go by, then God needs to sack his draughtsman and brush up on his own inventive skills.
How do you explain the highly successful dinosaurs being eliminated from the big plan? Why take hundreds of millions of years, creating something as advanced, diverse, and wonderful, then just wipe them out and start again? Seems more like trial & error, not the act of an omnipotent super-being, implementing a long term plan…..
I guess God must have killed all those dinosaurs and trees to make coal and oil for the industrial revolution. Hey, that’s some foresight. Wouldn’t it have been easier and more environmentally friendly to give man the knowledge to invent solar panels and electric vehicles and machinery in the first place, instead of this convoluted, 200 year long, high pollution version of his plan? Seems like another potential cock-up to me.
Am I taking the piss? Yes and no. I’m trying to be logical and objective. I find it very confusing when someone, who seems able to see through the all the hoaxes, cons and other fakery, still has a deep belief in any religion. I can level my scorn at mass shootings and fake suicides and fake voting system and medical malpractice and underhanded scientific bias and fraud, yet taking one step toward ridiculing religion and it’s ‘Whipple shields up’ defence mode active. Why is that?
Atheism isn’t a religious belief, it is a ‘lack’ of religious belief, (“rejecting any belief in Gods”). Am I an atheist? Nope! I don’t think there is a being out there which fits the descriptions in the ancient texts. Logic disproves such a being can exist. But I am open to the possibility that there are beings/entities out there, somewhere, maybe the other side of the galaxy, which are – to us at least – incredibly intelligent, have highly advanced technology, and maybe, just maybe, are not humanoid (Hollywood/Star Trek etc). The simple fact(?) that ‘the’ God, who was partly his own son (Trinity), who then walked the Earth as his own son(?) who promptly pissed off some, erm…Jews was it? Who then nailed him up. So Jesus being God, or part thereof, means that the Jews effectively nailed up God himself. So it wasn’t Jesus, really, who was resurrected but God, literally going home to heaven, and being a little bit peeved by the actions of the Jewish people, maybe was thinking a little retribution might be needed? I’m trying to whittle everything down to basics here for simplicity, but either way, the logic is all over the place.
But then there’s that ultimate excuse, God forgives everyone (even rapists(?)!
Just say that you are sorry, and mean it, and all is forgiven.
Right oh then! Googles ‘how to rob a bank’ hehehe!!!
LikeLike
Russell said:
“I guess God must have killed all those dinosaurs and trees to make coal and oil for the industrial revolution. Hey, that’s some foresight.”
And maybe God made humanity to create plastic for the earth?
LikeLike
@dkuehne: I actually believe in and agree with almost all of what you said, and prefer to love by far than to hate. Except none of it really negated my point, which was that rape was not codified in the Ten Commandments. Do you know how you can tell for sure? The word, “rape” is not in the ten commandments.
Nobody on Earth has ever thought “rape” was the same as “theft”. No animals alive do now, and no pastoral twisting of the words can achieve this difference. In many cases, rape is as bad or worse than just being killed. So to lower its import to “stealing” is one form of gymnastics in the first place, but to completely omit or deny this difference by not codifying rape is just fucking pathetic.
I have never been raped, but it’s by far the most damaging event that has surrounded me amongst the people I love. So while I love my people, I hate those who harm them, and that’s how morality is defined at this level – for me, anyway. Hating those people doesn’t mean causing them harm, it just means my mind is telling me that they are a danger.
And I feel the same way about the Tyrants. They and their mechanisms are the only real danger in our lives, short of random physical trauma or Earthborn doom. So the hatred is useful, as long as it’s not a consuming emotion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So you agree with the principle of love, but you don’t see that love is the underlying principle for the Ten Words (commandments), is that correct? And if you do see that it is the basis, you choose instead to look for specific language: specifically “rape”? If so, I think it rather a myopic approach. But if you do see that love is the basis, which is easy to see if you read the commandments that deal with love for others, stated in the negative (theft, bearing false witness, murder, etc.), then why look for some specific term like “rape.” Does not love encapsulate and lie at the foundation of that is harmful to others? I know anarchists who are atheists who would basically agree with this. Let’s no toss the baby out with the stinkin’ bath water. And I too can appreciate George Carlin (up to a point), but he too was a controller (I’m not saying you posted that).
In fact the Old Testament shows rape was taken very seriously (many cultures took rape very seriously). More so than today (although I’m not advocating that we kill family members of rapists, but the point is, they didn’t take it lightly, and I have good reasons from my own experience, not to take it lightly either): “When Jacob’s daughter, Dinah, was violated by the son of a neighboring ruler, Shechem, her brothers murdered him, his father, and the all of the men of his city in revenge (Gen. 34). After the Unnamed Concubine was gang-raped and left for dead by men in the tribe of Benjamin, the other tribes went to war against them upon hearing of her injustice (Jgs. 19-21). And after Tamar was raped by her half-brother, Amnon, her brother Absalom killed him, and incited a rebellion against his father, King David (2 Sam. 13). Rape was neither covered up nor ignored. Instead, it was answered and avenged. It was such a cultural convulsion that it was answered with outrage and further violence. The cases of rape in Scripture tell us something about the cases of rape we are hearing today: These women must be heard and they must be protected.”
Amen to that last part—that women (and men), need to be heard and receive justice. But I have a personal connection with this, and one that touches my very family, so keep reading…
My own daughter was raped by a pedophile when she was 5 years old. Does that drive me mad, yes. That bastard is dead, from cancer that ate up his spine—good riddance. But I don’t feel that was justice. And since he was in the Airforce, they gave him a 21 salute! I wish I’d known about this before he died, since I might have given him a 44 or 357 salute (with some magnum to boot). I wish there had been no meds to help that wicked man soothe his pain. If I was responsible, he would have suffered for weeks—years if I had the choice. He did this to all his adopted daughters too. Do you think I don’t wonder how I could have protected her? Does that not affect me to this day? He and his worthless wife ran an orphanage in Brazil and he also sent kids to the states—where many of those were taken advantage of. I’m sure this was a pedophile ring, but have no proof, just a pattern. He was “respected” in the community too. He was a preacher too. Yeah, reminds me of a movie I once saw. The lowest of the low. So I know what this does to people. It angers me to no end, and if I could resurrect that bastard who did this to my daughter, I’d kill him all over again—but slowly. Yes, I’m sure that would do something to my soul—killing it slowly. He has already done something to my soul. He killed my daughter and she has never been the same. Oh, yes she lives, but a part of her is dead. And she’s extremely talented in many ways, but broken. She in fact shines with talent in our community and people stop to listen to her play her guitar and sing her original songs. They all say she will be famous some day, but I know better—we all know better—especially my daughter. She’s not one of the chosen. So this vile person not only took something from her, but from my wife and me. He took something from her future husband. Does that need to be codified as “rape” somewhere just to make it horrible? No. Cannot it not also be contained in the underlying principle love—without a label. Obviously.
Are we not adults who see and understand, without something being spelled out in simplistic terms like children need, say in Kindergarten? Obviously they did see the severity of this in ancient times. My daughter has had to deal with the demons and the cutting and on and on for years. Do you hear voices? She does. And I’m not talking about the voices everyone hears, but worse. Voices that say she is not worthy of living; voices that say she should kill someone. Yeah. I know what rape does. Today, thankfully, she is off her drugs and is making some good choices, but something was taken, and it was done by someone who had no love. They violated the law of love and everyone knows it. And I’m certainly not downplaying the word “rape.” We should also use “pedophile” and any and all vocabulary that will shock sense into this stupid generation. We all know, in the end, that it is a violation of a love principle.
I also had a good friend who passed away recently, who was raped in the late 70’s (and not by a fake Ted Bundy). He was raped by a man he had picked up hitchhiking. Did you notice I said “he”? How many time do you think this played back in his head. I was even embarrassed when he first told me, more for him I guess than myself—it’s an awkward horrible thing to listen to though, so yes it was embarrassing. I was mortified. It was a very uncomfortable story, and I didn’t want to really know the details, but he told me anyway, because he had come to peace with it, and wanted me to know why he now had peace. But the short story is, he decided to pick up a hitchhiker and soon after, the guy pulled a gun on him, had him pull off the road and proceeded to rape him against the vehicle and pistol-whipping him afterwards. The bastard then left him naked and bleeding along the roadside, as he drove off in my friend’s car. And to put salt in the wound, the Police arrested him for indecency as he was wandering down the road naked and dazed. That “killed” something inside him. It “stole” something from his soul. That “blew out his brains” in ways you cannot know—unless you’ve experienced it. He made peace with it, but I still am outraged when I think of it. And by the way, my friend found solace in God, even into his last days. No one can take that away from him, even if they don’t believe in a creator.
So I know what rape does. Am I in some way lessening the severity of rape by saying that it and other crimes of hate are all encapsulated in “do no harm to your neighbor”? As adults, we know that overarching principles can cover a multitude of immoral acts, without them being spelled out, systematized, and numbered—ad nauseam. Everyone knows rape is not love and if they’re raped, something “dies” inside. Something is “stolen” from them—and no amount of restitution can alleviate the loss and heartache and torture done to them and their loved-ones.
Since most people agree, that love covers everything, we shouldn’t say, “well since the fucking word ‘rape’ is not there, then it’s not covered! It’s not codified.” What kind of reasoning or lack of such, is that? If I said, “don’t cause any harm to someone.” Do you say “well, he didn’t mention rape, so I guess I’m good to go on that score.” No, that’s crazy talk. It’s presumptions like this, which drive people along like the proverbial cattle prod—ignoring the obvious. I’m not sure if you have a bur up your bum when it comes to Christianity, but a lot of people are blinded by the bur, and can’t see past it—even when the truth stabs them in the eye. I’m just the opposite, I reject or accept on merits and I don’t toss the baby out with the bathwater, just because I watched a few videos on YouTube or was forced to sit for hours in some charismaniac church when I was younger.
Anyway I wish the best for all here, and hope that their journey is full of love—not hate.
LikeLike
Dkuehne said: “I’m just the opposite, I reject or accept on merits and I don’t toss the baby out with the bathwater, just because I watched a few videos on YouTube or was forced to sit for hours in some charismaniac church when I was younger.”
Then it’s a good thing your straw man rebuttal doesn’t apply at all here either, right?
It’s polemics, man. I made a point, which you attempted to counter but could not. It’s fine. We’re still on the same side. You can keep your religious doctrines and enjoy them and find strength in them all you like, I won’t and couldn’t stop you nor would I even desire to. I just don’t need them myself. Battle on!
LikeLike
But of course you right and I’m wrong, because you say so. You had and have not argument. Like you, I’ll just say I’m right and you’re wrong. There. I’m now posting like you do all the time.
LikeLike
When it comes to religion and the 10 commandments I always listened to the expert on the subject.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I used to find this stuff really funny and insightful. Comedians though have been the ground troops in destroying the family unit and furthering degeneracy, re: The Aristocrats.
LikeLike
Must be a whole audience of atheists, because the material really isn’t funny. His main joke is “this is bullshit because I say so.” And how about the hypocrisy of the final line, “thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself…” says the guy who is not keeping his religious thoughts to himself, but spouting them in front of a huge audience. I don’t know who he is, but see how he’s fine with the commandment that in his words encourages economic growth, but critical of the ones that encourage a) respect for your parents, and b) a married man not to masturbate over another woman. Not to mention the whole segment is designed to ridicule Christianity. Looks like spook 101 to me.
I personally think there is a lot of goodness that can be taken from certain parts of the Bible, but also find it a wholly unreliable document, given all we know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“It’s all bullshit and it’s bad for you.”
His act is damning in every direction, especially of government. The religious commentary is rather small in comparison to his DECADES of slamming the government. Is he controlled opposition? Probably. But he’s fucking hilarious and an amazing orator.
We could only be so lucky, if our stupid, pathetic Tyrant-puppets in the actual government were half as witty, funny, or well-performed.
“If you’re gonna fuck me, at least kiss me first.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
While I am not sure if I am included in the statement anymore (since I am old) but I hate when people talk about how “this” generation is the worst one ever. A quote that brings a smile to my face whenever I come across it is,
“The Children now love luxury; they show disrespect for elders and love to chatter in place of exercise. Children are tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when their elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs and tyrannize over their teachers.”
Written over 2,400 years ago by Socrates it is a wonder that the human race made it is as far as we did, huh?
There is no generation in American History which is better than the preceding one:
The United States currently has the lowest teen birth rate since we started keeping track 70 years ago. There were always overactive forceful teenage men as much as there always has been adventurous females.
