Here’s a quickie I did to commemorate the 22nd anniversary of Yizhak Rabin’s alleged assassination on Nov. 4th. Miles Mathis published it at his site, with some juicy additions of his own and upgrades to my fauxto analysis. Link is below the fold:
Was the Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin a Hoax?
From the opening:
November 4th marks the 22nd anniversary of the alleged assassination of Yitzhak Rabin. You may recall that Rabin won the Nobel Prize in 1994 for signing the Oslo accords with Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres. He is still widely remembered as the “soldier of peace” who would have brought an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. . . if only he hadn’t been killed by a right-wing nut-job named Yigal Amir in an attempt to derail the peace process.
The assassination took place at night, just after Rabin had addressed a huge
peace rally held to support the Oslo accords in the face of virulent right-wing opposition. After the rally, as Rabin made his way down the steps from the speakers’ platform, Amir approached and shot him from behind. He was brought to a nearby hospital and died on the operating table, despite the doctors’ best efforts. All of this is well known, documented on videotape and firmly established by the Shamgar Commission, which investigated the assassination. It was named after its chairman, Israeli Supreme Court justice Meir Shamgar. Sort of like the Warren commission, except here they mock us by openly advertising that it was a sham.
Would it surprise you to learn that there are at least half a dozen conspiracy
theories swirling around Rabin’s assassination? It surprised me. When I first heard of them, I didn’t know how to make sense of all the anomalies, contradictions, and impossibilities that these theories lay bare, let alone sift
through the plausibility of different claims about who was behind it all. Some of these theories hold that Rabin was killed because he was about to pull the plug on the peace process, and the people behind the plot didn’t want that, for various reasons. It didn’t seem the least bit plausible. I mean, if that was their goal they seem to have achieved the exact opposite: his murder derailed the peace process, didn’t it?
I learned of those theories before I had ever heard of Miles Mathis or read his
papers on the hoaxed assassinations of JFK and Lincoln. Thanks to him, now I
do know how to make sense of it all, and in this (hopefully) short paper I’m going to explain why I think the Rabin assassination was another hoax. If you are convinced by the end, great. If not, can’t blame a guy for trying.
Cutting Through the Fog 
A very interesting read for me. I’ve only heard of the guy a few times, and had no prior knowledge of this “fauxsassination”, but it seems more and more evident that these types of events are the norm, not the exception. Somehow the most allegedly vile men in history escape assassination, such as Hitler or Stalin or Mao, but these barely-somebodies like Rabin or Kennedy take all the lead?
What I mean by that is would Kennedy even be relevant if he HADN’T been fake-sassinated? Like Obama, what did he actually do except talk? Obama has the historical benefit of being mixed race so he’ll likely live on simply because of that “first”, but Kennedy… Did what, in his presidency?
A quick look at his Wiki starts with:
“Kennedy served at the height of the Cold War, and much of his presidency focused on managing relations with the Soviet Union.”
Shouldn’t it start with something he actually accomplished? We have to scroll down very far to get to the first thing he actually did:
“Kennedy approved Defense Secretary Robert McNamara’s controversial decision to award the contract for the F-111 TFX (Tactical Fighter Experimental) fighter-bomber to General Dynamics (the choice of the civilian Defense department) over Boeing (the choice of the military).[91] At the request of Senator Henry Jackson, Senator John McClellan held 46 days of mostly closed-door hearings before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigating the TFX contract from February to November 1963.[92]”
So this rich president guy stamped an approval for a ridiculous warplane’s contract to go to Texas instead of Seattle. Only interesting given we’ve seen so much more recently about Texas, albeit Fort Worth isn’t Houston or Austin. A tenuous link, but there it is.
I didn’t mean to turn this into a rant about Kennedy, but it seems like every time we research these people we find more and more dirt. Were any of them actually real? Is everyone in the public eye already compromised?
LikeLike
Thanks, Jared. Great point about Kennedy. The same can definitely be said about Rabin bringing peace. No, he didn’t. The assumption is that he would have if he had “lived.” Same thing about Kennedy: he would have taken power away from the Fed and scattered the CIA into the wind. If only they hadn’t killed him! Gandhi was also heralded as such a hero but if you look at his record he actually accomplished very little, and the “independence” of India really didn’t have anything to do with him. If anything, he helped delay it.