We have had over 20 recessions in the last century – 15 of them lasted over 10 months. This recession is not new phenomenon. We were overleveraged just like we were in the early 90s and in the late 20s.
It was only Forty Three years ago that interracial marriage was illegal. Could you even imagine a time? Somehow same sex marriage is still illegal?
There were always have been and always will be drugs. Sears-Roebuck sold Heroine. How f’in ridiculous is that? Imagine calling up Amazon for some H? And all you Baby-Boomers don’t go saying it is different…when you were taking LSD that was bad! You can’t just go around taking hallucinogens and blame it on experimenting.
It was only 70 years ago when nearly the entire industrialized world was at war with one another. Imagine that today! The American Civil War claimed 625,000 U.S. Military Lives in 4 years, the War on Terror? 5,491 in 9 years.
Is it that hard to go back in American History to find a group of immigrants being blamed for stealing jobs?
Porn and Prostitution has literally always existed. Like Literally.
When was that pesky event when baseball players were accused of cheating? Late 90’s or was it 1919?
We saw 8.0%+ Unemployment in all of 1975 and from Late 1981 to early 1984 we even had a few months with over 10% unemployment
Am I pessimistic? Absolutely not. Do I want more drug use, teen pregnancy, financial hardship, deaths, and ill will toward a particular type of citizen? Absolutely not.
What I would like is that people realize the past that they idolize just isn’t as amazing as they remember it and to live in the present. Embrace current culture instead of demonizing it.
https://www.myjourneytomillions.com/articles/past-wasnt-as-good-as-remember-so-get-over/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same here. Unfortunately I recently did a trawl of Robin Williams’ routines/interviews and I did notice the usual “liberal” agenda. They always have a dig at traditional institutions but don’t invert that to have a go at the mad aspects of globalism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Of course Carlin is controlled opposition. The proof? He’s allowed to use a microphone and be on TV.
LikeLike
Many people are having internet issues lately in my town. The company may be upgrading components. Check your back yard for that little connection hub. They just attached an orange cable to mine and I’ve been having problems. No need to get paranoid. Start using the library, university libraries are also open to the public. Goto the cable internet billing office and complain in person. Start being seen and observe people that come out of the wood works. Talk to people, ask questions and be aware of their comments and replies. Take photos, video, keep a journal of experiences.
LikeLike
@ Russell Taylor:
“…Am I taking the piss? Yes and no. I’m trying to be logical and objective. I find it very confusing when someone, who seems able to see through the all the hoaxes, cons and other fakery, still has a deep belief in any religion…”
Thanks for your great rant which exposes some of the critical flaws in religious
doctrines. Many people conflate the writers of the script for the Global Shoah with the gods! Applied critical thinking is a good method to use to solve these mental conundrums / dilemmas.
LikeLike
As for ‘Scripture’, Jeremiah was complaining about false scribes back in his day. (Jer. 8:8) Scripture has been mutilated over time, to be sure. But the clear message is always there, on almost every page, except for the false prophet Paul’s pages.
Love and respect our Creator. And respect the Creator’s creation. Of which you are part.
Be good. Be real good. And when you are not, you’d better say ‘sorry’ and make it up.
All will be judged after our test here, by our Creator.
That’s it. Sermon is over.
But for kicks you may want to verify the discoveries I mentioned earlier. Ron Wyatt was as humble and true of a guy as one could ever know. God used him to find it all, over 20 + years of looking. All recorded. He chose well. I owned a ‘Christian’ bookstore 20 years ago. At that time I was convinced Ron Wyatt was a fraud based upon the words written against him by almost everybody. Turns out these ministries are all run by the folks you all keep talking about. Ron’s discoveries are so obviously true they are as plain as realizing Miles is usually right.
You can say what you’d like about me and my beliefs. Sticks and stones and all. Time will tell who has got His message, and who has attached themselves to the King, who kept saying “follow me”. ( Not any pastor, preacher or parasite. And NOT Paul! Or anyone else. Not even Miles. 😉
LikeLike
We’ve discussed Ron Wyatt before on this site. I certainly don’t find him as trust worthy as you, but won’t go over old ground. Will only add that I recently discovered new (to me) information about him. Born 2/6/33… Yes, thats 8/33. Doesn’t prove anything on its own, but is often a good starting point…
LikeLike
Throw out Paul the Apostle, in comes Ron of Wyatt.
‘By their fruits you shall know them.’
LikeLike
‘By their fruits you shall know them.’
ya but everybody has fruits. so doesn’t really shine a brighter light on anyone.
except for the ones we already know about that are pushing the agendas
LikeLike
“except for the ones we already know about that are pushing the agendas”
If we can on a esoteric level, why not on a forum ?
LikeLike
I love listening to this bloke. Very funny and speaks the truth. First words out of his mouth in this video are priceless.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“I love listening to this bloke.”
Me too. I’ve been a fan of Big Clive for a while now. This is one of my favorite videos of his:
LikeLike
Where is MM?
LikeLike
@Mary
A reader here has informed me that he was in touch with Miles who reports being OK but still having unresolved connectivity issues.
LikeLike
Still working from the library. Lots of papers in the can but can’t upload them. I will be back.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You swot.
LikeLike
Good to hear
LikeLike
If angry Phoenicians keep blocking your website, many of us have personal websites that could host downloading of the new material.
Why not email the PDFs to a trusted collaborator like Josh or Jared? They could probably distribute them through a mirror site of your work.
We worry about you and hope your muses are staying locked and loaded : )
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know they’re blocking his home internet access but I don’t know how his access to his site is being blocked. It could be that whatever he needs to update his site is on his home computer. Whatever the case, I’m ready to help however I can.
LikeLike
In my opinion, while that could work, KnowThanx, I feel like it needs to be on HIS site to be authentic. Sure we have mirrors for archive purposes, but it’s Miles’ work and he should rightly only trust himself to publish it. I mean, I trust him and Josh implicitly but there’s no way I’d take on such a responsibility unless he asked me directly, and even then I’d have some things to say on the topic.
That kind of responsibility makes me nervous. I’m pretty well-known in circles and even with my security measures and heavy hardware, there are plenty of ways the Spooks could take advantage of such a situation. The only reason they never have directly is because I’m not a threat, just a nuisance at best. But if they’ll screw Miles over on internet access, they could screw me over just as easily. And for me, that’s my livelihood and it would be gone. Too risky. I do a lot of web design and send lots of permit plans and 3D-renderings online and without that, I’m doomed.
I mean, I’d do about anything to help out but if they wanted to ruin me financially that would do the trick.
LikeLike
Thanks Jared,
I too would be timid about hosting a mirror site that would trace to my business and livelihood. Miles is fearless and has cast iron balls.
But what do we do if a month from now he still can’t edit his site? (or 2 months from now or 3 months…). Even worse: what if the immense resource that’s already there has mysteriously disappeared from the internet?
I hear that Iceland has excellent digital anonymity and protection for renegade free-thinkers. If a hat were being passed to contribute money towards a more secure website there for Miles then I think most of us would chip in to help make it happen.
I have an Icelandic business partner who I think could facilitate obtaining a secure mirror (www.mileswmathis.is). Miles would obviously be it’s sole webmaster…
Hopefully his hosting hassles will resolve very soon without the need for a backup site… but it’s worth thinking about if this situation persists. Hope for the best but plan for the worst.
Peter
no.reply@unseen.is
LikeLike
@KnowThanx: It is never wise to underestimate one’s opponent. Or oneself.
LikeLike
And why keep his site up and running if they’re trying to shut him down? It looks like they might have gone straight to the service/server that his hosting his site and simply disabled editing rights? I’m assuming it is stored on an external system.
If Miles needs to lawyer up, a Texan called Ty Beard might be sympathetic to his cause.
LikeLike
…and the donation link on the site is still linked to the Melisa email address…which is not surprising considering Miles cannot update the site.
LikeLike
You are working in the tallest building in Taos 😉
LikeLike
@ KnowThanx
We have to assume this will persist. I’d say let’s start somewhere and begin to secure a backup server in Iceland for his mirror site. I’ve already offered to contribute if a hat is passed around.
LikeLike
There is already a mirror site.
LikeLike
Here is one full mirror, which I believe backs up monthly:
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/mathis/mirror/www.milesmathis.com/index.html
LikeLike
The issue here is not Miles’ site. Everything there is fine at this point and there are backups and mirrors elsewhere. What isn’t fine, Miles cannot connect to his site, nor to the internet, plus his PayPal account may also have been compromised. A secure server in Iceland is nice, but a secure home/internet connection there would be much more usable.
Miles has done everything right in keeping things simple, using older computers running older OS’s and uploading PDFs for his articles. Using HTML sparingly keeps hackers at bay. Near as I know he has no credit cards and is basically living barely on the grid. He’s been hit where in the one place he had the least control—the internet connection to his home.
If the laptop and iPhone arrive unscathed, then great, he has a chance—if he has a strong VPN while changing servers settings often, an unlocked phone and changes out accounts (SIM cards) regularly, he can use the iPhone as a WiFi hotspot for uploads. BUT, he should continue to write his papers offline and use the phone only for uploading said articles. The laptop can be used at free WiFi spots for research or with phone as a hotspot, but should be used away from his home. At this point no one here knows what exactly is being perpetrated.
This is reality as it now stands.
LikeLike
Thanks. KnowThanx was suggesting to setup another website on an overseas server outside of US domain such as Iceland (milesmathis/updates.is) to circumvent the access issues with his website in the US. Miles would be the only one that can edit or control it to post his new essays on the additional server.
LikeLike
Nevyn deserves a gold star… his mirror site is exactly what I was thinking about.
The problem can’t be as simple as poor connectivity… I think that Miles is running into a brick wall that’s put there by bad actors. If he can post here from the library then you’d think he could post to his own website. He undoubtedly has friends in Taos who would gladly let him use their computer for a few minutes to upload some PDF files.
The blockage appears to be a “de-platforming” effort. We can’t let that happen.
LikeLike
WOW… I just started exploring Nevyn’s Lab. It’s beautiful…
https://www.nevyns-lab.com/
Thanks Nevyn!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Of course I have some serious biases on the topic, but the people I trust wholesale in physics would be:
Miles
Nevyn
And that’s it. They’re literally the two best physicists in the world. Anyone else claiming that status, or even claiming they KNOW physics, should be highly suspect. They’re the real deal. Even for myself I just regurgitate their statements. If you have real questions, those guys will have some answers.
Everything I personally present is a product of their work. My errors are my own though, not theirs. They give us a framework and it appears nobody else is working on this so it’s up to us to delve in further. They are real people and have real lives and work to do, let’s help them out where we can and not hinder them with too much distraction!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Everyone was scared to let me use their computer, afraid the same would happen to them. Valid fear, I would say, so I didn’t insist. A reader sent me an Iphone, which I am using to create a hotspot. That is working for now, though I don’t like Wifi.
LikeLike
Just so everyone knows, the reader who supplied Miles with a phone and internet access solution was none other than the man who posts here as RT. (I don’t remember if he has used his name publicly so I won’t disclose it.) I’m sure I speak for everyone when I say we truly appreciate your efforts and generosity. Three cheers for RT.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll second that! Thanks RT.
LikeLike
@Miles, didn’t you say some months ago that there was a cable van parked across or down your cul de sac street for several days, which seemed somewhat suspicious? Maybe they made whatever alterations were necessary for being able to interrupt your cable and even phone service… Or perhaps they can do that to any of us at any time with the standard infrastructure already in place.
LikeLike
For my DSL phone line a few months back CenturyLink demonstrated a new low in technical competence. Took way more than a week and around the 6th tech to get someone capable to fiix it and it wasn’t even broken, just trying to make some changes. Meanwhile they are rolling out 5G. Perhaps their tech staff is suffering self induced impairment. Meanwhile half is outsourced to India.
Conspiracy? Or collective brain fog?
Or maybe they abandon the old tech to force all repair visits to install the new 5G stuff.
LikeLike
I believe the term is ‘cost cutting’. I would replace that with the term ‘profit boosting’.
Cost cutting sounds like a harmless attempt to make the business more successful, to prevent it going bust and make it run more efficiently. In reality, they simply want to spend as little as is humanly possible, to maximise profits, so the directors can buy a new house/yacht/Rolls’ every two years.
Councils bid for the ‘most competitive’ (re:cheapest), price and get what they pay for.
If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys!
I suppose you can’t blame the workers. They are slaves to the elite owners just like us.
I have said before that it has always been this way – well it’s true Miles – and we suffer the same cheap-skate, lame workmanship today that we suffered back in the 60s.
At least back in the 60s people had a high degree of skill, they were just paid a pittance. That’s why they didn’t care back then. Today they are relatively unskilled, and paid a pittance, so care even less. Get paid, then get down the bar to drown your sorrows. I see so many people stuck in that same routine….so sad.
To break free they spend thousands getting new qualifications, a better job with more pay, but then find they have a much higher cost of living, paying vastly more insurance, higher taxes and have 200 more rules and regulations to follow than they had before. Stress goes up. Back to the bar! I know plenty of people in both camps including the ones with diplomas, in decent jobs, with half decent pay, who, after paying their private landlords rent, council tax, income tax, national insurance, and commuting costs, they would be 10% better off not working and drawing benefits to support their wife and child. The government said they were going to bring in measures to make work pay, to ween people off the benefits system. Has it happened? Nope! How do we do something about it? See above! The situation I described was the same in the UK in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, it has never changed. The names change – social security – the dole – the job centre – the employment agency – but the system never does.
Don’t blame the workers Alan, blame the company for paying them peanuts…..
LikeLike
If Miles has a landline he can connect via dialup:
https://store.netzero.net/account/showService.do?serviceId=nz-dialup
Of course, the spooks could then knock out his landline, I suppose.
LikeLike
Jared, come on. That dig at Rolleikin was totally unnecessary and really out of the blue. So he didn’t think through the idea that Miles’ internet was anyway coming through the phone line rather than cable. So what? Neither did I. He was just trying to help. Relax. Besides, maybe the solution would work. Who knows?
I deleted your comment and the ensuing back-and-forth. Please return to your corner and refrain from replying to Rolleikin to the best of your ability. Let’s leave the below-the-belt punches to people who fight dirty.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Phone lines? You fools — they are not phone lines but rather Phoen Lines 😉
LikeLike
Yeah…I see that damned word everywhere now too.
What do you call a Jew on a bus?
A mobile Phoen’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad to see that satellites have been brought up once again, I just can’t get enough of ‘em. there’s never been the need to propagandize about landlines; but the propaganda is strong with satellites for some reason. anyone that’s kicked a soccer ball about recognizes the famous Telstar communications satellite even if they don’t realize it of course…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adidas_Telstar
…the son of the founder of rko couldn’t wait to tell the world about the Telstar program back 1962…
…and apparently space geeks hoyendia are still impressed by the Telstar satellite program which is still going strong thanks to elon’s space x; who wouldn’t be though, those Merlin engines sound incredible…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstar
…they sound even better set to muzak…
LikeLike
@Josh: I just saw your response here and apologize, as I can’t delete the rebuttals I just posted on the Space Fakery blog to the person who just can’t get enough of me and enforces censorship upon my replies. I had posted those prior to reading your comment here.
At this point I can’t comment freely and can’t respond to the consistent personal attacks without rancor, so I’m just gonna fuck right off and let things unfold here as they may, without me. It’s fine. I can communicate with everyone here without dealing with this sacrosanct personage in my life; yourself, Miles, Vexman, the Russells, and anyone else who wishes to have discussions with me. My email is jared.magneson@outlook.com if anyone wishes more babbling from me.
And this isn’t a jab at you either, Josh. As you know, we’re “all good in the hood” and I personally hold you in the highest regard. And part of that is knowing when to fuck right off and let you run your show how you see fit. I’m not going to be able to withhold my vehemence and you don’t deserve having to deal with that. Nor does Miles, in a blog about him.
Party on, and I’ll just get back to work on my physics vids for Miles’ stuff and my artwork.
LikeLike
Jared, I’m very sorry to see you go. I think you brought a lot of knowledge and experience to this forum, and I typically learn a lot from your input. I hope at some point you will reconsider. I have no ill feelings towards you and likewise hold you in high regard. You are always welcome back.
I don’t think Rolleikin deserves your rancor, despite my disagreement with him on the topic of satellites. I simply insist that we treat each other respectfully despite our differences. Save the rancor for the trolls.
LikeLike
Don’t worry, Josh. He’ll be back. And, a whole lot sooner than you think. 🙂
LikeLike
I hope so.
LikeLike
Jared is a genius who can single-handedly take on a squad of spooky-sophists.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Shout out to RT: I sent you an e-mail on Aug. 30. Please check your spam.
LikeLike
@ Mary – Good question! I’m cramping instead of camping now, in front of my computer. Ten papers at once and all. And I’ve run out of smores. Better get smore. And Miles, come on dude. We really do care about you. Good to peep now and then. We don’t need to know details, just that you are safe.
@ Benjamin – I’m puzzled by your comment about discussing Ron Wyatt on this site before. Seems I saw a mention at one time too, but the previous conversations do not come up in a search. ‘ron wyatt site: cuttingthroughthefog.com’ Odd. As for his finds being real, perhaps Josh would like to visit Sodom, just below Masada, and dig out some very flammable sulfer found nowhere else on the globe.
@ Philip – Yup! Wyatt’s fruits were as fruitful as it gets. Paul’s fruit? In my opinion, fruitless, ‘faith alone’ religion, covers a good chunk of the globe.
@ RT – What the bleep does a cattle prod have to do with defending Miles Mathis? For another, perhaps more amusing and musical Bankster Bash see this ditty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSIUf2hD6Io
Called ‘Bugger the Bankers’.
@ The Final Frontier – Josh, perhaps I’ll read your take when you post it. Your stuff is intelligible to my low-brow brain. The talk of fake sky-everything makes me crave spaghetti.
LikeLike
Very odd. I got the same results from Google, but DuckDuckGo has it:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ron+wyatt+site%3Acuttingthroughthefog.com&ia=web
This is the discussion I recall:
https://cuttingthroughthefog.com/2018/11/09/current-events-discussion-thread/comment-page-11/
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a good place for you…… Maybe the history section could learn a thing or two from you !
Looking forward to the next post. Have a Fantabulous day man.😁😜
LikeLike
Re-reading old papers. From http://mileswmathis.com/stoner.pdf:
Ha ha! Brilliant!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I could be wrong but I think when Miles says he can’t upload from the library, it is because uploads are not allowed there by anyone, not that he is blocked from accessing his site.
LikeLike
Actually, Rolle, both are true. Library computers don’t have apps like Filezilla which allow for uploading files to a website, and don’t allow you download them. They also don’t allow you to plug in flashdrives. However, I am also blocked from accessing my site, thepeerage, or Barnes and Noble from my local library, which is very strange. My life is beginning to feel like a Bourne movie, except that I am not boring and constipated like Matt Damon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the info, Miles.
LikeLike
Talk about hanging the dog.
LikeLike
We can start defending Miles again chaps and chapesses…..he’s back.
The relief is overwhelming!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed.
LikeLike
The new papers are already on my Palm Pilot!

See, I’m not kidding. The picture also explains why I don’t read them on my phone.
LikeLike
Kobo, Mobile Phoen and compooter so I always have Miles at hand wherever and whenever I need to reference him.
Palm Pilot? Didn’t they stop making those around 1874 dude?
LikeLike
Sometime like that, but they didn’t replace it with anything superior, for my uses. This m515 fits in a (specially designed) wallet, so I actually have it with when I want to read it. It’s usually working too, since a battery charge lasts a week or two.
LikeLike
I’ve always been a sucker for Sherlock Holmes since I was a kid watching those old Basil Rathbone movies.
BTW, Basil was a military intelligence officer during WWI.
The current BBC show “Sherlock” starring Benedict Cumberbatch is set in modern day with cell phones and such which I don’t care for and it has its little propaganda moments such as gay promotion, etc. Sherlock is also characterized as being a “high functioning sociopath” as he puts it. I guess that means he is supposed to be mentally ill.
But, the show has its moments. Such as when Holmes barely glances at a person or a scene and detects all sorts of details and information invisible to everyone else.
LikeLike
Indeed… it’s like Christmas morning with a real live pony under the tree : ))
I was genuinely concerned for his safety.
I’m feasting on the science updates. Phoenician phoenies are for desert…
LikeLike
Wow, it’s true 😀
I had just prepared my gravatar to face off these cowards seemingly trying to “de-platform” Miles and challenge them with a lengthy diatribe including my exact coordinates in Ghana (which I still might post for the fun of it).
regards, Alexander Christoph Gordon Bradley Illi
LikeLike
Hi Miles, reading up on your new papers before going to sleep. Good to “have you back”!
However, one I’d like to point out regarding the beginning of
http://mileswmathis.com/muse2.pdf ,
that UNCONDITIONAL LOVE does not mean to approve of or even silently endure everything. Quite the contrary, it furthers perception of faults.
To me, it means a departure from the brutal ‘an eye for an eye”, that hasn’t seemed to have brought us forward in any meaningful way.
May I give you an example:
~2 weeks ago someone attempted passing our un-fenced 4-family compound with a machete, not seeing me working in my car. Our dog jumped out at him from underneath, because some male person has broken his leg with a stick, so he hates any ‘armed’ males he doesn’t recognise. Him at once raising the machete against my dog, I rushed out the car, whereupon he scrambled, loosing his shoe. I picked up the shoe and informed him about the reason of the dog’s behaviour, instead of smashing his face in or so.
I don’t even wish the people who apparently killed my cat recently (he was a very experienced alpha male, so in this area only people, some of whom here eat cats and dogs, could likely have happened to him) any harm – better for me would be they learn, regret and come up.
I don’t know anyone whom I’d wish evil per se – not from lack of negative experience or naivety, though.
(I would have def beaten them, if in flagrante delicto, nonetheless)
LikeLike
Yes, there are often CenturyLink and COmcast trucks on this little deadend street, though I have no proof they are involved. But since I have written about Comcast, outing them as a CIA front, the cui bono is obvious. That would be a good first guess as to the cause of all this. But they would probably have orders from above, and the possibilities are nearly endless as to who would ask for those. There are very few famous people I haven’t outed, at this point. Probably someone with local links, such as Attiyah, Hopper’s buddies, or someone like that. Paseo is going on right now, which is kind of like the mess I wrote on in HObart, Australia, with giant metal eyes of Horus installed downtown, etc. posing as “art”.
LikeLike
So many local spooks in Taos with nothing to do except bug the one man who could cure them of their spiritual malaise.
I now refer to the spooky MI5 HQ in Northern Ireland as a “theatrical company”: all they do is setup incident after incident (see the “death” of Lyra Mckee). Methinks they want to start-up the “Troubles” again. All it takes is to stage an event with one of their fake terrorist groups (e.g. “The Real IRA”) and then the Organ Grinder begins.
One fake attack leads to 24 hours of interviews and debates on the BBC. Every talking head is now a spook as far as I’m concerned — politicians, news presenters, “pundits” and experts. Anyone who thinks a group named like the “Judean People’s Front” is genuine, is a retard or a spook.
LikeLike
The Judean People’s Front? Isn’t that from Life of Brian?
LikeLike
Yes, I was taking the p*ss out of all these silly “Irish Republican” groups that have popped up since the peace process began over here, e.g. The Real IRA, The Continuity IRA, The Republican Y-Front (made that one up). They’re all clearly MI5 controlled groups. It reminded me of that Life of Brian gag.
There are many people here who think these groups are genuine; attending so-called “dissident” meetings, not realizing they are being bounced from one controlled organization to another. The scary thing is that the spooks could start the conflict here again in an instant — they have everything in place to fake an event that allows such groups to flame the discontent.
LikeLike
@nada0101: Aye I spent an afternoon reading up on the Troubles and all the IRA groups. It’s readily admitted on various pages these IRA groups were stacked with British agents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Irish_Republican_Army#Informers
I actually googled JPF and looks like they are still continuing the “joke”:
https://twitter.com/judeanpf?lang=en
“I asked for a media empire, but the Elders of Zion only gave me a Twitter account and a blog. RT = 100% agreement, support, & allegience”
https://twitter.com/elderofziyon?lang=en
“International man of mystery, who just happens to run the world. Zionism, Israel, the Arab world, Palestinians, all from a different viewpoint.”
Bad jokes and memes, scaring Jews into immigrating to Israel, and boilerplate Zionist propaganda. Are ya’ll laughing now? This is what I was talking about earlier. The next stage of the game is to turn the new revelations into a big ol’ cynical joke now. I’m sure we’ll get a Hollywood movie very soon starring an Austin Powers-like Zionist with superpowers, and written and directed by Seth Rogan. It’ll be meme-tastic.