I have been thinking that one of the main reasons for these fauxsassinations is that they give the illusion that some of our leaders are good guys and that there is legitimate opposition among the higher-ups. They don’t want us knowing that they’ve got total control already, so they manufacture these types of events to keep us thinking that there are real forces fighting each other. That’s why they need us to think these people really died, no matter the narrative. The mainstream story tells us either Kennedy was killed by a communist sympathizer,
which serves to sell communism as a genuine ideology that is opposed to capitalism, and also serves to blackwash any decent ideas associated with Marxism, such as that workers should not be exploited. Or he was killed because he had gotten on the wrong side of the CIA or the some faction of the deep state, which sells us the idea that Presidents are independent, have real power and can take real action against parts of the deep state like the CIA. They are trying to do the same thing with Trump now, but frankly JFK was much more believable.
I don’t know the answer to your questions, but I would wager no and yes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly. As Miles has alluded to many times, it to keep us (the masses) from actually doing anything meaningful about it (like coming together in large numbers) if they can convince us that there is real opposition at the top. Fascism is already here and “they” flaunt their symbolism everywhere in plain sight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed, Cory. They’ve become as brazen as they like, and there’s no apparent opposition in sight, despite their propped-up claims and puppets pretending otherwise.
I often feel stupid after reading these outings, like why didn’t I see that myself? But that’s just ego. The reason I didn’t see it myself is because my mind works a certain way and is good at certain problems and other people’s minds work different ways and they’re better than me at certain problems, maybe even many or MOST problems, and that’s okay. It’s sometimes very hard for me to just BE a student, to learn from others, but Miles and Josh and Vexman make it a lot easier. I could read their writings all the live-long day.
But I’m also determined to begin spotting more of these fauxtographies in the future, and saw a great many in the Vegas thing on my own, so it’s kinda like Miles and co. have given me the confidence to just make the call – especially in a digital photograph, as most people really do suck at Photoshop. So maybe I’ll be able to contribute sooner or later, instead of just pontificating from afar. 🙂
LikeLike
An excellent post, Josh, I’m adding his name and face to the list of known cons. Although I’ve never heard of that guy, it seems he was in the league. Some people think they fake die only to re-emerge in some other important role. I hope they decide for Yitzhak it was his last “job” 🙂
LikeLike
I think he played Voldemort in the Harry Potter movies. (-;
LikeLike
haha : D
LikeLike
Thanks! Rabin plays such a huge role in the Israeli historical narrative and his fauxassassination is viewed as extremely pivotal, both in terms of the peace process and in terms of creating an irreconcilable rift between the secular left and the religious right in Israel. It would be hard to overstate its importance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My favorite part of this excellent post is the implication that Rabin was a persona put together from scratch. Famous people could be anyone, pre-fame, and it only takes a handful of assets to affirm his fake bio. The media echo chamber will carry it from there. As for sloppy fauxtography, either its a signal only the insiders could read at the time, or basic incompetence because real talent would be hard to come by for such a project as the creation of a synthetic country so far off the beaten path. My final answer would be both: The project managers have no eye for talent and can’t ID sloppiness but their bloodline superiors are so inured of amateurishness (laziness) as a virtue that it gets approved. Hubris also plays a huge part in this kind of thing. They’ve had no challengers for so long that they’ve gotten fat and out of shape. (Hey, maybe that’s why obesity and other health issues have been allowed to flourish- If we can’t run very fast, they certainly don’t need to.)
LikeLiked by 3 people
Excellent points, Tyrone. I’ve often wondered how in hell these fake photos get published, or even leave the darkroom/Photoshop computer before they’re published. I’ve been doing CGI my entire adult life and wouldn’t be happy with any of these fakes, and I’m only one guy with almost no budget. It seems absurd that anyone working for The Powers would be allowed to publish such obvious and ham-handed prevarications – wouldn’t they want their money’s worth?
But then again, as you point out and Miles has laboriously in his art essays, these guys don’t KNOW what’s good work, either in art or in lies. I think the chief reason so few people have broken through these veils is due to the massive social pressure involved any time one brings it up in conversation to… Well, you know. The Sleepers. Or whatever we could call them. But how could nobody spot the fakes before?
I think maybe a lot of people have spotted the fakes, but had no forum to discuss it or place to do so really. I mean sure there’s forums all over the internet, but those are also highly populated with fake PEOPLE and spooks as well. I run into them every day on FB. I even had an unsolicited private message conversation with a US Marshal today, when I surmised that the latest Texas church shooting was fake. But the guy had a gnarly beard and when I Googled him, nothing came up except a famous dead US Marshal from 1878. Either he was lying about being a Marshal or he was intelligence, seems like.
Anyway, as a digital artist I find it way too brazen the way they deliver these fakeries to us. Like they’re daring us to catch on, because they know we can’t do shit directly even when we do. It’s disheartening and encouraging at the same time.
LikeLike
They are playing with us and even if you find out about it there is nothing you can do. Good luck telling anyone about your findings who has never heard of any of these events being fake yet believing that it could be fake. It’s not always sloppiness sometimes it’s the best one could do given the time, money and technology at hand. The most efficient way that convinces 80% is good enough. And no one goes into conspiracies because of discrepancies in a photo. It only makes sense once you have heard alternative theories to events.
LikeLike
I see the poor quality of the photo fakery as being similar to the poor quality of the fake stories and fake personalities they are intended to represent. That is to say, that the photos don’t stick out for being poorly made – since the whole production is poorly-made, they help to reinforce the unreality of it all by being consistently unreal.
I suspect that the photos and stories and people make no sense on purpose, and not only because we are being trolled for giggles (which is how Mr. Mathis often explains it) – they make no sense *because* having us accept nonsensical things as real, itself, serves a practical purpose.
For one thing, if we swallow nonsense stories as real, then real stories appear less real by comparison. We lose interest in things that are merely real, if unreal things are explicitly designed to be stranger and more interesting-seeming. This causes us to disengage with the world and become more passive.
There is probably a lot more to this, but I haven’t yet had time to think it through very far.
LikeLike
Another good point, Bryan. We see it in polemics all the time, that the sensationalist viewpoint simply sells better. People want Pi to be some absurd, unending number because it mystifies them, and if one suggest that (in most cases, kinematically) it’s just “4” they lose all fascination with the concept and just get angry. We see it constantly in all of mainstream physics posts from every “official” angle, that the absurd and ridiculous is more salable and believable than real physics – often because those people can’t do real physics, but that’s not why it sells so well. Most people WANT to believe in fake things. They want to believe their electronics operate by tunneling electrons and teleporting “q-bits” and other hocus-pocus, instead of just believing that light itself is the mechanism. It’s insane.
Reality is boring. Fiction sells far more than non-fiction.
LikeLike
Many conspiracy theorists are on the look for “far-out” conspiracies filled with “high strangeness” and “high-octane speculation.” Toke it up, guys!
LikeLike
The world is still wonderful. And adventurous, if one likes.
Even in Miles’ science, there might be something more than ‘photons’, just as when he writes about not having found the ultimate source that drives the galactic engines, the source of the photons themselves also still seems unresolved.
So, in my view, even Miles’ thorough theory still leaves plenty-plenty of space for speculation and dreams, so dearly beloved to all (-or most?-) of us, whom we are much so inclined as to have pet theories of our own on how the world may be constituted.
Maybe, many of them can still be reconciled with the current standard set by Miles, so that even people not as de-rigeur in the field of physics, and us lazy buggers, the common people, hahaha, can still claim our slice of understanding some of the world before Miles. (So I normally also don’t dismiss others’ theses with sleight of hand)
E.g. me, about energy (photons) restricting ITSELF in geometric, quasi-crystalline, structures, which I still find quite akin to how Miles’ nuclear diagrams are constructed. (I ‘never’ would have gotten to the photons-can-be spun-up-into-bigger-particles conclusion without Miles, though.)
And I like that the wave-pattern of photon movement (that many people wouldn’t like to lose : ) is cohesively explained in his theory, and even my beloved “etheric eddies” still find resemblance in Miles’ charge-eddies.
So nothing of the wonder has been lost for me, and just think of the possibilities of applications already discovered, which by far exceed the current state of affairs*.
Also, there are still the mysteries of the photon itself – I mean, gyroscopes imply sub-structure… …
Summa summarum: It’s still better than any movie.
*That’s why this greedy for-profit-scheme of the govs holds back the whole development of mankind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Ty. Finding those fake pics came as a surprise to me. In retrospect, I don’t know why. I mean, I’ve found fake pics of Gandhi’s childhood (plus the Gandhi switcheroo later in life) and fake pics of Dreyfus’s background. But someone it seemed like Rabin was more “real.” Nope!
LikeLike
Pingback: Tinfoiltopia Conspiracy Theories - Was the Yitzhak Rabin Assassination a Hoax? (You probably already know the answer.)
Read the work of the late Barry Chamish if you want to know about the Rabin event.
LikeLike
Pingback: Assassinat du premier ministre israëlien Yitzhak Rabin le 4/11/95 : exemple parfait du canular et de la fraude des théories du complot mainstream | Stop Mensonges
Pingback: Assassinat du premier ministre israëlien Yitzhak Rabin le 4/11/95 : exemple parfait du canular et de la fraude des théories du complot mainstream – Canulars et autres événements truqués de ce monde
Pingback: test rabin – Canulars et autres événements truqués de ce monde
Pingback: Israel’s Kennedy moment | Fakeologist.com