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2019/09/antisemitism-far-worse-than-you-thought.html
“I don’t think that Weiss has the answers for North American Jews. But maybe her description of exactly how bad the situation is, and how it is likely to get worse, will impel some of them to think seriously about aliyah.”
The eternal Zionist project. They still haven’t finished hooking or crooking Jews into coming to Israel.
LikeLike
Today I looked at Google news and in the “Spotlight” section, which I guess represent articles they deem important to me personally, there was this:
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29787/the-sr-71-blackbirds-predecessor-created-plasma-stealth-by-burning-cesium-laced-fuel
This is a long and tedious article explaining why the CIA used cesium in planes:
“The basic principle behind this is a concept known as “plasma stealth.” In the simplest terms, this involves creating a cloud of plasma, or ionized gas, around some or all of an object. The plasma then absorbs electromagnetic radiation, such as radar waves, preventing them from reflecting back. There are multiple ways to generate the required plasma Lovick’s idea was to inject an alkali metal, via a fuel additive, into the extremely hot exhaust streams, where the heat would turn it into an ionized gas.
Lockheed tested mixtures using sodium, potassium, and cesium. “Cesium seemed to be the material of choice because in the gaseous state it is the most easily ionized.””
I am trying to figure out what level of paranoia is called for. I have been reading the comments in this forum about cesium-drive planes. Then I re-read the paper where Miles mentions the idea. I may have done a search for “cesium”, which may explain why they fed me this article.
Also, the article was published Sept. 12, quite recently. Could they have cooked up this article in response to our forum discussions?
LikeLike
Cue music to The Twilight Zone?
The BBC are blessed with these coincidences too.
LikeLike
This is really interesting. Yes I find it highly suspect and would not be surprised if they wrote this piece on caesium as some kind of misdirection. The use of caesium in creating plasma is interesting, since the bright, shifting colors often reported in UFO sightings seem to be emitted from plasma that either surrounds or is underneath UFOs.
About 6 years ago I got really into learning about UFO’s and related phenomena. I was deep into it. One of the books I used to recommend to people was Paul Hill’s Unconventional Flying Objects. I eventually lost interest, as I tend to do, and then I discovered other conspiracies and Miles’ work in short order, and then real physics. That’s when I realized that Paul Hill’s connection to NASA was a red flag, not an imprimatur of scientific authority, and that Paul didn’t understand how relativity or gravity worked, so his speculations were pretty much worthless.
What to make of the sighting reports that he compiled in that book? I’m not sure. I am inclined to believe that most of them are true. However, I am skeptical about reports of sightings of the UFO occupants. They are far fewer and easier to hoax, since you just need to pay somebody to say he saw little green men or whatever. Sightings of UFOs are extremely common, or appear to be common if organizations like MUFON are to be believed. I think the fact that we have 3 or 4 people here who chimed in with their UFO sightings is an indication of how common they are. I myself haven’t seen one, but I know at least one person I trust who has.
The realization that UFOs were probably human-made craft where the alien pilots are just a cover story occurred to me before Miles wrote his paper touching on the subject. It made a lot of pieces of the puzzle fall together. For example, how is it possible that so many “former” military officers have come forward to talk about the presence of UFOs at nuclear military facilities, where some even testified that the UFOs disarmed the nuclear weapons or otherwise shut down the facilities, yet they faced no repercussions? You would think that if this was true, it would be a deeply held military secret, and that these men would be court-martialed for disclosing those secrets. Even if they were really retired, their are still bound by their security oath. But if these men were running a psyop, lying about what they had seen, then it makes perfect sense. They were probably paid handsomely for doing their duty. Of course the “UFO’s and Nukes” psyop is a two-fer, since you sell the lie of aliens and nuclear weapons.
I’m still open to the possibility that UFOS are piloted by aliens or some kind of alien tech. Or they could be some kind of recovered technology from an ancient civilization. But for now the hypothesis that they are more mundane than that sits well with me and helps me make much more sense of the UFO landscape than any other explanation.
I am still at a loss to understand their flight capabilities. I agree that with the kind of acceleration UFOs exhibit, it’s hard to imagine how a person could withstand that kind of G-force. And then of course there is the question of how the craft itself could withstand that. As Russell Taylor pointed out, flying at that speed would create an awful amount of heat. Well, you could imagine some kind of charge supercavitation technology, similar to the kind of cavitation that torpedoes use to travel faster under water. In his paper on UFO’s, I think Miles alludes to these as ‘charge envelopes.’
I quick skim over the principles of cavitation and supercavitation suggest that it is created by a differential in pressures/densities. I realize that the principles governing fluid dynamics are not necessarily the same as charge field dynamics, but Miles often talks about how electrons, for example, follow the field potential, and we know that the charge field does vary in density. So perhaps local charge can be manipulated in a similar way by creating a differential charge pressure, creating a kind of short-lived charge void in front of (or above) the craft in a way that would allow it to move at speeds relatively unencumbered by the drag caused by the charge field, let alone air molecules. Miles has said many times that you cannot really create a true vacuum, since charge can’t be kept out. But perhaps it is possible to create a very short lived charge vacuum through some form of cavitation.
One implication of this is that inertial forces is really just a byproduct of matter interacting with the (opposing?) charge field. Remove the charge field, and you remove g-forces. This would be akin to the gravity shielding proposed by Hill in his book. I just scanned Miles’ science site for the word “inertia” and it only comes up in his intro to the 3rd wave as a result of expansion. But since expansion has been relegated to the circular file with charge taking its place, I’d love to see a new explanation of inertial forces that takes this new perspective on gravity into account. It might be as simple as I’ve described here. Such an accounting would also be a good antidote to McCulloch’s DARPA-funded theory of Quantized Inertia (AKA Modified Inertia from a Hubble-scale Casimir effect or MiHsC).
Another implication of a charge envelope is that it makes superluminal travel theoretically possible, if it is indeed the case that the speed of light is imposed by charge field density, as Miles has proposed.
Whether or not supercavitating charge envelopes are involved, a final implication of the UFO as man-made contraption, given their apparent flight capabilities, in my opinion, is that TPTB have a much better understanding of the charge field than I’d like to give them credit for. I’m also doubtful they could power these craft just by stripping electrons off caesium, but maybe there’s more power to be had there than I realize. Or maybe you don’t need much power once you’ve created a charge envelope.
By the way, I think that Rolleikin’s observation of a clear boundary between ambient temperature and very cold under the craft is also an indication of prowess in charge field manipulation, and it would indicate that they maneuver by manipulating charge field density. I reckon cold air directly under the craft would indicate the creation of a charge minimum directly underneath, which enabled it to levitate close to the ground.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I hope you’re wrong 😀
LikeLike
Posts like this is why I really miss your papers, Josh.
If PTB really have some advanced understanding of charge field, it’s completely empirical. Trial and error until they made anything work. I don’t believe they have a profound understanding of real physics, mechanics and math such as Miles has demonstrated.
This cesium-laced fuel story has only a single source on the web, dated to September 15th 2019. There is no other report or news story from the past, which makes it a red flag. Why now? And what kind of misdirection you think is at play here? Just to make an excuse for finding traces of cesium in the atmosphere, so nobody would look into it for real like Miles did?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Vex. I do hope you’re right. On the one hand, I want to believe that 20th century (and earlier) physics really is the shit-show that Miles has shown it to be, and that it was just the work of people who couldn’t figure out how things work and tried to hide their ignorance with piles of math and redefining theorizing as simply coming up with new names for observed phenomena.
But I’m not so sure.
I was struck by the following paragraph from Miles’ 2009 paper on The Fine Structure Constant and Planck’s Constant:
“I will now show that Planck’s constant is very easy to derive mechanically, which makes it astonishing that the derivation is not on the Wiki page or in any textbooks. Once you see how easy it is, you will agree that this information must be hidden on purpose. There is no way that a century of particle physicists could have been ignorant of what I am about to prove, so we must assume they were hiding it with full intent to deceive.”
Then of course there is his 2011 paper on whether physics was taken over by intelligence communities (conclusion: yes it was).
So then the question becomes: if they are not bumbling fools, how much do they know? Well, in my opinion, in order to misdirect from the truth in the way that they have, they would have to have a solid understanding of how things actually work. To use an analogy, magicians don’t use misdirection haphazardly. They use it very carefully to hide something very specific that they don’t want you to see. I think the same principle applies here: the misdirection is not haphazard; it is very carefully crafted. And it couldn’t be carefully crafted without a good understanding of what’s really going on. Plus I really don’t see how UFOs could achieve what the appear to be capable of without a solid understanding of the charge field.
I would like to give them as little credit as possible, don’t get me wrong. And even if I’m right, the credit would really belong to whatever brilliant minds they’ve bribed and co-opted and cajoled. Or maybe knowledge was discovered it in the records of some ancient civilization. But here I’m way, way out on a speculative limb.
But since I’m out here, might as add one more thing about UFOs:
This from the Wikipedia page on supercavitation: “A key feature of the supercavitating object is the nose, which may be shaped as a flat disk or cone.” Could be a clue towards the disk or cigar shapes most frequently reported in UFO sightings.
LikeLike
It was interesting to read what you think about it, speculative or not. We may disagree about how much PTB actually know about charge, though.
Understanding the principle of how charge works may be purely empirical, without supporting math and physics to explain it in terms of mechanism and forces involved. As in the case of chemical elements/chemistry – some properties of chemical reactions were used long before the knowledge could properly explain it, as in the case of i.e. gun powder. Electricity and magnetism are another example where mastering the use of produced effects wasn’t explained with contemporary science. It still isn’t properly explained if MS physics is applied, however everybody knows that electricity caries power/energy and how to properly harness it without killing themselves. So in analogy, PTB may have the know-how to use charge field and its properties without knowing how to explain it with math and mechanics.
As much as it’s reasonable to assume the conspiracy of this issue, I’m not (yet) willing to believe they had the profound understanding of charge field before Miles came along. Simply because I don’t believe that any of indoctrinated physicists with a degree from their universities would dare to deconstruct Newton, for starters. Followed by disproving many other established myths and their authors. Just no way they could have pulled that off, in my opinion. So, trial-and-error method is what I’d give them all the credit for when it comes to charge field.
LikeLike
A light-hearted aside…Josh’s post reminded me of the “anti-gravity” paint from First Men on the Moon…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Men_in_the_Moon
I think the “anti-Gravity” paint was from a different story or movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As a science fiction fan I immediately thought about how Miles’ charge field physics could be utilised for spacecraft and superluminal travel as soon as I read into his papers. Thinking about something like charge cavitation to create a void where a vessel would not be impeded by collisions with photons or anything else to allow FTL travel analogous to how a supercavitating torpedo travels trough water is very tempting at first. But as soon as you realize that charge physics is purely mechanical this analogy falls quickly apart.
The torpedo is surrounded by a medium that has a higher pressure yet a subtantially lower density than the water. Pressurized air can push away the water and provide a low density environment for faster travel. But in a charge field you cannot create a region with higher pressure yet lower density. As soon as a charge-free void would be created there is nothing that stops the void from collapsing amidst the outer charge pressure. You would have to counteract the inbound charge by a constant stream of outgoing charge which defeats the concept of a real (even temporary) charge vacuum.
So basically, the photons in the ambient charge field need to be displaced to create a void. But the only thing that can displace them are other photons that push them outward. The net impulse then precludes FTL travel as usual.
A charge drive that uses the cavitation concept would only yield a benefit in an atmosphere or under water, where a high density environment of molecules and atoms is displaced by a high-pressure expanding photon field that creates a vacuum (in the sense of airless space) around the vehicle. There may even be a propulsion effect in space but only at sublight speeds.
LikeLike
Miles has updated his caesium paper in light of the google article –
Click to access caes.pdf
LikeLike
95%? Hypergolic huh? And rocks! Just 15 hours?
This fence is feeling very rickety all of a sudden.
I did spend some time trying to find video footage showing a Space Shuffle followed all the way into orbit. Shouldn’t be too difficult; have you seen the zoom capability on some of these TV cameras? Not found one yet! Temporarily gave up trying.
LikeLike
Good luck. 🙂
LikeLike
And that is how the Masters of Discourse will control the debate on mainstream forums. Now if you mention “caesium tech”, guaranteed someone is going to quote that article. Of course, if you can grasp the detail and logic of Miles’ paper then you can immediately counter. If you wanted to get into such a debate…
LikeLike
@Josh said
“So perhaps local charge can be manipulated in a similar way by creating a differential charge pressure, creating a kind of short-lived charge void in front of (or above) the craft in a way that would allow it to move at speeds relatively unencumbered by the drag caused by the charge field, let alone air molecules.”
Did Miles recently give us a clue in this direction? From his diamagnatism paper,
“The ONLY thing that can affect a charge field is a denser or more aligned charge field.”
LikeLike
“The ONLY thing that can affect a charge field is a denser or more aligned charge field”
Didn’t he also say that it is the directionality of emitted charge that creates the magnetic field associated with conductors like iron for instance? Magnetised iron having magnetically aligned molecules? Could caesium be manipulated to directionalise it’s charge output to create an extremely powerful magnetic field? This is something I’ve read in the past about unidentifiable flying craft. That the technology probably uses a very powerful magnetic field to cause an anti-gravitational effect, so lift isn’t a problem any longer. Someone probably already proposed this….so I’m perhaps just remembering their words. So much information….such a small head hehehe!
LikeLike
“This is something I’ve read in the past about unidentifiable flying craft. That the technology probably uses a very powerful magnetic field to cause an anti-gravitational effect, so lift isn’t a problem any longer.”
I suspect it is a field of some kind but not what we know as a magnetic field. I think it is more like a gravity field in that it affects all matter, not just iron and a few other metals as a conventional magnetic field does. I also suspect it can reverse its polarity, that is, to either attract or repel. But, I am just guessing here and this still wouldn’t explain the inertia-less and super high speed maneuvers.
(I say this only because of what I have witnessed along this line as noted elsewhere)
And, I expect the resident aerospace experts will be along momentarily to explain how I have it all wrong. 🙂
LikeLike
@Ian
I thought that was about spin direction. But maybe it applies more generally. Or maybe that’s all that needs to be manipulated to achieve those kinds of flight dynamics.
LikeLike
Happy birthday, Miles!
LikeLike
Aye, happy birthday Miles Slàinte mhath!
LikeLike
Happy Boitday Mr. Mathis😁
LikeLike
Indeed .. have a very happy birthday Miles.
One great thing about those blonde curls, it’s difficult to tell when they start going grey hehehe!
LikeLike
Yes, Happy birthday Miles. Thank you for all of your work. It is VERY much appreciated.
LikeLike
Click to access elpaso.pdf
New paper by Lestrade @ Miles’ on the El Paso hoax.
LikeLike
Thanks for the heads up Lewis
LikeLike
Good read. I hope someone outs the Dayton shooting. I would, but like Miles, I’m just sick and tired of these hoaxes and am ready to move on. If anyone is writing one for Dayton let me know and I’ll forward info if needed.
In addition, I want to bring up another (I believe) fake shooting phenomenon called ‘swatting’. I was just reminded of this crap this morning when I came across this article:
https://egamingdesk.com/console/us-gamer-jailed-over-swatting-death/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Wichita_swatting
The stories make no sense and are replete with numerology. Apparently all you have to do is make an anonymous call to a police department, say there is a hostage situation, and then police will proceed to the target location, storm the premises, and then shoot anyone who makes a wrong move on sight. All based on anonymous or a single call. No questions asked, apparently.
However the most interesting part about all of this is that its basically a reverse of these hoax shootings, where we are being told anonymous citizens are calling in hoaxed events into the police and TV stations, instead of the media and emergency services (DHS) pushing hoaxed events onto the people, but pretending they are real. They may still fake a death I guess for posterity, but it’s interesting in these ‘swattings’ we repeatedly told they were accidents or based on a ‘hoax’ report.
Furthermore, down at the bottom of the Wichita swatting wiki, we get this:
In response to Finch’s slaying, the Kansas state legislature approved a bill in March 2018 to establish creating a false alarm resulting in injury or death as a class one felony, carrying a prison sentence between 10 and 41 years. The bill was signed into law by Governor Jeff Colyer on April 12.[28] The Andrew T. Finch Memorial Act of 2018 was introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Ron Estes in March 2018. The bill, also known as the Preventing Swatting and Protecting Our Communities Act of 2018, would make providing false information with the intent to cause an emergency response punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment, up to 20 years’ imprisonment if serious injury results, and up to life imprisonment if the act results in death. The bill was referred to the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations,[29] but was never taken up for a vote and died in committee. Rep. Eliot Engel introduced a bill in January 2019 to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for enhanced penalties for the transmission of misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to trigger an emergency response. As of March 2019 it has been referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.[30]
So I gotta ask..in these bills, does the DHS/Intelligence get a free pass on reporting hoaxes? Homeland Security doesn’t seem very eager in passing this bill. Hmmm..
I think Miles once wrote that there probably isn’t any laws on the books regarding hoaxes. As everyone already knows, there are already laws on he books for making false reports to the police, so is this some stealthy counter-attack by another party in the legislatures, trying to clamp down on these hoaxes? Very interesting I’d say, because this isn’t the first attempt to do so:
“In 2011, California State Senator Ted Lieu authored a bill to increase penalties for swatting. His own family became a victim of swatting when the bill was proposed.[26] A dozen police officers, along with firefighters and paramedics surrounded his family home.
In 2015 a New Jersey State Assemblyman Paul D. Moriarty announced a bill[27] to increase sentences for hoax emergency calls, and was targeted by a hoax.[28][29] The bill proposed prison sentences up to ten years and fines of to $150,000.
A 2015 bipartisan bill in Congress sponsored by Katherine Clark and Patrick Meehan made swatting a federal crime with increased penalties.[30][31] Congresswoman Clark wrote an op-ed in The Hill saying that 2.5 million cases of cyber stalking between 2010 and 2013 had only resulted in 10 cases prosecuted, although a source for this was not provided.[32][33] As revenge for the bill, an anonymous caller fraudulently called police to Rep. Clark’s house on January 31, 2016.[34] “
It’s really impossible to believe they would ‘accidentally’ swat a state senator’s house.
There’s even a fake within a fake involving the Parkland hoax. Can’t remember if that paper included this ‘swatting’ bit:
“On June 5, 2018, police were called to the Parkland, Florida home of Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivor and gun-control activist David Hogg.[78] The caller claimed that there was a “hostage situation,” prompting an emergency response that included a SWAT team.[79] Hogg was not at home at the time, as he was in Washington, D.C., with his family to receive the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award as one of the organizers of the March for Our Lives.[79]”
LikeLike
Also dunno if I just noticed this myself, but the Crows on Demand website received a facelift last time I looked at it:
https://crowdsondemand.com/
https://crowdsondemand.com/who-we-are
https://crowdsondemand.com/protests-rallies-and-advocacy
“Crowds on Demand was hired by multiple large non-union firms to push back against new regulations in a deeply labor-friendly state. We successfully lobbied the legislature and the Labor Commission to push back proposed labor regulations. We created two organizations with associated websites: one conservative site focused on the impact unions have on drastically increasing government spending and one liberal one focused on the racially discriminatory and sexist policies of many unions. We provided phone-bankers and constituent lobby visits associated with the two organizations to lobby conservative and liberal lawmakers and policymakers respectively. Within two months, the proposed regulations were off the table.”
Just wow.. Black Operations For Hire. But again, why am I surprised? There are way too many spooks in the graveyard, and they are totally out of control.Make sure to send this page to your Team Red and Team Blue friends out there who still think they live in a ‘democracy’, or ‘republic’, or some such non-sense.
In fact send this to everyone. I wanna be like that Major in that Monty Python skit where the Mob comes in demanding protection money, and just stand up and say no. ‘This is silly, ridiculous non-sense and I don’t even get a funny line.’ (that video has been scrubbed off YT btw).
Someone should Request A Quote for how much it would cost to set up a protest in front of Langley.
https://crowdsondemand.com/request-quote
LikeLike
Highly informative posts thank you.
LikeLike
Monty Python Mafia vs Army
LikeLike
Lol. This is all getting very silly; very silly indeed.
LikeLike
…….And affiliated with Hollywood Chamber of Commerce no less……don’t touch that dial…..wonder how many of the hoaxes these dirt-bags have been associated with????
LikeLike
Back in my Hollywood “extra” days I worked a day for one of these crowd suppliers. My booking service set it up without my knowledge. I went ahead and worked the job. It was just an audience gig for a TV show. We had to do all sorts of lame reaction shots for the stupid stuff going on on stage. Laughing, cheering, yelling, etc. It was really stupid. I hated it and told my service to never book me on one of those again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A suitable microcosm that explains the theatrics of mainstream Clown World.
I don’t think it is a coincidence that the expression “Clown World” is doing the rounds just as “The Joker” film is being promoted. The spooks want us to think that are existence is just crazy, random; that life is bizarro with no meaning.
Reality says different, of course. The “Clown World” is the mainstream bulls**t fed to us past, present and future. The real world has beauty and meaning.
LikeLike
our existence
Reality says differently?
Me go get coffee; me go get cookie 😉
LikeLike
SATIRE
Want to scare people into never leaving their homes? Come on down to Wee Willys!!
Need some fake kids for a fake shooting in an empty school?
No problem! http://Www.crisiscast.com
Need a large crowd of people running away from CGI’d collapsing skyscrapers?
We got ya covered! http://Www.crowdsondemand.com
Need to start a border riot with stolen guns and burning police cars?
Done deal!! http://Www.crowdsondemand.com
Need some fake victims at a fake concert shooting in Las Vegas?
What are you waiting for? http://Www.crisescast.com
Come on down to Wee Willies Fakery Emporium and Smoke House. No hoax is too big or too small for Wee Willys! Plus we serve ribs! Call today – Fake tomorrow!
Depending on target availability. (Not valid in Rhode Island)
LikeLike
Maybe someone can offer some clarification on Miles’ cesium addendum (http://mileswmathis.com/caes.pdf)
He explains that the Cesium couldn’t be used to reduce the radar signature. He writes:
“[…] Cesium wasn’t just an additive, it was probably the main component of the fuel. The Cesium in the exhaust was then just unspent fuel. ”
But then he dismisses the fuel idea:
“This was a plane created to fly at over Mach3, so the fuel needed to be as efficient as possible. Oxygen levels also drop at the altitudes it was flying. Adding both Cesium and Dialkyl Phosphate shouldn’t have helped in that regard, since although we are seeing that Cesium can be used a fuel, it can’t be used in the same way jet fuel is.”
“It couldn’t be burned in the same process as kerosene. This is because kerosene is a molecule and Cesium is an element. Kerosene breaks down into Carbon Dioxide and Water when burned in Oxygen, but you can’t burn an element in that way, since it won’t break down.”
Now, how does cesium burn exactly?
Wiki says:
“It [Cesium] is highly pyrophoric: the autoignition temperature of caesium is −116 °C, and it ignites explosively in air to form caesium hydroxide [CsOH] and various oxides.”
“Caesium metal is one of the most reactive elements and is highly explosive in the presence of water. The hydrogen gas produced by the reaction is heated by the thermal energy released at the same time, causing ignition and a violent explosion. This can occur with other alkali metals, but caesium is so potent that this explosive reaction can be triggered even by cold water.”
That seems as if it were very useful as jet fuel since the explosive expansion would offer more thrust in addition to the explosion of the kerosene in the jet engine. And as Miles writes: “Kerosene breaks down into Carbon Dioxide and Water when burned in Oxygen” That means the caesium is exposed to water, and as Wiki writes: “[Caesium] is highly explosive in the presence of water.” and “it ignites explosively in air to form caesium hydroxide [CsOH]” So the water not only acts as a catalyst, it’s also a reactant to form the reaction product CsOH. So the lack of oxygen in the upper atmosphere wouldn’t be an issue as Miles writes: ” By the time you hit 300,000 ft, there is virtually no Oxygen left to burn, since the atmosphere is mostly Hydrogen.”
So, the story to use the cesium to reduce the radar signature is obviously bullshit. But could it still have been used as jet fuel?
LikeLike
Imagine the whole “chem trail” psyop was to cover-up such things like this technology.
LikeLike
Hmmmm…..yup!
LikeLike
“chem Trail” psy op?? Are you suggesting those long white clouds in the sky are a psy op??? How so…
LikeLike
“Are you suggesting those long white clouds in the sky are a psy op?”
Dic Def:
“military actions designed to influence the perceptions and attitudes of individuals, groups, and foreign governments”
‘They’ say the trails are normal and nothing to worry about….which makes me worried!
They certainly aint normal…just ask an ex-military jet pilot…
LikeLike
Exceptionally well done video showing the difference. Contrails vs Chemtrail 101 lesson starts @ 9:08
LikeLike
Opinion only here:
I just took a trip to europe and saw the trails in and around the Rhine river even in the Netherlands. My opinion is still that the trails are used in weather manipulation. I watch this meteorologist often and he explains it pretty well.
Thanks for indulging. It’s all good. 😉
https://www.youtube.com/user/1PacificRedwood/videos
LikeLike
Egghead:
I guess the big and obvious – in your face – things are just smoke and mirrors, while the real nasty stuff is actually residing in your fridge.
After the huge kerfuffle in the UK about fluoridated water supplies, I decided to start drinking bottled spring water. Not just any brand but stuff I researched and knew was genuine. But just recently my daughter asked me about the best built-in water filters fitted to kettles. During my research I found that her local drinking water wasn’t fluoridated. So I checked our local supply and that isn’t fluoridated either.
So were all the news articles and scare stories just a hoax to get everyone to buy ultra-expensive water? Maybe? Worked for Del Boy.
blob:https://www.thesun.co.uk/a409ba6c-e619-4266-aeb2-71aed19cbad3
They must be keeping the toxicity down, because if they were proven to be causing major pollution of the atmosphere, the public would be hopping mad, and the perpetrators wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. How would they get rid of the crap then? At a huge cost, funded by the tax payer as usual.
If they did everything the easy way, then costs would sky-rocket, and we would all be paying 80% of our wages in taxes. There has to be some balance for the sake of stability..
Oil tanker breaks up, leaks oil all over the sea bed. Catastrophe! Environmental disaster….but…. 10 years later the sea bed is thriving with more sea-life than before the spill. Plus the fact that oil seeps (that’s what they’re called) from the sea bed all over the world, all the time. It’s natures mineral fertiliser for the oceans. The boost in sea-life near seeps and even volcanic thermal vents is well documented.
So yet again, we get all the hyperbole by the shovel full, when the reality is often the opposite of that which we are told. So BP get fined ‘plenty millions’ for their naughty oil spill. They then stick 10 cents on every gallon of fuel for the next 20 years, so you and I pay the fine. Meanwhile the fishes and plankton are having a feckin banquet!
My point? I thought you’d never ask. Don’t take too much notice of the stuff that’s shouted from the rooftops. It’s a distraction!
LikeLike
Agreed. You hit on one of my favorite topics – fluoride. Yep, I own a tester and have found that the water supply to my home is exactly the same as our city provides the results on online. .3 ppm.
What was also interesting was what I found after analyzing everything in my liquor cabinet. Many top shelf bottles exist there so I tested them “all.”
And they all have fluoride in them. Every single one of them. Top shelf examples like tequilas, vodkas, scotches and whiskey’s. ALL OF THEM HAVE FL values from .3 ppm to .5 ppm. Very interesting to ask yourself, or actually prove to yourself, where are these products actually made? Are they made where the label says? Hmmm..
Or are they made right here in the good ‘ol fluoridated US of A? Latter obviously.
After that test I went and purchased a bunch of single bottles of beers, Mexican, American and more importantly since I just came back from Germany, Holland etc. I bought many German and Belgian varieties. Results: the Mexican beers had the highest levels where I found as much as 1ppm (yes 1 part per million – not point 1). Typical american had about .3 ppm to .5 ppm as well. But every single one of the German and Belgian beers were completely free of fluoride. Hmmm.. again.
I’m just a brain that likes to think so this got me thinking, similar to what you discovered in your own water supplies, that the hype is mainly for that great social experiment called the Us of A. We seem to get the population control products and treatment here but it doesn’t seem to blatantly exist there – in the EU.
Now, I did not take the tester with me on my vacation but I did notice that most water bottles, supplied from Germany typically, had the test lab names and results on each bottle of water. Fluoride values were not on those bottles but every other mineral, found in that water, was.
LikeLike
As far as I’m aware, the Republic of Ireland puts fluoride in the water but Northern Ireland does not. Howzat for a massive, genocidal experiment.
LikeLike
I forgot to mention the wines.
My wife drinks organic wines, so I tested all of those. All clean. In fact I went beyond and started testing wines of the ‘not organic’ variety and all those came out clean too. No fluoride registered on any wines I tested.
I imagine since they are made from the grapes and not added water this may be why.
Thanks for your indulgence. 😉
LikeLike
“And they all have fluoride in them. Every single one of them. Top shelf examples like tequilas, vodkas, scotches and whiskey’s.”
Um … they have something else in them too that might be even worse than fluoride. 🙂
LikeLike
Miles solved my long term chemtrail study.
Miles said that there just dumping industrial toxic waste into the jet fuel to get rid of it….. like they do with fluoride in the water. Fluoride is a industrial toxic waste that they needed to get dumped somewhere…. so they figured…. “Hey… let’s just put it in the water…. ha ha ha”.
So they needed to get rid of some more industrial waste and just put it in the jet fuel…. ha ha ha.
It also answers the question that I always had about the COST of putting “whatever” “Scary Shit” the conspiracy theorists ( not you guys of course😉) say that they’re putting into the jet fuel.
It doesn’t cost them anything….. it actually saves them trillions by not dumping the correct way!
LikeLike
I once thought such theory might be possible. But answer me this: how come these trillionaires are immune to air and water pollution? Do they have a sterile environment, where they breathe some other air, drink and eat items from another world? I mean, it’s practically impossible to avoid pollution wherever you go. How do they get away with it so it doesn’t affect their health as much as ours?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question, Vexman. Is it possible that they have enclaves so remote that they really don’t have to worry about this? Or underground cities?
LikeLike
Either way….. whether they’re paying for it or whether it’s free there are still chemtrails in the sky.
LikeLike
The trails got very heavy here in the skies over Southern California but about 2 years ago they suddenly subsided (coincidentally, so did the drought we were having during the same period). They haven’t stopped completely but are MUCH less than they were during the drought.
I don’t think the reason the trails suddenly lessened is because toxic waste suddenly lessened. I think the reason has more to do with the drought.
But the above is not the only reason I think the drought is connected to the trails. During the heaviest trail activity there were always more trails just before, during and just after we had wet weather. When the weather was dry there were very few trails. I observed this connection over a period of some years and the connection was VERY consistent and predictable. Wet weather = more trails, dry weather = less trails.
Consistent heavy trails was coincident with drought and light trails were consistent with end of drought.
There may be more than one purpose for these trails but I am convinced that at least one purpose is to create dryer conditions.
LikeLike
@Josh, I really don’t know. Was just thinking out loud as this kind of questions are interesting to think about. It’s really nuts if they’re dumping poison, which then comes back at them as well. It would make sense if they were immune to it for whatever reason, but I don’t believe they are.
Remote enclaves? Is there any such place where you won’t find nano plastics, polluted water, poisoned earth, GSM signals or chem trails’ presence in the air? Where do they dump their trash in such remote area? How do they grow their food there? Their old mansions and castles they’ve built and still occupy seem real enough, far from remote or underground. They’re either stupid for doing what they’re doing or we got it partially wrong. An extreme stretch would be to say they’re immune because they’re not entirely human, but I really don’t want to go there. It seems more likely that we still don’t get the big picture while being 30 years behind.
LikeLike
@rolleikin
“During the heaviest trail activity there were always more trails just before, during and just after we had wet weather. When the weather was dry there were very few trails. I observed this connection over a period of some years and the connection was VERY consistent and predictable. Wet weather = more trails, dry weather = less trails.”
One thing I did wanna say and I don’t wanna be overly optimistic but I think that the earth actually has a really tremendous ability to clean itself and detoxify itself. But that aside.
If I was going to release something in the air that I wanted to eventually disperse, I would release it during a rainstorm so that the rain can take it down to the earth without it being in the air that long. If it happens to make a drought who cares.
There also could be chemtrail free zones on the earth that we don’t know about on beautiful paradise type islands.
LikeLike
It affects them. We see them aging very poorly, so it affects them. Witness the Hollywood royalty, aging faster, not slower, than normal people. See Mick Jagger, who an article yesterday said was avoiding cellular aging. Except that they forgot to post a picture of him after 1986 with the article. He’s 75 and looks about 90.
LikeLiked by 3 people
When Jagger lost his lips he started looking more and more like a skinny Schwartzenegger.
Related?
LikeLike
Maybe the top top top top family members that really run everything have a safe place to detoxify and live nice. While the moron cousins do all the work?
LikeLike
in the atlantic ocean, between 33th and 47th parallels south ?
where no boat and no plane go (rememeber the map posted by gaiasphere…)
or in antarctica which is not at all what we are told…
LikeLike
also, there are algorithms to simulate aging on a face…
may be the pictures we get are (bad) computed aging of these people… while they stay “forever young…
remember alpha-ville “forever young” (21 septembre 1984)
Can you imagine when this race is won?
Turn our golden the faces into the sun
Praising our leaders, we’re getting in tune
The music’s played by the, the madman
Forever young
I want to be forever young
Do you really want to live forever?
Forever, and ever
written by : Bernhard Lloyd, Marian Gold, Frank Mertens
LikeLike
Do you think there trying to give us a hint as to where they are?
LikeLike
Khan Noonien Singh before he became a renegade spacecraft thief…
LikeLike
I think they get access to better or more complete medicine than the rest of us.
Something I’ve learned over the past few years fixing my own health is that most day-to-day problems and chronic issues can be solved at home. Herbal medicine like infusions, decotions, tinctures, etc., and acupuncture (incredible, but if needles aren’t your thing then acupressure works, its the same thing as massage), good clean food, exercise, and good relationships are what people need for good health. I doubt that top Families are showing up at public hospitals and the like. They can get access to the top medicine and doctors anywhere in the world. Like you take a look at David Rockefeller and wonder how could this evil fuck have lived so long?
Conventional medicine today is more about population control than anything else. Ayurveda and TCM are centuries ahead of Western big pharm medicine, and conventional has no excuse anymore. The Indians and Chinese weren’t as fucked in the head as whitey in sending their spook agents to completely eviscerate their own traditional medicine system. What kind of monstrous foreign aliens do that to their own people?
LikeLike
They’re all on Bikini Atoll, of course. Except for JFK. He went to Skorpios (paid for via Jackie O swap) 🙂
LikeLike
remember the NRO analysis by mile’s guest writer, the three islands, saint Helene…and Ascension…
why do we have to believe that our maps are complete or right ?
what do we know about the south half of atlantic ocean ?
are we sure there is no island here ?
what about the famous novel, el criticón, written by Baltasar Gracián y Morales, a Spanish Jesuit, and considered as one of the most influential works in Spanish literature, along with Don Quixote and La Celestina, that makes the link between santa elena and the island of immortality.
??
LikeLike
I think Miles getting rid of toxic substances theory definitely holds water. Pardon the pun. Living in Denver, I am acutely aware of the power of the sun and ozone to break things down. So I think its possible that some mad scientist at DARPA thought “Hey! We could get rid of lots of evil toxic liquids, of which the Pentagon is by far the worst bad actor, by spraying them out of high altitude military flights where it will be cooked by UV and bleached by O3 and then drift down fairly harmlessy to the ground. And if we can engineer the weather at the same time, we’ll that’s a Two Fer!” We’ve also had record snows in the mountains here in several of the past 5 years. One place here was still open with a few runs last June:
https://arapahoebasin.blogspot.com/2019/06/this-year-compared-to-last.html
LikeLike
elpaydoublay, I was thinking the same thing.
Maybe most of the stuff is not “super duper toxic”…. just enough toxic that it is technically required to be dumped correctly and very expensive to dump.
LikeLike
It could be that the elite have advanced chelation or detox methods that they don’t share with us (probably).
LikeLike
“It could be that the elite have advanced chelation or detox methods that they don’t share with us (probably).”
Good point!
LikeLike
Though as I look at many of the public elite, many of them seem to be suffering from vitamin A toxicity. Miles brought up Keith Richards. A counter point perhaps could be the Queen of England. She has held up surprisingly well. No, I suspect these kinds of secrets are kept mainly for the echelons who live out of the spotlight…
LikeLike
I mean all they’d have to do is not eat the same foods they’re selling us, yeah?
LikeLike
and turn off TV, turn off radio, not go to watch stupid movies full of subliminal messages, etc.
only look at beautiful things, listen to beautiful music, smell flowers not exhaust fumes,
eat appetizing dishes and not stacks of brownish, whitish, greenish and reddish layers
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hamburgers)
never go down the town, always look at it from up
never take crowdy subway but private flights or armored cars.
never wait for anything, never loose time
live in nice and green environment, with no noise, no advertisement signage
and never worry about how you will pay your bill tomorrow… just worry about where you will take your next vacations… sea ? or mountain ?
https://www.kuoni.co.uk/french-polynesia/bora-bora/hotels/intercontinental-bora-bora-resort-and-thalasso-spa
https://destination-nouvellezelande.com/mont-cook-aoraki-hooker-valley/
LikeLike
I think the top families have chelation methods that can remove the heavy metals from their systems and then spend much of their time on the island with Elvis and all the others… haha
LikeLike
And many of ’em get their faces chopped-up, stretched and stuffed to try and look…weirder? Some of ’em look like Emperor Palpatine after a dose of force-lightening 😉 It makes sense that some top rankers will know what to avoid but it seems to me that some of the lower rankers will be sacrificed with contemptuous relish. Or their hubris is so overarching now, their lies so overwhelming, that they cannot discern anymore and are destroying themselves faster than they can destroy us.
LikeLike
A little more on Cesium: …”Cesium is used in atomic clocks and more recently in ion propulsion systems.”
Read more: https://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/cs.htm#ixzz5zzLkIsOG
In the winter her in Denver the sky is frequently criss-crossed with creeping spider webs of persistent contrails. And sometimes the very fast moving very high planes can be seen laying those tracks. Clearly moving much faster and higher than any kind of commercial civilian traffic.
LikeLike
Leaving elemental cesium’s crazy reactivity aside, the problem with ion thrusters in the atmosphere is that they are absurdly low thrust. They were dreamed up by my man tsiolkovsky(the rocket equation and metal dirigibles guy of course) per the narrative. So they belong in space where inertia really matters andwhatnot. If you got the proper licensing you can get some 99% pure cesium on amazon. It’s going for something like 90 bucks a feckin gram. I know money is just zeros on a puter hoyendia, but damn that seems a bit pricey for jet fuel: don’t it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
“It’s going for something like 90 bucks a feckin gram. I know money is just zeros on a puter hoyendia, but damn that seems a bit pricey for jet fuel: don’t it?”
And to a trillionaire needing to get from New York to Japan in a little over two hours?
To them, thousands of dollars are loose change….generous tips!
Reading Miles description, it seems like the caesium might be used as a fuel additive, in a similar way to which water injection is used to boost power in high performance internal combustion engines. Little tweaks with big results.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_injection_(engine)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermionic_converter
Then there’s this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium_injection_cycle
LikeLiked by 1 person
How many gallons of cesium do you reckon it would take to turn a 14 hour flight into a 2 hour flight? This fella says you can buy cesium in bulk for as low as 25 to 3 bucks per gram, but he doesn’t provide a citation of course…
https://www.cs.rochester.edu/users/faculty/nelson/cesium/cesium_faq.html
…even 3 bucks a gram will get ridiculous real quick in a jet seeing as we’re told a 747 will burn a gallon of fuel a second and there are about 3800 grams in a gallon of water and cesium has a specific gravity of 1.9 and the specific gravity of kerosene is only .8.
I was also bit confused by the water injection analogy. The wiki page you cited even states that water injection is also called anti-detonant injection. Wouldn’t cesium have the opposite effect?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“even 3 bucks a gram will get ridiculous real quick in a jet seeing as we’re told a 747 will burn a gallon of fuel a second”
I guess it all depends what part the caesium plays and therefore how much is used per second under different loads. Maybe it’s only used at high altitude to attain extreme speed. Maybe the hydrogen component plays a significant role?
I’m just guessing but then, that’s how we join the dots isn’t it…? Maybe the caesium plays a completely different role to that of creating thrust.
Would it be possible to use the electropositive nature of caesium to somehow channel charge through a conduit, instead of the craft, reducing its inertia, and therefore requiring less thrust to accelerate? The idea of creating a sort of magnetic, anti-gravity bubble around an aircraft to reduce air-drag/pressure has been around a very long time, but then I am of the belief that the ‘they’ are decades ahead of what we think ‘they’ are capable of. The timeline of the F117 being a prime example. It does seem odd that we haven’t seen any radically new technology of late. A veritable drought of new aircraft. Maybe that’s because they’ve developed a completely new design which they aren’t willing to divulge for some reason, maybe nefarious, and quite likely, they will use it as part of a massive alien attack hoax.
Wasn’t it Cheney or Rumsfeld who was heard to say, ‘if you think 911 was bad, wait until you see what’s coming’, etc, etc? Look around you. Most of the western population is overweight and sick. Not exactly an efficient fighting force. They could use the alien attack ruse to kill off hundreds of millions, thinning out the hoards of useless eaters, saving the planets resources and fulfilling those tactfully presumptuous words on the Georgia Guide Stones.
Personally, I think that they’re doing a very efficient job of slowly killing us off anyway, and the process is speeding up, and making loads of dollar for the elite in the process.
I will reiterate…then watch this space…as soon as there is enough, reliable automation in place, everyone who’s job will be taken is going to be made a redundant article. Useless … see above! ‘They’ have required us to build ‘their’ world and make it function. Automation will be a game changer the likes of which the world has never seen. We won’t be needed any longer!
Thunk time!
Could caesium play a role in the development of high speed maglev type train travel? Especially inside vacuum tubes to cut air drag. I do like that idea. More feasible than extreme speed air travel I would have thought! That way, the caesium could be used in a more electrical nature.
“I was also bit confused by the water injection analogy”
Well, it does seem counter-intuitive to inject water into a system designed to burn fuel and air does it not? But it works! Lets face it, under many normal conditions, water puts a fire out. And yes, I know pouring water on a fuel fire makes it worse but that’s not really relevant inside a combustion engine.. But it doesn’t necessarily follow that the caesium is simply added and burned in a conventional way, as I think Miles already pointed out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s a video that I think is related as the presenter talks about the dual propulsion systems allegedly used on the x-15 flown by our old pal Neil Armstrong. One system for in atmosphere propulsion and one system for edge of space control. If true, I suspect dual propulsion is much more common than we’ve been led to believe, though Armstrong’s involvement makes the doubt the whole thing.
LikeLike
Excuse my taking of the pee pee but that guy sounds like he’s educated in Edinburgh but hails from the Hebrides. A wonderful mix of accent and dialect.
I could be wrong of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks RT! I could not place his accent other than somewhere in UK. I’m usually pretty good at narrowing down to AUS, NZ, London, Midlands, Wales, Scottish, Ireland, N. Ireland. Now I can add Scottish Hebrides to the list. 😉
LikeLike
Yes, I think the ion thrusters reference is a dodge. My observations and gut tell me its just geo engineering and they are trying to dress it up as something else. In fact today in Denver was a particularly upper atmospheric haze day with contrail grid lines clearly visible above and seeping across the firmament like nuclear winter.
LikeLike
Yes, I said it could be used as fuel, just not in the same process as kerosene, since they don’t burn in the same way. But your comment about water is good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
New paper up @ Miles’, with more on the El Paso hoax –
Click to access skull.pdf
LikeLike
Down in the West Texas town of El Paso
I fell in love with a beautiful girl…
She asked me if I was in need of a beard,
I said wtf are you talking about…
etc etc.etc..
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really appreciated this short paper of Miles’ on that fake optical illusion. Key takeaway:
“You see, they want you confused, and one way to do that is to make you question your eyes and brain. They want you doubting your own ability to see the world and to make sense of it. If you doubt your own eyes, you will also doubt your ability to read all the hoaxes around you. You will think that maybe you are just wrong, as with this optical illusion. ”
This is SO true. A few weeks ago there was an exchange about Hawking on Jared’s Really Fake Science group on Facebook. There was a guy who was not buying any shenanigans about Hawking. I posted Miles’ paper on the impostor, which Jared had apparently already shown him. The guy wrote:
“I’m not saying he’s wrong as I’m not able to say one way or the other. … [it’s] an opinion I lack the foundational knowledge to support.”
I replied “But you don’t lack eyes. Just the willingness to believe them.”
His answer was: “You probably shouldn’t trust a thing that has lied to you repeatedly (eyes).”
So there you have it. Yes, they absolutely DO NOT want us trusting our judgement, our eyes, our instincts, our emotional reactions, our adverse reactions to toxic food, nothing. Reading Miles is a very good antidote to that. Probably the most important things I got out of reading his work is the courage to trust my own judgment no matter how many people tell me I’m wrong.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Great insight Josh. Concur with the wisdom gained from reading Miles work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. I am learning not to wait for “facts” to be presented and interpreted for me; but to rely more on logic, common-sense and intuition.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m just now seeing these messages. What’s funny, Josh, is it’s that same guy (Chris whatever) who started up a few philosophy groups several years ago and who, among several others, actually DROVE me to Mathis in a big way. He’s actually SEEN all the links to all the papers and read me quote and argue them, at least three years go. Maybe five, it’s a bit of a blur. Miles was as devastating then as now, and I quoted him heavily on a multitude of topics and linked his writing constantly. I had some of my own arguments – this isn’t plagiarism, mind any errant reader – but I often opined about topics using Miles’ papers as backup.
So the guy has had several YEARS to read the work. And he’s actually a pretty cool, smart guy for the most part. Yet he still has not empowered himself to THINK for himself or even trust his own eyes.
Their damage can get pretty deep. I don’t dislike the guy at all, but cannot trust HIS eyes or assessments since he himself won’t trust his own, you know? His polemics are not only flawed, they have been DAMAGED from without. Imagine not even trusting in one’s own eyes, in not even believing in the photons entering it to be real. It’s just sad.
LikeLike
Hey, just read some of the posts above, from about a month ago. Since Josh already told you, I can confirm that RT sent me an Iphone8 I am using to create a hotspot. WOrks, mostly. Except that as Wayne said, I am burning through my allotted quota very fast, especially when browsing and downloading photos. I had thought at first it was unlimited, but it wasn’t. So if anyone wants to send me internet time rather than a cash donation, I will gladly accept it. I don’t even know what a simcard is yet, but I guess I will be figuring it out soon. BTW, I had a 40 page paper on Norway ready to go when it disappeared from my computer. Vanished, although it had been saved about 100 times. Open Office failed to recover it and now tells me it does not exist. I am having a local guy try to retrieve it, but I am curious how this could happen. I will now save new papers to pdf as I go, so that I will have two separate copies, but I would like to hear some theories about how it happened. I assume CIA has some way of planting such destruction on bot computers like mine? It won’t stop me of course, since I can rewrite the whole thing in couple of days. They haven’t yet invented a device to enter my head and erase information there.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Do you have USB sticks Miles? If not then buy a few. You don’t need huge ones and they are super cheap these days. My folder containing your files – not up to date yet – takes up just 226Mb for well over 600 files. You can get a stick with many gigabytes of space for just a few bucks…your whole site in your pocket. And you could include a mobile Linux operating system like Ubuntu on the same stick (only a few megabytes), so you could use any computer or laptop, anywhere. Just put the USB stick into a USB port and boot the computer. Boot it to the OS on the stick and it’ll put the linux OS into your RAM so you can run the computer from there. Very fast and efficient and comes with many bog standard tools which you can add to like Open Office. You can also encrypt the files which is added security. You can also encrypt the files on your computer for added security.
Norway huh? I can’t wait for this…..
LikeLiked by 2 people
New paper: http://mileswmathis.com/diana.pdf
Curious why the paper says “First published December 14, 2019” and the updates page says 12/13 (todays date). Just curious if this is curious or just plain fun. 😉
LikeLike
“Curious why the paper says “First published December 14, 2019”…”
I can only assume it’s due to GMT and the date line. If it was already, officially, according to that line in Greenwich, London, actually the 14th, at the time that Miles posted it, then I guess it passes scrutiny. If it was still before midnight in Taos, then it would still be the 13th for Miles.
Of course it could be Miles seeing if anyone notices, like you said…fun.
Nice read though. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Thanks for taking the time Miles.
LikeLike
Sorry to hear about the loss of that paper. I look forward to reading the resurrected Norway paper — lots of strange shenanigans going on in those Scandinavian countries. The real shocker is that that those countries seem to have been ruled by the Jewish Families for a very long time indeed.
I always wondered why countries like Sweden were at the forefront of the implementation of cultural marxist policies and I bought the propaganda about agents being sent from Israel (see “Barbara Spectre”) to convert these nations. Same with Ireland, we had the likes of Ronit Lentin arriving around the same time to accuse the Irish of being racialist because they are white and Christian.
Of course, I now see all that as misdirection. Given that we know these countries have been ruled by the Families for 100s if not a 1000 years or more, then people like Lentin and Spectre can be seen for what they truly are — agents of misdirection.
Online spooks pretending to be nationalists could point and fulminate against Spectre, who helpfully stars in an interview setting out the plot and who is responsible (“zee Jews”). Yet it was our own governments and local spooks who are funding and implementing the societal destroying policies. The arrival of Lentin and Spectre into these European countries was a propaganda move, acting as cover for the local governments who got on with implementing the Families wishes.
Barbara Spectre’s institution for “re-educating” the Swedish was called Padeia and was given millions by the Phoeny Swedish Government. Padeia is the Ancient Greek term for education but it also means civilising the barbarous. So the spooks get to mock Ancient Greek civilisation and the modern Swedes all in one. I seriously doubt that “Barbara Spectre” is even her real name…
…but none of this has anything to do with Norway 😛 Miles, I hope you figure out how they deleted your file.
LikeLike
As far as HOW, all Intel chips (Macs only use Intel CPUs) have built-in back doors as we’ve discussed before. AMD chips likely do as well to some extent or other, but whatever. There’s a reason the company is called Intel in the first place. They have full access to whatever they want. You can back up your stuff to .pdf or USB but if they want to, they’ll just delete that too as soon as you plug it in or whenever.
I want to think it was just a file I/O (input output) error but given all the other fishy things going on, that would be naive.
One thing I do with my big project files is save iterations as I go, in case the main file gets corrupted or in case I just screw up. Totally different than just writing a simple document but the solution is the same – save in steps. When you hit 5 or 10 pages, save it as “filename_5pgs.docx” or something? Then again at 10, 20, whatever you feel works easiest for you. That might give you some breathing room if things happen again.
And another, safer alternative is to write as an email to yourself. It will save as drafts, and you can email yourself chunks obviously or do it a few pages at a time. But then there’s nothing local for them TO delete, and ProtonMail would give you another layer of potential protection. Then when you’re done, you collate all the text and format it for .pdf how you normally do?
Just some ideas. If they are in fact deleting your files, it will happen again. One file going poof is bad enough, but I’d hate to see this happen continuously.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another, perhaps last-ditch effort would be to ask Josh or Vexman to make you an invisible (not posted to their sites) Blog page for you to log in to their sites and write on. That would circumvent a great deal of potential Intelligence access, and nobody would know about it but you and them. WordPress itself (internally, not here in the comments) has a TON of Word-like features too so you could insert images and stuff and basically write how you normally would, and then collate that out and publish to .PDF when you’re finished.
If you want to try it I’ll make you a username/login on one of my sites, my construction company’s site or something totally unrelated, and you can give it a whirl. Again, nobody would be able to see it but you and whoever you choose. Josh and Vex may have issues since they’re using WordPress.com sites instead of full, standalone WordPress but if any of these options sounds worthwhile, I’d be happy to help and imagine they would as well! But I also imagine their sites are likely under scrutiny (at the VERY least), so there’s a couple more ideas you can ponder.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Norway Norway Norway Norway Norway
……can you feel the excitement?
Miles….find a way please…
It sits there, tucked out of the way under all that darkness and ice for much of the year.
Just mountains and lakes and trees and fish….all serene and innocent.
I’ll bet it’s like 50 shades of grey, Watergate and Conan the Barbarian rolled into one behind the scenes.
LikeLike
This won’t exactly tide you over but it’s a decent primer for anyone who might be interested. I’m salivating for that paper too. 😉
LikeLike
This was a recent desperate article from our local CIA “alt-weekly” rag by Daniel Walters [red flag name—related to Barbara?]. Unbelievable. Laughable. Sad.
““A lot of the misinformation being spread is not the result of bad actors,” Phillips says. “It’s everyday people doing everyday things.””
“Marantz, the expert on online trolls, says the long-term solution to the disinformation crisis is a deep and philosophical one that he’d explain at length with phrases like “reaffirming our commitment to epistemic depth.” But for now, the simpler way to react to disinformation is to rely a little bit more on the old gatekeepers.
“If you read The New York Times or the BBC or the alt-weekly in your town or the New Yorker, you’re going to be better informed than if you read Facebook,” Marantz says.
Not because they’re perfect—there’s a billion reasons to complain about mainstream journalists, he says—but because, for all their flaws, right now they’re the best we’ve got.”
“The way they keep people clicking and sharing and commenting is prioritizing things that get your heart pumping,” says Andrew Marantz, author of Antisocial: Online Extremists, Techno-Utopians, and the Hijacking of the American Conversation. “It’s like stocking a huge grocery store, but all of the visible aisles are Oreos and rat poison.”
[Sounds like a line Miles could have written. Haha.]
Daniel Walters goes on to write:
“Art of the lie
Politicians are known to lie. It’s what they do. Presidents lie, whether about WMD or keeping your health care or not having sexual relations with this or that woman. But there used to be limits. [haha]
“There were unwritten rules or norms about spin,” said Tim Miller, Jeb Bush’s former campaign spokesman. “You exaggerated for your candidate. You used hyperbole. You tried to muddy the waters.”
But there were unspoken, unwritten lines, implicit walls that mainstream candidates didn’t try to breach. Then came Trump.
Misinformation comes in a hundred ways from a hundred different sources. And yet Trump is somehow all of them.”
[On and on the merry-go-round goes…]
“When you’re flooded with so much bullshit,” New York Times media columnist Charlie Warzel says, separating fact from fiction becomes so difficult that “the task of trying to do it becomes, you know, tiresome, so you just stop.”
It’s the sort of thing your college philosophy professor might call an “epistemic crisis.” We don’t know what to believe. Truth is hazy. Reality itself becomes irrelevant. It’s a phenomenon that has already happened in places like Russia and the Philippines—and experts say that in the past few years, the United States has suddenly found itself on the same path.
“And that, to me, is one of the scariest things to think about,” Warzel says.”
Over-the-top nonsense. Full article here:
https://www.newsreview.com/chico/weapons-of-mass-deception/content?oid=29249926&fbclid=IwAR2RF9OIodJj8W6dKPTmQyt6gUtrutp–7QL8wKOUX3pZ3ExPqoFubmkSa0
LikeLike
Another new Miles’ paper up —
Click to access malc.pdf
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dammit. Another hero bites the dust crushes designer specs underfoot 😉
LikeLike
I once heard a bloke say ‘Malcolm X, wert he the last king of Scotland?’
Malcolm IV, was the last Scottish king called Malcolm, interesting portrait —
.jpg)
LikeLike
To whom it may concern:
ProtonMail security review
https://www.techspot.com/news/82776-protonmail-review-secure-email-really-secure.html
Pros
Emails are encrypted at rest and stored on Swiss servers
Strips IP address from emails
Can import contacts and emails through bridge feature
Officially under Switzerland jurisdiction
Apps for mobile devices
Can be used with email clients through the ProtonMail Bridge feature
– Cons
Now I don’t think any OTHER email platform is any better about security and most are absolutely wide open, especially to intelligence, but just thought some of you folks using it might want more information. TechSpot is also a known spook hangout so be aware of that as well; they have many biases and openly censor my comments all the time, too.
LikeLike
No doubt the CIA has a tentacle in Protonmail’s “ultra secure” underground bunkers. Switzerland has long been known as another one of their homes away from home.
But you’re right its about picking your poison when it comes to whatever client you want to use. Protonmail is good enough to keep out the spammers for me. Also it could be Switzerland is ‘neutral ground’ of sorts. That doesn’t mean much for us plebs, but it might mean our info possibly won’t get passed around like a cheap harlot during World Cup week. Like the Google/NSA does with anyone’s gmail account.
LikeLike
What I like about protonmail is that (so far), if you mail somebody else who has a protonmail address, they will receive the e-mail. In the past my e-mails to and from Miles were frequently messed with. The spooks don’t seem to have been able to interfere with that (or they don’t want us to know that they can). I don’t expect confidentiality of any kind. I assume they can log my keyboard strokes and take screenshots without my knowledge so that anything I write or see can be known by them. So whether or not the e-mail itself is “safely” encrypted is moot in my opinion.
LikeLike
Indeed, like I said I still feel like it’s probably the MOST secure around, so anyone with security issues by all means, try it. It’s worked for a few people here and I hope I didn’t sound like a naysayer. I don’t use it myself and haven’t had any issues that I know of using my Yahoo/Outlook emails, but that may change and then I’d try Proton.
And also “Proton” is of course just a really cool word! “NeutronMail” proably wouldn’t SOUND as cool to say aloud, so I feel like they at least named it something fun.
LikeLike
New paper up: The ASSASSINATION of MALCOLM X WAS STAGED
Click to access malc.pdf
“This one was made up by a writer.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Someone should write a paper about what really happened in history.
I guess we’ll all just have to wait for that big de-programming in the sky to find out.
LikeLike
Here you go:
Click to access history.pdf
LikeLike
Thanks
I remember that one.
Nice to read again.
LikeLike
New paper up!
Click to access neumann.pdf
Although I have to disagree that the John von Neumann propaganda is new. When I took physics in high school in the 80s my teacher presented von Neumann as the real genius of 20th century physics. And I’ve seen similar articles in the years since.
Also I wonder if the latest von Neumann activity is somehow related to that WeWork creep Adam Neumann.
LikeLike
“Von” was originally used to indicate a place of origin but later to indicate ‘nobility’.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I didn’t realise Wayne Knight was about 2ft 9″ in heels!
LikeLike
Thanks for the heads up. I do remember people going on about the “Von Neumann Model”.
LikeLike
…during my University days. Context helps 😛
LikeLike
Just quoting Miles for the constructive triumphalism — looks like mainstream magic, or Fizzix, is being hollowed out by the truth. 😀
LikeLike
What would I know? I just have two oak doors and a couple of shirt rails.
LikeLike
Hi everyone,
english is not my mother language so please excuse any mistakes.
I’ve read all of Miles’ history papers and all the comments here, but I still have a few questions left that no one can answer with certainty, but I just wanted to know how other people think the world works.
How financially successful can someone NOT from the families become
I’m still not completely sure if I understand the history of these families right, so please correct me if I got it wrong. As I understand it, it seems that thousands of years ago a group of people established a worldwide empire that has controlled the world from behind the scenes ever since. Which means that most likely every famous and rich person from the last thousands of years came from these families.
I’ve been wondering since learning how the world really works, how far a person not from the families can make it in this world.
If someone sets up his own company and builds into a multi-million dollar business, would at some point the people in power deny him the opportunities to grow his business further?
Or will they allow his business to grow but try to get him to marry into the peerage?
Is it even possible for a nobody to own a multi-million dollar business?
How rich will the families allow ordinary people to become?
Spooks in forums
One of the commenters here said that almost all posts in the Reddit Conspiracy subreddit are by paid shills.
That got me thinking, that maybe there’s also paid shills in those subreddits and other forums for independent musicians, self-publishing authors etc. since a few commenters here believe that the underground scenes are controlled as well.
I’ve seen many times posts there from people, claiming they know someone who self-published his book and sold hundreds of thousands or millions of copies or they know someone who worked at McDonalds 2 years ago and now plays festivals.
Are these people lying?
Are these people spooks who spread false hope and try to get people to put a lot of money and time into their music or book, knowing damn well they will never get far?
What if someone has the financial means,
for example, a doctor who’s single & has no kids to put a huge amount of money in advertising his book and thereby reach tons of people and be able to sell hundreds of thousands or millions of books. Do you think the families would somehow prevent that from happening too?
Marry into the peerage
Miles said in a paper that he could’ve married the jewish girl and be in the top 1%.
Is it even possible for a ‘poor’ person to marry into the families ?
In another paper he said the families like tall and blonde people. He said they were interested in him for breeding purposes, but I think for that they wouldn’t even need someone from their family to marry him. They could’ve just paid him for his sperm, impregnate their women with it and claim one of their male billionaires is the biological father.
Fake photographs
I have noticed in some photos that are clearly fake, that all people in the photo look in different directions and I’ve seen the same in other photos where I’m not 100% sure those are fake too. I just find it odd that in a group photo of say 10 people, only 2 are looking at the camera. I’ve come across such photos several times while researching famous people, so I was wondering if that is another indication that a photo is fake.
LikeLike
What if I didn’t want to sell my sperm? EVer think of that? But yes, people looking in different directions is a sign of a fake. I have said that in several papers. So ask better questions.
LikeLike
Right now I see that Mathis’ science website works, but the general website doesn’t work (mileswmathis.com). I hope that this is only due to hosting renewal issues or something similar.
LikeLike
Doesn’t work at all at the moment. Was just reading it and then the page redirected to a page that said: This domain was recently registered at Namecheap. Please check back later!
LikeLike